市场资讯及洞察

随着伊朗冲突的重塑 能源市场,中央银行转为鹰派,尽管混乱不堪,黄金仍处于自由落体状态,2026年的避险手册比以往任何时候都更加复杂。
事实速览
- 尽管中东战争活跃,但黄金已从历史最高水平下跌了20%以上
- 新加坡元兑美元汇率接近自2014年10月以来的最高水平
- 这个 澳大利亚储备银行(RBA) 由于伊朗推动的油价推动澳大利亚通货膨胀率上升,2026年3月将利率上调至4.10%
1。黄金(XAU/USD)
黄金仍然是全球交易最广泛的避风港。它受益于地缘政治压力、美元疲软和负实际利率环境。但是,它在2026年的短期行为需要解释。
尽管中东战争活跃,但黄金仍大幅抛售。可能的原因是美联储下调了2026年的降息预期,理由是生产者通货膨胀率高于预期, 霍尔木兹海峡-油价推动了通货膨胀的持续性。
归根结底,黄金的牛市取决于实际收益率下降和美元疲软,而目前这两个条件都不具备。交易者应意识到,在像伊朗冲突造成的通货膨胀供应冲击中,黄金的表现并不总是如预期。
但是,如果你缩小视野,长期前景将巩固黄金的避险地位,到2025年成为有记录以来最强劲的年份之一。
值得关注的关键变量:美联储指引、实际收益率和美元方向。
2。日元 (JPY)
由于日本是世界上最大的净债权国,日元长期以来一直是避险货币。在压力时期,日本投资者倾向于汇回资本,推动日元走高。
但是,到目前为止,这种动态似乎在2026年发生了变化。日元同比下跌6.63%,接近2024年7月以来的最低水平,石油进口成本的飙升正在打压该货币。
但是,日元的避险作用并未消失。在股票大幅抛售和流动性事件中,它往往会重新站稳脚跟。但是在石油驱动的通胀冲击中,它面临着结构性阻力。
值得关注的关键变量:日本央行的利率决定、美日收益率差异以及日本当局发出的任何干预信号。
3.瑞士法郎 (CHF)
瑞士的政治中立性、账户盈余和强大的机构框架使法郎成为反身避险货币。与日元不同,瑞士法郎在当前环境中保持不变,2026年法郎兑美元汇率上涨,欧元/瑞郎保持稳定。
对于欧洲和中东的交易者来说,瑞士法郎通常是压力事件中的第一停靠港。
值得关注的关键变量:瑞士国家银行的干预语言、欧洲的地缘政治发展和全球风险指数。
4。美国国债 (US10Y)
在正常情况下,美国政府债券是世界上最大、流动性最高的避险工具。但是 2026 年不是正常情况...
收益率一直在上升,而不是下降,这意味着对于任何寻求安全的人来说,债券价格都朝着错误的方向发展。
当避险事件期间收益率上升时,这表明市场将债券视为通货膨胀风险而不是安全资产。
但是,像票据和2年期国债这样的短期国债则是另一回事。与长期债券相比,它们可能提供更高的收入和更低的期限风险,这就是为什么一些投资者在动荡时期更能防御性地使用它们的原因。
值得关注的关键变量:美联储通讯、消费者价格指数和个人消费支出数据,以及10年期国债收益率是否突破4.50%或回落至4.00%以下。
5。澳元兑美元(澳元/美元):反向竞争
澳元被广泛认为是一种风险货币,与全球大宗商品需求和中国的增长密切相关。
在避险环境中,澳元/美元通常会下跌。澳元/美元下跌可以作为更广泛全球压力的主要指标,这对于具有区域风险敞口的交易者来说可能是一个有用的背景。
澳洲联储的加息周期(自2026年初以来两次加息)为澳元提供了一些下限,但在持续的全球避险走势中,这种支撑是有限的。
值得关注的关键变量:澳大利亚央行前瞻性指导、中国采购经理人指数数据、铁矿石价格以及石油对澳大利亚通胀预期的影响。
6。美元指数(DXY)
在急性压力期间,美元充当世界储备货币和反身避风港。当流动性枯竭时,无论潜在趋势如何,全球对美元的需求往往会激增。
在过去的12个月中,由于全球对美国财政轨迹的信心动摇,美元已经下跌。但在过去的一个月中,在鹰派美联储和地缘政治风险上升的支持下,它已经走强。
在避险环境中,美元继续吸引避险资金流动。但是,油价上涨会增加通货膨胀风险,使美联储的政策预期复杂化。
值得关注的关键变量:美联储利率路径、美国通胀数据和全球流动性状况。
7。新加坡元 (SGD)
新加坡元是当前环境中最具弹性的货币之一,在全球范围内鲜为人知,但在整个东南亚都具有很高的相关性。
在避险资金流和投资者被新加坡AAA评级债券、股息密集的股票市场和可预测的政府政策所吸引的支持下,新加坡元已升至接近2014年10月以来的最高水平。
新加坡金融管理局通过名义有效汇率区间而不是利率来管理新加坡元,使其具有与其他避险货币不同的性质。
对于有印尼、马来西亚、泰国、越南和更广泛的东盟地区敞口的交易者来说,美元/新加坡元可以作为区域风险偏好的实用基准。
值得关注的关键变量:新加坡金融管理局的政策区间调整、区域贸易流动以及更广泛的美元/亚洲动态。
