Market news & insights

Even during the strongest of market trends, prices do not move in straight lines for long.Nor do they move in random lines. Price structure has a tendency to be more like a wave, creating a visual rhythm on a chart. You can think of market structure as the framework on which all price action sits. If you can read structure clearly, it helps everything else make more sense and adds more weight to your decision-making.

Key Principles of Market Structure

Trends vs. Ranges

What you see on a chart is a reflection of sentiment toward the asset you are looking at in real time. Markets will either be trending (moving in one direction for a period of time) or ranging (moving sideways between two price points).A trend shows a strong imbalance between buyers and sellers, while a range shows balance and potential uncertainty about what should happen next.Recognising which environment the price action is in is vital. Trend strategies will often fail in a range, and range strategies will often be punished in a strong trend.

Swing Points

Swing highs and lows are fundamental pieces of price information and are the turning points of price. In an uptrend, the market trend builds with higher swing highs and higher swing lows. In a downtrend, it does the opposite. These points help traders map the direction and strength of a move. A failure to form the expected swing can be an early warning sign of change — a ‘break of market structure’.

Support and Resistance

Past swing levels often act as areas where traders make decisions. A prior swing high may act as resistance (a ceiling where price struggles to break higher), and a prior swing low may act as support (a floor where price struggles to break lower). This happens because many orders — stops, entries, or take-profits — are clustered at these levels.

Order Flow Reflection

Market structure is a reflection of order flow. Simple supply and demand based on the perception that an asset is under- or overpriced compared to its valuation.This is a battle between buyers and sellers over a succession of candles on the chosen timeframe you are looking at. If a series of higher highs is being made, it shows that sentiment-driven buying pressure is consistently strong enough to push prices to new levels. If that rhythm breaks, it tells us something has changed in the underlying supply/demand balance.

Fractality

The strongest structure (arguably) is fractal. What looks like potential noise or range forming on a daily chart may be a clear structure on a 30-minute chart, and vice versa. Imagine you have a group of 100 traders. 25 trade a 15-minute chart, 25 trade an hourly, 25 trade a 4-hourly, and 25 trade a daily.That means a confirmed trade on one timeframe has 25 interested participants, whereas if there is agreement on three, you have 75 traders about to press the entry button. In practical terms, a common approach is to use one or more higher timeframes for context and a short timeframe for entry.The image below shows an uptrend with higher highs and higher lows marked in green and red circles as the trend develops, and then a final breach of the previous swing low — a break of market structure.[caption id="attachment_712309" align="aligncenter" width="686"]

Chart showing the break of market structure[/caption]

What Is a Break of Market Structure?

A Break of Market Structure (BOS) happens when the price no longer follows the established rhythm it has been in for a period of time.Break of Market structure involves either:

• Price stops making higher highs and instead makes a lower low in an uptrend
• Price stops making lower lows and instead makes a higher high in a downtrend

This is the first sign that the “previous market story” that has brought the price to its current level may no longer apply. However, this doesn’t guarantee a full reversal. It may just see price move into a rangebound or sideways holding pattern until more information comes to the market.The bottom line is that it could be a critical clue that the balance of power between buyers and sellers has now shifted.With open trades you may have, it could be the time to consider exiting and moving into something else that is showing a new trend or continuation using the same market structure principles.

Why Is BOS Important to Traders?

Early Warning of Reversal

A BOS can be the very first sign that a trend is ending. Catching the shift early means avoiding overstaying in a trade or getting ready to position yourself for a potential trade in a new direction. Of course, this is a “get ready” and you would only take action when all confluence factors are in place as per your trading plan. i.e., don’t assume it is good until there is evidence that it is actually happening.

