市场资讯及洞察

Markets are navigating a familiar mix of macro and event risk with China growth signals, US inflation updates, central-bank guidance and earnings that will help confirm whether the growth narrative is broadening or narrowing.
At a glance
- China: Q4 GDP + December activity + PBOC decision
- US: PCE inflation (date per current BEA schedule)
- Japan: BOJ decision (JPY/carry sensitivity)
- Earnings: tech, industrials, energy, materials in focus
- Gold: near record highs (yields/USD/geopolitics watch)
Geopolitics remain fluid. Any escalation could shift risk sentiment quickly and produce price action that diverges from current baselines.
China
- China Q4 GDP: Monday, 19 January at 1:00 pm (AEDT)
- Retail sales: Monday, 19 January at 1:00 pm (AEDT)
- PBOC policy decision: Monday, 19 January at 12.30 pm (AEDT)
China’s Q4 GDP and December activity data, together with the PBOC decision, will shape expectations for China's growth momentum and the durability of policy support.
Market impact
- Commodity-linked FX: AUD and NZD may react if growth expectations or the policy tone shifts.
- Equities: The Shanghai Composite, Hang Seng and ASX 200 could respond to any change in how investors view demand and stimulus traction.
- Commodities: Industrial metals and oil may move on any reassessment of China-linked demand.
US
- PCE Inflation: Friday, 23 January at 2:00 am (AEDT)
- PSI: Friday, 23 January at 2:00 am (AEDT)
- S&P Flash (PMI): Saturday, 24 January at 1:45 am (AEDT)
- Netflix: Tuesday, 20 January 2026 at 8:00 am (AEDT)
The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index is the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge and a key input for rate expectations and (by extension) Treasury yields, the USD, and growth stocks. Markets are likely to focus on whether the reading changes the inflation path that is currently priced, rather than simply matching consensus.
Market impact
- USD: May move if rate expectations shift, particularly against JPY and EUR.
- US equities: Growth and small caps, including the Nasdaq and Russell 2000, may be sensitive if the data or interpretation challenge the current rate outlook.
- Gold futures: May be influenced indirectly via moves in Treasury yields and the USD.
Japan
Key reports
- Inflation: Friday, 23 January at 10:30 am (AEDT)
- Bank of Japan (BoJ) Interest Rate Meeting: Friday, 23 January at ~2:00 pm (AEDT)
Markets will focus on what the BOJ signals about inflation, wages and the policy path. A shift in tone can move JPY quickly and flow through to broader risk via carry positioning.
Market impact:
- JPY/USD pairs and crosses: Pairs are sensitive to any guidance change and the USD/JPY has broken above 158, but the move could reverse if the BOJ strikes a more hawkish tone.
- Japan equities and global sentiment: Could react if the dynamics shift.
- Broader risk assets: May be influenced via moves in the USD and volatility conditions.
US earnings
- Netflix: Tuesday, 20 January 2026 at 8:00 am (AEDT)
- Johnson & Johnson: Wednesday, 21 January at 10:20 pm (AEDT)
- Intel Corporation: Thursday, 22 January at 8:00 am (AEDT)
A busy week of US earnings is expected with large-cap names across multiple sectors reporting. Early results and, importantly, forward guidance may help clarify whether growth is broadening or becoming more selective.
With the S&P 500 close to the psychological 7,000 level, earnings could be a catalyst for a fresh test of highs or a pullback if guidance disappoints.
Market impact
- Upside scenario: Results that exceed expectations and are supported by steady guidance could support sector and broader market sentiment.
- Downside scenario: Cautious guidance, particularly on margins and capex, could weigh on individual names and spill into broader indices if it becomes a repeated message.
- Read-through: Early reporters in each sector may influence expectations for related stocks, especially where peers have not yet provided updated guidance.
- Bottom line: This is a week where the market may trade the forward picture more than the rear-view numbers. The key is whether guidance supports the idea of broad, durable growth, or whether it points to a more selective backdrop as 2026 unfolds.
