Oil prices tend to rise when demand is strong, supply is constrained or geopolitical events disrupt normal trade flows. In this case, the US and Israel appeared to act pre-emptively in what they saw as a defensive move. The broader market impact has been felt more widely.

When oil prices move, they rarely move in isolation. Higher crude prices can affect inflation, central bank expectations, shipping costs and corporate margins across the global economy.

What is happening

There are three broad ways companies can benefit from higher oil prices:

1. Producing oil and gas, by selling the commodity at a higher price
2. Providing services and equipment to producers
3. Transporting oil around the world

Each of the stocks below represents one of those exposure types, with a different risk profile when crude climbs.

1. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM)

Exxon Mobil is one of the world’s largest integrated oil companies, involved in everything from exploring for and producing oil to refining it into fuel and producing chemicals. When oil prices rise, its upstream business may benefit from wider margins, while its size and diversification can help cushion weaker spots in the cycle.

Exxon has major positions in growth regions such as the US Permian Basin and large offshore projects, which are designed to deliver relatively low-cost barrels over many years. When prices are high, low-cost production may support free cash flow and the company’s capacity for dividends, buybacks or further investment.

Exxon Mobil (XOM) vs. Brent Crude 6-month performance

Consensus: Buy

According to TradingView, analyst sentiment towards Exxon is broadly positive, with a consensus Buy rating. Of the 31 analysts tracked, 15 rate the stock as Strong Buy or Buy, while 13 rate it Hold.

The positive view is linked to Exxon’s balance sheet strength and higher-margin production, with the most optimistic analysts projecting a 1-year price target as high as US$183.00. However, a small minority of 3 analysts has issued a Sell or Strong Sell rating, contributing to an average price target of US$145.00, which sits about 3.6% below the current trading price.

2. Chevron (NYSE: CVX)

Chevron is another global integrated major that has benefited from the recent move higher in crude, with its shares trading near 52-week highs. Like Exxon, Chevron operates across the value chain, including upstream production, refining and marketing. Chevron’s completed acquisition of Hess adds Guyana and other upstream assets, which some analysts see as supportive over time, although the earnings impact remains subject to integration, project execution and commodity-price risks.

In an environment where oil and gas prices can be volatile, that diversification may help smooth earnings while still providing leverage to stronger energy prices.

Exxon Mobil vs Chevron performance, 6-month chart

Consensus: Buy

Chevron is viewed similarly to Exxon, with broker sentiment remaining broadly constructive. Recent TradingView aggregates show 30 analysts covering the stock over the past three months, with 17 rating it Strong Buy or Buy, 11 at Hold, 1 at Sell and 1 at Strong Sell. Analysts have highlighted its diversified portfolio and the potential contribution from Hess, although commodity-price volatility and execution risks may keep some more cautious.

3. SLB (NYSE: SLB)

Higher oil prices do not only affect producers. In this case, SLB (formerly Schlumberger) is one of the world’s largest oilfield services companies, providing technology, equipment and services that help producers find and extract hydrocarbons more efficiently. When crude trends higher, producers may increase drilling and completion activity, which can lift demand for SLB’s services and software. Recent commentary has also pointed to the company’s growing digital business and global exposure, which may support earnings growth if the upcycle continues.

Consensus: Buy

According to TradingView, analyst consensus on SLB is Buy, indicating broadly positive sentiment. Of the 33 analysts tracked, 27 rate the stock Strong Buy or Buy, while 4 rate it Hold and 2 rate it Sell or Strong Sell.

Analyst sentiment appears to reflect expectations around SLB’s position as a broader technology partner. The average price target of US$55.71 implies 15.8% upside from current levels, while the highest target stands at US$74.00. These forecasts appear to be linked to expectations of increased international drilling activity and a recovery in offshore deepwater markets.

4. Baker Hughes (NYSE: BKR)

Baker Hughes is another major oilfield services and equipment provider, with additional exposure to industrial segments such as LNG and power infrastructure. Even when oil prices are not at extreme highs, advances in drilling technology and lower break-even costs have helped keep many shale plays profitable, supporting demand for its services.  

The company has been described as well positioned because of its balance sheet and its exposure to ongoing exploration and production activity. In a period of higher, or even stable-to-firm, oil prices, that mix of services and energy technology may create several revenue drivers.

Consensus: Strong Buy

Broker sentiment towards Baker Hughes is broadly positive, similar to SLB. More than 75% of covering analysts rate the stock as a Buy or Strong Buy, with the remainder generally at Hold. Analysts have pointed to its exposure to both traditional oilfield services and energy and industrial technology, including LNG infrastructure.

[CHART]

Transport and shipping exposure

5. Global oil tanker operators

Oil tanker companies can benefit when higher prices, OPEC+ policy shifts and geopolitical tensions increase long-distance shipments and disrupt usual routes.

Recent reports have pointed to stronger freight rates and high volumes of oil in transit, as increased production from the Middle East and supply growth from the US, Brazil, Guyana and Canada flow towards Asian markets. That ‘tonne-mile’ demand may support tanker day rates and profitability even when the broader energy market is volatile.

