Start with what actually happened to FX markets in the lead-up to April: there was a geopolitical shock and oil supply out of the Middle East came under pressure. The immediate reaction across currency markets was the one traders have seen before: money moved toward safety, toward yield, and away from anything that looked exposed to the disruption.

Safe-haven flows meet yield divergence

The US dollar benefited from both of those forces at once. It is a safe haven and it also carries a yield advantage that most of its peers cannot match right now. The Swiss franc picked up some of the overflow from European risk aversion. The yen, which used to attract safe-haven flows almost automatically, is stuck in a different situation altogether where the yield gap against the dollar is now so wide that safe-haven logic has been overridden by carry logic.

The currencies that had the toughest month were the ones caught in the middle: risk-sensitive, commodity-linked, or running policy rates that simply cannot compete. The New Zealand dollar is the clearest example while the Australian dollar is a messier story. Sitting underneath all of it is a repricing of 2026 rate cut expectations that central banks in multiple countries are now reassessing.

Strongest mover: US dollar (USD)

The US dollar spent most of 2025 gradually losing ground as the Fed cut rates and the rest of the world played catch-up. That story stalled hard in late March. The Iran conflict changed the calculus, and the dollar reasserted itself in a way that reflects something real about its structural position in global markets.

The US exports oil and when energy prices rise, that is a terms-of-trade improvement, not a terms-of-trade shock. Most of the dollar's major peers sit on the other side of that equation. Add a policy rate range of 3.50% to 3.75% that now looks locked in for longer, and the dollar's advantage is both cyclical and structural at the same time. The US Dollar Index (DXY) has regained the 100 level but tThe question heading into April is whether it holds there or pushes further.

Weakest mover: New Zealand dollar (NZD)

If you wanted to design a currency that would struggle in the current environment, the NZD fits the brief almost perfectly. It is risk-sensitive. It is commodity-linked. It runs a policy rate of 2.25%, which sits below the Fed and now below the RBA as well. New Zealand is also an energy importer, so rising oil prices hit the trade balance and the domestic inflation outlook at the same time.

None of those things are new but the combination of all of them hitting at once, against a backdrop of a surging dollar and broad risk-off sentiment, has compressed the NZD in a way that is hard to ignore. The carry trade that once made NZD attractive has reversed as capital has been moving out, not in.

USD/JPY

USD/JPY is the pair that most clearly illustrates what happens when a currency's safe-haven status gets overridden by carry logic. The yen used to be the first port of call for traders looking for protection during geopolitical stress. That dynamic has been suppressed, and the reason is straightforward: you give up too much yield to hold yen right now.

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) policy rate sits at 0.75% while the Fed's sits at 3.50% to 3.75% and that gap does not encourage safe-haven flows. It encourages borrowing in yen and deploying elsewhere. So while the dollar rose on geopolitical risk, the yen fell on the same event. That is not how it is supposed to work, but it is how the maths works out when yield differentials are this wide.

USD/JPY is sitting near 159, which leaves it not far from the 160 level that Japan's Ministry of Finance has consistently flagged as a line requiring attention. The BOJ meeting on 27 and 28 April is now a genuinely live event.

Data to watch next

Four events stand out as the clearest potential FX catalysts in the weeks ahead. Each has a direct transmission channel into rate expectations, and rate expectations are driving much of the move in FX right now.

Key levels and signals

These are the reference points that traders and policymakers are watching most closely. Each one represents a potential trigger for a shift in positioning or an official response.

‍

Access a broader FX universe and stay flexible as conditions change.
Open an account · Log in

Oil prices tend to rise when demand is strong, supply is constrained or geopolitical events disrupt normal trade flows. In this case, the US and Israel appeared to act pre-emptively in what they saw as a defensive move. The broader market impact has been felt more widely.

When oil prices move, they rarely move in isolation. Higher crude prices can affect inflation, central bank expectations, shipping costs and corporate margins across the global economy.

What is happening

There are three broad ways companies can benefit from higher oil prices:

1. Producing oil and gas, by selling the commodity at a higher price
2. Providing services and equipment to producers
3. Transporting oil around the world

Each of the stocks below represents one of those exposure types, with a different risk profile when crude climbs.

1. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM)

Exxon Mobil is one of the world’s largest integrated oil companies, involved in everything from exploring for and producing oil to refining it into fuel and producing chemicals. When oil prices rise, its upstream business may benefit from wider margins, while its size and diversification can help cushion weaker spots in the cycle.

Exxon has major positions in growth regions such as the US Permian Basin and large offshore projects, which are designed to deliver relatively low-cost barrels over many years. When prices are high, low-cost production may support free cash flow and the company’s capacity for dividends, buybacks or further investment.

Exxon Mobil (XOM) vs. Brent Crude 6-month performance

Consensus: Buy

According to TradingView, analyst sentiment towards Exxon is broadly positive, with a consensus Buy rating. Of the 31 analysts tracked, 15 rate the stock as Strong Buy or Buy, while 13 rate it Hold.

The positive view is linked to Exxon’s balance sheet strength and higher-margin production, with the most optimistic analysts projecting a 1-year price target as high as US$183.00. However, a small minority of 3 analysts has issued a Sell or Strong Sell rating, contributing to an average price target of US$145.00, which sits about 3.6% below the current trading price.

2. Chevron (NYSE: CVX)

Chevron is another global integrated major that has benefited from the recent move higher in crude, with its shares trading near 52-week highs. Like Exxon, Chevron operates across the value chain, including upstream production, refining and marketing. Chevron’s completed acquisition of Hess adds Guyana and other upstream assets, which some analysts see as supportive over time, although the earnings impact remains subject to integration, project execution and commodity-price risks.