Gold
Continued strength in gold may support gold equities and gold-linked ETFs relative to the broader market but geopolitical developments and policy uncertainty may influence demand for defensive assets.
A sustained reversal in gold could be interpreted by some market participants as a sign of improved risk confidence. The driver set matters, especially whether the move is led by yields, USD strength, or a fade in event risk.


昨日,澳大利亚储备银行(RBA)宣布将基准利率下调25个基点至4.1%,这是自2020年以来的首次降息。此举旨在应对国内经济增长放缓和通胀压力减弱的局面。然而,这一政策调整不仅影响澳大利亚本国经济,也在全球范围内引发了一系列连锁反应。这次澳联储的降息决定主要基于通胀放缓和经济增速放缓两个基本因素。从2022年通胀达到峰值以来,澳大利亚的基础通胀率已从高位回落至3.2%,说明通胀压力的缓解速度略快于预期。 并且2024年第四季度数据显示,澳大利亚GDP增长动力已经开始减弱,主要可以体现在家庭消费疲软,私营部门就业增长乏力等方面。然而虽说是降息了,但澳联储主席米歇尔·布洛克强调,货币政策仍将“保持紧缩”,未来的政策调整需要根据通胀与就业数据而决定。

这次澳联储降息的影响并不仅仅局限于对澳洲经济市场,全球范围内债券和外汇市场等等都受到了不同程度的影响。比如受澳联储降息影响,全球多国政府债券收益率上升:美国10年期国债收益率升至4.55%,英国10年期国债收益率攀升至4.56%,德国10年期国债收益率上升至2.5%,澳大利亚10年期国债收益率跃升至4.51%。而外汇市场上与澳币相关的货币对波动则更加明显,澳元兑人民币的汇率经历连续上涨后在18日开始下跌,但消息公布后有瞬间上涨趋势至4.6211,澳元兑美元的汇率也同样走高至0.6366。这次降息并没有使澳元下行的原因也有很多,比如市场早就对此次降息做出了预期,从通胀、汇率等数据可以看出已经对此次降息做出了消化。尽管实施了降息,澳联储在政策声明中仍强调,未来的货币政策将依旧保持谨慎,避免过度宽松。这种鹰派立场增强了投资者对澳元的信心,推动了其汇率的上升。而全球范围内风险情绪的改善也给澳元带来了短期的支撑,近期全球贸易紧张局势有所缓解,市场风险偏好上升,投资者对高收益资产的需求增加。而澳元作为商品货币,通常会在风险情绪改善时受到追捧,从而升值。

对于澳洲本国来说,最显著的变化可能就是房产业要迎来明显提振。降息通常会降低贷款成本,提高借贷意愿,尤其是在澳洲这样一个高度依赖房贷的市场。过去一年,由于高利率环境,澳大利亚房地产市场经历了一段低迷期,房屋销售量放缓,投资者持观望态度。而本次降息可能会推动房屋贷款需求回暖,带动房价出现短期反弹。然而,考虑到澳联储仍然维持相对谨慎的政策立场,长期来看,房价上涨的可持续性仍需关注未来的利率变化和市场信心。其次这次降息也会给澳洲的消费市场带来信心,根据澳洲零售协会(ARA)的数据,澳洲零售销售自2024年下半年以来增长乏力,但这次宽松货币政策的实施会有效帮助刺激澳洲消费经济,推动消费回暖。

最后,国际贸易层面,澳元贬值的预期可能提振出口,但进口成本上升或带来挑战。尽管本次降息后澳元短期内走强,但整体来看,随着市场对未来进一步降息的预期增加,澳元可能面临一定贬值压力。较弱的澳元通常有利于出口,澳大利亚的矿产(如铁矿石)、农产品(如小麦、乳制品等)在国际市场上的竞争力将有所增强。但与此同时,进口商品价格可能上升,尤其是澳洲高度依赖进口的电子产品、汽车和消费品等领域,可能会使得国内消费者面临更高的进口成本,影响部分行业的盈利能力。总的来说,尽管澳联储开启了降息周期,但其谨慎态度表明,未来政策走向将取决于经济数据和全球经济环境的发展。所以短期内澳元可能还是会受到支撑抵抗下行风险,但未来究竟会如何变化,作为投资者的我们能做的就是多观察市场动态和各国联储的态度,灵活应对不断变化的经济形势。免责声明:GO Markets 分析师或外部发言人提供的信息基于其独立分析或个人经验。所表达的观点或交易风格仅代表其个人;并不代表 GO Markets 的观点或立场。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Yoyo Ma | GO Markets 墨尔本中文部


So for the first time in over four years the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has cut the official cash rate by 25 basis points to 4.1%. They fired the gun they've loaded it for the possibility of more but are they blanks? Let's drive into what was said in the statement, what outlook was given and what this means for the Australian dollar and your trading going forward.