Liquidity Insight

Stop clusters are areas where many traders place their stop-loss orders, place profit targets, and where pending orders for entry may also be sitting. Many automated trading models are also primed to take action on a break of market structure within their coding.All of these can create pauses or reversals. Once these have all been swept away, this can be a signal of a BOS, and new momentum may be emerging.This can create a “liquidity sweep.” A liquidity sweep occurs when the price pushes temporarily beyond a swing high/low, triggering stops and attracting breakout traders, before snapping back the other way. In charting terms, you may see a one or two-candle “probe” beyond a key level before reversing. In practical terms, you can account for this in your decision-making by (for example) giving a little space below a previous swing high/low.

Helps Manage Risk

If you’re in a trend trade, a BOS against your position tells you to tighten stops, scale out, or exit. It’s a clear signal that your initial trading idea may no longer be valid, or it might be time to lock in any profits.

Framework for Strategy

Many discretionary traders and automated model builders create whole strategies around BOS events. For example, entering after a liquidity sweep and break, or waiting for retests of the broken market structure levels.

Final Thoughts

Market structure can give you a useful trading map of the evolution of sentiment behind a price move. Understanding this can help you define and act upon a break of structure, which is telling you when the map has changed (or is about to).By developing a greater understanding of the principles of structure, learning what BOS means in practice, and recognising related concepts like stop clusters and liquidity sweeps, traders can gain invaluable insights that help them take practical action to take for entry and exit decision-making.The reality is that most effective strategies will have these principles at their base. A BOS, especially when confirmed with context and market character, is one of the clearest signs of that shift.

The “Magnificent Seven” technology companies are expected to invest a combined $385 billion into AI by the end of 2025.

‍Microsoft is positioning itself as the platform leader. Nvidia dominates the underlying AI infra. Google leads in research. Meta is building open-source tech. Amazon – AI agents. Apple — on-device integration. And Tesla pioneering autonomous vehicles and robots.

With such enormous sums pouring into AI, is this a winner-take-all game?

Or will each of the Mag Seven be able to thrive in the AI future?

Microsoft: The AI Everywhere Strategy

Microsoft has made one of the biggest bets on AI out of the Mag Seven — adopting the philosophy that AI should be everywhere.

Through its deep partnership with OpenAI, of which it is a 49% shareholder, the company has integrated GPT-5 across its entire ecosystem.

‍Key initiatives:

• GPT-5 integration across consumer, enterprise, and developer tools through Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot, and Azure AI Foundry
• Azure AI Foundry for unified AI development platform with model router technology
• Copilot ecosystem spanning productivity, coding, and enterprise applications with real-time model selection
• $100 billion projected AI infrastructure spending for 2025

Microsoft’s centrepiece is Copilot, which can now detect whether a prompt requires advanced reasoning and route to GPT-5's deeper reasoning model.

This (theoretically) means high-quality AI outputs become invisible infrastructure rather than a skill users need to learn.

However, this all-in bet on OpenAI does come with some risks. It is putting all its eggs in OpenAI's basket, tying its future success to a single partnership.

Elon Musk warned that "OpenAI is going to eat Microsoft alive"[/caption]

Google: The Research Strategy

Google’s approach is to fund research to build the most intelligent models possible. This research-first strategy creates a pipeline from scientific discovery to commercial products — what it hopes will give it an edge in the AI race.

‍Key initiatives:

• Over 4 million developers building with Gemini 2.5 Pro and Flash
• Ironwood TPU offering 3,600 times better performance compared to Google’s first TPU
• AI search overviews reaching 2 billion monthly users across Google Search
• DeepMind breakthroughs: AlphaEvolve for algorithm discovery, Aeneas for ancient text interpretation, AlphaQubit for quantum error detection, and AI co-scientist systems

Google’s AI research branch, DeepMind, brings together two of the world's leading AI research labs — Google Brain and DeepMind — the former having invented the Transformer architecture that underpins almost all modern large language models.

The bet is that breakthrough research in areas like quantum computing, protein folding, and mathematical reasoning will translate into a competitive advantage for Google.

