As we sit here and review the last weeks of 2024, it has dawned on us that 2024 was the year of wanting everything and getting nothing. Now that might sound like a ridiculous statement considering equities across the MSCI world are averaging double digit returns for 2024. In fact in the US they are on track for two consecutive years of 20% gains or more.

So we certainly gained something, but what we have come to realise is that 2024 was a year of anticipation and more anticipation and more anticipation but nothing being delivered particularly here in Australia. So let us put forward our reasoning. 1. RBA Rates – Pricing v the reality At the start of 2024 it's hard to believe that three rate cuts were fully priced into the cash right by December this year.

The pricing versus the reality facing the RBA in 2024 was one reason that we have probably seen muted movements in currencies and bond markets. We do need to commend the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) for navigating what has been a perplexing year in 2024. As mentioned, we start the year influenced by global central banks for multiple rates, driven in particular by the U.S.

Federal Reserve. However, by mid-year, pricing shifted so dramatically it moved through 189 basis points to be factoring in not one but up to four rate increases as inflation remained in a state of suspension as sticky components slow the rate of change and has seen underlying inflation holding at 3.5% and above. Despite this the RBA held rates steady throughout the year and has now adopted a dovish tone at its December meeting.

This is key – its 2024 cautious approach is seeing a 2025 pivotal shift and the board is now making it clear that its focus of managing inflation risks is starting to switch to addressing growth concerns. Market forecasting has easing beginning at the April meeting, the range from economists is February through to May 2025. Whenever it starts, the consensus between the market and the theoretical world is the same – one cut will bring several and come December 2025 the belief is the cash rate will be as low as 3.6%. 2.

Labour Market The other factor that has kept the RBA on the sidelines has been employment. IF we were to look at employment in isolation it should be championed. Underemployment, underutilisation and unemployment as a whole is – strong.

It has completely defied expectations in 2024, with employment levels reaching record highs and participation levels for the population and women in particular also at records. It should be noted that part of the reasoning for this is robust immigration, cautious corporate behaviour toward redundancies and then the big one public sector hiring. Surges in hires for education, healthcare, and hospitality, drove public sector resilience, offsetting weakness in private sectors like manufacturing, mining, and financial services.

What could force a change here is the 2025 Federal election – a minority government or even a change of government could lead to fiscal restraint and dampen employment growth, while a surprising downturn in job data could prompt the RBA to expedite rate cuts and increase the amount of cuts as well. Something traders will need to have their fingers on. 3. Record level Wage Growth Wage growth, a key concern earlier in the tightening cycle, moderated in 2024, easing pressure on policymakers both on the fiscal and monetary side.

At one point their wages were growing at levels not seen since record began. However, it did coincide with an inflation level of a similar rate meaning real wages were flat. Looking into 2025, wages remain a concern for rate watches for the following reasons: Minimum wage has consistently followed the inflation rate with a premium suggesting the will increase exceeding 3.5%.

Industrial relations reforms over the past 2 years have embedded wage rigidity. Finally accelerating wage increases in Enterprise Bargaining Agreements are now averaging 4%. Without corresponding productivity gains, these dynamics could challenge the RBA’s assumptions, complicating the path to rate cuts. 4.

Gravity defying markets Earnings multiples of the ASX 200 and its sector have soared in 2024. It’s a reflection of the optimism bordering on exuberance about peak interest rates and an imminent easing cycle. The forward P/E ratio of 17.9x is well above the 10-year average of 16.0x and significantly above its historical average of 14.2x.

Looking into 2025 – yes, these multiples are stretched, but when put into a global context it is understandable and even defendable. For example - Australian equities trade at a 21% discount to the S&P 500’s multiples and expectation for the US market in 2025 is one of further expansion. Thus to sustain these levels robust earnings growth are needed to close the P/E gap.

A 17.0x multiple down from 17.9, would meet expectations. 5. Banks being banks? One area that we note has not just defied expectations but also logic is Australian banks.

The banking sector was the standout performer in 2024. The sector outpaced the broader market by 25%, not hard when you look at CBA which has surged 40% in the past 12 months. It’s even more remarkable when you compare it to the material sector, it has outperformed its cycle peer by 50.2%.

The surge in passive investment flows (exchange traded funds and the like) which is growing at record levels, alongside superannuation sector contributions, fuelled this robust performance considering the Big 4 and Macquarie sit inside the top 20 and make up 45% of the ASX 20. However, this dominance is likely to face challenges in 2025. Key factors to watch include China’s commodity and economic outlook, shifts in risk asset performance, and potential regulatory scrutiny of superannuation’s ties to bank equity.

Coupled with stretched bordering in snapping valuations – the risks underscore the sector’s sensitivity to macroeconomic and policy developments going forward and overdone investment. 6. Iron Ore – heavy lifting Iron ore defied the forecasts in 2024. The expected collapse never truly eventuated, buoyed by cost-curve dynamics and stronger-than-expected demand in the latter half of the year.