Consensus: N/A

This is a broader industry category rather than a single publicly traded stock, so there is no single broker consensus for it. Analyst views would need to be assessed at the company level, such as Frontline plc (FRO), Euronav (EURN) or Scorpio Tankers (STNG). More broadly, the sector is often viewed as cyclical, although current conditions may support freight rates when geopolitical disruptions lengthen shipping routes.

6. Woodside Energy (ASX: WDS)

Woodside adds an Australia-based name with global LNG and oil exposure. Its 2024 full-year results showed underlying profit down 13%, primarily because of lower realised oil and gas prices, according to the company’s full-year results announcement. That highlights how sensitive earnings can be to commodity price realisation.

If crude and related energy prices strengthen, Woodside’s earnings outlook may improve, although the extent of that change will still depend on company-specific factors and realised pricing.

Consensus: Hold

In contrast to the larger US majors, broker sentiment towards this Australian-based producer is more cautious, with consensus generally at Hold. Most analysts favour maintaining existing positions rather than increasing exposure. That more measured view is often linked to its LNG pricing exposure, softer realised commodity prices and longer-term regulatory and decarbonisation pressures.

[CHART]

Risks and constraints

Higher oil prices are not a free ride for these stocks.

• If prices spike too far, too fast, they may trigger demand destruction and policy responses that weigh on future profits.  
• Political decisions from OPEC+ or major producers mau reverse a rally by increasing supply.  
• Services and tanker companies are highly cyclical. When the cycle turns, pricing power can fade quickly.

In other words, these names may benefit from higher oil prices, but they also carry sector-specific, geopolitical and company-level risks that deserve close attention.

Key market observations

• Higher oil prices often support integrated majors such as Exxon and Chevron through stronger upstream margins and diversified cash flows.
• Oilfield services stocks such as SLB and Baker Hughes may see stronger demand when producers increase drilling and completion activity.
• Tanker operators may benefit from higher freight rates when geopolitics and supply shifts increase long-haul shipments.  
• These stocks can be volatile, so diversification and time horizon remain important during commodity upcycles.

‍

^{References in this article to Exxon Mobil, Chevron, SLB, Baker Hughes, Woodside, tanker operators, analyst consensus ratings and price targets are included for general market commentary only and do not constitute a recommendation or offer in relation to any financial product or security. Third-party data, including consensus ratings and target prices, may change without notice and should not be relied on in isolation. Energy and shipping exposures are cyclical and can be materially affected by commodity price volatility, realised pricing, production changes, project execution, geopolitical disruptions, freight market conditions, regulatory developments and shifts in investor sentiment. Any views about potential beneficiaries of higher oil prices are subject to significant uncertainty.}

Oil smashed US$100 a barrel as US-Israeli strikes on Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, triggering the biggest single-day crude spike since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 

‍

Quick facts

• Brent Crude intraday peak: US$119.50/bbl (up ~50% in 10 days)
• Reported vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz fell to <20% of average
• Analysts estimate up to ~20% of global seaborne oil flows could be affected if disruption persists (largest since the 1956 Suez Crisis)

‍

Why have oil prices spiked?

Oil markets woke up on 9 March 2026 to joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian oil depots that sent Brent crude to an intraday peak of US$119.50 a barrel (its highest level since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war) before settling back near US$90.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard has threatened to target any tanker transiting the Strait of Hormuz, collapsing vessel traffic to near-zero. 

The strait carries roughly 20% of the world's daily seaborne oil supply, and analysts are describing the disruption as the largest since the Suez Crisis of 1956–57. Crude had already risen around 16% in the week before the strikes as markets priced in escalating tensions.

Middle East escalation: oil, VIX and volatility scenarios

ExxonMobil's chief economist, Tyler Goodspeed, has said the distribution of probable outcomes skews heavily toward the Strait remaining effectively closed for longer than markets currently expect. 

Meanwhile, Donald Trump has played down the need to release strategic petroleum reserves, calling any short-term price pain a small cost for global safety. The G7 is discussing a coordinated SPR release, which briefly pulled prices back toward US$110 before late-session trading moved them lower on fresh Trump commentary about a potentially “swift end” to the conflict.

Biggest single day crude oil spike since 2022 | TradingView

Market Reaction

The ASX response has been sharply split. The broader ASX 200 fell as investors priced in inflation and potential demand destruction, with materials stocks like BHP sinking close to 6%. Energy was the only sector in the green. The IMF estimates that every sustained 10% rise in oil prices adds 0.4% to global inflation and reduces global growth by 0.15%.

If oil holds above US$100 for an extended period, recession risk in major importing economies could rise materially. ASX energy investors are navigating a world where the same tailwind for producers could become a headwind for global demand.

S&P/ASX 200 vs S&P/ASX 200 Energy Index | TradingView

‍

Top 5 ASX energy stocks to watch

1. Woodside Energy Group (ASX: WDS)

Woodside is Australia’s largest listed oil and gas producer and is often closely watched when energy prices rise. Woodside operates Pluto LNG in the Pilbara with a 90% stake, the North West Shelf LNG project, and a growing international portfolio. Shares hit a fresh 52-week high and have risen 33% since January.