Today, we're introducing AlphaEarth Foundations from @GoogleDeepMind , an AI model that functions like a virtual satellite which helps scientists make informed decisions on critical issues like food security, deforestation, and water resources. AlphaEarth Foundations provides a… pic.twitter.com/L1rk2Z5DKk

— Google AI (@GoogleAI) July 30, 2025

Meta: The Open Source Strategy

Meta has made a somewhat contrarian bet in its approach to AI: giving away their tech for free. The company's Llama 4 models, including recently released Scout and Maverick, are the first natively multi-modal open-weight models available.

‍Key initiatives:

• Llama 4 Scout and Maverick - first open-weight natively multi-modal models
• AI Studio that enables the creation of hundreds of thousands of AI characters
• $65-72 billion projected AI infrastructure spending for 2025

This open-source strategy directly challenges the closed-source big players like GPT and Claude. By making AI models freely available, Meta is essentially commoditizing what competitors are trying to monetize. Meta's bet is that if AI models become commoditized, the real value will be in the infrastructure that sits on top. Meta's social platforms and massive user base give it a natural advantage if this eventuates.

Meta's recent quarter was also "the best example to date of AI having a tangible impact on revenue and earnings growth at scale," according to tech analyst Gene Munster.

However, it hasn’t been all smooth sailing for Meta. Their most anticipated release, Llama Behemoth, has all but been scrapped due to performance issues. And Meta is now rumored to be developing a closed-source Behemoth alternative, despite their open-source mantra.

Amazon: The AI Agent Strategy

Amazon’s strategy is to build the infrastructure for AI that can take actions — booking meetings, processing orders, managing workflows, and integrating with enterprise systems.

Rather than building the best AI model, Amazon has focused its efforts on becoming the platform where all AI models live.

‍Key initiatives:

• Amazon Bedrock offering 100+ foundation models from leading AI companies,  including OpenAI models.
• $100 million additional investment in AWS Generative AI Innovation Center for agentic AI development
• Amazon Bedrock AgentCore enabling deployment and scaling of AI agents with enterprise-grade security
• $118 billion projected AI infrastructure spending for 2025

The goal is to become the “orchestrator” that lets companies mix and match the best models for different tasks.

Amazon’s AgentCore will provide the underlying memory management, identity controls, and tool integration needed for these companies to deploy AI agents safely at scale.

This approach offers flexibility, but does carry some risks. Amazon is essentially positioning itself as the middleman for AI. If AI models become commoditized or if companies prefer direct relationships with AI providers, Amazon's systems could become redundant.

Nvidia: The Infra Strategy

Nvidia is the one selling the shovels for the AI gold rush. While others in the Mag Seven battle to build the best AI models and applications, Nvidia provides the fundamental computing infrastructure that makes all their efforts possible.

This hardware-first strategy means Nvidia wins regardless of which company ultimately dominates. As AI advances and models get larger, demand for Nvidia's chips only increases.

‍Key initiatives:

• Blackwell architecture achieving $11 billion in Q2 2025 revenue, the fastest product ramp in company history
• New chip roadmap: Blackwell Ultra (H2 2025), Vera Rubin (H2 2026), Rubin Ultra (H2 2027)
• Data center revenue reaching $35.6 billion in Q2, representing 91% of total company sales
• Manufacturing scale-up with 350 plants producing 1.5 million components for Blackwell chips

With an announced product roadmap of Blackwell Ultra (2025), Vera Rubin (2026), and Rubin Ultra (2027), Nvidia has created a system where the AI industry must continuously upgrade to Nvidia’s newest tech to stay competitive.

This also means that Nvidia, unlike the others in the Mag Seven, has almost no direct AI spending — it is the one selling, not buying.

However, Nvidia is not indestructible. The company recently halted its H20 chip production after the Chinese government effectively blocked the chip, which was intended as a workaround to U.S. export controls.

Apple: The On-Device Strategy

Apple's AI strategy is focused on privacy, integration, and user experience. Apple Intelligence, the AI system built into iOS, uses on-device processing and Private Cloud Compute to help ensure user data is protected when using AI.

