Noticias del mercado & perspectivas
Anticípate a los mercados con perspectivas de expertos, noticias y análisis técnico para guiar tus decisiones de trading.

Tres bancos centrales están decidiendo las tasas simultáneamente, el crudo Brent se balancea salvajemente alrededor de 100 dólares el barril, y una guerra en el Medio Oriente está reescribiendo las perspectivas de inflación en tiempo real. Pase lo que pase esta semana podría marcar la pauta para los mercados para el resto de 2026.
Datos rápidos
- El Banco de la Reserva de Australia (RBA) anuncia su próxima decisión sobre la tasa de efectivo el martes, con los mercados ahora valorando una probabilidad del 66% de una segunda subida a 4.1%.
- Algunos analistas han advertido que la guerra de Irán podría empujar la inflación estadounidense a 3.5% para fin de año y retrasar los recortes de tipos de la Fed hasta septiembre, lo que convierte el diagrama de puntos del FOMC de esta semana en el más observado en años.
- El crudo Brent está coqueteando con 100 dólares el barril después de que Irán lanzara lo que medios estatales describieron como su “operación más intensa desde el comienzo de la guerra”.
RBA: ¿Australia volverá a subir?
El RBA elevó la tasa de caja por primera vez en dos años a 3.85% en su reunión de febrero luego de que la inflación repuntara materialmente en el segundo semestre de 2025.
La pregunta ahora es si vuelve a moverse antes incluso de ver la próxima impresión trimestral del IPC, que no vence hasta el 29 de abril.
El vicegobernador Andrew Hauser reconoció antes de la reunión que los formuladores de políticas enfrentan una decisión genuinamente dividida, moldeada por señales económicas conflictivas en el país y la creciente inestabilidad en el extranjero.
Actualmente los mercados financieros asignan alrededor de un 66% de probabilidad a otra alza, con un aumento de mayo considerado prácticamente seguro independientemente de lo que ocurra el lunes.
Fechas clave
- Decisión sobre la tasa de efectivo del RBA: martes 17 marzo, 14:30 h AEDT
- Conferencia de prensa del gobernador Bullock: martes 17 marzo, 15:30 h AEDT
Monitorear
- Cualquier referencia de Bullock a nuevas subidas es probable en mayo
- Reacción inmediata del AUD/USD.
- ASX bancos y REITs.

FOMC: Es probable que todos los ojos estén puestos en el diagrama de puntos
El FOMC se reúne del 17 al 18 de marzo, con la declaración de política programada para las 2:00pm ET del 18 de marzo y la conferencia de prensa del presidente Jerome Powell a las 2:30pm. El CME FedWatch muestra una probabilidad del 99% de que la Fed mantenga las tasas en 3.50% a 3.75%.
El verdadero accionar se encuentra en el Resumen de Proyecciones Económicas (SEP) y el diagrama de puntos. El punto medio actual muestra un corte de 25 puntos básicos para 2026. Si cambia a dos cortes, eso es dóciles y alcistas para los activos de riesgo. Si se desplaza a cero recortes o agrega una subida de tasas a la proyección, los mercados podrían reaccionar en la otra dirección.
Para complicar aún más las cosas, el mandato de Powell como Presidente de la Reserva Federal expira el 23 de mayo de 2026. Kevin Warsh es el principal candidato para reemplazarlo, visto como más duro en política monetaria. Cualquier comentario de Powell sobre esta transición podría mover los mercados independientemente de la decisión de tasa en sí.
Fecha clave
- Decisión de tasa FOMC + Gráfica SEP/punto: jueves 19 de marzo, 4:00 a.m. AEDT
- Conferencia de prensa de Powell: jueves 19 de marzo, 4:30 a.m. AEDT
Monitorear
- El lenguaje de Powell sobre el petróleo y la inflación arancelaria.
- Reacción de rendimiento de tesorería a 2 años.
- Reajuste de precios de FedWatch de CME para cualquier cambio en la probabilidad de corte de septiembre.