Fully franked dividends add yield support; the company recently paid an 83.4-cent-per-share final dividend. For cautious investors, Woodside is a potential entry point in the sector right now.

‍

2. Santos Ltd (ASX: STO)

Santos is the ASX's second-largest oil and gas producer with a market cap of nearly A$23 billion, and it offers a compelling production growth story on top of the price tailwind. 

The Barossa gas project shipped its first LNG cargo in January 2026, and production is expected to grow around 30% by 2027 as Barossa and the Pikka project in Alaska ramp up together. 

CEO Kevin Gallagher sold A$5.6 million in stock in late February to cover personal tax obligations, which some investors have flagged as a caution signal, but the growth fundamentals remain intact.

‍

3. Karoon Energy (ASX: KAR)

A mid-cap pure-play oil producer with 100% interests in the Bauna and Patola offshore oil fields in Brazil's Santos Basin, plus the Who Dat assets in the Gulf of Mexico, it was the biggest mover on the entire ASX 200 in recent sessions.

With a market cap near A$1.25 billion and a Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio of 7, the stock is extraordinarily sensitive to oil price movements. Karoon generated a free cash flow margin of approximately 45% against a base case of US$65 per barrel. At current prices, the cash flow profile could improve dramatically. 

A new dividend of A$0.031 per share has been declared alongside 2026 production guidance. The risk is symmetrical: if the war premium fades and oil drifts back toward the mid-US$60s, the pullback could be as sharp as the rally. 

‍

4. Ampol Ltd (ASX: ALD)

Ampol is Australia's largest integrated fuel company, operating the Lytton oil refinery in Brisbane alongside a national fuel retail and distribution network and Z Energy in New Zealand. 

Higher oil prices are a double-edged sword for Ampol. They improve crude inventory value and refining margins, but can compress consumer demand over time. 

A planned A$1.1 billion acquisition of EG Australia's fuel and convenience network adds a structural growth catalyst independent of the oil price. A 100%-franked trailing yield of 3.2% could also provide income support.

‍

5. Beach Energy (ASX: BPT)

Beach Energy has underperformed the broader ASX energy sector over the past year, weighed down by reserve replacement challenges and a difficult recent earnings period. 

However, the company beat half-year FY2026 estimates by 13.5%, and management maintained full-year production guidance of 19.7–22.0 million barrels of oil equivalent. 

Beach's asset base spans the Cooper and Eromanga Basins, the Otway Basin, the Perth Basin's Waitsia LNG export project, and New Zealand. 

A 6.1% dividend yield with a payment due in March 2026, and the stock's low beta of 0.20 means it could offer materially less volatility than peers. 

CEO Brett Woods has flagged M&A interest in East Coast gas assets and a target of 35% emissions intensity reduction by 2030. A sustained high-oil environment could arrest Beach's production decline trend.

‍

What to watch next

Energy markets are moving on fear and geopolitics rather than fundamentals, which means the trade can reverse as fast as it started. The key question is whether this is a brief war premium or the start of a sustained structural disruption.

A prolonged Hormuz closure could push Brent even higher and keep ASX energy stocks elevated. A swift diplomatic resolution or coordinated G7 SPR release could snap oil back downwards and reverse much of the recent move. 

Sitting over both scenarios is the question of recession: if oil holds above US$100 for six to eight weeks, markets may begin pricing in central bank responses and demand destruction, which could ultimately weigh on the Energy sector that is outperforming today.

‍

US inflation data on Wednesday is the week's centrepiece, but with oil nearing seven-month highs, Bitcoin (BTC) sentiment shifting, and the Australian dollar at three-year highs, traders have plenty to navigate in the week ahead.

‍

Quick Facts

• US inflation rate (February) is the key binary event for rate cut pricing and equity direction.
• Brent crude is trading around US$82–84/bbl, near seven-month highs, with a $4–$10 geopolitical risk premium baked in from Iran/Hormuz tensions.
• Bitcoin is trading above US$70,000 as of 6 March, a potential trend change if it holds through the week.

‍

United States: inflation in focus

Last month’s US inflation reading showed prices rising 2.4% year-on-year, still well above the Fed's 2% target. 

February's inflation rate, due Wednesday, will be scrutinised for signs that tariff pass-through or rising energy costs are pushing prices back up, or whether the slow grind lower is still intact.

The March FOMC meeting on 17–18 March is now priced at only an 4.7% probability of a cut. A higher-than-expected inflation print this week could potentially push rate cut expectations further out.

A softer read opens the door to renewed cut pricing and potential relief across risk assets.

Key Dates

• US Inflation Rate (February CPI): Wednesday 11 March, 12:30 am (AEDT)

Monitor

• Core vs. headline inflation divergence as evidence of tariff pass-through in goods prices.
• 2-year and 10-year treasury yield sensitivity to the print.
• USD direction and FedWatch repricing in the lead up to the 18 March FOMC decision.