‍Key initiatives:

• Apple Intelligence with multi-model on-device processing and Private Cloud Compute
• Enhanced Siri with natural language understanding and ChatGPT integration for complex queries
• Direct developer access to on-device foundation models, enabling offline AI capabilities
• $10-11 billion projected AI infrastructure spending for 2025

The drawback of this on-device approach is that it requires powerful hardware from the user's end.  Apple Intelligence can only run on devices with a minimum of 8GB RAM, creating a powerful upgrade cycle for Apple but excluding many existing users.

Tesla: The Robo Strategy

Tesla's AI strategy focuses on two moonshot applications: Full Self-Driving vehicles and humanoid robots.

This is the 'AI in the physical world' play. While others in the Mag Seven are focused on the digital side of AI, Tesla is building machines that use AI for physical operations.

‍Key initiatives:

• Plans for 5,000-10,000 Optimus robots in 2025, scaling to 50,000 in 2026
• Robotaxi service targeting availability to half the U.S. population by EOY 2025
• AI6 chip development with Samsung for unified training across vehicles, robots, and data centers
• $5 billion projected AI infrastructure spending for 2025

This play is exponentially harder to develop than digital AI, and the markets have reflected low confidence that Tesla can pull it off.

TSLA has been the worst-performing Mag Seven stock of 2025, down 18.37% in H1 2025.

However, if Tesla’s strategy is successful, it could be far more valuable than other AI plays. Robots and autonomous vehicles could perform actual labour worth trillions of dollars annually.

The $385 billion Question

The Mag Seven are starting to see real revenue come in from their AI investments. But they're pouring that money (and more) back into AI, betting that the boom is just getting started.

The platform players like Microsoft and Amazon are betting on becoming essential infrastructure. Nvidia’s play is to sell the underlying hardware to everyone. Google and Meta compete on capability and access. While Apple and Tesla target specific use cases.

The $385 billion question is which of the Magnificent Seven has bet the right way? Or will a new player rise and usurp the long-standing tech giants altogether?

‍You can access all Magnificent Seven stocks and thousands of other Share CFDs on GO Markets.

Traders love to talk about “trading the gap,” but they often skip over the first, and most critical step — defining what a gap is and why it is happening. The reality is that there are multiple types of gaps, and each can offer different opportunities and risks.The key is knowing the type of gap you are dealing with and how to respond.

What Is a Gap?

In price action terms, a gap on a chart occurs when the price jumps from one trading period to the next without any trades in between. It is most commonly seen between the close of one session and the open of the next session across multiple asset classes. Even with assets that trade 24 hours a day, gaps are often seen at the start of the next trading week.

Why Do Gaps Form?

The market is a continuous auction of buyers and sellers, but between sessions or over weekends, new information can drop that affects the market.Economic data releases, corporate earnings announcements, geopolitical developments, and unexpected supply/demand changes can all occur outside of market hours.When the market reopens, the price adjusts instantly to reflect this. If the next available trades are far from the previous close, you get a gap.In continuous markets like forex, gaps most often appear on Monday opens after weekend news, but may show up on intraday charts after unexpected events that cause major liquidity changes.

The Main Types of Gaps

Common Gaps

• Usually small.
• Occur within an established range or trend
• Most likely to fill quickly
• No strong underlying cause
• Successful trades reliant on being there at the time of occurrence

Breakaway Gaps

• Appear at the start of a new trend
• Break out from a long consolidation or key support/resistance
• Driven by strong conviction created by a big event
• Less likely to fill quickly
• Represent a genuine shift in market positioning.

Runaway (Continuation) Gaps

• Tend to occur mid-trend
• Signal momentum in the previous direction is intact
• Often act as future support or resistance levels
• May not fill until the trend is complete

Exhaustion Gaps

• Form near the end of a strong move
• Often result from a final push of buying/selling pressure.
• Price will often reverse after exhaustion gaps as the last participants are trapped

The key is to identify when and which of these four types of gaps is in play and decide whether to fade (trade against) the gap or go with it.

