Noticias del mercado & perspectivas
Anticípate a los mercados con perspectivas de expertos, noticias y análisis técnico para guiar tus decisiones de trading.

Los precios del petróleo tienden a subir cuando la demanda es fuerte, la oferta está limitada o los eventos geopolíticos interrumpen los flujos comerciales normales. En este caso, Estados Unidos e Israel parecieron actuar de manera preventiva en lo que vieron como un movimiento defensivo. El impacto más amplio en el mercado se ha sentido más ampliamente.
Cuando los precios del petróleo se mueven, rara vez se mueven de forma aislada. El aumento de los precios del crudo puede afectar la inflación, las expectativas del banco central, los costos de envío y los márgenes corporativos en toda la economía mundial.
¿Qué está pasando?
Hay tres formas generales en que las empresas pueden beneficiarse de los precios más altos del petróleo:
1. Producir petróleo y gas, mediante la venta de la mercancía a un precio más alto
2. Prestación de servicios y equipos a los productores
3. Transportar petróleo alrededor del mundo
Cada una de las acciones a continuación representa uno de esos tipos de exposición, con un perfil de riesgo diferente cuando el crudo sube.
1. Exxon Mobile (NYSE: XOM)
Exxon Mobil es una de las compañías petroleras integradas más grandes del mundo, involucrada en todo, desde explorar y producir petróleo hasta refinarlo en combustible y producir productos químicos. Cuando los precios del petróleo suben, su negocio ascendente puede beneficiarse de márgenes más amplios, mientras que su tamaño y diversificación pueden ayudar a amortiguar los puntos más débiles en el ciclo.
Exxon tiene posiciones importantes en regiones de crecimiento como la Cuenca Pérmica de Estados Unidos y grandes proyectos offshore, que están diseñados para entregar barriles de bajo costo relativamente bajo durante muchos años. Cuando los precios son altos, la producción de bajo costo puede apoyar el flujo de caja libre y la capacidad de la compañía para dividendos, recompras o mayor inversión.
Desempeño de Exxon Mobil (XOM) frente al Brent Crude a 6 meses

Consensus: Comprar
Según TradingView, el sentimiento de los analistas hacia Exxon es ampliamente positivo, con una calificación de compra consensuada. De los 31 analistas rastreados, 15 califican la acción como Strong Buy or Buy, mientras que 13 la califican Hold.
El punto de vista positivo está ligado a la fortaleza del balance de Exxon y a la producción de mayor margen, con los analistas más optimistas proyectando un objetivo de precios a 1 año tan alto como US$183.00. No obstante, una pequeña minoría de 3 analistas ha emitido una calificación de Sell o Strong Sell, lo que contribuye a un precio objetivo promedio de US$145,00, que se ubica alrededor de 3.6% por debajo del precio de negociación actual.

2. Chevron (NYSE: CVX)
Chevron es otra importante global integrada que se ha beneficiado del reciente movimiento al alza en crudo, con sus acciones cotizando cerca de máximos de 52 semanas. Al igual que Exxon, Chevron opera en toda la cadena de valor, incluida la producción inicial, refinación y comercialización. La adquisición completa de Hess por parte de Chevron agrega Guyana y otros activos upstream, que algunos analistas ven como un apoyo a lo largo del tiempo, aunque el impacto en las ganancias sigue sujeto a la integración, la ejecución de proyectos y los riesgos del precio de los productos.
En un entorno en el que los precios del petróleo y el gas pueden ser volátiles, esa diversificación puede ayudar a suavizar las ganancias y, al mismo tiempo, proporcionar apalancamiento para precios de la energía más fuertes.
Desempeño de Exxon Mobil vs Chevron, gráfico de 6 meses

Consensus: Comprar
Chevron se ve de manera similar a Exxon, con el sentimiento de los corredores que sigue siendo ampliamente constructivo. Los agregados recientes de TradingView muestran a 30 analistas cubriendo las acciones en los últimos tres meses, con 17 calificándola Strong Buy o Buy, 11 en Hold, 1 en Sell y 1 en Strong Sell. Analistas han destacado su cartera diversificada y la contribución potencial de Hess, aunque la volatilidad de los precios de las materias primas y los riesgos de ejecución pueden mantener a algunos más cautelosos.