‍

Oil: elevated and event-sensitive

Brent is currently trading around US$83–85 per barrel, with a 52-week range spanning $58.40 to $85.12, reflecting the dramatic move triggered by the Middle East conflict. 

Analysts estimate the geopolitical risk premium already baked into oil at US$4–$10 per barrel, and average 2026 Brent forecasts have been lifted to US$63.85/bbl, up from US$62.02 in January. 

The EIA's Short-Term Energy Outlook forecasts Brent to average $58/bbl in 2026, well below the current spot price. 

The gap between spot and the forecast baseline could be a useful frame for traders this week: any de-escalation signal from the Middle East could rapidly close that gap.

Monitor

• Strait of Hormuz developments and any diplomatic signals from Iran nuclear talks.
• EIA weekly oil inventory data.
• Oil's knock-on to inflation expectations and whether it shifts central bank posture.
• Energy sector equity performance relative to the broader market.

‍

Bitcoin: sentiment watch

BTC has been attempting to stabilise after a brutal 53% correction over the past 17 weeks, fuelled by escalating geopolitical tensions and renewed tariff concerns.

However, yesterday saw a 8% jump back above $72,000, and the crypto “fear and greed index” jumped up to 29 (fear), up from below 20 (extreme fear), where it has been sitting for over a month, indicating a potential sentiment shift.

A cooler-than-expected US inflation print on Wednesday could provide further fuel for the breakout; a hot print risks potentially pulling BTC back below the US$70,000 level it has just reclaimed.

Monitor

• Inflation print reaction on Wednesday as the primary macro catalyst for the move.
• Any rotation into altcoins following BTC strength.
• ETF inflow/outflow data as confirmation of institutional participation.

‍

AUD/USD: Hawkish RBA meets geopolitical crosswinds

The Aussie is trading near more than three-year highs and heading for its fourth consecutive monthly gain, up more than 6% year-to-date, making it the top-performing G10 currency in 2026. 

The driver is a clear policy divergence. RBA Governor Michele Bullock signalled the March policy meeting is "live" for a possible rate increase, and warned that an oil price shock from Iran tensions could reignite domestic inflationary pressures. 

Market pricing now suggests around a 28% chance of a 25bp hike at the upcoming meeting, while fully pricing in tightening through May, and around a 75% chance of another increase to 4.35% by year-end. 

This hawkish read, set against a Fed on hold and facing dovish political pressure, creates a potential structural tailwind for the Aussie.

Monitor

• AUD/USD reaction to Wednesday's US inflation data.
• RBA rate hike probability repricing through the week.
• Iron ore and commodity prices as secondary AUD drivers.
• China demand signals, given Australia's export exposure.

Latin America (LATAM) saw over $730 billion in crypto volume in 2025, a 60% year-on-year surge that made the region responsible for roughly 10% of global crypto activity. 

In 2026, institutional players are starting to take the region seriously, regulation is crystallising, and the structural drivers from 2025 show no sign of fading. But the region is not a single story, and 2026 will test whether the current momentum is built on solid fundamentals or speculative optimism.

‍

Quick facts

• LATAM monthly active crypto users grew 18% year-on-year (YoY), three times faster than the US.
• Argentina reached 12% monthly active user penetration, accounting for over a quarter of the region's crypto activity.
• Over 90% of Brazilian crypto flows are now stablecoin-related.
• Three LATAM countries rank in the global top 20: Brazil (5th), Venezuela (18th), Argentina (20th).
• Peru's crypto app downloads grew 50% in 2025, with 2.9 million downloads.

‍

From survival tool to financial infrastructure

Latin America did not embrace cryptocurrency because of speculation. It embraced it because traditional financial systems repeatedly failed ordinary people. Over the past 15 years, average annual inflation across the region's five largest economies ran at 13%, compared to just 2.3% in the US over the same period.

In Venezuela, it reached 65,000% in a single year. In Argentina, it exceeded 220% in 2024. For millions of people, holding savings in local currency was a slow act of self-destruction. Stablecoins became the natural response. Digital assets pegged to the US dollar offered a reliable store of value, borderless transferability, and access without a bank account. 

Unlike in the West, where crypto is seen more as a speculative instrument, in LATAM it has become a necessary financial tool. However, adoption drivers are not entirely uniform across the region. Brazil and Mexico are institutional stories, driven by regulated market participation and established financial players. 

Argentina and Venezuela remain store-of-value plays, with crypto serving as a direct hedge against fiat collapse. And Peru and Colombia are more yield-seeking markets, where crypto offers returns that traditional savings accounts cannot match. 

‍

How fast is LATAM adopting crypto?

LATAM’s on-chain crypto volume rose 60% year-on-year in 2025. The region has recorded nearly $1.5 trillion in cumulative volume since mid-2022, peaking at a record $87.7 billion in a single month in December 2024.

Monthly active crypto users across LATAM also grew 18% in 2025, three times faster than the US.

Stablecoins are the primary vehicle driving this adoption. Of the $730 billion received in 2025, $324 billion moved through stablecoin transactions, an 89% year-on-year surge. In Brazil, over 90% of all crypto flows are stablecoin-related, and in Argentina, stablecoins account for over 60% of activity. 