First – the action. The RBA made its first move in over a year 15 months to be exact, cutting the cash rate by 25 basis points to 4.1% at its February meeting. This marks the first rate reduction since November 2020, and marks what looks to be the other side of the “Table Top” mountain effect for the cash rate as we had discussed when the hike cycle began.
While the cut itself was widely expected - the RBA went full hawk in explaining what the outlook and rate cutting cycle will look like particularly on expectations of an extended easing cycle. To really highlight this point, have a look at the AUD when RBA Chair Michele Bullock was speaking on this point during her press conference. The short reversal is telling.
The crux of the whole position is - the RBA acknowledges progress on inflation but remains cautious about declaring victory. And that is a fair position to hold, core inflation is running at 3.2% and headline at 2.4%. Yet the bank is forecasting headline inflation to flare to 3.7% come December with core (trimmed mean) at 2.7% unchanged for TWO AND A HALF YEARS!
It reflects a delicate balancing act—while inflation is tracking lower, the labour market remains unexpectedly tight. The central bank wants (needs) more evidence before committing to further cuts, making it clear that markets are getting ahead of themselves hence the moves in the AUD. It begs the question: Why Cut Rates Now?
The Inflation-Labor Market Trade-Off Clearly the RBA’s decision to ease policy was largely driven by better-than-expected inflation data in Q4 2024. Disinflation has been happening faster than anticipated, which gave the central bank confidence to remove some policy restrictiveness, which it has always said it would as soon as it thought it could. But inflation is only one side of the equation.
The flip side is the labour market – which is hot and running hotter than expected. Unemployment remains at 4.2%, below the RBA’s estimated full employment level of 4.5%. While job vacancies have eased slightly, demand for workers remains strong, which could keep wage pressures elevated.
Caveat – the wage price index the day after the RBA meeting came in at 3.2% meaning in real wages terms wages growth is 0. But – it still presents a risk: easing too much too soon could reignite inflation, particularly in wage-sensitive sectors like services. Hence the hawkish stance.
As mentioned inflation is projected to settle at 2.7%—still above the 2.5% midpoint of its target range—while unemployment is expected to remain relatively low. This suggests that the RBA is not entirely convinced that inflation will continue declining without further policy restraint. The central bank is effectively saying: "We’ll cut where possible as we don’t want to leave policy restrictive any longer than necessary, but we’re not ready to call this the start of a full easing cycle." Is this just new aged jawboning?
Moderating the Market We feel we are now entering a new phase – upside jawboning a deliberate ploy to temper market expectations and more importantly – the consumer. The concern is that easing policy could trigger a rebound in spending, asset prices, and broader economic activity—creating inflationary pressures that could undo recent progress. This is why Governor Michele Bullock took a firm stance in her press conference, directly challenging the market’s expectation of multiple rate cuts and described the market’s pricing—which holds three additional cuts in 2025—as " far too confident." In short the Board’s message is clear: February’s cut does not automatically signal a sustained easing cycle.
The Board remains data-dependent and will only consider further rate reductions if inflation risks subside and the labour market shows definitive signs of cooling. What’s the biggest threat to the RBA? The Federal Election and Fiscal Policy Never underestimate a government and spending money – which makes fiscal policy risk number 1.