Why Price Often Fills Gaps

The idea of “gap filling” is generally dependent on market mechanics when a gap forms:Traders caught on the wrong side may want to exit near the pre-gap price. Large unfilled orders from before the gap can be sitting in the relevant price range. And if the gap was driven by an emotional overreaction rather than strong fundamentals, the price often reverts to normal.But although gap filling may be a common occurrence, it is not guaranteed. As with any trading approach, risk management is critical, and having a clear set of unambiguous criteria for both entry and exit is a must.Ideally, your risk management should consider the following:

• Knowing the context. Understand whether the gap is technical (range breakout) or news-driven before acting. This impacts the type and longevity of any move.
• Avoid chasing. Gap approaches are always best actioned early to provide a higher probability outcome. Not entering at all and waiting for the next opportunity is better than entering late.
• Place stops strategically. For gap fill approaches, many traders will place stops go beyond the gap extreme, for go trades, stops go just inside the gap.
• Consider the volatility of the underlying asset. Position your trade size accordingly, appropriate to the technical picture and your tolerable level of risk.

Gap Trading Strategies

Gap Fill (Fade) Strategy

This tends to offer the optimum opportunities with common and exhaustion gaps.Traders should be patient and wait for early signs across multiple short timeframes that momentum is fading after the open bar(s).The approach here is to enter in the opposite direction of the price gap move. Profit targets are usually set at a price prior to (but not at) the pre-gap price Stops may be placed just above the initial gap price, and a trailing approach to locking in profit can be used to enable early exit if conditions change.Example: If EURUSD gaps up 40 pips on a quiet Monday with no news, and price struggles to push higher in the first hour, you might consider a short trade with a profit target at Friday’s close.

Gap and Go Strategy

This approach is suited to breakaway or continuation gaps. Traders should look for a move in the gap direction after the first bar with a high-volume confirmation that the pressure is continuing in that direction.Trade entry is in the direction of the gap, and many traders would accumulate further positions should the momentum increase on continuation of a price move. Initial stops are often placed just inside the gap, giving a little space to accommodate market noise and a potential retest. Aim to capture momentum, with a trailing stop approach to ride the trend aligned with any accumulation into the positionExample: Oil price gaps up on a Monday after Friday's COT (commitment of traders) data release, suggesting a change in institutional interest and breaks out from a 1-month range on high volume.Important: Both these strategies, although they can often be seen at the same initial gap on a chart, are different in terms of entry and exit approaches. They merit a separation in terms of trading plan and should not be combined as a single approach with a variation.

Final Thoughts

Gap trading is as much about identifying context and having clear criteria for what constitutes a gap. A real edge with gap trading comes from understanding why it has formed, what type it is, and early identification of what is happening.Whether you trade gaps manually or with an EA, it is good to remember that a gap is simply the space; any opportunity will come from reading what that space is telling you.

Scaling in and out of positions is one of the most effective ways to maximise opportunity while managing risk. But it is also one of the easiest areas to let emotions take over, rather than having a clear systemised set of rules within a trading plan.If done well, scaling in can help you capitalise on strong trends without taking excessive initial risk, and scaling out can protect profits while still leaving room for the trade to run. If done poorly, it can lead to overexposure, premature exits, and a confused trading record that is difficult to evaluate.

Your Scaling Checklists

By having clearly defined rules for scaling in and out, you remove uncertainty during live market conditions, create consistency, and ensure that each of your trading actions aligns closely with your overall risk and performance objectives.Use the checklists below to help create your own rules and integrate these criteria into your written trading plan.

