Market news & insights

IntroductionIn the world of trading, "poor discipline" is frequently cited as the downfall of many aspiring and even experienced traders. It's the convenient explanation when trades go wrong: "I just need more discipline." However, this perspective misses a crucial insight—poor trading discipline is rarely the root problem. Rather, it's a symptom of deeper underlying issues that, if left unaddressed, will continue to manifest in trading behaviours that undermine success.This article explores why poor discipline should be viewed as a warning sign rather than the primary diagnosis and why identifying the true root causes is essential for lasting behavioural improvement in trading performance.The Real Cost of Poor Trading DisciplineBefore diving into the underlying causes, let's examine why addressing poor discipline is so critical by looking at its tangible and intangible costs:Financial Costs

• Direct monetary losses: Impulsive entries, failure to cut losses, and premature profit-taking all directly impact returns. For example, a trader who consistently moves their stop loss to avoid small losses often ends up with catastrophic drawdowns when positions move strongly against them.
• Compounding opportunity loss: Small discipline breaches compound dramatically over time. Consider a portfolio that takes a 20% loss from failure to exit a bad position—this now requires a 25% gain just to break even, pushing the recovery timeline significantly further. Over decades of trading, these setbacks can reduce final portfolio values by millions of dollars.
• Transaction costs accumulation: Overtrading from lack of discipline increases commissions and fees, creating a significant drag on performance. A trader who churns their account with 30 trades monthly instead of 10 well-planned entries might see 2-3% annual returns evaporate in transaction costs alone.

Psychological Costs

• Eroded confidence: Repeated discipline failures create self-doubt that bleeds into all trading decisions. When a trader has broken their rules multiple times, they begin to question their judgment even on valid setups. One trader described it as: "After three consecutive discipline breaches, I started second-guessing even my most high-probability trades, missing several winners that matched my criteria perfectly."
• Decision fatigue: The mental energy expended fighting poor impulses depletes cognitive resources needed for analysis. Studies show that willpower and decision-making ability diminish throughout the day when constantly tested. A trader fighting urges to deviate from their plan has less mental bandwidth for analysing market conditions or spotting opportunities.
• Emotional damage: The stress and anxiety from undisciplined trading can lead to burnout and abandonment of trading altogether. Many professional traders report that their worst losing streaks weren't caused by market conditions but by their emotional responses to initial losses, creating a downward spiral of poor decisions.

Strategic Costs

• Invalidated testing: Even the best trading strategies become untestable when executed inconsistently. When a trader backtests a strategy showing 60% win rate and 1:2 risk/reward ratio but then implements it inconsistently—perhaps holding losers too long or cutting winners short—the actual performance bears no resemblance to the expected results, making further optimization impossible.
• Misattributed failures: When discipline issues cloud results, traders often blame their strategy rather than their execution. A common scenario: a trader abandons a perfectly viable strategy because "it doesn't work," when in reality, they never truly followed the strategy's rules in the first place.
• Stunted development: Traders stuck in discipline loops rarely advance to higher-level trading concepts and strategies. Instead of progressing to sophisticated risk management, portfolio theory, or advanced market analysis, they remain trapped in the cycle of "discover strategy → implement poorly → abandon strategy → repeat."

Root Causes of Poor Trading DisciplinePoor discipline manifests in many ways—impulsive trades, inability to follow rules, emotional decision-making—but these behaviours stem from deeper sources. Let's examine the most common underlying causes:

1. Misalignment Between Strategy and Psychology

• Risk tolerance mismatch: Trading with position sizes that trigger outsized emotional responses. For example, a trader comfortable with 0.5% risk per trade suddenly increases to 5% risk and finds themselves unable to follow their rules under the heightened pressure. One professional trader noted: "When I exceeded my natural risk threshold, even temporary drawdowns caused me to abandon my tested methods and make emotional decisions."
• Personality-strategy disconnect: Using trading approaches that conflict with natural psychological tendencies. A detail-oriented, methodical person might struggle with discretionary price action trading but excel with systematic, rules-based approaches. Conversely, intuitive, big-picture thinkers often feel constrained by highly mechanical systems and may unconsciously seek to override them.
• Time frame incompatibility: Trading time frames that don't match one's lifestyle, attention span, or stress tolerance. A parent with young children attempting to day trade during family hours will likely experience constant interruptions and stress, leading to impulsive decisions. Alternatively, someone with a high need for action and feedback might struggle with position trading where trades take weeks to unfold, leading to overtrading or premature exits.

2. Knowledge and Preparation Gaps

• Inadequate planning: Trading without clearly defined entries, exits, and risk parameters. Consider a trader who enters a position based on a promising chart pattern but has no predetermined exit strategy—when the trade moves against them, they're forced to make decisions under pressure, often resulting in poor outcomes. A complete trading plan would specify: "Enter long at $X if Y condition is met, with stop loss at $Z (1% risk) and first target at 2R with trailing stop."
• Statistical misunderstanding: Failure to grasp the probabilistic nature of trading and proper expectancy. Many traders cannot emotionally handle normal losing streaks because they don't understand that even a strategy with a 65% win rate can easily produce 5-6 consecutive losses. Without this understanding, they abandon strategies prematurely or make modifications at exactly the wrong time.
• Incomplete strategy validation: Using approaches that haven't been thoroughly tested, creating doubt during execution. A trader who implements a strategy based on a few examples or back-of-napkin calculations lacks the confidence that comes from rigorous testing across different market conditions. This uncertainty breeds hesitation and second-guessing when real money is on the line.