Banco de Japón: Podría adelantarse un mayor endurecimiento
El BOJ se reúne del 18 al 19 de marzo, con la decisión prevista para el jueves por la mañana, hora de Tokio. La tasa de política actual se sitúa en 0.75% (un máximo de 30 años), y la reunión de enero de 2026 produjo una retención en una votación de 8-1.
El gobernador Ueda ha categorizado la reunión de marzo como “en vivo”, señalando que el cronograma para un mayor endurecimiento podría “adelantarse” si las negociaciones salariales de primavera de Shunto arrojan resultados más fuertes de lo esperado.
Esos resultados van a comenzar a fluir durante la semana, convirtiéndolos en el insumo crítico para la decisión del BOJ. Nomura espera que las subidas salariales de Shunto 2026 lleguen en torno al 5.0%, incluida la antigüedad, con un crecimiento salarial base de aproximadamente 3.4%. Si los resultados confirman esa trayectoria, el caso de una alza en marzo se fortalece considerablemente.
La complicación es el telón de fondo global. Japón importa aproximadamente el 90% de sus necesidades energéticas, y el petróleo alrededor de 100 dólares por barril está empujando al alza los costos de importación y amenazando con agregar presión inflacionaria. Una subida del BOJ a un shock petrolero global sería un movimiento inusualmente audaz.
La mayoría de los participantes del mercado aún se inclinan hacia una espera en esta reunión, siendo abril o julio vistos como el momento más probable para el próximo movimiento.
Fecha clave
- Decisión sobre la tasa de política del BOJ (actualmente 0.75%): Jueves 19 de marzo, mañana AEDT
Monitorear
- Resultados salariales de Shunto como principal detonante de un alza en marzo.
- Idioma de la conferencia de prensa de Ueda y orientación a futuro en abril y julio.
- Reacción del USD/JPY.

Petróleo: Volatilidad continua
El crudo Brent tocó brevemente 119,50 dólares por barril a principios de semana antes de caer 17% a menos de US$80, luego rebotando hacia US$95 ante señales mixtas de Washington sobre el Estrecho de Ormuz.
Al jueves, Brent estaba de vuelta por más de 100 dólares, ya que Irán lanzó nuevos ataques contra el transporte marítimo comercial y la liberación de la reserva de la AIE no logró brindar un alivio significativo.
En el escenario donde un conflicto más prolongado inflige daños a la infraestructura energética, los analistas estiman que el IPC podría subir a 3.5% para fines de 2026, con los precios de la gasolina acercándose a los 5 dólares por galón en el segundo trimestre.
Para esta semana, el petróleo actúa como una macro meta-variable. Cada titular geopolítico, señal de alto el fuego, ataque de petroleros, liberación de reservas y comentario de Trump podrían mover acciones, bonos y monedas en tiempo real.
Monitorear
- Cualquier flujo de petrolero reanudado del Estrecho de Ormuz.
- Liberación de reserva de emergencia de la AIE.
- Declaraciones de Trump sobre Irán.
- La renta variable del sector energético.

When you boil it all down trading is a game of numbers, the more numbers you make over time the more money you make however many traders don’t focus on the numbers game over time and instead focus their attention only on if they are winning or losing right now and it affects their ability to control their emotions. Here is a suggestion that could help you better focus on the numbers game rather than just focus on the Win or Loss right now. I like to call this process “Thinking in 10’s” but before I share the theory with you let me remind you that trading is not necessarily about how many times you win or lose.
Trading is about how much you win when you win and little you lose when you lose. Trying to find a system that wins 70%, 80% or even 90% of the time is extraordinarily difficult and any system that does have such a high strike rate for a period of time will eventually see a change in the percentage success. Just because it worked 70% of the time the past couple of months doesn’t mean it will continue to run at 70%.
Think about this for a moment. A trading system that has a risk / reward target of 1:2 meaning only needs to be correct 38% of the time to break even. Better than 38% and a 1:2 risk / reward strategy is potentially very profitable.
The probability when you trade is 50/50, the market can only go up or down, so gaining an edge to be at least 50% correct with a risk / reward target surely cannot be that difficult. It’s not the edge or % success that is the question, it’s the behavior of the trader in being able to focus over the long term on 1: 2 and not trade to trade. So consider thinking in 10’s.
Instead of evaluating your result day-to-day or week-to-week consider evaluating your performance after the next 10 trades. Lower your expectation on each trade, just follow your system, narrow your focus and ensure your risk is less than the reward and trade the plan for the next 10 trades. Then evaluate your overall result allowing the trades to show an overall success risk / reward ratio after 10 trades.
Many successful traders will be able to tell you what their risk / reward ratio is. In other words for every $1 they risk what is their average return? I think all traders should know these numbers and a good start would be to work out yours after the next ten trades.
So thinking in 10’s is all about following your strategy for 10 trades and not thinking win or loss per trade. Remember it's a numbers game over time, you will win some and you will lose some and it’s about how much you win when you win and how little you lose when you lose. Risk management is the key.
For more trading tips join me every Wednesday evening live online at 7pm AEST. You can simply click on this link and join the coaching session. http://gomarkets.webinato.com/room1 Andrew Barnett | Director / Senior Currency Analyst Andrew Barnett is a regular Sky News Money Channel Guest and one Australia’s most awarded and respected financial experts, and is regularly contacted by the Australian Media for the latest on what is happening with the Australian Dollar. Connect with Andrew: Email

