Berita & analisis pasar

Let’s make things very clear – Australia’s inflation rate is plateauing in fact I would argue it’s starting to reaccelerate in areas Australia can least afford. From a trading and momentum perspective this needs explaining. Stronger Than Expected Print April's CPI data exceeded expectations and was at the very top of the surveyed range.

Headline CPI increased by 3.6% YoY, well ahead of the consensus of 3.3% YoY. Seasonally adjusted, the increase was even higher at 3.8% YoY. Both the headline and core CPI rose for the third consecutive month.

This is a major concern. Now, the monthly increase slowed sequentially to 0.2% MoM, annual headline inflation has risen every month in 2024. Then the RBA’s core: trimmed mean inflation rose from 4.0% to 4.1%, and the ex-volatiles measure increased from 4.1% to 4.2%, with a three-month annualized rate of 5%, there is clear daylight between the RBA’s target band of 2%-3% and the core measure of inflation Here is the chart of the three main figures.

Monthly CPI Indicator annual moment (%) All this makes the RBA’s ‘narrow path’ almost unattainable. A point not lost on the AUD and the ASX as seen by each one’s initial reactions. ASX 200 v AUD/USD Source: Refinitiv Broadening Persistence However, with the passage of time the data is throwing up bigger concerns – and that is the persistence of price pressures in areas that make up large parts of the CPI basket.

The expectation for a weaker April CPI print was based partly on the skew towards goods in the sampling for the first month of the quarter which have been in structural decline. However, both goods and services contributed to the rise. Notable increases were seen in categories such as: Fruit and vegetables: from -1.2% YoY to 3.5% YoY Apparel: from 0.3% YoY to 2.4% YoY, with a 4% MoM increase Healthcare: from 4.1% YoY to 6.1% YoY The upside surprise was mainly due to significant increases in volatile expenditure items, including: Fruit: +7.3% MoM Oils and fats: +4.6% Women's garments: +4.5% Children's garments: +6.8% Accessories: +3.6% Furniture: +3.3% International holiday travel and accommodation: +11% These items constitute 7.5% of the CPI basket and largely explain the forecast miss.

Then you have clothing, which was expected to fall by 0.4%, rose by 4.1%. Furnishings, household equipment, and services, expected to be flat, all increased by around 0.6%. Recreation and culture, predicted to rise by 0.8%, actually went up by 2.3% in April.

This point was not lost on the Bond market with both the 3-year and 10-year Australian bonds surge on the data seen here: Australian 3-yr and 10yr Bond reactions Source: Refinitiv (Blue 3-year, White 10-year) Goods Prices Acceleration You can certainly explain away the volatile items as being affected by the early Easter period and a correction in the March data that had these items under pressure. But that ignores the seasonal and 3- and 6-month averages which are still high. You can also ignore the volatile international travel and accommodation sector, which accounted for much of the forecast miss, but again you can’t ignore the acceleration in goods prices where deflation was expected.

Categories such as clothing & footwear, furniture, and other major household and electronic appliances, typically measured once per quarter, suggest that goods inflation will likely remain strong. The monthly measurement of goods inflation rose by 0.9% in April, adding 0.2 percentage points to the headline monthly CPI, marking the largest increase since April last year. Services Inflation – the ‘sticking’ point One of the floors with the April CPI print is that is was heavy on goods prices but light on services.

This will be reversed in May - services prices are expected to remain fairly sticky. These are the areas the media like to quote like dentists and hairdressers. But somewhat cheapens the services that do move the dial, rents, telecommunications, financial service and insurances etc. these are big components of the CPI basket.

Considering the upside miss in April and the anticipated persistence of services inflation in May and June, the consensus now for Q2 headline CPI has been upwardly revised to 0.9% QoQ (range of 0.6% to 1.2%), that implys an annual reading of 3.7%. For core inflation (trimmed-mean), it has been adjusted to 0.8% QoQ, implying an annual reading of 3.8% - which is in line with the RBA’s new forecast. Implications for the RBA The implications from this CPI print will challenge the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

It does pressure its assumption that the re-acceleration in inflation in Q1 would quickly revert. The unexpected strength in goods in particular coupled with sticky services suggests more persistent inflationary pressure than initially anticipated. It also shows that ‘inflation psychology’ is real – there is an argument to be made that spending has maintained on the ‘idea’ cuts would come because inflation is falling.