3. Cognitive and Emotional Factors

• Cognitive biases: Succumbing to confirmation bias, recency bias, and other thinking errors. For instance, a trader who has had two successful trades in the tech sector might overweight recent positive experiences and ignore risk factors when evaluating the next tech opportunity. Another common example is the gambler's fallacy—believing that after a string of losses, a win is "due," leading to oversized bets at precisely the wrong time.
• Identity attachment: Tying self-worth too closely to trading outcomes. When being right becomes a matter of personal validation rather than a probabilistic outcome, traders defend losing positions rather than accepting small losses. One reformed trader shared: "I realized I was viewing each trade as a referendum on my intelligence. Once I separated my self-image from my P&L, I could finally follow my stop-loss rules consistently."
• Unresolved psychological issues: Using trading as an outlet for excitement, validation, or escape. Some individuals trade to experience the thrill of risk rather than to execute a business plan, making discipline inherently difficult. Others use trading to escape boredom or dissatisfaction in other life areas, creating an emotionally charged environment where clear thinking is compromised.

4. Environmental and Contextual Elements

• Financial pressure: Trading with needed living expenses or under external performance expectations. A trader who depends on monthly trading profits to pay bills faces enormous psychological pressure, making it difficult to maintain discipline during inevitable drawdowns. Similarly, someone trading family money or with partners looking over their shoulder may feel pressure to perform which leads to overtrading or excessive risk-taking.
• Inappropriate trading environment: Working in distracting or emotionally charged settings. The trader attempting to make decisions while monitoring multiple news sources, social media, and chat rooms is bombarded with information that triggers fear of missing out or fear of loss. Physical environment matters too—one hedge fund manager requires his traders to maintain clean, organized desks, finding that physical disorder correlates with mental disorder in trading decisions.
• Lack of accountability: Absence of mentorship, trading journals, or other feedback mechanisms. Trading in isolation without systematic review processes allows small discipline breaches to go unnoticed and uncorrected until they become habitual. A professional prop trader described their turnaround: "Everything changed when I started recording every trade with my reasoning before and after. Patterns of undisciplined behaviour became obvious, and I couldn't hide from them anymore."

The Path to Improved Trading DisciplineTrue improvement in trading discipline requires addressing root causes rather than symptoms:Self-Assessment and Awareness

• Conduct a thorough inventory of trading behaviours, noting patterns of discipline breaches. Review at least 100 recent trades, looking specifically for instances where you deviated from your stated rules. Categories might include moving stop losses, increasing position sizes after losses, trading outside planned hours, or ignoring pre-trade checklists.
• Identify emotional triggers that precede discipline lapses. Common triggers include consecutive losses, approaching monthly profit targets, trading during personal stress, or trading after reading market opinions that conflict with your analysis. One trader discovered that 70% of his discipline breaches occurred after checking his month-to-date performance, leading him to remove this information from his trading screen.
• Honestly evaluate whether your trading approach aligns with your personality and circumstances. Ask whether your chosen time frame matches your availability and temperament, whether your risk per trade truly feels comfortable, and whether your strategy's complexity level matches your analytical tendencies.

Targeted Interventions

• For strategy misalignment: Adjust position sizing, time frames, or trading style to better match your psychological makeup. A trader struggling with day trading's intensity might find swing trading more sustainable. Someone uncomfortable with discretionary decisions might adopt a fully systematic approach with clearly defined rules. Position sizing adjustments—often reducing size until emotional responses diminish—can be transformative.
• For knowledge gaps: Create comprehensive trading plans and enhance statistical understanding. Develop detailed playbooks for every scenario: entry conditions, initial stops, how to trail stops, when to add to positions, and multiple exit scenarios. Study probability and statistics to build confidence in your strategy's long-term expectancy despite short-term variance. One trader reported: "Understanding that 7 consecutive losses with my 65% win rate strategy had a 0.4% probability—rare but entirely normal—freed me from panic during losing streaks."
• For cognitive/emotional factors: Develop mindfulness practices and consider working with a trading coach. Regular meditation or breathing exercises before trading sessions can reduce emotional reactivity. Trading coaches who specialise in psychological aspects can identify blind spots and provide objective feedback. Some traders benefit from visualization exercises, mentally rehearsing and maintaining discipline through challenging scenarios before they occur.
• For environmental issues: Create a dedicated trading space and establish clear boundaries around trading capital. Physically separate trading from other activities with a dedicated workspace free from distractions. Financially separate trading capital from living expenses with at least 12 months of expenses in separate accounts. Develop protocols for communication with spouses or partners about trading results to reduce external pressure.

Systems and Guardrails

• Implement technological solutions to enforce discipline. Use broker platforms that allow automated stop losses that cannot be modified once set. Create custom alerts that flag when you're exceeding daily trade count limits or risk thresholds. One options trader programmed his platform to prevent opening new positions after 2pm when his historical data showed decreased decision quality.
• Create decision trees that remove in-the-moment choices during emotional market periods. Develop if-then contingency plans for various market scenarios: "If price breaks support level X, then I will execute plan Y without hesitation." Pre-commitment to specific actions reduces the cognitive burden during high-stress periods.
• Establish pre-commitment mechanisms that make discipline breaches more difficult. This might include trading with a partner who must approve stop-loss modifications, scheduling accountability calls with mentors after trading sessions or creating financial penalties for rule violations that are donated to charity. One creative trader set up an arrangement where breaking specific rules required him to make a substantial donation to a political cause he opposed—a powerful deterrent!

ConclusionPoor trading discipline is rarely just about willpower or character. By recognizing discipline problems as symptoms pointing to deeper causes, traders can address the true sources of their trading difficulties. This approach not only improves immediate trading performance but creates sustainable behavioural change that can transform trading results over the long term.Rather than berating yourself for discipline failures, use them as valuable data points that highlight areas needing attention in your trading psychology, knowledge, strategy, or environment. When these foundational elements are aligned, discipline becomes less of a struggle and more of a natural expression of a well-designed trading approach.The most successful traders understand that consistent discipline isn't achieved through force of will but through creating circumstances where disciplined behaviour is the path of least resistance. By addressing root causes rather than symptoms, they develop trading approaches that work with—rather than against—their natural tendencies, leading to sustainable success in the markets.