Scaling In Checklist:

CategoryChecklist ItemPre-Trade Plan for ScalingScaling strategy defined before entry (pyramiding, fixed lot add-on, % equity add-on, etc.) Maximum total exposure per instrument set (lots or % of account) Price level(s) or technical conditions for add-ons are pre-defined Risk per add-on is calculated, sothe combined stop placement keeps the total risk within the planTechnical & Market Conditions CheckOriginal trade is already in profit by a set buffer (e.g., +1R or above breakeven) Market structure still supports the trade thesis (trend intact, no reversal signs) Key support/resistance is not immediately ahead of the price Volatility and liquidity remain healthy — no widening spreads or news shock riskExecution RulesAdd-on triggered by pre-defined signal — technical pattern, breakout, retracement entry Stop-loss for add-on set, so the combined position risk is controlled Position size adjusted to account for existing open risk All add-ons logged in a journal with rationale and levelRisk ContainmentHave a defined cap on the number of scale-ins (e.g., max 3 total entries per trade) Combined positions’ stop reviewed and adjusted where appropriate Portfolio correlation checked — scaling in doesn’t overexpose to a single asset class

Scaling Out Checklist:

CategoryChecklist ItemPre-Defined Scaling Out RulesProfit targets for partial closes set in advance (price levels, trailing stops, % move) Minimum portion to leave running defined — e.g., 25% of position Scaling method chosen, e.g., fixed lots, % of original size, ATR-based, or structure-basedMarket & Trade Condition CheckPrice has reached the first profit-taking zone (support/resistance, measured move, fib level) Technical signs of slowing momentum or potential reversal are visible Volatility spike or news risk approaching that could threaten open profits Trade has met or exceeded the minimum R target — e.g., 2RExecution RulesPartial close executed according to plan — no hesitation or emotional overrides Stop-loss on remaining position tightened if conditions warrant Take-profit levels for the remaining position are re-evaluated after partial closePost-Scale ReviewDocument in journal: reason for scaling out, % closed, remaining size, new stop Track performance impact of scaling — did partial exits improve net profitability or reduce potential gains? Adjust future scaling-out rules based on review data

Final Thoughts

The goal of scaling in and out is not to make a trade “feel” safer or more profitable, but to execute a pre-planned sequence of actions that have the potential to enhance your overall performance and better meet your trading goals. Whether you are attempting to add to an existing position or lock in gains for a specific trade, every adjustment should be intentional, tested, and documented.This disciplined approach can help turn your scaling approaches into something of consistent benefit, rather than a hit-or-miss, heat-of-the-moment type of tactic that most traders use.

Many traders begin their exploration of indicators with the assumption that “more tools” equals “more clarity.” The result is stacking indicator after indicator into the chart in the hope that it will reveal the perfect moment for entry when everything aligns.But rather than offering clarity, it often results in conflict with some indicators suggesting “buy,” while another says “wait.”

What Are Indicators and What Are They Not?

Indicators are tools, not predictors.They don’t forecast the future, they analyse past price movement and associated variables and relationships using mathematical formulas. They cannot tell you with certainty what will happen next, eliminate risk, prevent losses, or work consistently in every market condition with every asset type.However, this does not mean they are not useful. Previous price action does have an influence on current price movement. What indicators can help with is quantifying market behaviour up to a point in time. They provide context for current price action and have a strong role in defining potential risk parameters like stops or targets.Price action should always be king for both entry and exit trading decisions. But some confluence (the level of agreement or refuting what you see in price) relating to the overall context can also be key to system development and implementation.Additionally, strong, specific, and unambiguous objective criteria can offer some clarity and consistency in action, which is crucial for performance evaluation.

What Are You Actually Measuring?

You should never use an indicator as part of your decisions unless you know what it is telling you about the market. Indicators are at their most powerful when combined with current price action and market structure (e.g., key levels).Most indicators fall into one of four core types:

1. Trend-Following Indicators

Examples: Moving Averages (MA), MACD, ADXWhat they do: Smooth price to identify direction and filter out potential market noiseHow they help: Keep you trading in the dominant direction. e.g., by checking trends on longer timeframes or through comparison of different period MA’s can give confirmation that trend may be nearing its end, changing, or has changed already.

2. Momentum Indicators

Examples: RSI, Stochastic, What they do: Measure the speed and strength of price movesHow they help: Can help spot overbought/oversold areas that mean the market may be more likely to change. Some also utilize them to look for divergence in direction versus price as a suggestion that things may be about to change.