Looking ahead, the Latin America cryptocurrency market is forecast to reach $442.6 billion by 2033, growing at a compound annual rate of 10.93% from 2025, according to IMARC Group. 

For traders, the speed of adoption matters less as a headline than what is driving it: a region of 650 million people building parallel financial infrastructure in real time, with stablecoins as the foundation.

‍

The institutional turn

For most of LATAM’s crypto history, adoption was bottom-up. Unbanked or underbanked retail users drove volumes through local exchanges. That picture is now changing at the top end of the market.

In February 2026, Crypto Finance Group, part of the leading global exchange operator Deutsche Börse Group, announced its expansion into Latin America, targeting banks, asset managers, and financial intermediaries seeking institutional-grade custody and trading infrastructure. 

Traditional banks and fintechs are following suit. Nubank now rewards customers for holding USDC. Brazil's B3 exchange approved the world's first spot XRP and SOL ETFs, ahead of the US, in 2025. Centralised exchanges, including Mercado Bitcoin, NovaDAX, and Binance, have collectively listed over 200 new BRL-denominated trading pairs since early 2024.

In March 2025, Brazilian fintech Meliuz became the first publicly traded company in the country to launch a Bitcoin accumulation strategy, now holding 320 BTC.

“Crypto adoption in LatAm is already global-scale. What the market needs now is institutional-grade governance, and that’s exactly why we’re here,” — Stijn Vander Straeten, CEO of Crypto Finance Group

‍

Crypto remittance use case

Latin America receives hundreds of billions of dollars annually from workers abroad, making remittances one of the most concrete and measurable crypto use cases in the region. Traditional transfer services charge an average of 6.2% per transaction. On a US$300 transfer, that is roughly US$20 in fees.

Blockchain-based infrastructure more broadly offers dramatic fee reductions. Bitcoin brings costs to around US$3.12 per US$100 transferred. While cheaper alternatives like XRP or Ethereum layer-2 infrastructure can reduce that to less than US$0.01.

For a migrant worker sending US$1,500 home to Peru, switching from a legacy bank saves more than the average Peruvian weekly wage in fees alone.

‍

LATAM’s crypto regulatory environment

The variable that will most determine whether LATAM  lives up to its 2026 potential is crypto regulation. And here, the picture is genuinely mixed.

Brazil leads the region with its Virtual Assets Law, which covers asset segregation, VASP licensing, AML/KYC requirements, and capital standards. It also implemented the Travel Rule for domestic VASP transfers, which came into force in February 2026. However, some more controversial proposals, including a US$100,000 cap on cross-border stablecoin transactions and a ban on self-custody wallet transfers, remain under active consultation.

Mexico's 2018 Fintech Law remains one of the world's earliest formal recognitions of virtual assets. Chile's 2023 Fintech Law established licences for exchanges, wallets, and stablecoin issuers, formally recognising digital assets as 'digital money.' 

Bolivia reversed a decade-long crypto ban in June 2024 by authorising regulated digital asset transactions. Argentina introduced mandatory exchange registration in 2025. And El Salvador continues to expand tokenised economic initiatives despite removing Bitcoin's legal tender status.

Ten countries across the region now have formal crypto frameworks of some kind. But for traders, regulatory divergence remains a live risk, and given Brazil receiving nearly one-third of all LATAM crypto volume, any significant policy reversal there could have outsized consequences.

‍

What traders should watch

Brazil's institutional momentum is the most significant structural trend. With $318.8 billion in on-chain volume in 2025, Brazil effectively is the LATAM market. 

The outcome of the Brazil stablecoin consultation could have a big influence. A restriction on foreign stablecoins in domestic payments would directly impact the most traded asset class in the region's dominant market. 

Argentina is the volatility play. Monthly active user penetration of 12% and 5.4 million crypto app downloads in 2025 signal deep and growing retail engagement. 

Colombia is an early-warning market to watch. The peso's 5.3% depreciation in 2025 and deepening fiscal crisis are driving stablecoin inflows in a pattern that mirrors Argentina's trajectory in earlier years. If Colombia's macro situation deteriorates further, crypto adoption could accelerate.

There is also an exchange concentration risk at play. Binance crypto exchange is the primary exchange for over 50% of LATAM crypto users. If the exchange faces any regulatory action, operational disruption, or competitive shock, it could have an outsized market impact.

‍

Bottom line

Latin America's crypto market has entered a new phase. The structural drivers that caused initial crypto-demand in the region have not gone away: inflation, remittances, financial exclusion, and currency instability are all still at play.

What has changed is the layer being built on top of them. Institutional infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, corporate treasury adoption, and global exchange capital flowing into a region that was, until recently, largely self-contained. 

Brazil's near-250% volume growth in 2025 and its position receiving nearly one-third of all LATAM crypto are the defining market developments. Its regulatory trajectory, stablecoin policy decisions, and ETF pipeline will effectively set the tone for the region in 2026. 