8。现金和短期固定收益
有时,最有效的避风港可以简单地减少暴露。由于主要经济体的中央银行利率仍处于较高水平,现金和短期政府债券可以在不受市场风险影响的同时提供可观的收益率。
澳洲联储在3月份的会议上将现金利率提高至4.10%。英格兰银行维持在3.75%,而欧洲央行将其存款便利利率维持在2.00%,主要再融资利率维持在2.15%。 在所有主要经济体中,短期政府票据多年来首次提供了实际回报。
在动荡的环境中,资本保值有时比回报最大化更重要。
值得关注的关键变量:所有主要经济体的中央银行会议日历,以及利率路径前瞻性指导的任何变化。
接下来要看什么
美联储通胀数据。 核心个人消费支出是目前黄金、债券和美元最重要的单一数据点。任何一个方向上的任何惊喜都可能同时移动所有这三个方向。
日元干预风险。 日元接近此前引发日本当局行动的水平。具有亚太地区风险敞口的交易者应密切关注。
澳洲联储的下一步行动。 澳大利亚目前为4.10%,通货膨胀率仍高于目标,问题在于徒步周期是否还有更长的路要走。下一次澳洲联储会议将于5月5日举行。
地缘政治轨迹。 任何缓和中东局势的举措都将迅速减少避险需求,并将资本转回风险资产。反之亦然。
中国的增长信号。 中国复苏强于预期,可能会提振大宗商品货币,降低整个亚太地区的防御地位。
长期镜头
2026年的环境表明,避险资产的有效性取决于 类型 令人震惊,而不仅仅是其严重性。
伊朗冲突造成的通货膨胀供应冲击是传统避风港最困难的环境之一。
随着实际收益率的上升,黄金下跌。随着通货膨胀预期的攀升,债券抛售。随着日本进口成本的飙升,即使是日元也可能贬值。
无论宏观条件如何,都保持着机构信誉、管理框架和充足流动性的资产。瑞士法郎、新加坡元和短期现金工具比目前的黄金或多头债券更符合这种描述。
在2026年,交易者面临的问题不是 “哪个避风港?”它是 “避风港,避开什么?”

Oil on the Rise After reaching its lowest price for 15 years back in January, we have seen the oil prices rising in the recent months since June. The price recently reached a two-year high following a partial closure of the Keystone pipeline connecting Canada-US oilfields. With more upcoming meetings and geopolitical tensions rising in the Middle East, the future of the oil prices will depend on how the future events unfold.
OPEC Meeting The next Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is taking place on 30 th November in its headquarters in Vienna, Austria. It is expected that the pact on cutting output beyond March 2018 expiry will be extended, although Russia – a non-OPEC member and the second largest oil exporter in the world has sent mixed signals about its support for an extension on the cuts. “With the majority of OPEC members endorsing an extension, Russian support is the key risk,” Jon Rigby, head of oil research at UBS, wrote in a note. Last month, President Vladimir Putin indicated that Russia is backing extending the deal to the end of next year, but recent comments by officials and Russian media have created uncertainty since Putin’s comments.