Which has left enough demand in the economy to hold inflation up. So, does this imply the RBA is about to raise rates? Here is the market’s pricing on that idea.

Interestingly enough despite the hawkish risks, the likelihood of the RBA hiking rates is still tempered in the market and explains why the AUD in the hours since the CPI has moderated. Why? Emerging signs of activity weakness.

Retail sales have been weak, corroborated by several companies reporting soft trading updates. Then there was Q1 construction work done which was released at the same time as the CPI data - significantly missed expectations (-2.9% QoQ versus the expected 0.5%) that is a huge miss. Things the RBA will be watching over the coming week is the Fair Work Commission's Minimum Wage decision on Monday and the Q1 GDP release next Wednesday.

These events will be crucial in assessing the broader economic outlook and potential RBA policy responses. Anything that has an upside surprise should be seen as a AUD positive and an index negative. The RBA will likely need to jawbone this result to further slow household demand for non-essential items, which is way we highlight the ‘inflation psychology’ term and the effect ‘anticipation’ is having.

However, as the market and economist point out it is unlikely that the RBA will increase interest rates again, as this would disproportionately impact households already struggling under tight financial conditions. Thus – we are stuck in this weird holding pattern and as other central banks around the world begin to cut rates it will attract flows to the AUD and its higher yields. There is a silver lining here too – as countries cut due to their respective disinflation moves and thus cheaper imports, this will benefit Australia’s inflation problem but that is a way off and the AUD will remain attractive for a while to come.

The USD saw decent strength in Wednesdays session, with The US Dollar Index (DXY) rising from an open of 104.67, pushing through the resistance at 105 to hit a high of 105.14 on the back of firmer US Treasury yields. Despite this rally DXY is heading into the end of the month looking to have its first monthly decline since December 2023. Ahead today we have US GDP as well as several Fed speakers, including Williams at the Economic Club of NY.

JPY declines against a resurgent USD with rising US yields pushing the US10Y-JP10y rate differential higher. USDJPY remained above 157.00 and pushing to a high of 157.74 and back in the April intervention zone. Remarks from BoJ Board Member Adachi, who stated that if excessive Yen falls are prolonged and expected to affect the achievement of the BoJ's price target, responding with monetary policy becomes an option, failing to help the Yen significantly.

AUD, and to some extent NZD, saw some short lived strength after a hotter than expected Aussie CPI reading in the APAC session. This strength did fade in the UK and US session with both the AUD and NZD currencies resuming their weakness, tracking risk appetite. AUDUSD just holing above the psychological 0.66 level heading into Thursdays APAC session.

We know that this is slightly contrary to the consensus views but we think it needs to be said. The communication from the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) is unusually unclear, confusing and conflicted. The view conveyed in statement, press conference and minutes currently we would argue counter each other.

And the reason for this we believe is because the RBA is a reluctant hawk and is frightened to act. Let us now present why we think this and what it will mean for FX and yields in particular. The RBA has just completed a mass review of its operations and one of the key changes was to improve transparency.

This included press conferences, extended meetings, and more public discussions from members. The catch with this has been the mixed communications. Take for example the statement which was extremely ambiguous.

It was filled with terms like uncertainty, mixed signals, and complexity. It explains why the statement has this line: ‘the path of interest rates that will best ensure that inflation returns to target in a reasonable timeframe remains uncertain and the Board is not ruling anything in or out.’ That’s fair – things are complex and we understand why the board is waiting for more data. That was countered with this: ‘ The Board remains resolute in its determination to return inflation to target and will do what is necessary to achieve that outcome.’ Historically, whenever the Board has included such a resolute statement in its communications, they followed up with a cut or a hike in the preceding meetings – the frightened hawk is there and strongly suggests that a rate hike is likely.

The initial AUD reaction to the statement we think shows why the communication is mixed. Then take the press conference – Governor Bullock’s were much stronger than the statement, indicating a significant stance, not really clear in the statement. As mentioned, the Board stated they are not ruling anything in or out, but in reality, they have dismissed the possibility of rate cuts.