For traders, the headline growth figures are real, but so are the concentration risks, regulatory uncertainties, and country-level divergences that sit beneath them.

Access 39 of the top Crypto CFDs on GO Markets

On February 28, 2026, as the joint US and Israeli attack began, the numbers on the screens started moving in ways that felt clinical, even as the reality on the ground with the tragic deaths of civilian casualties in Iran, felt anything but. Markets, as they say, do not have a moral compass, rather they have a weighing machine and right now, they are weighing the transition of the entire global economy from a "just-in-time" model to a "just-in-case" cycle.

What markets were signalling

On March 2, the index tape stayed cautious while defence rose. Historically, conflicts can speed up restocking and orders but how big it gets (and how fast) still depends on budgets, approvals and delivery bottlenecks.

The Winners

1. Hanwha Aerospace (012450.KS)

Hanwha is one of the more actively traded names linked to the “K-Defence” theme, a company markets increasingly view as a scalable supplier into a tightening global artillery and munitions cycle. Capacity and delivery credibility.

When replenishment becomes urgent, the ability to produce at scale often matters as much as the platform itself. Export demand tied to systems like the K9 Thunder and Chunmoo has reinforced the narrative of durable order flow even when outcomes still hinge on budgets, approvals and delivery timelines.

Key things that can move sentiment: order-book updates, production cadence, and any follow-on export announcements.

‍2. Northrop Grumman (NOC)

Northrop moved into focus as investors repriced exposure to strategic modernisation and large, long-running programs. Defence markets often seen as mission-critical can persist across cycles. It’s less about one quarter and more about whether momentum stays steady if modernisation priorities remain in place (and whether timelines shift if they don’t).

Key variables that can move sentiment: Procurement pace, contract timing, and program-related funding language.

3. RTX Corporation (RTX)

RTX returned to the centre of the tape as investors priced an interceptor replenishment cycle and the economics of high-tempo air defence. Attrition is expensive and when usage rates rise, governments typically have to replenish inventories and, in many cases, fund production expansion which can extend backlog and lift revenue visibility.

Key variables that can move sentiment: Replenishment orders, manufacturing expansion indicators, and delivery throughput.

4. Lockheed Martin (LMT)

Lockheed drew attention as markets focused on missile-defence demand and the question every procurement desk faces in a high-tempo environment: how fast can inventories be rebuilt? If utilisation stays elevated, the winners tend to be the contractors best positioned to scale production and deliver reliably. Lockheed’s missile defence exposure keeps it closely tied to that replenishment narrative.

Key variables that can move sentiment: production ramp signals, unit economics, and budget-driven order cadence.

5. BAE Systems (BA.L)

With an £83.6 billion backlog and a central role in the AUKUS submarine program, BAE moved into focus as parts of Europe signalled higher defence spending ambitions. The stock rose 6.11% to a 52-week high amid a “risk-off” rotation, with traders watching AUKUS milestones and European air and missile defence procurement, including “Sky Shield”.

Key variables that can move sentiment: A potential catalyst is any clear step-up in German spending that lifts order flow across BAE’s European units, while key risks include a sharp spike in UK gilt yields, renewed pound sterling volatility, or “threat of peace” profit-taking.

The Losers: not every ‘war stock’ rises

6. AeroVironment (AVAV)

AeroVironment surged 18% at the open before falling 17% intraday after reports that the US Space Force was reopening a US$1.4 billion contract. The move highlights how procurement processes and contract risk can drive volatility, even in supportive thematic environments.

7. Kratos Defence (KTOS)

Kratos sits in the drone and loitering munition theme that gained attention as the Middle East conflict intensified. The stock still sold off after earnings, highlighting a common defence-sector risk. Kratos announced a large follow-on equity offering in the US$1.2 billion to US$1.4 billion range, the move strengthens the balance sheet and can support future program investment.

For traders focused on short-term “conflict premium” narratives, dilution can quickly change the setup. Even when demand conditions appear supportive, the market may reprice the stock if each shareholder ultimately owns a smaller portion of the business.

8. Intuitive Machines (LUNR)

Some speculative space-tech names lagged as investors appeared to favour companies with more established defence-linked revenue.

9. Boeing (BA)

Boeing was down around 2.5% on the session. While its defence division is meaningful, its commercial business can be more sensitive to aviation demand, airspace disruptions and oil-price moves.

10. Spirit AeroSystems (SPR)

Spirit AeroSystems remains closely tied to the global aircraft production cycle as a major aerostructures supplier. Recent results showed widening losses despite higher sales, reflecting ongoing production cost increases on major aircraft programs. These pressures have weighed on investor confidence in the near-term outlook. The planned acquisition by Boeing may ultimately reshape the company’s position in the supply chain, but execution risk and production stability remain central to how the market prices the stock.

What to watch next

• Escalation vs de-escalation: A shift toward diplomacy or ceasefire discussions can quickly change sentiment around defence stocks.
• Oil and shipping: Energy spikes can tighten financial conditions and pressure cyclical sectors.
• ‍Budgets and awards: Price moves can sometimes precede contract decisions, with clarity arriving when awards are finalised.
• ‍Production capacity: Companies with proven production and delivery track records often attract the most investor attention.
• Supply chain constraints: Rare earths, propulsion and electronics remain potential bottlenecks that can limit how quickly production scales.