3. SLB (NYSE: SLB)
El aumento de los precios del petróleo no sólo afecta a los productores. En este caso, SLB (antes Schlumberger) es una de las empresas de servicios petroleros más grandes del mundo, proporcionando tecnología, equipos y servicios que ayudan a los productores a encontrar y extraer hidrocarburos de manera más eficiente. Cuando el crudo tiene una tendencia al alza, los productores pueden aumentar la actividad de perforación y terminación, lo que puede elevar la demanda de servicios y software de SLB. Los comentarios recientes también han apuntado al creciente negocio digital de la compañía y su exposición global, lo que podría respaldar el crecimiento de las ganancias si el ciclo de reciclaje continúa.
Consenso: Comprar
Según TradingView, el consenso de los analistas sobre SLB es Buy, lo que indica un sentimiento ampliamente positivo. De los 33 analistas rastreados, 27 califican la acción Compra o Compra Fuerte, mientras que 4 la califican Hold y 2 la califican Sell o Strong Sell.
El sentimiento de los analistas parece reflejar las expectativas en torno a la posición de SLB como socio tecnológico más amplio. El precio objetivo promedio de US$55.71 implica 15,8% al alza con respecto a los niveles actuales, mientras que el objetivo más alto se encuentra en US$74.00. Estos pronósticos parecen estar vinculados a las expectativas de una mayor actividad internacional de perforación y una recuperación en los mercados de aguas profundas en alta mar.

4. Baker Hughes (NYSE: BKR)
Baker Hughes es otro importante proveedor de servicios y equipos para yacimientos petrolíferos, con exposición adicional a segmentos industriales como GNL e infraestructura eléctrica. Incluso cuando los precios del petróleo no están en máximos extremos, los avances en la tecnología de perforación y los menores costos de equilibrio han ayudado a mantener rentables muchas obras de esquisto, apoyando la demanda de sus servicios.
La compañía ha sido descrita como bien posicionada debido a su balance general y su exposición a la actividad continua de exploración y producción. En un período de precios del petróleo más altos, o incluso de estabilidad a empresa, esa combinación de servicios y tecnología energética puede crear varios impulsores de ingresos.
Consenso: Compra fuerte
El sentimiento de los brókers hacia Baker Hughes es ampliamente positivo, similar al de SLB. Más del 75% de los analistas de cobertura califican las acciones como Compra o Compra Fuerte, con el resto generalmente en Retén. Los analistas han señalado su exposición tanto a los servicios tradicionales de yacimientos petrolíferos como a la tecnología energética e industrial, incluida la infraestructura de GNL.
[GRÁFICO]
Transporte y exposición de envío
5. Operadores mundiales de petroleros
Las compañías petroleras pueden beneficiarse cuando los precios más altos, los cambios de política de la OPEP+ y las tensiones geopolíticas aumentan los envíos de larga distancia e interrumpen las rutas habituales.
Informes recientes han apuntado a tarifas de flete más fuertes y altos volúmenes de petróleo en tránsito, ya que el aumento de la producción de Oriente Medio y el crecimiento de la oferta de Estados Unidos, Brasil, Guyana y Canadá fluyen hacia los mercados asiáticos. Esa demanda de “tonelada-milla” puede respaldar las tarifas diarias de los petroleros y la rentabilidad, incluso cuando el mercado energético en general es volátil.
Consenso: N/A
Esta es una categoría de la industria más amplia en lugar de una sola acción que cotiza en bolsa, por lo que no existe un único consenso de bróker para ello. Las opiniones de los analistas tendrían que evaluarse a nivel de empresa, como Frontline plc (FRO), Euronav (EURN) o Scorpio Tankers (STNG). En términos más generales, el sector suele verse como cíclico, aunque las condiciones actuales pueden apoyar las tarifas de flete cuando las perturbaciones geopolíticas alargan las rutas marítimas.
6. Woodside Energy (ASX: WDS)
Woodside agrega un nombre con sede en Australia con exposición global a GNL y petróleo. Sus resultados anuales de 2024 mostraron que las ganancias subyacentes bajaron 13%, principalmente debido a los menores precios del petróleo y el gas alcanzados, según el anuncio de resultados de todo el año de la compañía. Eso pone de relieve lo sensibles que pueden ser las ganancias a la realización de los precios de las materias primas.
Si los precios del crudo y de la energía conexa se fortalecen, las perspectivas de ganancias de Woodside podrían mejorar, aunque el alcance de ese cambio seguirá dependiendo de factores específicos de la compañía y de los precios logrados.
Consenso: Sostenga
En contraste con las grandes grandes estadounidenses, el sentimiento de los corredores hacia este productor con sede en Australia es más cauteloso, con consenso generalmente en Hold. La mayoría de los analistas prefieren mantener las posiciones existentes en lugar de aumentar la exposición. Esa visión más mesurada a menudo está relacionada con su exposición a los precios del GNL, una menor reducción de los precios de las materias primas y las presiones regulatorias y de descarbonización a más largo plazo.
[GRÁFICO]