That was confirmed when Bullock was asked on this exact point and confirmed that rate hikes were the only things discussed. There was no ongoing discussion about cuts in the near or medium term as they do not expect inflation to reach their target by mid-2026. The Board’s concern is that inflation is notably higher than expected, employment is solid and that overall demand is still generating inflation.

The reaction to all this was clear here: The next notable reaction was the interbank market. All though it doesn’t appear like much in this chart. Please understand this change is actually from a ‘cut’ to ‘hike’ so yes there is a 10% chance of a hike, that is from a 10% chance of a cut.

July will be crucial with substantial data releases, including the second quarter CPI (July 31), GDP figures, and the wage price index. Current forecasts suggest that inflation and employment are performing better than expected, raising concerns about the need for a potential harder landing in the economy to return inflation back to target. The focus is now shifting towards slowing down the economy further despite the per capita recession because in the RBA’s view the impact on the household’s price power in the future from high inflation is still too high.

Future Rate Decisions All things being equal – with the RBA turning itself in knots and trying so hard to stay the course the RBA's commentary suggests it still has preference to hold rates if possible. The big issue as it acknowledges is the possible need for near term tightening due to a lack of progress towards inflation targets. Here is the market’s forecast for rates post the meeting on Tuesday Which probably explains the AUD/USD reactions in the following 24 hours It flatlined – thus the market is telling us that it needs a catalyst, and those catalysts are clearly coming in July.

So to finish what’s the key? A significant upside surprise in the RBA's core inflation measure could lead to a rate hike, despite slowing demand and labour market conditions. We get the monthly inflation data next week, this will be the first strike then the July 31 quarterly read.

This will be huge and will be the biggest AUD mover outside of an RBA meeting. We will be providing as much information on this release the closer we get to the release. However as shown the RBA is a terrified hawk and without this inflation beat, the risk of further tightening diminishes, with expectations for the RBA to remain on hold until potentially the first rate cut in February 2025.

The next RBA meeting on August 6 it’s going to be an interesting 6 weeks for AUD traders ahead of what is a likely live event.

Entries for longer-term stock investment approaches can be based on either long-term technical trends or more commonly, fundamental data related to a company’s current and projected performance. Despite the plethora of such suggestions, there is often a lack of clear guidance, or even a complete absence, of instructions on determining the timing of an exit from a long-term position. Logically, whether it’s a short-term technical entry or long-term fundamental entry, many of the “rules of the game” are similar, including the need for clear and unambiguous exit strategies seems paramount for consistently positive investment outcomes.

The approach originally used to make an entry decision can serve as a good starting point but there are other considerations that can potentially benefit outcomes. This article aims to briefly describe six potential exit approaches you could consider, providing some detail and examples as to how to action your chosen approach. Target Price Exit Strategy Setting Targets: Determine a fair value (and thus exit price target) by conducting in-depth fundamental analysis, utilizing metrics like Price-to-Earnings ratio (P/E), Cash flow, debt levels, book value, or longer-term technical levels.

On-going monitoring: Regularly track the price against this target. For example, if you calculate a fair value for a stock at $50, and it’s currently trading at $45, you might decide to sell once it reaches or exceeds $50. Other Considerations: Regularly review and adjust the target price, taking into account changes in fundamental factors impacting the relevant sector or market as a whole.

Ongoing Fundamental Awareness Ongoing Analysis: Continuously evaluate underlying fundamentals, such as earnings, balance sheets, cash flow, and management quality. Be vigilant not only when next company reporting dates are due but also for the often-unpredictable release of operational updates or changes in guidance. Trigger Points: Identify specific company indicators or information that would prompt an exit.

An example of this may be a sustained decline in revenue or mounting debt levels, particularly when beyond what was originally expected. Other Considerations: Implementing this strategy requires consistent research and a nuanced understanding of the particular business and industry factors influencing the investment. Having the optimum resources in place to be able to do this is vital and identifying these should be a primary goal of any fundamental investor.