We would suggest that right now Markets are underestimating the impact of April 2 US Reciprocal Tariffs – aka Liberation Day monikered by the President.There is consistent and constant chatter around what is being referred to as The Dirty 15. This is the 15 countries the president suggests has been taking advantage of the United States of America for too long. The original thinking was The Dirty 15 for those countries with the highest levels of tariffs or some form of taxation system against US goods. However, there is also growing evidence that actually The Dirty 15 are the 15 nations that have the largest trade relations with the US.That is an entirely different thought process because those 15 countries include players like Japan, South Korea, Germany, France, the UK, Canada, Mexico and of course, Australia. Therefore, the underestimation of the impact from reciprocal tariffs could be far-reaching and much more destabilising than currently pricing.From a trading perspective, the most interesting moves in the interim appear to be commodities. Because the scale and execution of US’s reciprocal tariffs will be a critical driver of commodity prices over the coming quarter and into 2025.Based on repeated signals from President Trump and his administration, reinforced by recent remarks from US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Lutnick has indicated that headline tariffs of 15-30% could be announced on April 2, with “baseline” reciprocal tariffs likely to fall in the 15-20% range—effectively broad-based tariffs.The risk here is huge: economic downturn, possibilities of hyperinflation, the escalation of further trade tensions, goods and services bottlenecks and the loss of globalisation.This immediately brings gold to the fore because, clearly risk environment of this scale would likely mean that instead of flowing to the US dollar which would normally be the case the trade of last resort is to the inert metal.The other factor that we need to look at here is the actual end goal of the president? The answer is clearly lower oil prices—potentially through domestic oil subsidies or tax cuts—to offset inflationary pressures from tariffs and to force lower interest rates.‘Balancing the Budget’Secretary Lutnick has specified that the tariffs are expected to generate $700 billion in revenue, which therefore implies an incremental 15-20% increase in weighted-average tariffs. We can’t write off the possibility that the initial announcement may set tariffs at even higher levels to allow room for negotiation, take the recently announced 25% tariffs on the auto industry. From an Australian perspective, White House aide Peter Navarro has confirmed that each trading partner will be assigned a single tariff rate. Navarro is a noted China hawk and links Australia’s trade with China as a major reason Australia should be heavily penalised.Trump has consistently advocated for tariffs since the 1980s, and his administration has signalled that reciprocal tariffs are the baseline, citing foreign VAT and GST regimes as justification. This suggests that at least a significant portion of these tariffs may be non-negotiable. Again, this highlights why markets may have underestimated just how big an impact ‘liberation day’ could have.Now, the administration acknowledges that tariffs may cause “a little disturbance” (irony much?) and that a “period of transition” may be needed. The broader strategy appears to involve deficit reduction, followed by redistributing tariff revenue through tax cuts for households earning under $150K, as reported by the likes of Reuters on March 13.The White House has also emphasised a focus on Main Street over Wall Street, which we have highlighted previously – Trump has made next to no mention of markets in his second term. Compared to his first, where it was basically a benchmark for him.All this suggests that some downside risk in financial markets may be tolerated to advance broader economic objectives.Caveat! - a policy reversal remains possible in 2H’25, particularly if tariffs are implemented at scale and prove highly disruptive and the US consumer seizes up. Which is likely considering the players most impacted by tariffs are end users.The possible trades:With all things remaining equal, there is a bullish outlook for gold over the next three months, alongside a bearish outlook on oil over the next three to six months.Gold continues to punch to new highs, and its upward trajectory has yet to be truly tested. Having now surpassed $3,000/oz, as a reaction to the economic impact of tariffs. Further upside is expected to drive prices to $3,200/oz over the next three months on the fallout from the April 2 tariffs to come.What is also critical here is that gold investment demand remains well above the critical 70% of mine supply threshold for the ninth consecutive quarter. Historically, when investment demand exceeds this level, prices tend to rise as jewellery consumption declines and scrap supply increases.On the flip side, Brent crude prices are forecasted to decline to $60-65 per barrel 2H’25 (-15-20%). The broader price range for 2025 is expected to shift down to $60-75 per barrel, compared to the $70-90 per barrel range seen over the past three years.Now there is a caveat here: the weak oil fundamentals for 2025 are now widely known, and the physical surplus has yet to materialise – this is the risk to the bearish outlook and never write off OPEC looking to cut supply to counter the price falls.

Introduction in the constant pursuit of market edge, traders often find themselves crowded into the same analytical spaces, watching identical indicators and acting on similar signals. This collective attention of market participants potentially creates a paradox: the more traders follow conventional signals, the less effective these signals become. While price action, volume, moving averages, and oscillators dominate trading screens worldwide, beneath the visible surface of market activity lies a rich ecosystem of "silent indicators" that often telegraph significant moves long before they materialize in price.

The financial markets do not exist as isolated entities for specific assets but rather as an interconnected web where currencies influence commodities, bonds telegraph equity movements as obvious examples. Understanding these cross-market relationships enables traders to assemble a more complete market picture and recognise the early warning signs that often precede major moves. This is not an exhaustive list but aims to cover some of the key factors that also offer an opportunity of accessibility for the retail trader.

I have suggested some sources that may be useful. This article explores these potentially overlooked signals across multiple asset classes, providing traders with a framework to identify market shifts before they become apparent to the majority. Section 1: Institutional Footprints Volume Profile Analysis Core Concept: Volume profile analysis examines how trading volume distributes across price levels rather than just time periods, revealing where significant transactions occurred and potentially where institutional interest exists.

Point of Control Significance: The price level with the highest trading volume (Point of Control) often acts as a magnet during future trading sessions, as this represents the price where most transactions were agreed upon. Volume Nodes and Gaps: Areas with sparse trading volume often become "vacuum zones" where price can move rapidly when entered, while high-volume nodes frequently act as support/resistance. Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView Volume Profile indicator (free/premium) Sierra Chart volume profile tools (subscription) Tradovate volume profile tools (subscription) Open Interest Changes in Futures and Options Core Concept: Open interest represents the total number of outstanding contracts in derivatives markets.