The 7.95% downward move on the British Pound (GBP) on the back of the Brexit vote was definitely one of a kind. The black line in the chart below shows the daily closing prices for the cable all the way back to 1975. The red line is the daily net changes (measured from close to close) during the same period.
As you can see, never in the past 41 years have we seen a daily move like the one that occurred on the 24 th of June 2016. Despite the uniqueness and magnitude of such a move, many analysts, led by the famous financial mathematician and author of “Fooled by Randomness” and “Black Swan” (which are both highly recommended for serious traders), Nassim Taleb, believe the Brexit move was within the boundaries of statistical properties, which is another way of saying it was not an outlier. Nassim Taleb’s Twitter account a few days after Brexit: Regardless of how you chose to see the Brexit events, in this article I am going to crunch some numbers to see if such extreme price actions can potentially have any explanatory power that can be used by medium and short term traders.
Analysis of GBP returns from 1975 - 2016 For this analysis, I first needed to define what makes a price change normal and what makes it extreme. To do this, I gathered the daily, weekly and monthly returns for the cable since 1975 to today (excluding the Brexit day) and constructed the table below. This table shows some of the statistical attributes of the cable over the study period.
For example, under the Daily column, you can see that historically 52% of the times the Pound has had a positive return and 48% of the times it has seen price depreciation on a day to day basis. Furthermore, this table shows that the average of positive and negative returns across all time frames is around zero. This is quite normal and holds across many markets (including stock indices) and goes to show how difficult it is to predict the direction of the market.
From here, I want to draw your attention to where it says “1% largest”. These are the returns that have only occurred 1% of the times and have all been equal or greater than the number that appears in front of them. For example, the under the daily column, it says that only 1% of the times, the sterling has recorded a daily gain of 1.56% or more.
Said differently, this line item shows that 99% of the times, the daily Pound return has been less than 1.56%. On the flip side, the “1% smallest” means that only 1% of the times, the GBPUSD has dropped more than 1.69% a day which is the same as saying that 99% of the times, the Pound’s daily return has been greater than -1.69%. From these two lines, I constructed the “Extreme” range which is one of the thresholds used for this analysis.
An extreme day is when a daily return is either greater than 1.56% or less than -1.69%. If a daily return falls between those ranges mentioned in the above, then I call that a normal day. Please note that just because of the way I have defined my normal range, I expect 98% of the times the Pound’s daily return falls in the normal range.
You can extend the same terminology for the weekly and monthly returns. For example, looking at the monthly range, if any one month’s return is between -7.34% to 6.33%, you can call that month a normal month. However, if it moves outside of those limits, then that is going to be an extreme month.
The last line in the table above shows another range which I call the Super Extreme range. These are the observations that have only happened 0.1% of the times. For example, for a daily return to be superextreme, it has to be either greater than 2.92% or less than -2.94%.
Now that we have established the thresholds, let’s turn our attention to the Brexit. The table below shows sterling’s return on the Brexit day, week and month. As you can see from the table above, Brexit was an extreme move in all time frames.
However, with the exception of daily prices it cannot be accounted as a super extreme move. Analysis of GBP’s extreme moves Now let’s turn our attention to the negative extreme moves and see what’s happened each time the cable has come across such extreme moves in the daily, weekly and monthly time frames. The results for the daily observations are reported in the following tables.
As you can see under both extreme and super extreme scenarios, the market has usually bounced back in the first 10 days, and from there onwards the future direction of the market over the next 20 and 40 days has been a 50-50 game. Therefore, it appears that purely based on the historical daily data, we cannot draw any meaningful conclusion from an excessive down day. Daily Performance Next I looked at the weekly data and summarised the required information in the table below.
As you can see, there is a bit of an edge in the first 4 weeks after a large negative event. According to this table, 55% of the times the Pound has resumed its downward trend 4 weeks after an extreme negative event with an average price fall of -3.7%. From there onwards, the model does not have much to say.
Weekly Performance Looking at the monthly data, things start looking much better. According to the table below, in 100% of the times, once the sterling posts a negative extreme month, it continues downwards for the next 4 months where it drops by an average of 12.3%. Monthly Performance While the above finding is great and shows a future direction with a notable profit potential for medium term short sellers, it comes with a catch.
If you look at where it says “Total observations”, you will notice that there have only been five cases in the entire study period where the Pound has posted an extreme negative monthly return. So our sample size is too small. What makes the matter worse is when you realize that all of these five cases are either in relation to the Pound crash in 1992 or GFC in 2008.
Therefore, unless you believe the GBPUSD is fundamentally in the same situation (1992 or 2008), then it would be really hard to draw a meaningful comparison. Extreme Monthly negative returns since 1975 Beware of extreme price actions Based on the information provided in this analysis, unless you believe that the UK is in a similar situation today compared to where it was in 1992 or GFC, drawing conclusions based on outliers or extreme price actions seems to be a risky business. Also in a more generic term, it appears that extrapolating past events in the daily (higher) frequency is less informative compared to when lower frequency (i.e, monthly data) are brought to the picture.
The third point that I want to make is that big one day or one period moves should not be the basis of your trading systems. They may look compelling, but when you do some simple objective tests, they won’t pass. Please note that trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk, including the risk of losing substantially more than your initial investment.
Also, you do not own or have any rights to the underlying assets. You should only trade if you can afford to carry these risks. Our offer is not designed to alter or modify any individual’s risk preference or encourage individuals to trade in a manner inconsistent with their own trading strategies.
Ramin Rouzabadi (CFA, CMT) | Trading Analyst Ramin is a broadly skilled investment analyst with over 13 years of domestic and international market experience in equities and derivatives. With his financial analysis (CFA) and market technician (CMT) background, Ramin is adept at identifying market opportunities and is experienced in developing statistically sound investment strategies. Ramin is a co-founder of exantera.com which is a financial website dedicated to risk analysis and quantitative market updates.
Connect with Ramin: Twitter | LinkedIn | Ramin's posts