With a federal election due by May 17, government spending could play a significant role in shaping the economic outlook. If fiscal stimulus is ramped up, through cost-of-living relief measures or infrastructure spending, it will add upward pressure to inflation, thus reducing the urgency for further rate cuts. The RBA has explicitly stated that its forecasts do not assume any additional election-driven spending, meaning any surprises on this front could alter the rate outlook and the 3.7% headline figure could be worse.
Consumer and Housing Market Reactions Another key factor is how households respond to this rate cut. If consumer confidence rebounds strongly and household spending picks up, this may also signal a reassessment. Housing both prices and construction activity will be other critical indicators.
A surge in property market activity, driven by lower borrowing costs, could create renewed inflationary pressures, forcing the RBA to hold back on further cuts. And let’s be honest this has happened every easy cycle. Global Economic, Geopolitics The broader global economic landscape also plays a role.
If central banks in major economies, such as the US Federal Reserve, move more aggressively on rate cuts, this could influence the RBA’s decision-making. A more dovish global monetary environment could ease financial conditions in Australia, allowing the RBA to be more patient in its approach. Counter this with trade tariffs, trade wars and tit-for-tact reactions that increase inflation may lead to not only a long pause but also the risk of hikes.
Crystal ball time For now, the market has a cut fully priced in by the July meeting but the risk of a delay is growing. The RBA’s cautious approach suggests it wants more time to assess how inflation, employment, and economic activity evolve before making another move, suggesting September is a more likely month for the next cut, all things being equal. Ultimately, the path forward remains highly uncertain.
This means the central bank is unlikely to move quickly, and expectations of a rapid series of rate cuts may need to be revised. Hence as traders the AUD weakness may now have found a floor as cuts are not going to be as forthcoming. In short: while this cut marks the beginning of policy easing, it’s far from a signal that the RBA is on an aggressive cutting path.
The data will dictate the next steps, and for now, the Board remains firmly in watch-and-wait mode.


之前几个月说了很多纯文字版的分析,今天再让我们回到当年,用红极一时的K线图配合基本面分析给大家来做一次专业且全面的澳元分析扯淡。首先要和大家澄清,按照科班培训模板,也就是咱们经常说到的那些投行,基金公司的分析模板写作模式,看上去很难,但是实际上和我们中学语文作文模板差不了多少。基本结构就是:总结式开头,加一个背景介绍,然后按照时间线来走:先切入产品过去12个月走势,配合过去12个月的基本经济环境加上这个产品所在行业或领域的经济变化。第二步:说现在,当前走势如何,以及当前产品所在行业或领域的经济情况和其他环境如何。第三步:猜未来。毕竟未来谁也不知道,所以不论分析的多专业,多仔细,说到底,都是猜测。无非就是可能性大和小的不同。好了,我们开始。总结式开头:澳元,又被称之为大宗商品货币,其走势和很多工业原材料例如铁,煤,铜等价格走势有着密切的联系。而由于目前中国是全世界对于工业原材料消耗和进口量最大的国家,因此中国对于资源的需求量,将会对澳元走势产生巨大的影响。而除了铁矿石价格会影响澳元以外,美元加息的快慢,以及中国本身的经济走势也是另外两个影响澳元走势的重要原因。下一步:说过去。澳元在过去20年实际上和美元的汇率几乎经历了50%的起伏变化。从2007年巅峰时期超过美元1:1的汇率,到2018年的一度逼近0.5,再到2020年重新回到0.8,最后到如今的0.63附近.如果用一句话来总结澳元过去24年的走势,基本上和中国在2000年初加入世贸以后的经济周期高度重合。

在上面这幅澳元25年的走势图力,其中三个最关键的价格分别是
- 2001年初中国加入世贸以后的经济腾飞
- 中国在金融危机之后宣布4万亿刺激计划后的1年。
- 中美贸易战最严重的时期。
如果我们从超长时间周期,月线图上来看,澳元/美元其实早在2014年之后就跌破了关键的支撑位,最然在2016和2020年两次向上突破但是都没有冲破趋势线。在2020年之后,澳元和美元的走势几乎就是一路向下。而且从现在的长期趋势线组之间的距离来看,这个下跌的趋势并没有缓和,反而似乎还在加剧。其背后的原因,很大程度上也和中美高度竞争以及房地产行业停滞之后的经济有关。第二步:说现在说现在,通常就是说过去12个月到目前为止的走势。还是一样,完整的分析需要经济面+技术面综合考虑。过去12个月,是美国一直降息的过程,然而奇怪的是,按理说,美国降息,澳元不降息,那澳元利息是不是比美元还高?那是不是应该美元下跌,澳元反向上涨呢?如果抛开其他因素,这个逻辑是对的。但是,影响澳元的三大因素中,排在美元利息之前最大的影响因素则是铁矿石的价格走势。

然后我们再来看看过去12个月澳元和美元的走势图他们是不是大趋势上很像?