Changes in open interest, when combined with price movement, provide insights into whether new money is entering a trend or positions are being closed. Confirmation Signals: Rising prices with rising open interest confirms bullish momentum (new buyers entering); falling prices with rising open interest confirms bearish momentum (new sellers entering). Warning Signals: Rising prices with falling open interest suggests a weakening trend (shorts covering); falling prices with falling open interest suggests a weakening downtrend (longs liquidating).

Options Open Interest Concentration: Unusual accumulation of open interest at specific strike prices often indicates institutional positioning and can create price magnets or barriers. Retail-Accessible Sources: CME Group open interest data (free) TradingView futures open interest indicators (free/premium) Barchart.com options open interest data (free/premium) CBOE options volume and open interest (free) Commitment of Traders Analysis Core Concept: The Commitment of Traders (COT) report breaks down the holdings of different trader categories (commercial, non-commercial, small speculators) in futures markets, revealing how different market participants are positioned. Commercial vs.

Speculator Divergence: When commercial hedgers (smart money) and speculators (often trend-followers) show extreme position differences, it often signals potential market turning points. Historically Significant Extremes: Comparing current positioning to historical extremes provides context—when any group reaches unusual net long or short positions, mean reversion often follows. Multi-Market Applications: COT data covers currencies, commodities, bonds, and equity index futures, allowing for cross-market analysis and early warning of sentiment shifts.

Retail-Accessible Sources: CFTC COT reports (free, weekly) Investing.com COT data visualizations (free) BarcChart.com COT charts (free/premium) TradingView COT indicators (community scripts, free) Section 2: Sentiment Indicators Beyond the Headlines Market Internals Across Asset Classes Core Concept: Market internals measure the underlying strength or weakness of a market beyond just the headline index price. These include advance-decline lines, new highs vs. new lows, and percentage of assets above moving averages. Breadth Divergences: When market indices make new highs while internals weaken (fewer stocks participating in the advance), it often signals deteriorating market health before price confirms.

Confirming Strength: Strong internals during consolidations or minor pullbacks often indicate underlying buying pressure and increase the probability of continuation. Cross-Asset Applications: This concept applies beyond stocks—measuring the percentage of commodities in uptrends, currencies strengthening against the dollar, or global markets above their moving averages provides comprehensive market health metrics. Retail-Accessible Sources: StockCharts.com market breadth indicators (free/subscription) TradingView breadth indicators (free/premium) Investors.com market pulse data (subscription) DecisionPoint breadth charts (StockCharts subscription) Retail vs.

Institutional Sentiment Divergence Core Concept: When retail traders' sentiment significantly diverges from institutional positioning, the smart money view typically prevails. This divergence creates opportunities for contrarian traders. Retail Sentiment Gauges: Social media sentiment, trading app popularity rankings, and retail-focused brokerage positioning data reveal retail trader enthusiasm.

Institutional Positioning Clues: Fund flow data, professional survey results, and positioning metrics from prime brokers indicate institutional sentiment. Warning Signs: Extreme retail enthusiasm combined with institutional caution often precedes corrections; retail pessimism with institutional accumulation frequently precedes rallies. Retail-Accessible Sources: AAII Investor Sentiment Survey (free) TradingView Social Sentiment indicator (free) CNN Fear & Greed Index (free) Volatility Term Structure Core Concept: The volatility term structure shows expected volatility across different time frames.

The relationship between near-term and longer-term volatility expectations provides insights into market stability. Contango vs. Backwardation: Normal markets show higher volatility expectations for longer time frames (contango); inverted term structure (backwardation) signals immediate market stress and often precedes significant moves.

Term Structure Shifts: Sudden changes in the volatility curve often precede major market regime changes, even when the headline volatility index appears stable. Cross-Asset Volatility Comparison: Comparing volatility in related markets (e.g., currency volatility vs. equity volatility) can reveal building stress in one market before it impacts others. Retail-Accessible Sources: CBOE VIX term structure (free) VIX futures curve data on futures exchanges (free) TradingView VIX futures spread indicators (free/premium) LiveVol (CBOE) volatility data (free/subscription) Section 3: Cross-Asset Correlations Currency/Commodity Relationships Core Concept: Specific currency pairs often move in tandem with related commodities due to economic linkages—AUD with iron ore and coal, CAD with oil, NOK with natural gas, etc.

Divergences between the two can signal changing fundamentals. Leading Indicators: Currency moves frequently lead commodity price movements due to currency markets' greater liquidity and sensitivity to changing economic conditions and capital flows. Correlation Breakdowns: When previously correlated assets decouple, it often signals a fundamental shift in market dynamics or the emergence of a new driving factor.

Practical Trading Applications: Monitoring currency moves can provide early warning for commodity traders; likewise, significant commodity price changes may predict currency movements before they occur. Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView correlation indicator (free/premium) Investing.com currency and commodity charts (free) MacroMicro correlation tables (free/subscription) FXStreet correlation tables (free) Real-World Example: A clear illustration occurred in February 2025 when the Australian dollar (AUD) began weakening against major currencies despite stable iron ore prices. Traditionally, these two assets move in tandem due to Australia's position as a major iron ore exporter.

Traders monitoring this relationship noticed the divergence—the currency was signalling weakness while the commodity remained strong. Within three weeks, iron ore prices began a significant decline that the currency had "predicted" through its earlier weakness. Commodity traders who observed this currency leading indicator had already reduced exposure before the commodity price drop materialized.

Bond Market Leading Indicators Core Concept: Fixed income markets often signal economic changes before they appear in other asset classes. Key relationships like yield curve steepness, credit spreads, and bond market volatility frequently lead equity, commodity, and currency moves. Yield Curve Analysis: The relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates reflects economic expectations—flattening/inverting curves often precede economic slowdowns, while steepening curves frequently signal growth and inflation.