Riesgos y limitaciones
Los precios más altos del petróleo no son un viaje gratis para estas acciones.
- Si los precios se disparan demasiado, demasiado rápido, pueden desencadenar la destrucción de la demanda y las respuestas políticas que pesan sobre las ganancias futuras.
- Las decisiones políticas de la OPEP+ o de los principales productores pueden revertir un repunte aumentando la oferta.
- Las empresas de servicios y petroleros son altamente cíclicas. Cuando el ciclo cambia, el poder de fijación de precios puede desvanecerse rápidamente.
En otras palabras, estos nombres pueden beneficiarse del aumento de los precios del petróleo, pero también conllevan riesgos específicos del sector, geopolíticos y a nivel de empresa que merecen una atención especial.
Observaciones clave del mercado
- Los precios más altos del petróleo a menudo apoyan a las grandes integradas como Exxon y Chevron a través de márgenes ascendentes más fuertes y flujos de efectivo diversificados.
- Las acciones de servicios petroleros como SLB y Baker Hughes pueden ver una demanda más fuerte cuando los productores aumentan la actividad de perforación y terminación.
- Los operadores de petroleros pueden beneficiarse de tarifas de flete más altas cuando la geopolítica y los cambios de suministro aumentan los envíos de larga distancia.
- Estas acciones pueden ser volátiles, por lo que la diversificación y el horizonte temporal siguen siendo importantes durante los ciclos de los productos básicos.
Las referencias en este artículo a Exxon Mobil, Chevron, SLB, Baker Hughes, Woodside, operadores de petroleros, calificaciones de consenso de analistas y objetivos de precios se incluyen solo para comentario general del mercado y no constituyen una recomendación u oferta en relación con ningún producto financiero o seguridad. Los datos de terceros, incluidas las calificaciones por consenso y los precios objetivo, pueden cambiar sin previo aviso y no se debe confiar en ellos de forma aislada. Las exposiciones de energía y transporte marítimo son cíclicas y pueden verse afectadas materialmente por la volatilidad de los precios de los productos básicos, la fijación de precios realizados, los cambios en la producción, la ejecución de proyectos, las interrupciones geopolíticas, las condiciones del mercado de carga, los desarrollos regulatorios y los cambios en el sentimiento de los inversores. Cualquier opinión sobre los posibles beneficiarios de los precios más altos del petróleo está sujeta a una incertidumbre significativa.