British bank and financial services company Barclays expects a 6 to 9-month extension of an OPEC led deal to limit oil output during the meeting on 30 th November. The bank expects Brent to remain above $60 per barrel in the last quarter of this year and fall to $55 in 2018. “Whether or not the countries extend and the duration of the deal are not the relevant questions in our view. We believe the level of the cut is what really matters, and we assign a low likelihood to this detail being announced on November 30,” analysts at the bank said in a note. “If the meeting concludes as the market expects, prices could experience a short-term selloff, but the technicals and fundamentals will likely remain constructive,” the bank said.
Other concerns for oil prices are the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia and Iran have been involved in aggressive exchanges over the conflict in Yemen with both countries backing different sides. The Gulf region exports around 28 million barrels a day which is almost one third of a global production, therefore its important the relationships in the Middle East does not intensify further.
UKOUSD: Source: GO Markets MT4 USOUSD: Source: GO Markets MT4 See here for more information on Oil Commodity Trading.

Upcoming News » 10:30pm Employment Change - CAD » 10:30pm Trade Balance - CAD » 10:30pm Unemployment Rate - CAD » 10:30pm Average Hourly Earnings - USD » 10:30pm Non-Farm Employment Change - USD » 10:30pm Unemployment Rate - USD The BOE delivered on market expectations overnight with a rate cut to historic lows of.25%. Even though the cut was fully priced in it didn’t help the GBP/USD as it lost over 150 pips post release. Oil continued its rise adding another 70 cents after a very soft Asain session.
European stocks had a very strong session backed by the rate cut from the BOE. The FTSE100 increased by 105.76 points in contrast, US stocks had a quiet night in trade. The S&P500 barely changed up by 0.02%.
RBA statement, there are current concerns over the AUD and China. They’re keeping the current direction for the GDP and CPI outlook. Japan’s real wages rose the most in 6 years but this figure is exaggerated by the effect of falling prices.
The AUDUSD today has been in one way traffic, buyers have taken it past its.7640 resistance level. Local stocks have been flat and the JPY has been in a tug of war battle throughout the day. The JPN225 started strongly but has been struggling to hold it’s open.
AUS200 has been very quiet but is still holding above its short term 5490 support level. The USD has mainly been weaker so far today. Tonight we have average hourly earnings, the non-farm payroll employment change, and unemployment figures coming out at 10:30pm AEST.
The market is looking for 0.2 increase in earnings, 180K increase in the employment change and a slight decrease in unemployment to 4.8%. Any big misses in the employment change will cause USD and equity index volatility. AUDUSD – Another very strong session so far today.
We have seen a break out of the.7640 resistance point that goes back to the 24 th of June. We have one more clear resistance point to be tested at.7670. For the moment the current uptrend looks very strong.
One thing to note, we have had a breakout and divergence is starting to build. No indication a turn is coming but it’s something to keep an eye on. HKG33 – Testing highs closing highs today.
A strong rally today has seen prices hit 22175 closing highs. This area lines up with a previous high set in December 2015. A break above 22285 reconfirms the current trends strength.
A fail at this area could see a retest of the 21580 to 21320 area. XAUUSD – Buyers have returned after yesterday’s short-term weakness. Yesterday’s reversal was a key in buyer commitment in the short term, but I still see 1367 – 1374 as levels that need to be closed above. 1374.88 has proven to be a turning point and holds significance.
Step one in the short term is a move over the current short term resistance seen at 1363.55. Good Trading. Please note that trading oil CFDs, Forex or Derivatives carries a high level of risk, including the risk of losing substantially more than your initial investment.
Also, you do not own or have any rights to the underlying assets. You should only trade if you can afford to carry these risks. Our offer is not designed to alter or modify any individual’s risk preference or encourage individuals to trade in a manner inconsistent with their own trading strategies.
All times are in AEST. Written by Joseph Jeffriess, GO Markets Market Strategist

Most political scientists believe that all problems in the world are related to politics, and most economists believe that all problems are rooted in economics. However, what’s happening in Turkey now seems to be a combination of both as I'll explain. Firstly, investors have always regarded Turkey as one of the Emerging Markets with good economic growth.
We can see from the statistics that the GDP has remained an average 7% to 8% growth in the past ten years, and it even exceeded 10% in 2015. It looks pretty, right? But this is just nominal GDP.