3. Volatility Indicators

Examples: ATR, Bollinger Bands,What they do: Measure how far the price is moving within a specified chart time windowHow they help: Stop loss and take profit level placement. e.g., a multiple of current ATR may help anticipate breakouts and can be used in some mean reversion strategies on a price reversal or bounce.

4. Volume-Based Indicators

Examples: Volume Profile, Average, and relative volumeWhat they do: Indicate buying and selling activity behind price moves.How they help: Show commitment behind a move and may indicate the strength of a move or deviation from the norm.Where they fail: Limited usefulness in markets with unreliable volume data (e.g., spot FX)

Common Indicator Errors

1. Stacking Indicators That Do the Same Thing

This is probably the most common mistake people make with indicators.For example, using RSI and Stochastic at the same time —they're both momentum indicators. This leads to confirmation bias, not confidence.

2. Only Trading When Everything Aligns

Waiting for all your indicators to “line up” may delay good trades. This should not take away from having clear criteria articulated in your trading plan, but if you have a system that is too complex, you will find it becomes too hard to implement, and you end up ignoring your criteria anyway.

3. Attempting to Use Indicators to Fix a Poor System

“If I just add this one more indicator filter, I can avoid bad trades.”This is rarely the case. The primary reasons traders run into problems are that their system is poorly defined or there are problems following it. Adding yet another indicator to the many you may already have is unlikely to make any difference. This mindset leads to paralysis. Risk is part of trading — indicators refine edge, not remove risk.

4. Following Signals Without Price Action or Market Context

Blindly buying on MACD crossover or RSI below 30 not only ignores actual price but also other key factors such as market structure, news, sentiment, or time of day, all of which can have a massive impact on what happens next.

Purposeful Use of Indicators

The most effective traders simplify. They use fewer indicators but aim to use them in a better way. Here is some practical guidance that is worth considering:Use One or Two Indicators Per Function:

• One trend filter (e.g., 50 EMA)
• One volatility tool (e.g,. ATR for stops)
• One timing/momentum indicator (e.g., RSI)

This will help keep your chart clean, your strategy simpler, and your decision-making fast.Make Each Indicator Answer a Specific Question:Before you add any decision-making tool to your chart, consider what question you are trying to answer about your trading idea and which indicator serves this best.Use Indicators to Support Structure — Not Replace It:Remember that it is price that tells the story. Indicators provide extra evidence to support any price-based decision.

Indicator Audit Checklist

This 6-question checklist can help you decide whether to keep, remove, or replace an indicator on your chart.QuestionYesNoDoes this indicator provide information I don’t get elsewhere?Worth keepingLikely redundantDo I understand how it is calculated and what it is measuring?Use it with confidenceLearn it or remove itDoes it align with my trading style?RelevantMisalignedDoes it help me make faster/more confident decisions?Value-addingCluttering judgmentIs it part of a clearly defined process?PurposefulArbitraryHave I backtested or forward-tested it within my system?ProvenDangerous guesswork

Final Thoughts

Indicators are not the enemy of the trader, but it is clear that the indiscriminate use of them may be ill-advised.Consider carefully what you are going to put on your chart, making sure that you strive for clarity in your trading system processes first, and then indicators can prove to be invaluable.

Despite all of the enthusiasm, energy, and airplay entries receive, it is your exit that determines if your trade is considered successful or not.Yet most traders, even those with experience, continue to obsess over how to get into a trade, often treating the exit as an afterthought in comparison. They can recite their setup criteria at the drop of a hat, providing great step-by-step (and often complex) details. But when asked, “How do you decide when to get out?” that clarity and thoroughness are noticeably absent or vague. No matter what type of trader you are, it is your exit strategy that shapes your risk-reward, determines your win rate, and ultimately defines your trading edge.