Last week's ATR: 95-96.1 From the daily chart below, we can see that the US Dollar Index is currently testing its right shoulder, and I have marked the left and right shoulders by two red rectangles. It will take weeks for the price to tumble around the rectangle area, and there might be a lot of fake movements occur, thus it is still too soon to determine a directional bias. While waiting for the outcome to reveal, we should bear in mind that a candlestick chart under larger time frame (i.e., daily or weekly) is like looking at the larger picture.
By keeping daily or weekly chart as your main chart to look at, it should help you to try and avoid some of those fake breakouts on smaller time frames such as 4 hours chart. Last week, the US dollar index rose for the second consecutive week, and the Fed’s interest rate hike news continued to support this trend. Federal Reserve Powell pointed out on Wednesday: "Interest rates are still loose, but we are gradually moving towards a neutral level, which means neither blocking nor stimulating economic growth.
Interest rates may exceed neutral levels." In his fourth public speech in a week, Powell reiterated his optimistic expectation of the US economy. He also pointed out that the US economy is in a very stable, low inflation period accompanied with extremely low unemployment. This week, the market will focus on the US CPI report for September, which will be announced on Thursday (October 11).
The survey shows that the US CPI annual rate in September is expected to increase by 2.4%, the previous value is 2.7%; the core CPI yearly rate in September is expected to grow by 2.3%, the last value is 2.2%. By Lanson Chen – Analyst Lanson Chen @LansonChen This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.
Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.

Markets are rattled by US- North Korea tensions as Trump vows to respond to North Korea nuclear threats with “fire and furry”. The senior administration officials and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson tried to find different ways to explain the President’s comments and play down the tough talk. Trump reinforced his threats stating “they should be very nervous, because things will happen to them like they never thought possible”.
The standoff has unsettled the financial markets worldwide. The DOW dropped by 200 pips and S&P 500 fell to sessions lows. The CBOE Volatility Index, the best gauge of fear in the market spiked by 45%. [caption id="attachment_58085" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] The demand for safe havens has increased with the rising tensions.
Investors have switched to gold, yen, swiss franc and government bonds. USDJPY dropped to record low and Gold rose to its highest level in almost 2 months.. [caption id="attachment_58086" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] The risk sentiment gets hit by the escalating geopolitical tensions as Japan and South Korea also warned of a strong response if North Korea launches missiles toward Guam. Trump intensifies its warnings to North Korea as he believes that even if Russia and China are backing the UN sanctions, it would not be enough or effective as negotiations have been going on for years.
The Nikkei index fell since the “war of words” started. [caption id="attachment_58087" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] Chinese media warn that the US is engaging in dangerous confrontations. “The US is more powerful than North Korea, but in a real showdown I don’t think they would beat North Korea. There is a Chinese saying: ‘ A man with nothing to lose, doesn’t fear a man with something to lose ” Hu Xijin, outspoken editor of the Global Times said. The coming days will be crucial.
Investors will be looking for a “diplomatic outcome” rather than militaristic conflict. By: Deepta Bolaky GO Markets