From Economics 101 we know that we should divide nominal GDP by inflation rate to get a real GDP figure. Here is the inflation rate of Turkey: It looks bad. In July 2018 this number soared to 15.8%, which begs the question: what caused such high inflation?
Let me give you the overall picture, and then we can discuss the detail. Firstly, the high inflation is boosted by food prices and household goods such as furniture. Secondly, Turkey relies heavily on importing foods and merchandises from foreign countries, which has created a consistently negative trade balance since the 1990's.
A constant trade deficit means you have to borrow debt to satisfy the consumption of that imported good. See how Turkey’s Government debt accumulated in the past decade: Today only one country, the US, appears to escape from this natural law, by borrowing infinite new debts to cover its old debts and prolong repaying these obligations until...well... the end of the world. On the surface, it would seem all other countries need to obey this rule and repay their debts, unlike the US.
Thus, when a country’s debt is accumulating to a relatively high number (we often use Debt to GDP ratios to monitor), this country’s economy become vulnerable and potentially easier to be attacked by other financial powers. You could argue that this is an unlevel playing field in some respects and the US could well be using its ability to take advantage of this situations as they arise. A perfect example of this was George Soros who famously attacked the currency of southeast Asia Countries in 1997.
Note the foreign debt-to-GDP ratios rose from 100% to 167% in the four economies within the Southeast Asia region during 1993–96. If Turkey can somehow avoid getting involved in any significant conflicts of the world and focus on developing its economy, this whole debt issue might sort itself out over time. But unfortunately, given Turkey’s geographic location, it appears destined to be pulled into most conflicts simply by proximity.
We all know how vital areas such as Istanbul and the Turkish Straits are throughout history. Internally, Turkey has a Kurdish ethnic issue and a high household debt issue; externally it has the downing of a warplane issue with Russia, and also an Armenian genocide conflict with Germany. The list goes on.
In short, this patch of land is no stranger to dealing with massive problems. Ultimately this latest crisis comes down to one thing. Does Turkey compromise with America’s arrogant request, or make a stand against Washington's tactics and attempt to go their own way?
That is the dilemma that President Erdogan is currently facing. Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.
Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk. Sources: TradeEconomics.com

New sanctions imposed on North Korea by United Nations (UN) Security Council North Korea has been slapped with new sanctions after the detonation of a hydrogen bomb, an even more powerful nuclear weapon than the atomic bomb. The new resolutions widely adopted by the international community show the urgency of restricting North Korea’s ability to funds its weapons programs. Sanctions were imposed in the past but these fresh sanctions are much harsher.
The US submitted 2 drafts of sanctions whereby they proposed a complete ban on oil in the first draft. After a few negotiations and backing from China and Russia, the second draft was less drastic but unanimously adopted by the UN members. It includes the following new resolutions: China, being the main ally for supplying North Korea with oil for military purposes, has agreed to put a cap on crude oil and refined petroleum products after rejecting a full embargo proposal.
A complete textile ban which accounts around $760 million of North Korea’s exports revenue was maintained and combined with the previous sanctions on their exports such as iron, coal, seafood, and other minerals. The United States strongly believe that the combined measures will account for 90% of their exports reported in 2016. The new sanctions also prohibit countries from recruiting North Koreans and approving new and existing joint ventures.
Warning from North Korea following new sanctions North Korea immediately condemned the act and warned the United States of the “greatest pain and suffering” following the toughest-ever sanctions. Kim Jong-un’s foreign ministry also mentioned that they “will make absolutely sure that the United States pays due price if measures restricting its oil supply and textiles exports were passed”. North Korea accused the United States of manipulating the UN members and persuading them into adopting illegal and unlawful sanctions against them.
The following days will be crucial. Markets might revert to safer asset classes with these new escalated tensions. Stay with us for more live updates!!!!
By: Deepta Bolaky GO Markets

NAFTA - What Happens Next The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into effect on 1 st January 1994 and it formed one of the World’s largest free trade zones. It laid down the foundations for a strong economic growth for the United States, Canada and Mexico. While there is ample evidence of its shared positive economic impact, but how about its costs to the United States?