Credit Spread Warnings: Widening spreads between government bonds and corporate debt indicate increasing risk aversion; sector-specific spread widening often precedes industry-specific equity weakness. Treasury-Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS): The break-even inflation rate derived from conventional Treasuries and TIPS reveals market inflation expectations, often leading commodity price trends. Retail-Accessible Sources: FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) yield curve data (free) Bond charts and indicators (most CFD trading platforms) Investing.com bond market data (free) Koyfin yield curve visualization (free/subscription) Real-World Example: In mid-2024, while most equity markets were still rallying, high-yield corporate bond spreads began widening subtly against Treasury bonds.

This credit spread expansion wasn't making headlines, but traders monitoring these relationships noted the growing risk aversion in fixed income markets. Within six weeks, this "silent indicator" from the bond market manifested in equity markets as increased volatility and sector rotation away from higher-risk growth stocks. Traders who recognized this early warning sign had already adjusted their equity exposure and positioned defensively before the shift became obvious in stock prices.

Dollar Index Correlations Core Concept: The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) has strong inverse relationships with many asset classes. Understanding dollar strength or weakness provides context for moves in commodities, emerging markets, and multinational companies.

Commodity Price Impacts: Most commodities are priced in dollars, creating an inherent inverse relationship—dollar strength typically pressures commodity prices, while dollar weakness often supports them. Global Risk Sentiment Indicator: In risk-off environments, the dollar frequently strengthens as capital seeks safety; in risk-on periods, it often weakens as capital flows to higher-yielding assets. Correlation Phases: The dollar's correlation with other assets isn't static—it shifts based on market regimes and dominant narratives.

Identifying the current correlation regime is essential for proper interpretation. Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView dollar index charts (free/premium) Finviz.com correlation matrix (free) Investing.com currency correlation tables (free) MarketWatch dollar index data (free) Section 4: Time-Based Indicators Trading Session Patterns and Handoffs Core Concept: Global markets operate in a continuous cycle as trading activity moves from Asia to Europe to North America. How markets behave during these handoffs and how one region responds to another's moves provides valuable context.

Overnight Price Action Significance: Gaps between sessions often reveal institutional positioning; consistent patterns of overnight strength or weakness can identify the dominant trading region driving a trend. Regional Divergences: When markets in different regions begin showing different directional biases (e.g., Asian markets weak while European markets strengthen), it often signals changing global capital flows and potential trend shifts. Volume Distribution Changes: Shifts in when the bulk of trading volume occurs during 24-hour markets (FX, futures) often indicate changing participant behaviour and potential trend exhaustion.

Retail-Accessible Sources: Investing.com global indices charts (free) FXStreet session times indicator (free) Electronic market hours gap analysis on any charting platform Market Range Development Core Concept: Markets typically establish daily, weekly, and monthly trading ranges. How price behaves within these ranges, how it tests boundaries, and how ranges evolve over time reveals underlying market dynamics. Opening Range Theory: The initial trading range established in the first 30-60 minutes often defines the day's battleground; breakouts or failures from this range frequently determine session direction.

Weekly Range Analysis: Weekly opening gaps and the market's response to the previous week's high/low levels provide context for likely price behaviour; persistent testing of the same levels indicates important price zones. Range Expansion/Contraction Cycles: Markets cycle between periods of range expansion (trending) and range contraction (consolidation); identifying these patterns helps anticipate transitions between trading strategies. Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView range tools and indicators (free/premium) Trading session opening range indicators (available on most platforms) Average True Range (ATR) studies (available on all platforms) Session high/low markers (available on most platforms) Seasonal and Calendar Effects Core Concept: Despite market evolution, certain calendar-based patterns maintain statistical significance when viewed over long timeframes.

These patterns create probabilistic edges for specific time periods when combined with confirming indicators. Monthly Patterns: Many markets show persistent strength or weakness in certain months due to fiscal year timing, commodity production cycles, and institutional fund flows. Day-of-Week Tendencies: Statistical analysis reveals certain days consistently show different characteristics—some favor trend continuation while others show mean reversion tendencies.

Market-Specific Cycles: Each market has unique seasonal patterns—agricultural commodities follow growing seasons, energy markets follow consumption patterns, currencies reflect trade flow timing, etc. Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView seasonality indicators (community scripts, free) Equity Clock seasonal charts (free) Moore Research seasonal patterns (free/subscription) Seasonal Charts website (free) Time-Based Divergences Core Concept: Comparing market behaviour across different timeframes reveals momentum shifts before they become obvious. When shorter timeframes begin showing different behaviour than longer timeframes, it often signals changing sentiment.

Multiple Timeframe Analysis: Systematically comparing price action, momentum, and volume across different time periods (daily/weekly/monthly or hourly/4-hour/daily) provides context and early warning of trend changes. Period-to-Period Momentum: Tracking how momentum builds or fades across consecutive time periods reveals the strength or weakness of underlying trends before price confirms. Cycle Analysis: Markets move in overlapping cycles of different durations; identifying when multiple cycles align in the same direction or conflict provides insight into potential market turning points.

Retail-Accessible Sources: TradingView multi-timeframe indicators (free/premium) Multiple timeframe RSI divergence tools (available on most platforms) Multi-timeframe comparison templates (available in most trading platforms) Section 5: Integration Framework Building a Cross-Asset Dashboard Core Concept: Creating a systematic approach to monitoring multiple signals across different markets prevents information overload and reveals interconnections between seemingly unrelated indicators. Core Components: An effective dashboard should include: 1) Market regime indicators, 2) Cross-asset correlation monitors, 3) Sentiment gauges, 4) Leading indicators for each asset class, and 5) Anomaly alerts. Visual Organization: Arranging indicators by function rather than by asset class helps identify relationships—group all breadth measures together, all momentum indicators together, etc., across different markets.

