Introduction

The commonly used approach for those who trade financial markets in developing and implementing strategies often focuses on waiting for confirmation before entering positions. While the approach may help reduce false signals and offer some psychological comfort from confirmation, it may introduce a significant drawback. When a movement has been confirmed through a defined price level, much of the potential profit may have already vanished.

Consider this in light of your experience — how frequently have you entered a trade after a clear signal, only to watch the market immediately reverse or stall? Of course, this is frustrating, but it arguably stems from a fundamental issue with such reactive trading approaches. These can place you behind the curve, rather than ahead of it.

This article aims to review the standard reactive approach and explores ways that you may look to develop strategies that anticipate market movements before they materialise fully. This, at least in theory, can put you near the “front of the queue” for any potential move, so logically offering the chance of better entries and so trading outcomes through shifting your focus from confirmation to prediction.

Reaction versus Prediction: What’s the Difference?

The Reactive approach

Most trading strategies operate reactively, requiring definitive proof before committing capital to a trading idea. Consider a classic moving average crossover, a simple and commonly taught technical strategy. A trader looks at a chart until the shorter-term moving average crosses above a longer-term average, confirming an uptrend is underway. However, by definition, this signal arrives after momentum and price are already well underway.

So, what is happening here is fulfilling an approach that favours certainty over timing. They value confirmation and often enter positions after key levels break or indicators flash clear signals. Of course, this approach can reduce false positives, but will typically result in:

• Later entries, often at less favourable prices
• Reduced profit potential, as a significant early movement may have already occurred
• There is more competition at obvious entry points, as many traders see the same signals on the same charts, meaning markets may be moving quickly.

The Predictive Alternative

Predictive strategies attempt to identify high-probability probabilities before they completely present on a chart. So, rather than requiring absolute confirmation, these approaches identify conditions that historically suggest markets are more likely to behave in a specific way next.

So, let’s try and give an example.  Instead of waiting for prices to breach resistance, a predictive trader notices when:

• Price range narrows significantly (possibly measured by Bollinger Band contraction or a decline in ATR)
• Volume begins increasing while price remains constrained
• Minor resistance tests become more frequent
• The lows of consecutive candles are higher than the previous ones

This set of conditions may suggest increasing buying pressure that often precedes potentially significant price movement.  So, in this scenario, the predictive trader establishes a trade position before the breakout is confirmed, so anticipating rather than reacting to the event.

Predictive trading is therefore based on timing over certainty, accepting some extra uncertainty in exchange for potentially superior positioning. If it proves to be successful, this approach may offer:

• Earlier entries at better prices
• Larger profit potential by capturing the full movement
• Less competition at entry points that aren’t yet obvious to most traders

The similarities of both approaches and non-negotiables…

Let us be clear, some of the “golden rules” MUST still be adhered to irrespective of approach in that:

1. Entry is still based on strict criteria, not just a whim or guess.
2. Risk must be appropriately managed both in terms of capital loss and profit risk after trade entry, including position sizing consistent with the trader’s profile
3. ANY strategy must be tested on a small volume, evaluated on a critical mass of trades (not just one or two) and refined, before scaling up.
4. IT is not necessarily a replacement for every strategy you may be trading, merely a different approach to add to your “trading toolbox”.

The Anatomy of a Predictive Strategy?

Logically, more effective predictive strategies are going to rely on understanding market structure, the nature of price movements and some awareness of the principles of probability, rather than the alternative, which is viewing markets as random.

Structural Elements

Market structure provides the foundation for prediction. This may include:

1. Support and Resistance Dynamics: Not merely horizontal lines, but zones where buyer/seller psychology might change. Predictive traders observe how the price behaves approaching these areas rather than waiting for definitive breaks.

Candle structure will always be important both singularly, e.g. where the candle closes to its range, for example, in the top or bottom half and over several candles, e.g. creating higher highs and/or higher lows (or vice versa if considering a short predictive move).

1. Range Contraction and Expansion Cycles: Markets naturally alternate between periods of price consolidation and price movement, the first invariably leading to the latter. So, it makes sense that identifying late-stage consolidation patterns before they change provides at least some predictive potential.
2. Volume Patterns: Changes in market participation, evidenced by changes in volume, often precede price movement. An increase in trading volume during consolidation may frequently signal an impending breakout when combined with price action that is pushing against a price point. Differences in relative volume, e.g., a higher than the norm for a specific time of day compared to other days, have been cited as an interesting variable to look at.
3. Market Interrelationships: Correlations between related instruments sometimes show leading/lagging behaviours that may offer predictive value for inclusion within your criteria. For example, A move in USD may occur first before an opposite move in gold.\
4. Time: Market open and sessional changes, e.g. from the Asia to European sessions, are often where a directional move is more likely to occur as more traders enter the market. Additionally, but more fluid in terms of actual time, is using time as a reference. Examples of this may be previous day or session highs or lows, whenever they occur, may be important during the evolution of the trading day.