所以,虽然美元在降息,澳洲迟迟不降息,但是由于国际铁矿石价格以及中国过去进口矿产的总量影响,使得过去12个月,澳元在和美元的走势上显得非常的力不从心。但是,最近从1月以来,澳元在0.6150附近构建两个底部之后,目前在趋势线里,已经走出了一个明显的反弹信号。虽然距离关键阻力价格0.6450还有不少距离,但是一旦逼近甚至突破,不排除澳元在短期内会有更多反弹。为啥澳元可以反弹呢?这不是说美元还有可能短期不降息了么?那不应该澳元下跌么?解铃还须系铃人:还是铁矿石和中国经济在过去2,3个月出现的一系列利好消息,以及目前澳洲对于未来澳元降息力度和频繁度的期望值大大下降,都是帮助澳元在短期内反弹的原因。最后说未来:如果单纯从技术图形来看,周线图走势是一个很好的长期走势参考指标:澳元和美元自从2022年出现周线级别的下跌信号以后,就再也没回到支撑线以上。虽然在2022年11月,和2024年8月有过两次努力,但是最后都以失败告终。

从技术角度分析,现在的反弹也仅仅属于底部的反弹,距离大趋势的反转依然有至少350个基点的距离(0.6690)因此在最终反转周线级别的下跌趋势之前,技术上来说,澳元和美元下跌的大趋势并没有改变。配合经济分析:目前特朗普上台,再次开始增加关税的情况下,只有极少数情况,可以让澳元出现强劲反弹。而其中一种情况,就是中美可以达成贸易协定而停止贸易战,或者至少暂时停止。并且配合其他中国的经济刺激政策以及美国对中国临时的限制放缓。只有这样,大家对于未来中国重新提高资源需求量的期望才会增加。也只有这样,才可以提高资源产品的价格,从而帮助澳元走出目前的下跌。澳洲降息的时间可以在短期影响澳元,但是无法影响长期。我的判断依然和之前一样:长期影响澳元走势的因素,澳洲自己无法决定。免责声明:GO Markets 分析师或外部发言人提供的信息基于其独立分析或个人经验。所表达的观点或交易风格仅代表其个人;并不代表 GO Markets 的观点或立场。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Mike Huang | GO Markets 销售总监


The financial markets are evolving rapidly, driven by increased data availability, computational advancements, and sophisticated trading strategies. Traders—both institutional and retail—are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) and, more specifically, Machine Learning (ML) to gain an edge in the markets. At its core, Machine Learning is a subset of AI that enables systems to learn from data and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed.
This is a fundamental shift from traditional rule-based trading systems, which rely on static conditions and predefined rules. Instead, ML-powered strategies can adapt, refine, and improve their decision-making process over time, allowing traders to respond more dynamically to ever-changing market conditions. In this article we attempt to unravel not only what ML is but why is ML is likely to become such a dominant force in trading, how you might get ML to work for you, AND even if you are likely to sit on the sidelines what it all may mean for discretionary traders and how it could change the way process move.