Economic & Sector Changes On-going Analysis: Regularly review broader economic indicators like GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, or industry trends. Understand how such changes in these key data points may correlate with the asset price and establish exit criteria accordingly.For example, you may reconsider a position in a technology stock if there’s a widespread shift away from tech spending or growth concerns or regulatory changes that detrimentally affect the sector. Other Considerations: This strategy necessitates a broad understanding of economic cycles, industry dynamics, and how these elements interact with your particular investment holdings.

Additionally, it’s worth noting that appropriate resources should be in place to ascertain this as proactively as possible, or at worst in a timely manner. This may assist in preventing excess depreciation in asset price to the point where action is delayed and major capital damage has occurred. Dividend Targeted Approaches On-going Analysis: If part of your entry criteria and anticipated return from fundamental analysis-oriented trades is based on dividend yield to some degree, it is worthwhile to not only look at what is current but also perform ongoing evaluation of the reliability and/or growth of dividends.

Exit Criteria: Having established an expected return, it logically makes sense to have criteria in place to help decision making. For example a decrease in dividend yield below a certain threshold or a cut in dividends could be part of your potential exit plan for a specific investment. Other Considerations: As well as vigilance for the timing of company announcements where dividend changes are often announced, awareness of the yield of your current investment compared to others, and industry trends is required, as they could influence the sector and the market as a whole.

Time-Based Exits On-going Analysis: Often with time-based exits, there is alignment with a particular impending event. Examples of this type of event include a shift to EVs from petrol-fuelled cars or the impact on assets in the lead-up to an election. Either way, your investment time horizon needs to be reviewed should there be a change in circumstances and the rationale behind your initial thinking on entry.

Other Considerations: There is a discipline involved in exiting from a stock position that remains strong even after an event, or the impact of such, has passed. With a systematic approach to fundamental entries in place, it is legitimate to review whether other fundamental approach criteria are met and perhaps consider continuing to hold. Without this in place, or if no match with other approaches exists, logic would dictate that a planned exit is an exit, and you should action it as such, no matter how well this specific position has served you to date.

Portfolio Rebalancing On-going Analysis: Although not based on a specific entry approach, periodically evaluate your overall portfolio asset allocation is prudent. Reviewing whether the current holdings are still a fit with long-term investment aims and risk tolerance in current and ongoing market circumstances are appropriate rebalancing considerations. Rebalancing Exit Approach: Criteria for rebalancing should be pre-planned and clearly defined.

These may require consideration of multiple factors, such as an asset becoming an excessive portion of the portfolio on good performance, or changes in market or economic circumstances that threaten specific portions of the portfolio. Other Considerations: Continuous monitoring of the portfolio is required, and checking continuing congruence with desired asset allocation and your risk profile is vital. Rather than based on a specific entry approach, just to reinforce that the concept of rebalancing is one that is important across all of the approaches described above.

Summary Although they receive little “airplay” in comparison to technical approaches and exits, the exit strategies within a portfolio based on fundamental analysis entries are multifaceted, frequently interconnected, and equally important to master. Crafting a proficient exit system demands a comprehensive knowledge of each specific investment holding, and wider market and economic dynamics, in the context of your personal investment objectives, and risk tolerance. The need for a set of written system criteria for all actions, regular monitoring, thorough analysis, and disciplined adherence to predetermined exit criteria are essential.

The European Central Bank (ECB) is set to announce its interest rate policy this Thursday. Market participants are widely expecting the rate to remain on hold, but most importantly, the “language” and the “tone” of the statement will be closely watched. It is unlikely that there will be any surprises from the ECB policy meeting and they are expected to maintain the current guidance about ending bond purchases and keeping rates on hold.

Despite being mostly uneventful, it should stay on the Euro traders radar as policymakers have been slightly more hawkish on the underlying inflation pressures recently and some have even highlighted the possibility of bringing forward the timing of the first rate hike. The growing uncertainty around the Italian budget and fiscal position will be the main significant issue that investors will be keen to watch. This week, the European Commission officially rejected Italy’s budget proposal.