Prices exceeded consensus estimates by upward of US$20 a tonne and provided a tailwind for materials. But, and it is a major but, China remains a pivotal factor. Broad-based policy stimulus announcements in late 2024 lifted sentiment, but execution and clarity remain uncertain.

China is looking to stimulate itself in 2025 and that will determine whether materials can close the performance gap with commodity prices in 2025. The other big unknown for Iron Ore – Trump 2.0 and his future tariffs on Australia’s largest trading partner. Signing off 2024 was a year defined by shifting dynamics across monetary policy, sector performance, and macroeconomic trends.

As we move into 2025, investors and traders will face a complex landscape shaped by earnings growth challenges, election-related uncertainties, and potential shifts in global economic momentum and policy. Successfully navigating these factors will come from understanding the macroeconomic signals and sector-specific opportunities they will present.

We know that this is slightly contrary to the consensus views but we think it needs to be said. The communication from the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) is unusually unclear, confusing and conflicted. The view conveyed in statement, press conference and minutes currently we would argue counter each other.

And the reason for this we believe is because the RBA is a reluctant hawk and is frightened to act. Let us now present why we think this and what it will mean for FX and yields in particular. The RBA has just completed a mass review of its operations and one of the key changes was to improve transparency.

This included press conferences, extended meetings, and more public discussions from members. The catch with this has been the mixed communications. Take for example the statement which was extremely ambiguous.

It was filled with terms like uncertainty, mixed signals, and complexity. It explains why the statement has this line: ‘the path of interest rates that will best ensure that inflation returns to target in a reasonable timeframe remains uncertain and the Board is not ruling anything in or out.’ That’s fair – things are complex and we understand why the board is waiting for more data. That was countered with this: ‘ The Board remains resolute in its determination to return inflation to target and will do what is necessary to achieve that outcome.’ Historically, whenever the Board has included such a resolute statement in its communications, they followed up with a cut or a hike in the preceding meetings – the frightened hawk is there and strongly suggests that a rate hike is likely.

The initial AUD reaction to the statement we think shows why the communication is mixed. Then take the press conference – Governor Bullock’s were much stronger than the statement, indicating a significant stance, not really clear in the statement. As mentioned, the Board stated they are not ruling anything in or out, but in reality, they have dismissed the possibility of rate cuts.

That was confirmed when Bullock was asked on this exact point and confirmed that rate hikes were the only things discussed. There was no ongoing discussion about cuts in the near or medium term as they do not expect inflation to reach their target by mid-2026. The Board’s concern is that inflation is notably higher than expected, employment is solid and that overall demand is still generating inflation.

The reaction to all this was clear here: The next notable reaction was the interbank market. All though it doesn’t appear like much in this chart. Please understand this change is actually from a ‘cut’ to ‘hike’ so yes there is a 10% chance of a hike, that is from a 10% chance of a cut.

July will be crucial with substantial data releases, including the second quarter CPI (July 31), GDP figures, and the wage price index. Current forecasts suggest that inflation and employment are performing better than expected, raising concerns about the need for a potential harder landing in the economy to return inflation back to target. The focus is now shifting towards slowing down the economy further despite the per capita recession because in the RBA’s view the impact on the household’s price power in the future from high inflation is still too high.

Future Rate Decisions All things being equal – with the RBA turning itself in knots and trying so hard to stay the course the RBA's commentary suggests it still has preference to hold rates if possible. The big issue as it acknowledges is the possible need for near term tightening due to a lack of progress towards inflation targets. Here is the market’s forecast for rates post the meeting on Tuesday Which probably explains the AUD/USD reactions in the following 24 hours It flatlined – thus the market is telling us that it needs a catalyst, and those catalysts are clearly coming in July.

So to finish what’s the key? A significant upside surprise in the RBA's core inflation measure could lead to a rate hike, despite slowing demand and labour market conditions. We get the monthly inflation data next week, this will be the first strike then the July 31 quarterly read.

This will be huge and will be the biggest AUD mover outside of an RBA meeting. We will be providing as much information on this release the closer we get to the release. However as shown the RBA is a terrified hawk and without this inflation beat, the risk of further tightening diminishes, with expectations for the RBA to remain on hold until potentially the first rate cut in February 2025.

The next RBA meeting on August 6 it’s going to be an interesting 6 weeks for AUD traders ahead of what is a likely live event.

Venezuela: A Latin American Crisis Venezuela’s economy has been in turmoil in recent times with its inflation skyrocketing and with no signs of slowing down, the situation may worsen. The political tensions have also been rising in one of the OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) member country whose economy has been slowly declining since the crash of oil prices in 2014. We have seen large protests against the highly unpopular president Nicolas Maduro, who won the most recent in May this year.