Alert Parameters: Establish threshold levels for each indicator based on historical analysis, creating a system that flags only statistically significant deviations rather than normal market noise. Retail-Accessible Sources: MetaEditor development of custom indicators (free/premium but requires programming skills – although these can be accessed) Excel/Google Sheets dashboards with imported data MultiCharts custom workspaces (subscription) Signal Weighting and Contextual Analysis Core Concept: Not all indicators work equally well in all market environments. Adapting signal importance based on prevailing conditions—trending vs. ranging, high vs. low volatility, risk-on vs. risk-off—improves accuracy.

Market Regime Classification: Develop a systematic method to identify the current market regime using volatility metrics, correlation patterns, and trend strength measures. Conditional Signal Weighting: Assign different importance to indicators based on the current regime—momentum signals matter more in trending markets, while overbought/oversold indicators work better in ranging markets. Confidence Scoring System: Create a weighted scoring system that combines multiple indicators, giving greater weight to those with proven effectiveness in the current market environment.

Retail-Accessible Sources: Excel/Google Sheets for scoring models Trading journal software or “script” code development to track signal effectiveness Time Horizon Alignment Core Concept: Different indicators provide signals for different time horizons. Aligning indicator selection with your trading timeframe prevents conflicting signals and improves decision-making clarity. Signal Categorization: Classify each indicator by its typical lead time—some provide immediate tactical signals, others medium-term directional bias, and others long-term strategic positioning information.

Timeframe Congruence: Look for situations where signals align across multiple timeframes, creating higher-probability trade opportunities with defined short and long-term objectives. Conflicting Signal Resolution: Develop a framework for resolving conflicting signals between timeframes—typically by giving priority to the timeframe that matches your trading horizon. Retail-Accessible Sources: Trading journal to track signal effectiveness by timeframe Strategy backtesting tools to verify signal efficacy for specific timeframes Develop Custom multi-timeframe indicators (e,g, in MetaEditor) Conclusion and Your Potential Next Steps The key message throughout this article is that markets communicate through multiple channels simultaneously.

No single indicator provides a complete picture, but when disparate signals begin to align across different asset classes and timeframes, they create a compelling narrative about possible market direction. The trader who recognizes these patterns may gain the ability to position ahead of the crowd rather than simply reacting to price movements after they've occurred. As a suggestion, begin by selecting just two or three indicators from different categories that complement your existing strategy and time availability.

For example, a stock trader might add bond market signals and currency relationships to provide context for equity positions. A commodity trader could benefit from monitoring related currency pairs and institutional positioning through COT reports. Above all, remember that these indicators exist within a complex market ecosystem.

Interpreting them requires context—understanding the prevailing market regime, volatility environment, and broader narrative driving asset prices. An edge in trading has always belonged to those who can interpret what the market is saying before it becomes obvious to everyone else. By listening to the market's quieter signals, you position yourself to hear tomorrow's news today.

The biggest move in 80 years We need to start with what is probably the biggest structural change Europe has seen since the formation of the European Union to its biggest member – Germany. For the first time in 80 years Germany’s Bundestag has voted to lift the country's “debt brake” to allow the expansion of major defence and infrastructure spending under new leadership of incoming Chancellor Frederick Merz. We need to illustrate how much spending Germany is going to do in defence it is up to €1 trillion over the forward estimates. 5 billion of which is to support Ukraine for this year and to continue to put European pressure on Russia.

It's also a country it has been highly sceptical of stimulating itself having suffered through the Weimar government of the 1920s and 30s that led to hideous hyperinflation and drove the country to political extremism. It is also clearly in response to Washington’s change of tact regarding Europe and the war in Ukraine. As it is now clear that Europe who need to defend itself and that NATO is becoming a dead weight that can no longer be relied upon.

Couple this with what the EU is doing itself. Last week we saw the head of the EU Ursula von der Leyen, delivered a speech that stated the continent needed to: “rearm and develop the capabilities to have credible deterrence.” This came off the back of the EU endorsing a commission plan aimed at mobilising up to €800 billion in investments specifically around infrastructure and in turn defence. The plan also proposes to ease the blocs fiscal rules to allow states to spend much more on defence.

If you want to see direct market reactions to this change in the continent’s commitments – look no further than the performance of the CAC40 and DAX30. Both are outperforming in 2025 and considering how far back they are coming compared to their US counterparts over the past 5 years – the switch trade may only be just beginning. What is also interesting it’s the limited reactions in debt markets.

The 10-year Bund finished marginally higher, though overall European bond markets saw limited movement. Bonds rallied slightly following confirmation of the German stimulus package. Inflation swap rates were little changed, while EUR swaps dipped, particularly in the belly of the curve.

EUR/USD ticked up 0.2% to $1.0960. Hopes for a potential Russia-Ukraine cease-fire also offered some support to the euro but has eased to start the weeks as Russia looks to break the deal before it even begins. Staying with currency impactors – The US saw a range of second-tier U.S. economic data releases last week all came in stronger than expected.

Housing starts jumped, likely benefiting from improved February weather. Industrial production rose 0.7% month-over-month big beat considering consensus was for a 0.2% gain while manufacturing jumped 0.9%. Import and export prices also exceeded forecasts, prompting a slight upward revision to core PCE inflation estimates, mainly due to higher-than-expected foreign airfares.

These upside surprises led to a brief sell-off in treasury bills but yields soon drifted lower as equities struggled. Looking ahead to the FOMC decision, expectations remain for the Fed to hold steady. Chair Powell has emphasised that the U.S. economy is in a "good place" despite ongoing uncertainties and has signalled there’s no rush to cut rates.

The Fed’s updated projections are expected to show a slight downward revision to growth, a more cautious view on GDP risks, and slightly higher inflation forecasts. As for rate cuts, the median expectation remains two 25bps cuts in 2025 and another two in 2026, with markets currently pricing around 56bps of easing next year. All this saw the U.S. dollar trade mixed against G10 currencies as local factors took centre stage.