Why Now? The Perfect Storm for ML Adoption Several key developments in technology and financial markets have contributed to the widespread adoption of machine learning in trading. I have identified the primary four factors which include: Explosion of Market Data Financial markets generate enormous amounts of data every second, including price movements, order book data, trading volumes, macroeconomic reports, earnings releases, news articles, and even sentiment indicators from social media.
Historically, traders have relied upon basic statistical models or simple technical indicators to analyse this data. However, with ML, traders can now process and extract insights from vast amounts of structured and unstructured data far beyond human capabilities. For example, natural language processing (NLP), a branch of AI, can scan financial news sources, social media platforms like Twitter, and earnings call transcripts in real time to gauge market sentiment.
This allows traders to make more data-driven decisions, predicting how a specific news event might impact stock prices before traditional market participants react. Advancements in Computing Power The ability to leverage ML in trading was once limited by hardware constraints. However, the rise of cloud computing, GPU (graphics processing units) – which may be better than CPUs for acceleration of data pattern matching, and quantum computing research has dramatically increased the speed and efficiency of processing large datasets.
In practical terms, this means that ML models can be trained and executed in real-time, allowing traders (or trading algos) to make split-second decisions based on rapidly evolving market conditions. For instance, hedge funds and proprietary trading firms now run ML-driven models that execute high-frequency trades (HFT) at lightning-fast speeds. These models can analyse thousands of data points within milliseconds to determine the most optimal trade execution strategy.
Algorithmic Trading Dominance Institutional trading desks and hedge funds increasingly depend on sophisticated algorithms to identify patterns, predict price movements, and execute trades with precision. Machine learning adds an additional layer of intelligence, allowing these strategies to evolve and optimize continuously. For example, ML-powered quantitative trading strategies can adjust trading parameters dynamically, responding to shifts in volatility, changes in liquidity conditions, or sudden macroeconomic shocks (such as Federal Reserve rate decisions).
This gives firms a huge competitive advantage over traders using fixed-rule systems. Retail Trader Accessibility This is where it may become more relevant to you or I in a trading context! Machine learning is no longer limited to large institutions with deep pockets.
AI-powered tools and trading platforms are making ML-driven strategies more accessible to retail traders. Many brokers and third-party developers now offer plug-and-play ML models that traders can integrate into their trading systems, even without a deep understanding of coding or data science. For instance, platforms like MetaTrader 5, along with the help of those who know programming language, allow traders to build and test ML-based strategies, This democratisation of technology ensures that even independent traders and not just the big players can begin to utilise the leverage in decision making associated with AI-driven system development potential.
How is Machine Learning Used in Trading? Having covered why ML is a NOW issue in trading, let's explore in more detail how it can be used in trading so you can begin to understand its full potential. Machine learning is transforming trading strategies in several significant ways, enabling traders to gain insights, optimise trade execution, and react more dynamically to market movements and changes in sentiment.
Identifying Patterns That Humans Might Miss One of the most valuable aspects of machine learning is its ability to detect hidden patterns and relationships that may not be immediately obvious to human traders and traditional forms of technical analysis and standard indicators. Some key applications include: Detecting correlations between price, volume, sentiment, and macroeconomic indicators that are too complex for traditional analysis. Recognizing trading patterns such as mean reversion, momentum shifts, and breakout signals.
Using sentiment analysis on financial news, social media, and earnings reports to anticipate potential price movements. To give a potential example, an ML model can analyse Bitcoin price action, news sentiment, and trading volume to determine whether a sudden spike in tweets mentioning Bitcoin is more likely to trigger a short-term rally or a market dump. Optimising Trading Strategies for Higher Accuracy Machine learning doesn’t just help traders recognise patterns—it actively refines and optimizes trading strategies by learning from past market conditions and improving decision-making processes.
Reducing False Signals: ML models apply probability techniques in an attempt to limit the occurrence of false positives. This is particularly useful for traders whose strategies may struggle with whipsaws in volatile markets. Refining Trade Entry and Exit Points: Instead of rigid rules, ML systems dynamically adjust trade timing based on changing volatility, volume, and market sentiment.