The longer term lens

The 2026 Iran conflict is first and foremost a human tragedy. For markets, it may also represent a shift in how national security spending is prioritised within fiscal frameworks. If defence spending remains elevated over a multi year horizon, companies with scalable manufacturing capacity and integrated technology stacks could attract sustained investor attention. That said, markets move in cycles. Structural themes can persist, but they can also reprice quickly when assumptions change. Staying analytical and risk aware remains critical.

‍

^{References to specific companies, sectors or market movements are provided for general market commentary only and do not constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial product.Market reactions to geopolitical or macroeconomic events can be volatile and unpredictable, and outcomes may differ materially from expectations.}

Volatility doesn't discriminate. But it can punish the unprepared. 

Stops getting hit on moves that reverse within minutes. Premiums on short-dated options climbing. And the yen no longer behaving as the reliable hedge it once was.  

For traders across Asia, navigating this environment means asking harder questions about risk, timing, and the assumptions baked into strategies built for calmer markets.

‍

1. How do I trade VIX CFDs during a geopolitical shock?

The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day implied volatility on the S&P 500. It is often called the “fear gauge.” During geopolitical shocks such as the current Iran escalations, sanctions announcements, and surprise central bank actions, the VIX can spike sharply and quickly.

What makes VIX CFDs different in a shock

VIX itself is not directly tradeable. VIX CFDs are typically priced off VIX futures, which means they carry contango drag in normal conditions. 

During a geopolitical shock, several things can happen at once

• Spot VIX may spike immediately while near-term futures lag, creating a disconnect.
• Spreads on VIX CFDs can widen significantly as liquidity thins.
• Margin requirements may change intraday as broker risk models adjust.
• VIX tends to mean-revert after spikes, so timing and duration are critical.

What this means for Asian-hours traders

Asian market hours mean many geopolitical events can break while local traders are active or just starting their session. 

A shock that hits during Tokyo hours may already be priced into VIX futures before Sydney opens.

Some traders use VIX CFD positions as a short-term hedge against equity portfolios rather than a directional trade. Others trade the reversion (the move back toward historical averages once the initial spike fades). Both approaches carry distinct risks, and neither guarantees a specific outcome.

‍

2. Why are my 0DTE options premiums so expensive right now?

Zero days-to-expiry (0DTE) options expire on the same day they are traded. They have become one of the fastest-growing segments of the options market, now representing more than 57% of daily S&P 500 options volume according to Cboe global markets data.

For Asian-based participants accessing US options markets, elevated premiums during volatile periods can feel like mispricing, but usually reflects structural pricing factors.

Why premiums spike

Options pricing is driven by intrinsic value and time value. For 0DTE options, there is almost no time value left, which might suggest they should be cheap but the implied volatility component compensates for that.

When uncertainty increases, sellers may demand greater compensation for the risk of sharp intraday moves. 

This can be reflected in

• Higher implied volatility inputs.
• Wider bid-ask spreads.
• Faster adjustments in delta and gamma hedging.

In higher-VIX environments, hedging flows can contribute to short-term feedback loops in the underlying index. This can amplify price swings, particularly around key levels.

What this means for Asian-hours traders

Many 0DTE options contracts see their most active pricing and hedging flows during US trading hours. Entering positions during the Asian session may mean facing stale pricing or wider spreads.

If you are seeing expensive premiums, it may reflect the market accurately pricing the risk of a large same-day move. Whether that premium is worth paying depends on your view of the likely intraday range and your risk tolerance, not on the absolute dollar figure alone.

‍

3. How do I adjust my algorithmic trading bot for a high-VIX environment?

Many algorithmic trading systems are built on parameters calibrated during lower-volatility regimes. When VIX spikes, those parameters can become outdated quickly.

The regime mismatch problem

Most trading algorithms use historical data to set position sizes, stop distances, and entry thresholds. That data reflects the conditions during which the system was tested. If VIX moves from 15 to 35, the statistical assumptions underpinning those settings may no longer hold.

Common failure modes in high-VIX environments include

• Stops triggered repeatedly by noise before the intended directional move occurs.
• Position sizing based on fixed-dollar risk, which becomes relatively small compared to actual intraday ranges.
• Correlation assumptions between assets breaking down.
• Slippage on execution that erodes edge.

Approaches some algorithmic traders consider

Rather than running a single fixed set of parameters, some systems incorporate a volatility regime filter. This is a real-time check on VIX or ATR that triggers a switch to different settings when conditions shift.

Approach adjustments that some traders review in high-VIX environments

• Widen stop distances proportionally to ATR to reduce noise-driven exits.
• Reduce position size to maintain constant dollar risk relative to wider expected ranges.
• Add a VIX threshold above which the system pauses or moves to paper trading mode.
• Reduce the number of simultaneous positions, as correlations tend to rise during market stress.