Global central banks have been a crucial part in providing aid and support to the global economy during the coronavirus pandemic. Faced with an unprecedented crisis, central bankers have rapidly deployed various monetary tools to keep credit flowing and support businesses and households. Given that interest rates were somewhat already at record-lows in many major countries, asset purchase schemes were widely used to put downward pressure on long-term rates.
Monetary policies were also accompanied by huge fiscal intervention. Also, in a coordinated action to enhance the provision of liquidity via the standing US dollar liquidity swap line, the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, and the Swiss National Bank have even agreed to lower their rates on currency swaps. What's Next?
The two-day Federal Open Market Committee meeting which will end on Wednesday with a statement followed by a press conference will be heavily eyed. Markets will likely look for clues on how the Fed’s is viewing the health of the economy after easing lockdown measures. Even though Friday’s jobs report came much better-than-expected and there was a decline in the unemployment rate from 14.7% to 13.3% in May, it is widely expected that the FOMC will keep rates steady near zero.
The scenario of negative interest rates is also highly unlikely. As the pandemic continues to create havoc on the global economy, it is also reshaping the political dynamics: Quarterly Forecasts Much attention will, therefore, be on the economic and interest rate forecasts. The Fed refrained from providing any forecasts during the pandemic given the tremendous uncertainties about the economic outlook.
This Fed’s meeting has, therefore, the potential to move markets if much details are revealed about future plans and expectations for inflation, GDP and unemployment. The projections are expected to be much worse than the favourable outlook seen in the last forecasts back in December. Dot Plots High unemployment and weak inflation have been the key factors forcing central banks to keep rates at record low levels.
The recent jobs reports came as a surprise and have raised expectations that the labour market may be rebounding at a quicker pace than expected. Investors would, therefore, look for explicit guidance from the Fed on how long they will likely keep rates near zero. Even though the economic outlook remains highly uncertain, the so-called dot plot which shows the entries of the FOMC officials regarding the interest rate forecasts will be scrutinized for guidance.
Latest dot plots – December 2019 Yield Curve Control As short-term interest rates approach zero, there have been recent speculations of the possibility that the Federal Reserve may control the yield curve and cap specific yields to cushion the impact of a downturn. Stock Market Global stocks have rallied significantly since March lows on the back of massive economic stimulus packages from central banks and governments which will likely stay in place for a while. In an extremely low-interest rate environment, quantitative easing and large fiscal policy measures have absorbed the pandemic-induced shocks and camouflaged the stark reality of the impact of the coronavirus.
On Monday, investors drove the S&P500 to a 15-week high, erasing its 2020 losses– lifted by heightened expectations of a quicker recovery and a supportive Federal Reserve. After a great run to the upside, investors appear to be taking a pause and booked profits ahead of the Fed’s decision. Equity traders would want to hear that the Fed will stay accommodative, keep interest rates unchanged and remains committed to supporting the economy while still striking some optimistic tones on the recovery of the economy.
US Dollar The US dollar was mostly weaker against major currencies as risk sentiment has improved lifted by heightened expectations of a quicker recovery following the reopening of economies earlier than initially expected. The surprising nonfarm payrolls have fueled those expectations and kept the greenback on the downside. If the Fed is set to look into the yield curve control as per the speculations, the US dollar may come under more pressure.
Source: Bloomberg Gold Amid the reopening of economies, geopolitical risks and a weaker US dollar, the precious metal has been trading sideways within a $70 range as traders wait for the next biggest catalyst. As of writing, gold has firmed higher above the $1,700. Gold traders will eye the outcome of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting.
XAUUSD (Daily Chart) Source: GO MT4