However, most people called it a "show election" as it had the lowest voter turnout in Venezuela’s democratic history at 46%. The Economy With the economic and social crisis rising in Venezuela, we have seen the countries inflation rise to new record highs. From reaching 4068% in January, we have seen the inflation reach 46305% last month.

Experts are predicting the number could reach 1,000,000% by the end of 2018, according to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) economist Alejandro Werner and has compared it to Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation in late 2000’s. It is worth pointing out that the second highest inflation in the world is in Sudan at 122%. Shortages in electricity, water, and public transport affect millions of people of Venezuela.

President Maduro blames countries poor economy on an economic war that he says is being led by the United States and Europe. IMF’s Alejandro Werner says that if the country’s economic and social crisis deepens, Venezuela’s economy could decrease by around 50% over the next 5 years which be one of the worst economic falls in over 60 years. "The collapse in economic activity, hyperinflation, and increasing deterioration... will lead to intensifying spillover effects on neighbouring countries," Werner wrote in a blog post. IMF is estimating an 18% decrease in Venezuela’s economy in 2018, up from 15% drop it predicted back in April.

That would be the third double-digit annual decline in a row. Werner said the projections are based on calculations prepared by IMF staff, but he warned that they have a degree of uncertainty greater than in other countries. "An economy throwing you these numbers is very difficult to project," Werner said at a news conference. "Any changes between now and December may include significant changes." The Venezuelan Currency Countries official currency - Bolivar Fuerte (VEF) has weakened dramatically in recent times. 1 US Dollar is currently worth around 206841 bolivars. The Venezuelan government has recently announced it will slash five zeros from its currency.

The announcement was made on 25th July by President Maduro and it is part of a currency reform that was already scheduled for June and was a postponed on two occasions before. The existing Bolivar Fuerte banknotes, which range from 1,000 to 100,000 will stop circulating and will be replaced by the new "bolivar Soberano", which will range from 2 to 500. The new currency is set to start circulating this month.

By Klāvs Valters Sources: Yahoo Finance, Google Maps, Banco Central De Venezuela

Most political scientists believe that all problems in the world are related to politics, and most economists believe that all problems are rooted in economics. However, what’s happening in Turkey now seems to be a combination of both as I'll explain. Firstly, investors have always regarded Turkey as one of the Emerging Markets with good economic growth.

We can see from the statistics that the GDP has remained an average 7% to 8% growth in the past ten years, and it even exceeded 10% in 2015. It looks pretty, right? But this is just nominal GDP.

From Economics 101 we know that we should divide nominal GDP by inflation rate to get a real GDP figure. Here is the inflation rate of Turkey: It looks bad. In July 2018 this number soared to 15.8%, which begs the question: what caused such high inflation?

Let me give you the overall picture, and then we can discuss the detail. Firstly, the high inflation is boosted by food prices and household goods such as furniture. Secondly, Turkey relies heavily on importing foods and merchandises from foreign countries, which has created a consistently negative trade balance since the 1990's.

A constant trade deficit means you have to borrow debt to satisfy the consumption of that imported good. See how Turkey’s Government debt accumulated in the past decade: Today only one country, the US, appears to escape from this natural law, by borrowing infinite new debts to cover its old debts and prolong repaying these obligations until...well... the end of the world. On the surface, it would seem all other countries need to obey this rule and repay their debts, unlike the US.

Thus, when a country’s debt is accumulating to a relatively high number (we often use Debt to GDP ratios to monitor), this country’s economy become vulnerable and potentially easier to be attacked by other financial powers. You could argue that this is an unlevel playing field in some respects and the US could well be using its ability to take advantage of this situations as they arise. A perfect example of this was George Soros who famously attacked the currency of southeast Asia Countries in 1997.

Note the foreign debt-to-GDP ratios rose from 100% to 167% in the four economies within the Southeast Asia region during 1993–96. If Turkey can somehow avoid getting involved in any significant conflicts of the world and focus on developing its economy, this whole debt issue might sort itself out over time. But unfortunately, given Turkey’s geographic location, it appears destined to be pulled into most conflicts simply by proximity.

We all know how vital areas such as Istanbul and the Turkish Straits are throughout history. Internally, Turkey has a Kurdish ethnic issue and a high household debt issue; externally it has the downing of a warplane issue with Russia, and also an Armenian genocide conflict with Germany. The list goes on.

In short, this patch of land is no stranger to dealing with massive problems. Ultimately this latest crisis comes down to one thing. Does Turkey compromise with America’s arrogant request, or make a stand against Washington's tactics and attempt to go their own way?

That is the dilemma that President Erdogan is currently facing. Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.

Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk. Sources: TradeEconomics.com