Despite a weaker risk tone in equities, the DXY USD Index edged down 0.1%. The Aussie and Kiwi dollars softened (AUD/USD -0.3%, NZD/USD -0.4%) as risk sentiment deteriorated. The AUD will be interesting this week as we look to the budget that was never meant to happen on Tuesday.

Considering that we are within 10 weeks of a certain election, the budget really is not worth the paper its written on as it will likely change with an ‘election’ likely to be enacted straight after the new government is sworn in. That said, the budget is likely to show once again that Canberra is messing at the edges and not taking the steps needed to address structural issues. The AUD is likely to fluctuate on the release and then find a direction (more likely to the downside) over the week as the budget shows the soft set of numbers with little or no change in the interim.

Finally, the rally of the yen appears to be over as it continues to weaken. USD/JPY climbed from Y149.20 in early Tokyo trade to around Y149.90 as the London session got underway. With CFTC data showing significant long yen positioning, some traders likely unwound short USD/JPY bets ahead of the BoJ decision.

Other JPY pairs moved in tandem with USD/JPY. But whatever is at play out of Japan – the rally of the past 6-7 months looks to be ending and with USD/JPY facing the magic Y150 mark – will the BoJ step in like it did last year? Will the market look straight past it again?

Or will we see a completely different trend?

We're learning a lot about the Trump administration 2.0, it's going to be hard to bed down, it has a nationalistic principle like never before and unlike the first administration thought bubbles will turn into action rightly or wrongly as all checks and balances now don’t exist. What's also different between Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0 is using The US equity markets as a benchmark for performance. It's been fascinating to see just how silent on the markets the president has become, for example in his first term it was his favourite thing to talk about on social media and there's good reason for that.

From November 6 2016 to the following February in 2017 the S&P 500 climbed 13 percent and closed out the full year with an impressive 20% gain. If we take the same dates this time around: November 5 2024 to this February 2025 it's a completely different story up the S&P 500 is up just on 2% (and has fallen into the red if we include March trading) and that's despite the fact that in the first several weeks after the November election markets were on tear. You also need to compare the S&P to difference peers across the world - look at Europe, where markets have surged, China markets have also bounced even the Australian market has made records.

There have been some interesting deep dives into this situation over the last few weeks, here are some stark stats that highlight that this time around Trump might not care about the markets as he once did. In his first term, Trump posted about the stock market 156 times. Since the start of 2024, he’s only mentioned it once.

The political messaging has also changed, in his first term he constantly used positive economic developments for example: lower unemployment (he used terms ‘lowest ever seen’ however this was not factually correct), a surging stock markets, infrastructure spending in key states, manufacturing booming on his watch – all where used constantly to reconfirm that he was the difference. In his second term this has evaporated – messaging is focused on the debt ceiling, government spending and the task of DOGE, tariffs and nationalising everything. Now that’s not to say that he won’t return to the good old days of market-led commentary that we traders had learned to love.

But it there is no denying that the difference striking It also reenforces that the Trump trades that have now fizzed out may have more to lose. Just look at the reactions to the Trump trade over the past 10 days - market sentiment has soured, the narrative around the U.S. economy has turned dark and there is limited bright news coming. Now market “vibes” shouldn’t matter, they undeniably do.

Again look at what was happening a mere 6 weeks ago just before Trump’s inauguration, The proposed tariffs were viewed as inflationary but potentially beneficial for domestic manufacturing. Well that narrative has now flipped - The prevailing thought is that they’re seen as harmful to growth, with early inflationary effects likely stemming from importers rushing orders to avoid price hikes. Similarly, efforts to rein in federal spending, once praised as fiscal discipline, are now seen as a potential drag on economic momentum.

Then we just have to look at recent data: Retail sales posted their steepest decline in nearly two years, consumer confidence saw its sharpest drop in four years, and optimism among small businesses appears to have peaked. Getting back to the statistics that matter have a look at Citi index’s surprise index – the U.S. data is now consistently missing Wall Street forecasts, while Europe’s economy continues to outperform. The initial post-election reaction where based on several pillars ‘America First’—higher growth, higher inflation, higher interest rates, digital and a stronger dollar.” One by one, those assumptions are crumbling.

Just look at Bitcoin down 26% from its January high. U.S. stocks have dropped 4.5% from their recent peak—not even a technical pull back, but a sharp contrast to the relative strength in European and some Asian market markets. Its not just the Trump trade that is feeling the difference have a look at the impact the new administration is having on Tesla.

Being the face of DOGE and the President’s closest alley has downsides. Telsa is currently facing declining sales, especially in Europe and other zones that see Musk as a root cause for current issues. Now increased competition is a factor (have a look as just how well BYD is doing), Musk’s aggressive cost-cutting and controversial political moves aren’t helping.

Tesla shares have plunged 40% since mid-December. A Trump trade that is thriving - the Russian Ruble, up nearly 30% against the dollar this year with no sign of slowing down. Take that as you will.

Ultimately sentiment is always in a state of flux as we all know, but there is a telling trend in the new administration that is clearly a drag for the Trump trades as we have known them over the past periods. The question will be - can the president revive them, or have they officially been killed off? The president’s approval rating might be the answer to that telling question.

This coming Friday sees the January core PCE inflation data – the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation. Now most are forecasting that it should confirm that inflation has eased compared to this time last year. The consensus estimate has the monthly increase at 0.2 per cent with the annual rate at 2.5 per cent.

Now that is premised on a range of factors, they are also based on the fact the newly installed administration was not in power when these numbers were being collated. For now then – here are the key issues of the PCE read this Friday: Inflation Expectations: A temporary blip? Or is this the ‘transitory v structural debate again? – Upside impactor Several surveys are showing some upward movement in price expectations, mainly down to tariffs and other new external impacts.