EU Recovery Fund After a standoff between the EU and Germany, following a critical ruling on ECB’s quantitative easing program by Germany’s constitutional court, the gradual reopening of economies of member states within the Eurozone has brought some optimism. The downside risks for the Eurozone and its shared currency have somewhat eased on the fact that Europe, which was the epicentre of COVID-19 after China, might have gone through the worst phase of the pandemic. The sentiment for the Euro was also buoyed by the EU Recovery fund proposed by Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Emmanuel Macron to help Europe’s mostly hit countries.
Unfortunately, the optimism over the coronavirus fund proposal, which aims to show unity in overcoming the crisis and to achieve quicker economic recovery, was short-lived. Europe’s Frugal Four Amid an unprecedented crisis, the Franco-German proposal was to provide support and reinforce EU financial relations and show that Europe is standing together. Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden, dumbed as the “ frugal four ” put forward a counter-proposal that highlights the diversion of opinions in helping the Southern members states.
Grants or Loans The Franco-German proposal is about “overcoming the crisis united and emerging from it stronger ”. Both leaders proposed to make outright grants to help countries in need. They want to launch a temporary fund of 500 billion euro for EU budget expenditure: “This would not provide loans, but rather budget funding for the sectors and regions hit hardest by the crisis.
We firmly believe that it is both justified and necessary to now provide funding for this from the European side that we will gradually deploy across several European budgets in the future.” In contrast, the frugal four wishes to provide loans rather than grants to southern European countries and expect the recipients of loans to comply with the fundamental principles of the EU and commit to strong reforms in repaying the loans. Their two-year and “one-off” proposal appears to also outline how those countries should use the funds and target sectors that are mostly hit based on an assessment. The coronavirus pandemic is testing the solidarity of European members and is threatening to reawaken a euro crisis.
Southern countries like Greece, Italy and Spain lacked the fiscal space they need to put forward an economic stimulus package to support their economies, compared to Northern countries. Disparity? Compromise?
Both proposals are saying “ yes ” to emergency aids to assist with recovery, but the disparity lies on how the funds will be financed to respond to the economic wreckage. The size of the emergency fund, the conditions of the funds or whether it will be grants or loans will be a compromise the markets are expecting to see. However, the type of compromise might be a key factor in determining the relationships of EU members.
Unprecedented times probably need unprecedented Unity. Euro – The Shared Currency The fact that Europe may have gone through the worst phase of the coronavirus has somewhat eased the downside risks of the shared currency. But the current geopolitical tensions with China and uncertainties on the EU Recovery plan are putting a lid on the upside momentum of the Euro.
After the sharp plunge in March, the EURUSD pair has been trading within the 1.08 to 1.09 range. Yesterday, the better-than-expected IFO Surveys in Germany has helped the pair to hold ground and hover around the 1.09 level. The recovery plan could mitigate the selling pressure and allow a probable move above 1.10 level if there is a compromise that satisfies the frugal four.
EURUSD Source: Bloomberg Terminal The immediate attention turns to the European Commission which is supposed to unveil a draft recovery plan on May 27 th, 2020. About GO Markets GO Markets was established in Australia in 2006 as a provider of online CFD trading services. For over a decade, we have positioned ourselves as a firmly trusted and leading global regulated CFD provider.

The Logistics Company has reported a 27% decline in net profit (after tax) for the six months ended 31 December. The drop in profit is mainly due to higher costs on: Fuel Transport Brexit-proofing costs. The company was also deprived of the one-off tax benefit of US$130 million from a year ago.
Below is a summary of key metrics: Source: www.brambles.com With respect to the IFCO reusable plastic container business, the Chief Executive, Mr Chipchase did not provide any concrete information and said that the process “is not sufficiently” advanced, further adding that the company has not yet made any decisions on whether they will “sell” or “de-merge” it. Its share price dropped to a low of $10.85 which is a drop above 3% before rebounding slightly. As of writing, it is trading at $11.04:

Central banks of major economies like the US, UK and Japan turned to quantitative easing (QE) at a time where they were unable to push interest rates any lower. The European Central Bank (ECB) launched its first large scale of asset purchases in 2015 and was among the latest central bank to join the QE bandwagon. How QE works The ECB adopted the QE program to address the risks of a prolonged period of low inflation and help the Eurozone to return to the desired inflation level.
The QE, also known as the Asset Purchase Program (APP), consists of: Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP) Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) Asset-backed Securities Purchase Programme (ABSPP) Third Covered Bond Purchase Programme (CBPP3) On 13 December 2018, the ECB decided to end the net purchases under the APP and announced that it would keep reinvesting cash from maturing bonds for a long time after its first interest rate hike. Market Expectations As the economic sentiment in the eurozone is worsening rapidly, investors are expecting the central bank to announce a robust stimulus package at its next meeting on Thursday: An Interest Rate Cut and Resuming Quantitative Easing. However, we saw divergent opinions on whether the central bank should resume asset purchases.
An Interest Rate Cut An interest rate policy by itself might not be enough, as cutting rates that are already negative will bring little help to the markets. If the central bank resume bond purchases, it could boost monetary and financing conditions. However, we are seeing divergent opinions on whether the central bank should resume asset purchases.
QE2 – The Second Round of Quantitative Easing In the height of the eurozone crisis from 2011-2014, such policies were probably justified. The current weakness in the euro- area might not be weak enough to warrant such a step, and there is now much skepticism on recommencing such non-standard and controversial monetary policies. The ECB policymakers have also dampened expectations of the resumption of bond purchases lately.
Market participants were initially expecting Mario Draghi to end its term with a significant package of monetary stimulus before Christine Lagarde takes over. It was are largely priced-in and now that the expectations eased ahead of the meeting, we are seeing European bond yields bouncing off record lows. Money markets and the foreign exchange markets are still expecting a traditional monetary policy intervention – at least a 10-basis point rate cut.
The Euro received a boost on Monday on hopes of German fiscal stimulus, though some expectations of monetary easing have limited the gains. EURUSD (H4 Chart) Source: GO MT4 If the central bank failed to satisfy dovish expectations already instilled in the markets, the shared currency may get a boost. The EURUSD pair may be trading sideways around the 1.10 level ahead of the ECB meeting on Thursday.
The pair could pick up a strong bid if the central bank falls short of expectations.

The week kicked off with a series of ECB speeches, and markets participants were gearing up to have more updates on the Eurozone economy, interest rate and Italy. Investors were keen to see whether the ECB downplays the slowdown in the German economy and the Italian Budget risks. We bring you a summary of the main headlines following the speeches: ECB’s Praet Speech: Peter Praet is a member of the ECB’s Executive Board since 2011.
The most captivating headlines from the latter are probably: “ The eurozone has lost some growth momentum, and headwinds are becoming increasingly noticeable.” He also argued that there is limited spillover from Italy so far. Praet acknowledged how the factors related to protectionism, financial market volatility and vulnerabilities in emerging markets are creating headwinds. He reiterated that the ECB policy will remain predictable and will proceed at a gradual pace.
He mentioned that it would need a big change in scenarios not to abide by rate guidance. ECB’s Nowotny Speech: Ewald Nowotny is the governor of the National Bank of Austria and member of the European Central Bank (ECB)’s governing council. Nowotny discussed the quantitative easing program and that the ending process poses little risk to financial stability.
He believes that “ a well-communicated exit may benefit financial health and very low rates for a long time may impair stability ”. ECB’s Coeuré Speech: Benoît Cœuré is a member of the ECB's Executive Board. The speech was mainly focused on Growth, Europe and Togetherness.
His speech captures how to reap the benefits of the Single Market. He highlighted how Europe’s East is not catching up which might question the value of the EU. “There have been some notable improvements in certain countries over time, but in others the process of gradually catching up with their EU peers appears to have stalled, or even to have backtracked, in recent years.” “And if there is no credible prospect of lower-income countries catching up soon, there is a risk that people living in those countries begin questioning the very benefits of membership of the EU or the currency union.” ECB’s President Draghi’s Speech: The President provided further insights into the euro area outlook and the ECB’s monetary policy. “The data that have become available since my last visit in September have been somewhat weaker than expected.” “A gradual slowdown is normal as expansions mature and growth converges towards its long-run potential…. Some of the slowdowns may also be temporary.” “Underlying drivers of domestic demand remain in place.” Overall, he expressed that the ECB maintained their view that the economy was still in line with expectations.
However, inflationary pressures were lower than expected which means that while bond purchases are set to end in December, the ECB will maintain significant monetary stimulus due to the moderation in recent data.

Dissecting the FOMC Statement The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates overnight by 25 basis points, taking the US Federal Funds rate to 2.25%. The rate cut was mostly seen as a hawkish one. In the press conference, Chair Powell said that the central bank’s rate cut was a “mid-cycle adjustment to policy ” rather than “the beginning of a long series of rate cuts.” We have dissected the July FOMC statement in comparison with the June statement to highlight the changes for ease of reference.