The proposal of the deficit is definitely below the 3% EU deficit ceiling, but the EU was hoping that Italy will curb its massive debt given that they are the second largest public government debt pile in Europe after the Greeks. The debt to equity ratio in Italy currently stands at 131.81% of its GDP, and market participants are concerned on the country’s ability to repay its debt. European leaders have ramped up pressure on Italy over its public spending plans and gave unprecedented warnings.

Source: National Institute of Statistics All eyes will, therefore, be on the President Draghi’s comments on Italy’s budget woes to gauge the thoughts on the developments in Italy and the possible effects it may have on the Eurozone economy. Investors will also closely watch how the ECB is balancing the “external” risks that have become more prominent over the coming months: Threat of protectionism Vulnerabilities in the emerging markets Financial Market Volatility

Ideally, as traders, our aim is often to identify potential entries at the start of a new trend (so “first in the queue”) and exit at the end of that trend. Of course, we often will identify a price move where a trend may already be established and are therefore faced with the decision as to “join in” mid-trend (we hope) with the aim of catching the rest of a trend move. The concern of this approach is of course the fear of potentially entering just prior to that trend changing.

There are “clues” we can use, such as candle body/wick size and volume which may help, but also there is a group of indicators termed ‘oscillators’ which work on the idea that there are points in a price move which the underlying asset (be it a Forex pair or CFD) may be overbought (and hence a long trade could be deemed riskier), and oversold (where a short trade may be termed riskier). Although the Relative Strength Index (RSI) which we covered previous in an article (review "Adding the RSI to your entry or exit trading plan? "), is possibly a more commonly used oscillator for determining oversold and overbought situations, the stochastic although possibly seen as being slightly more complex, does appear to be frequently used by more experienced traders. This article aims to shed some light on how this indicator is used and what it may be showing you relative to price movement.

What is the stochastic trying to tell us? As with the RSI the Stochastic is an oscillator (whose value can theoretically lie between 0-100) which has identified key levels which may indicate whether a particular asset is overbought or oversold. A move into either of these two “zones” may suggest a trend change is more likely to be imminent.

The key levels are below 20 (oversold) and above 80 (overbought). See below a 30-minute chart for GBP/USD with the stochastic added using the default system settings (we have added horizontal lines from the drawing tools to make the key levels clearer. We will discuss settings later and the additional line but at a simple level, taking the blue line on the stochastic if it moves below 20, then you would be cautious and perhaps avoid entering a short trade (examples A and B), and perhaps avoid entering a long trade if it moves above 80 (see example C).

And the other dotted line? There are two lines that form the stochastic namely: %K (usually a solid line) – In this case blue as previously referenced above. %D (usually a dotted line) and is a moving average of %K (often set as an exponential) Slowing periods may also be set (default is 3). As a rule, the slower (bigger number the less “noisy” i.e. you will see less overbought and oversold conditions).

And how can it be used? a. As an additional entry criteria “tick” As referenced earlier, for entry, traders may use this as an additional tick (when other indicators may suggest entry) to make sure they do not enter a long trade on an overbought currency pair/CFD, or short trade on an oversold currency pair/CFD. b. As a warning to prepare for exit action in an open trade Though less commonly discussed, it would appear logical that if in a long trade for example and the Stochastic moves into an over-bought position this could be a warning to consider exit (more commonly used as a signal to tighten a trailing stop loss) c.

As a primary reversal signal Additionally, some traders may look to buy when moving out of an oversold situation when the EMA dotted line crosses the solid blue line. (and of course, the reverse when overbought). It would be rare to use this in isolation with no other indicators, using increasing volume, and candle change recognition would often be used also. The relatively fast default settings (5,3,3) may merit some review anyway but particularly in this case.

Which settings? As with any indicator you are in control of the settings and what you use for you is of course your choice. With the chart below, we have used the default 5,3,3 and added a 21,7, 7 to illustrate the difference of a less noisy set of perimeters.

In Summary Ultimately, and to finish, it is of course your choice as to which criteria you use for entry and exit. Remember, whatever these are for you, the key lessons of: a. specifically identifying how you are to use the criteria within your plan, b. the importance of forward-testing (as well as back-testing) of any system change, c. and of course, the discipline of following through are ALL critical whether you use the Stochastic, RSI or neither.