No adjustment eliminates risk. Backtesting new parameters on historical high-VIX periods can provide some indication of likely performance, though past conditions are not a reliable guide to future outcomes.

‍

‍

4. Is the Japanese Yen (JPY) still a reliable safe-haven trade?

During periods of global risk aversion, capital has historically flowed into JPY as investors unwind carry trades and seek lower-volatility holdings. However, the reliability of this dynamic has become more conditional.

Why has the yen historically moved as a safe haven?

Japan’s historically low interest rates made JPY the funding currency of choice for carry trades and when risk-off sentiment hits, those trades unwind quickly, creating demand for yen.

Additionally, Japan’s large net foreign asset position means Japanese investors tend to repatriate capital during crises, further supporting JPY.

What has changed

The Bank of Japan’s shift away from ultra-loose monetary policy in recent years has complicated the traditional safe-haven dynamic. 

As Japanese interest rates rise:

• The scale of carry trade positioning may change.
• USD/JPY can become more sensitive to interest rate spreads.
• BoJ communication and domestic inflation data may influence JPY independently of global risk appetite.

The yen can still behave as a safe haven, particularly during sharp equity sell-offs. But it may respond more slowly or inconsistently compared to earlier cycles when the policy divergence between Japan and the rest of the world was more extreme.

What to watch

For traders monitoring JPY as a safe-haven signal, BoJ meeting dates, Japanese CPI releases, and real-time US-Japan rate spread data have become more relevant inputs than they were a few years ago.

‍

5. How do I avoid ‘whipsawing’ on energy CFDs?

Whipsawing describes the experience of entering a trade in one direction, getting stopped out as the price reverses, then watching the price move back in the original direction.

Energy CFDs, particularly crude oil, are especially prone to this in volatile markets. And for traders in Asia, the combination of thin liquidity during local hours and sensitivity to geopolitical headlines can make this particularly challenging.

Why energy CFDs whipsaw

Crude oil is sensitive to a wide range of headline drivers: OPEC+ production decisions, US inventory data, geopolitical supply disruptions, and currency moves. 

In high-volatility environments, the market can react strongly to each headline before reversing when the next one arrives.

• Price spikes on a headline, stops are triggered on short positions.
• Traders re-enter long, expecting continuation.
• A second headline or profit-taking reverses the move.
• Long stops are hit. The cycle repeats.

Approaches traders may consider to manage whipsaw risk

Some traders choose to change their risk controls in volatile conditions (for example, reviewing stop placement relative to volatility measures). However these may increase losses; execution and slippage risks can rise sharply in fast markets

Other approaches that some traders review:

• Avoid trading crude oil CFDs in the 30 minutes before and after major scheduled data releases.
• Use a longer timeframe chart to identify the prevailing trend before entering on a shorter timeframe, reducing the chance of trading against larger institutional flows.
• Scale into positions in stages rather than committing full size on initial entry.
• Monitor open interest and volume to distinguish between moves with genuine participation and low-liquidity fakeouts.

Whipsawing cannot be eliminated entirely in volatile energy markets. The goal of risk management in these conditions is not to predict which moves will hold, but to ensure that losses on false moves are smaller than gains when a genuine directional move follows.

‍

‍

Practical considerations for volatile Asian markets

Asian markets carry structural characteristics that interact with volatility differently from US or European markets:

• Thinner liquidity during local hours can exaggerate moves on thin volume, particularly in energy and FX CFDs.
• Events in China, including PMI releases, trade data, and PBOC policy signals, can move regional indices.
• BoJ policy decisions have become a more active driver of JPY and Nikkei volatility in recent years.
• Overnight gaps from US session moves are a persistent structural risk for traders unable to monitor positions around the clock.
• Margin requirements on leveraged products can change at short notice during high-VIX periods.

‍

‍

Frequently asked questions about volatility in Asian markets

What does a high VIX reading mean for Asian equity indices?

VIX measures expected volatility on the S&P 500, but elevated readings typically reflect global risk aversion that flows across markets. Asian indices such as the Nikkei 225, Hang Seng, and ASX 200 can often see increased volatility and negative correlation with sharp VIX spikes.

Can 0DTE options be traded during Asian hours?

Access depends on the platform and the specific instrument. US equity index 0DTE options are most actively priced during US trading hours. Asian traders may face wider spreads and less representative pricing outside those hours.

Are algorithmic trading strategies inherently riskier in high-volatility conditions?

Strategies calibrated during low-volatility periods may perform differently in high-VIX environments. Regular review of parameters against current market conditions is prudent for any systematic approach.

Has the JPY safe-haven trade changed permanently?

The Bank of Japan’s policy normalisation has introduced new dynamics, but JPY has continued to strengthen during some risk-off episodes. It may be more conditional on the nature of the shock and the BoJ’s concurrent posture.

What is the best way to set stops on energy CFDs in high-volatility conditions?

There is no universally best method. Many traders reference ATR to calibrate stop distances to prevailing conditions rather than using fixed levels. This does not guarantee exit at the desired price and does not eliminate whipsaw risk.