Probability Assessment

As well as market structure, predictive strategies include some sort of probability thinking. In practical terms, this means:

1. An acknowledgment and underlying belief that predictions involve probabilities, not certainties, and this must be managed accordingly
2. A need to identify conditions that historically are more likely to precede specific outcomes (There are ways to determine this mathematically based on previous price action that may accelerate getting to this point, but a detailed discussion of this may be worth exploring in a future article). The desirable one, of course, is that a price continues in your predicted direction, but it is equally important to be able to identify when this is less likely to happen.
3. Having tested and developed unambiguous statements as part of your plan that MUST be ticked off before action.
4. Continue to monitor expectancy through ongoing analysis
5. Consider, particularly if you can determine a scoring system that suggests a strength of predictive signal (rather than a simpler yes/no threshold), as a way of altering lot size for any position entered.

What we are doing is getting to a place where the trader isn’t guessing but simply recognising conditions that historically precede specific market behaviours. In simple terms, think of this along the lines of “If A and B and C occur, then D is likely to follow”, is where we want to get to.

Leading Indicators and Metrics that may Assist in Prediction

Several technical approaches seem to be potentially beneficial for prediction. We have already considered market structure, candle action, volume and time, but the following three may also be worth some consideration.

1. Volatility Measurements:

• ATR (Average True Range) compression identifies energy building in the market
• Bollinger Band width alerts traders to narrowing ranges before expansion
• Historical volatility percentiles can show where current conditions stand relative to typical behaviour

1. Momentum Measures:

• The rate of change in oscillators often shifts before price action confirms
• Divergences between indicators and price suggest weakening of existing conditions and a potential change, e.g. RSI and price

1. And then there is data:

• New market information is the precursor to significant potential sentiment change, irrespective of previous price action. It would be amiss not to include some reference to this in any predictive plan.

Enhanced Risk Management

Because predictive strategies involve greater uncertainty by nature, they require a robust approach to risk management. The following are worth consideration:

1. Asymmetric Risk-Reward: Predictive entries should target at least 2:1 reward-to-risk. This compensated for the lower certainty with higher payoff potential
2. Tight Initial Stops: Early invalidation points, i.e. that your trading idea has not worked, make sure that losses are kept small when predictions prove incorrect
3. Position sizing: Remember, there is always the option of adding to a position at any stage during a trade. Perhaps an approach that will enter a small lot size than is your norm on a reactive approach, and adding to this on confirmation, may be worth exploring.
4. Partial Position Exits: Using multiple price targets to capture profits at different stages of the anticipated move. This could be combined with a move of initial stops upwards (even past breakeven)

Summary and Final Thoughts

A shift from reactive to predictive trading represents more than a technical adjustment, it requires a fundamental change in perspective. As previously stated, this does not mean, nor should it, that it is a complete shift, but rather supplementing, not replacing, what you are doing now. Indeed, there is merit in comparing approaches side by side, not only to build confidence but also as a personal “quality control” measure.

Remember what you are doing here is trying to change your view of markets from something to respond to, as something to give yourself a timing edge. BUT there are no shortcuts here, you must adhere to the golden rules of market engagement as covered earlier and make sure all you do in both new plan creation and ongoing evaluation and refinement is based on some evidence and has a discipline in follow-through.

Begin slowly, with one strategy, get your process sorted, and then you can move on to others with relative ease. The first will always require the most work and be the most psychologically challenging.

Of course, there are automated ways that we can use through strategy creation and back testing, as well as some sophisticated probability software and machine learning techniques that can all add to your ultimate process. But these are NOT your starting point, rather things to integrate later (unless of course you are already doing some of these).

Remember, the goal of any individual or set of strategies isn’t perfection but rather developing a consistent positioning advantage over other market participants and so potential profit over hundreds of trades. By focusing on the next bar rather than the last, traders may have an opportunity to be in there at the start of market movements rather than follow them.

It is an exciting journey ahead for those who choose to explore this further.

Ready to start trading?

Try free demo Open account