Most don’t see this as a sign of a new inflationary trend but that is cold comfort considering how wrong these forecasts have been over the past three years. Case in point here is the University of Michigan’s 5 to 10 year inflation expectations which jumped to 3.5 per cent in February release, highest of this cycle. The caveat is that while this figure is high, historically this read has run above actual inflation, even when inflation was stable at 2 per cent, even so – a 1.5 per cent miss seems way out and even a 2.8 to 2.9 per cent read would be an issue for further cuts and the current US inflation story.

Other things to keep in mind: Tariffs were front and centre in February and clearly remain a political and geopolitical risk/threat. It should die down in the coming weeks as the administration settles in, the news cycle moves and the size of the tariffs retreat – that is until something causes the President to react. But March should be quieter – but the year will be volatile.

Countering the University of Michigan survey is the New York Fed’s, which hasn’t shown a major shift. If the increase in expectations were widespread, this would move the dial and would be more concerning. It makes the NY Fed data all the more interesting ahead of its launch.

We should also point out February’s manufacturing PMI showed rising input and output prices, while service sector price indices eased – why? Tariffs. This aligns with the 10% tariffs on Chinese imports that kicked in earlier this month.

With 25% steel and aluminium tariffs set for March 12, some price pressures may persist in March. Used Car Prices: A Temporary Divergence? – Down side impactor Used car prices in CPI have been running hotter than expected, especially relative to wholesale prices, which typically lead by a few months. And, this even after the surge in used car prices during the COVID era.

This market has remained above trend but is easing a Manheim wholesale used car prices fell 1.1 per cent month on month in early February, reinforcing our view that CPI inflation in this category has limited room to rise. If consumer demand were truly driving higher prices, we’d expect to see wholesale prices moving up as well which hasn’t happened. New York Congestion Pricing: Is this one and done?

A big policy pitch from the President for the state of New York was the congestion charging throughout New York City. True to its word the Trump administration revoked approval for congestion pricing in New York City, which had gone into effect in early January. This is likely to be the reason for the 2.6 per cent month on month spike in motor vehicle fees within CPI.

If the fee is ultimately scrapped, we’d expect an equivalent pullback in this CPI category. But with legal challenges keeping the fee in place for now – it was a double hit. One to watch.

Housing & Shelter: Watching LA Zillow’s single-family rent index rose 0.33 per cent month on month in January, consistent with shelter inflation continuing to slow – but still growing above historical averages. However it is not even across the country - Los Angeles rents spiked 1 per cent month on month - the biggest monthly jump since early 2022. The recent fires may have played a role, and if this strength persists, we could see upward pressure on shelter inflation later this year.

Median home prices remained flat in January, and with the broader housing market cooling, long-term upside risk to shelter inflation remains limited. In short, this Friday’s PCE is going to a line ball read – any hit that inflation is continuing to defy expectations as it has since September, the Fed will be dealt out of the rate market in 2025 and the USD, US bonds and risk exposures with debt are going to see reasonable movements. Which brings us to the other elephant in the market trading room – Tariffs on silver things.

Tariff Changes on Steel and Aluminium: Who really pays? We have been reluctant to write about the steel and aluminium tariffs that were announced on February 11. The Trump administration confirmed its plan to reinstate full tariffs on imported steel and aluminium—a move that will significantly impact both industries and consumers.

These tariffs are scheduled to start in early March, these Section 232 import tariffs will impose a 25% duty on steel and aluminium products, with aluminium tariffs rising from the previous 10% to 25%. Right now every nation on the planet (including Australia) is in Washington trying to wiggle their way out of the impending price surge – so far there is radio silence from the administration on if it will budge on any of the changes. Memory Lane If we take the 2018 tariffs as a guide, history suggests that once domestic stockpiles are depleted and buyers turn to global markets, U.S. prices will likely rise to reflect most of these duties.

However, exemptions may still be granted, particularly for aluminium, where the U.S. depends heavily on imports about 85% of aluminium consumption comes from overseas. While U.S. importers will bear roughly 80% of the tariff costs, exporters may need to lower prices to remain competitive—assuming they can’t find better pricing in other markets. Other things to be aware of from a trading point of view - The U.S. imports ~ 70 per cent of its primary aluminium Canada.

Who is the biggest play in that Canadian market? Rio Tinto. And it's not just Canada Rio Tinto ships approximately 1.75 million tonnes of aluminium annually from Canada and Australia.

Nearly 45 per cent of Rio Tinto’s U.S. aluminium sales are value-added products, which carries a premium of $200-$300 per tonne over London Metal Exchange (LME) prices. That is something that very much irks the President. Couple this with the fact physical delivery in the U.S. is also at a premium price and that gives you an average price estimate that could rise by ~40 per cent to approximately $1,036 per tonne ($0.50/lb), up from the 2024 average of $427 per tonne.

The thing is Rio Tinto itself is forecasting strong demand in North America, and its Value-add pricing is unlikely to change as domestic suppliers can’t easily replace the volumes it needs. In short, price pressure is coming – and suppliers will likely win out over the consumer. So what about Steel?

The U.S. imports 25-30 per cent of its steel so it’s not as reliant on this product as aluminium, but 80 per cent of those imports are currently exempt under Section 232 which is about to scrap it. That means the tariffs will impact around 18 million tonnes of steel imports annually, with: 35-40 per cent being flat products, 20-25 per cent semi-finished steel, and the rest covering long steel, pipes, tubes, and stainless steel. The Trump administration has signalled concerns over semi-finished steel imports, particularly Brazilian slab imports (~3-4 million tonnes per year).

What Does This Mean for Steel Prices? All things being equal - U.S. domestic steel prices will rise in full alignment with the 25% tariff on affected imports. The short and tall of it For both steel and aluminium, the reintroduction of tariffs means higher prices for U.S. buyers, particularly once inventories run down and imports reflect the new duty rates.

While exemptions remain a possibility, businesses reliant on imported metals should prepare for cost increases and potential supply disruptions. Traders should be ready for volatility, margin changes and erratic conditions as the administration rages over pricing issues.