In Economics, the difference between 10 Year and 2 Year Bond Yields is one of the leading indicators that help investors to observe any significant changes in the economy. Let's break things down a little further. Firstly, common sense dictates that if you want to make a term deposit in the bank, the rate you can get from the long-term deposit will be more than short term.
Therefore, the spread between long-term and short-term return rate should always be positive, well, in most of the time. However in some historical periods, sometimes the yield spread would be “flatted” (i.e., drop close to zero) or even become negative, in some extreme cases. If that happens, where short-term returns are higher than long-term returns, this is seen as an economic overheat, and a recession is coming.
From the chart below, we can see that the current yield spread is heading towards zero. Since the Fed is guaranteed to have four rate hikes in 2018, and more increases are foreseeable in 2019, the spread is very likely to go negative sooner or later. We'll take a look that the previous cases of the inverted yield curve (i.e., negative yield spread) 1. 2000’s Dotcom Bubble The US Federal Reserve increased its interest rate from 4.75% to 6.5% in a brief time, between Jun 1999 to May 2000, which makes short-term yield soar rapidly and inverted yield curve occurred.
After the NASDAQ bubble burst, the Fed dropped its rates thirteen times in two years, to save its economy. 2. 2008’s Subprime Crisis The same story happened all over again, the Fed first increased its rates 17 times, from 1% to 5.25%. At that time whole world’s economy reached its peak, there is a 6-7% average GDP growth in emerging markets, and even in advanced countries there is a 2.5% growth (which is a lot, compared with today’s growth in the UK) However soon after the crisis triggered, the Fed dropped its rates from 5.25% to 0.00% in only one-year time and kept its zero-rate environment for almost a decade. From the two lessons above, we can observe a similar pattern.
Inverted yield curves consistently occurred near the end of the rate hike cycle, and a substantial economic recession would generally follow. Currently, the US is in the middle of its rate hike cycle, and it seems many of the economic data reveals a sign of overheat. Take the unemployment rate as an example, last month it fell to 3.9%, which is an 18-year low.
The performance of new jobs number is in one of the best periods of growths in recent history. Although previous activity doesn't necessarily predict future outcomes, history suggests once these figures reach their highest possible level, a turning point could be around the corner. There is a saying that lightning never strikes twice, we shall see in this case.
Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions. Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.
Sources: TradeEconomics.com

Venezuela: A Latin American Crisis Venezuela’s economy has been in turmoil in recent times with its inflation skyrocketing and with no signs of slowing down, the situation may worsen. The political tensions have also been rising in one of the OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) member country whose economy has been slowly declining since the crash of oil prices in 2014. We have seen large protests against the highly unpopular president Nicolas Maduro, who won the most recent in May this year.
However, most people called it a "show election" as it had the lowest voter turnout in Venezuela’s democratic history at 46%. The Economy With the economic and social crisis rising in Venezuela, we have seen the countries inflation rise to new record highs. From reaching 4068% in January, we have seen the inflation reach 46305% last month.
Experts are predicting the number could reach 1,000,000% by the end of 2018, according to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) economist Alejandro Werner and has compared it to Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation in late 2000’s. It is worth pointing out that the second highest inflation in the world is in Sudan at 122%. Shortages in electricity, water, and public transport affect millions of people of Venezuela.
President Maduro blames countries poor economy on an economic war that he says is being led by the United States and Europe. IMF’s Alejandro Werner says that if the country’s economic and social crisis deepens, Venezuela’s economy could decrease by around 50% over the next 5 years which be one of the worst economic falls in over 60 years. "The collapse in economic activity, hyperinflation, and increasing deterioration... will lead to intensifying spillover effects on neighbouring countries," Werner wrote in a blog post. IMF is estimating an 18% decrease in Venezuela’s economy in 2018, up from 15% drop it predicted back in April.
That would be the third double-digit annual decline in a row. Werner said the projections are based on calculations prepared by IMF staff, but he warned that they have a degree of uncertainty greater than in other countries. "An economy throwing you these numbers is very difficult to project," Werner said at a news conference. "Any changes between now and December may include significant changes." The Venezuelan Currency Countries official currency - Bolivar Fuerte (VEF) has weakened dramatically in recent times. 1 US Dollar is currently worth around 206841 bolivars. The Venezuelan government has recently announced it will slash five zeros from its currency.
The announcement was made on 25th July by President Maduro and it is part of a currency reform that was already scheduled for June and was a postponed on two occasions before. The existing Bolivar Fuerte banknotes, which range from 1,000 to 100,000 will stop circulating and will be replaced by the new "bolivar Soberano", which will range from 2 to 500. The new currency is set to start circulating this month.
By Klāvs Valters Sources: Yahoo Finance, Google Maps, Banco Central De Venezuela