In an environment where oil and gas prices can be volatile, that diversification may help smooth earnings while still providing leverage to stronger energy prices.

Exxon Mobil vs Chevron performance, 6-month chart

Consensus: Buy

Chevron is viewed similarly to Exxon, with broker sentiment remaining broadly constructive. Recent TradingView aggregates show 30 analysts covering the stock over the past three months, with 17 rating it Strong Buy or Buy, 11 at Hold, 1 at Sell and 1 at Strong Sell. Analysts have highlighted its diversified portfolio and the potential contribution from Hess, although commodity-price volatility and execution risks may keep some more cautious.

3. SLB (NYSE: SLB)

Higher oil prices do not only affect producers. In this case, SLB (formerly Schlumberger) is one of the world’s largest oilfield services companies, providing technology, equipment and services that help producers find and extract hydrocarbons more efficiently. When crude trends higher, producers may increase drilling and completion activity, which can lift demand for SLB’s services and software. Recent commentary has also pointed to the company’s growing digital business and global exposure, which may support earnings growth if the upcycle continues.

Consensus: Buy

According to TradingView, analyst consensus on SLB is Buy, indicating broadly positive sentiment. Of the 33 analysts tracked, 27 rate the stock Strong Buy or Buy, while 4 rate it Hold and 2 rate it Sell or Strong Sell.

Analyst sentiment appears to reflect expectations around SLB’s position as a broader technology partner. The average price target of US$55.71 implies 15.8% upside from current levels, while the highest target stands at US$74.00. These forecasts appear to be linked to expectations of increased international drilling activity and a recovery in offshore deepwater markets.

4. Baker Hughes (NYSE: BKR)

Baker Hughes is another major oilfield services and equipment provider, with additional exposure to industrial segments such as LNG and power infrastructure. Even when oil prices are not at extreme highs, advances in drilling technology and lower break-even costs have helped keep many shale plays profitable, supporting demand for its services.  

The company has been described as well positioned because of its balance sheet and its exposure to ongoing exploration and production activity. In a period of higher, or even stable-to-firm, oil prices, that mix of services and energy technology may create several revenue drivers.

Consensus: Strong Buy

Broker sentiment towards Baker Hughes is broadly positive, similar to SLB. More than 75% of covering analysts rate the stock as a Buy or Strong Buy, with the remainder generally at Hold. Analysts have pointed to its exposure to both traditional oilfield services and energy and industrial technology, including LNG infrastructure.

[CHART]

Transport and shipping exposure

5. Global oil tanker operators

Oil tanker companies can benefit when higher prices, OPEC+ policy shifts and geopolitical tensions increase long-distance shipments and disrupt usual routes.

Recent reports have pointed to stronger freight rates and high volumes of oil in transit, as increased production from the Middle East and supply growth from the US, Brazil, Guyana and Canada flow towards Asian markets. That ‘tonne-mile’ demand may support tanker day rates and profitability even when the broader energy market is volatile.

Consensus: N/A

This is a broader industry category rather than a single publicly traded stock, so there is no single broker consensus for it. Analyst views would need to be assessed at the company level, such as Frontline plc (FRO), Euronav (EURN) or Scorpio Tankers (STNG). More broadly, the sector is often viewed as cyclical, although current conditions may support freight rates when geopolitical disruptions lengthen shipping routes.

6. Woodside Energy (ASX: WDS)

Woodside adds an Australia-based name with global LNG and oil exposure. Its 2024 full-year results showed underlying profit down 13%, primarily because of lower realised oil and gas prices, according to the company’s full-year results announcement. That highlights how sensitive earnings can be to commodity price realisation.

If crude and related energy prices strengthen, Woodside’s earnings outlook may improve, although the extent of that change will still depend on company-specific factors and realised pricing.

Consensus: Hold

In contrast to the larger US majors, broker sentiment towards this Australian-based producer is more cautious, with consensus generally at Hold. Most analysts favour maintaining existing positions rather than increasing exposure. That more measured view is often linked to its LNG pricing exposure, softer realised commodity prices and longer-term regulatory and decarbonisation pressures.

[CHART]

Risks and constraints

Higher oil prices are not a free ride for these stocks.

• If prices spike too far, too fast, they may trigger demand destruction and policy responses that weigh on future profits.  
• Political decisions from OPEC+ or major producers mau reverse a rally by increasing supply.  
• Services and tanker companies are highly cyclical. When the cycle turns, pricing power can fade quickly.

In other words, these names may benefit from higher oil prices, but they also carry sector-specific, geopolitical and company-level risks that deserve close attention.

Key market observations

• Higher oil prices often support integrated majors such as Exxon and Chevron through stronger upstream margins and diversified cash flows.
• Oilfield services stocks such as SLB and Baker Hughes may see stronger demand when producers increase drilling and completion activity.
• Tanker operators may benefit from higher freight rates when geopolitics and supply shifts increase long-haul shipments.  
• These stocks can be volatile, so diversification and time horizon remain important during commodity upcycles.

‍

^{References in this article to Exxon Mobil, Chevron, SLB, Baker Hughes, Woodside, tanker operators, analyst consensus ratings and price targets are included for general market commentary only and do not constitute a recommendation or offer in relation to any financial product or security. Third-party data, including consensus ratings and target prices, may change without notice and should not be relied on in isolation. Energy and shipping exposures are cyclical and can be materially affected by commodity price volatility, realised pricing, production changes, project execution, geopolitical disruptions, freight market conditions, regulatory developments and shifts in investor sentiment. Any views about potential beneficiaries of higher oil prices are subject to significant uncertainty.}