Over the last couple of months, the question has been raised as to how positive NAFTA is, especially to the United States. During the Presidential election campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly said that the Agreement is only beneficial to Canada and Mexico and has threatened to end it with the two nations. » Impact on the US economy Since NAFTA has been in place, the United States trade with Canada and Mexico has more than trebled, growing faster than trade with countries around the world. Most statistics suggest that NAFTA had positive impact on the US GDP of around 0.5 percent (total addition of up to $80 billion) to the US economy.
One of the reasons why NAFTA is criticised is for destroying around half a million jobs and lowering the wages. The US has also seen its trade deficit has widening during that period. An exodus of US manufacturers across the border saving on labour costs has resulted in thousands of US manufacturing jobs lost to their Mexican neighbours.
That is one of the reasons Donald Trump is pushing to renegotiate the agreements and bring back jobs to the US. US manufacturing jobs from 1993 to 2016 Source: BLS It is hard to say with certainty if NAFTA is directly responsible for the decline in the manufacturing jobs sector since the biggest drop we have seen was from around 2000 to 2002. It is worth pointing out that China joined the World Trade Organisation on 11 th December 2001 so that may have had an impact on the drop in the manufacturing jobs too.
It has been noted that the automotive industry was one of the most affected industries since the agreement came into place back in 1994. Forex - USDMXN and USDCAD since Trumps decision to renegotiate NAFTA Click to enlarge Click to enlarge Source: GO Markets MT4 » What happens next? It looked like the NAFTA agreement was on its way out but on 27 th April Donald Trump announced he received phone calls from both the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of Mexico to make him change is his mind.
President Trump decided to make a surprising U-turn and will instead renegotiate NAFTA but on only one condition – if the deal is a fair for all three countries as he is pushing to bring back jobs to the US. There is no timeframe of when renegotiations will begin between the three countries but it is worth keeping an eye for further development as it will most likely re-shape world trade in the years to come. -By Klavs Valters

It’s been one year since the trade renegotiations on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, the United States and Mexico began. Since then we have seen tough rhetoric on how the agreement should look like moving forward from each country, especially the United States. But are we finally getting closer to an agreement?
About NAFTA The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into effect on 1st January 1994 and it formed one of the World’s largest free trade zones and laid down the foundations for a strong economic growth for the United States, Canada, and Mexico. However, in recent years the agreement has come under a lot of scrutiny from the US, with President Trump calling it "the worst trade deal ever made", which has led to renegotiations between the three nations. Latest developments It appears that the negotiations between the US and Mexico have been going well, with both reportedly close to agreeing on a deal in their talks to revise the NAFTA deal.
However, Canada has not been part of the latest part of the discussions. “Right now, it appears they are getting incredibly close to finishing the discussions between the U.S. and Mexico,” said Inu Manak, who has monitored the talks for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington. Even though the talks between the US and Mexico are going well, there will be no final deal on NAFTA unless Canada agrees to re-join the renegotiations. In a recent tweet, Donald Trump praised the new President of Mexico, however, he had a dig at Canada’s tariffs and trade barriers, threatening to tax Canadian made cars if they cannot make a deal.
In response to the President Trumps tweet, Canada Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland said that they will not change the course of the renegotiations. “Our focus is unchanged,” Adam Austen, a press secretary for Canada Foreign Affairs wrote in an email. “We’ll keep standing up for Canadian interests as we work toward a modernized trilateral NAFTA agreement.” Both US and Mexico are working hard to get a deal signed by the Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto before he departs office on 1st December to give way to the President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. The Canadian negotiating team have been on the sidelines in the recent part of discussions but are expected to join the negotiation table soon. However, the Mexican Economy Secretary Ildefonso Guajardo said that there are currently no timeframe for when the Canadian counterparts will join the discussions. “We have to make sure that the U.S.-Mexico bilaterals are done,” Guajardo said, adding that Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland will “hopefully” be a part of the discussions soon.
Financial markets The US Dollar has strengthened by around 5% since the beginning of the year against the Canadian Dollar, currently trading at around 1.31 level. However, it has weakened by around 1.2% against the Mexican Peso. Currently trading at around 19.18 level.
Further developments in the talks will certainly have an impact on the financial markets moving forward. USDCAD - Daily Chart USDMXN - Daily Chart Klāvs Valters Market Analyst Sources: Go Markets MT4, Twitter