Why Most Traders Struggle With Exits

Exiting trades effectively is more difficult than entering.Not only are you trying to read what is currently happening, but there is a level of prediction needed to decide what may happen next.Let’s start with the three most common exit challenges that traders face:

1. Emotional Exits

Many traders close positions prematurely. Not because their setup failed or their exit plan is unclear, but simply because they feel increasingly uncomfortable. This usually stems from fear of giving back existing profit or getting sucked in emotionally to every price move and market noise.This inconsistency in action makes it difficult to determine if your trading strategy is effective. You constantly adjust actions that deviate from your planned strategy, rather than having evidence of performance and how to refine it.

2. Fixed Exits That Don’t Fit the Market

Some traders apply the same x pips/points risk-reward target for every trade, regardless of volatility, current market structure, instrument pricing, direction, or timeframe. While mechanical consistency has its place, ignoring market context can lead to premature exits in trending conditions, overstretched targets in low-volatility environments, and stops too tight to withstand normal price noise.Your exit approaches need to be dynamic to reflect market behaviour. A 20-pip exit might be fine for a 30-minute chart, but it is completely inappropriate for a 4-hourly trade. Consider using variables that adjust with the underlying asset, timeframe, and volatility. E.g., an ATR multiple rather than set points or pips.

3. Poor Exit Plan on Entry

The number one cardinal sin is to have an absent or poorly defined exit plan. When your exits are not effectively pre-planned, decisions are always reactive. As you watch the screen, waiting to "see what happens," you are more likely to:

• Hesitate when you should not
• Regret when you see what you should have done and did not
• Miss regular opportunities for profit
• Sustain larger losses than you should have

You can have the most amazing entry approaches in the world, but if you haven’t made the strategic decision on when and how to exit, your trading outcomes will fall short of expectations.

Reframing Your Exit

To improve your exits, you need to treat them as a strategic component of your system, not a secondary detail. A good exit plan is always:

• Intentional – You know why you’re exiting, consistent with your overall trading objective and financial situation
• Structured – You know how you’re going to exit before you place the trade.
• Adaptive – Your criteria and approaches can adjust to the type of trade or market conditions.
• Consistent – You execute your exit criteria with discipline and consistency, not emotionally driven impulse.

Types of Exit Strategies

Profit Target and Stop-Loss Structure

Even if you are using price action (or another exit approach) for stop loss placement, you should still consider a “safety net” stop to manage a possible catastrophic candle or gap.Ideally, these should be based on something that responds to instrument and timeframe idiosyncrasies.

Signal-Based Exits

This falls into the profit risk category. With signal-based exits, we are looking for a situation where a technical reversal happened before a trail stop being triggered.An example of this could be that you see a technical double top forming as a reversal signal on a long trade (or double bottom on a short trade).

Partial Closes

Although this is not a full exit approach, it is good for the management of profit risk. There are two scenarios where this may be considered:

1. The price has moved a predetermined level towards your ultimate profit.
2. As an alternative to full exit — it can limit risk while retaining some interest in the trade and locking in profit before a predictable market-moving event.

Moving Forward with Exits

Exit strategy is a process of evaluating where you are now and then putting in the work to fill in any gaps.Here’s a simple six-point audit checklist tool you can use to review your trade exits:QuestionYesNoWas my exit plan defined before I entered the trade?☐☐Did I follow my exit logic without emotional interference?☐☐Was the exit based on price structure, volatility, or a technical signal?☐☐Did my exit strategy align with the type of trade?☐☐Was I satisfied with the efficiency of the exit (profit vs. potential)?☐☐Would I exit the same way again if the trade repeated?☐☐

Final Thoughts

You have equal control of exits as you have over entries. It is your responsibility to exercise that control if you are serious about moving forward with your trading.Professional traders define where to get out before they get in. They accept that some trades will reverse, others will trail out, but the aim should be long-term consistency in action.The exit is the point at which you either receive your market “pay-check” or effectively manage capital risk so you are ready for the next opportunity. It is worth the equal effort and commitment that you give to your trade entries.