Automating Risk Management: ML-powered risk models optimize stop-loss levels and position sizing based on the current market environment (and the likelihood that this may change) For example, a forex trader might use an ML system that widens stop-losses during high-volatility events like FOMC rate decisions and tightens them when price action is stable. Adapting to Changing Market Conditions Unlike traditional strategies, ML models dynamically adjust parameters in response to market shifts. Regime Detection: ML identifies when markets switch from trending to ranging, adjusting trading strategies accordingly.
Adaptive Position Sizing: Models automatically increase or decrease trade size based on real-time risk assessments. Feature Selection: ML continuously selects the most relevant technical indicators based on current market behaviour. For instance, an ML-driven strategy might rely on moving averages during a trend, but switch to RSI and Bollinger Bands when markets consolidate.
How Machine Learning Works in applying trading – A process model Machine learning follows a structured four-stage process when applied to trading. This process ensures that trading models are built, refined, and continuously improved to enhance the chances of profitability and appropriate adaptability. Should you dive into the world of ML this would provide an appropriate framework for you to follow.
Let’s break down each stage with examples of how traders and institutions can, and do, apply these concepts in real-world markets. Recognising Patterns – Collecting and Analysing Market Data The foundation of any machine learning model is data collection. Without accurate and comprehensive data, ML models cannot learn effectively.
In trading, this involves gathering historical and real-time market data, such as: Price action (open, high, low, close, and volume) Order book data (bids, asks, and execution flow) Macroeconomic indicators (inflation rates, GDP data, central bank decisions) News and sentiment analysis (financial news articles, earnings reports, and social media sentiment) Let’s give an example to help clarify how this could work. A hedge fund using ML might aggregate 10 years of historical price data from multiple asset classes (stocks, forex, crypto, commodities) along with real-time social media sentiment data from Twitter and Reddit. The model scans for correlations between news sentiment and asset price movements, allowing it to predict how a stock may react to a particular news headline before the broader market does.
Using Additional Factors – Feature Selection and Confluence Indicators Once raw data is collected, the next step is to identify the most relevant factors (also called features) that contribute to successful trading decisions. Feature selection helps filter out unnecessary noise and focus on variables that strongly influence price action. ML models use statistical techniques to evaluate which features matter most, including: Standard Technical indicators: Moving Averages, RSI, Bollinger Bands, MACD, etc.
Order flow dynamics: Imbalance between buyers and sellers at key price levels. Volatility measures: ATR (Average True Range) and historical volatility. Sentiment indicators: Word frequency analysis from news articles.
Again, here is an example to help illustrate this approach. Suppose a trader is building an ML model to predict breakout trades in the S&P 500 index. Initially, the model considers 100 different features, including volume, volatility, RSI divergence, Bollinger Bands, earnings reports, and Federal Reserve announcements.
After running a feature selection process, the model identifies that only five key factors have predictive power—for instance, breakouts are most reliable when combined with a sudden surge in trading volume, an increase in open interest, and a bullish sentiment score from recent news headlines. By narrowing down the list of variables, the ML system focuses only on high-probability signals, reducing false positives and improving accuracy. Testing and Adjusting Probabilities – Training the Model Once relevant features are identified, the next step is to train the ML model.
Training involves feeding historical data into the model, allowing it to learn how different market conditions impact trade outcomes. This phase involves: Backtesting: Running the model on past data to see how well it would have performed historically. Cross-validation: Splitting data into multiple sets to prevent overfitting (where the model memorizes past data instead of generalizing patterns).
Probability adjustments: Refining the model by increasing the weight of more reliable signals and reducing the impact of weaker ones. As an example, a forex trader using ML wants to develop a model that predicts trend reversals in EUR/USD. Initially, the model has an accuracy of 55%, which is slightly better than random chance.
However, after adjusting the model’s probability weighting, the trader discovers that reversal trades are significantly more reliable when price is near a key Fibonacci retracement level AND volatility is low. After refining these inputs, the model’s accuracy improves to 68%, making it a potentially more viable trading tool. This stage is crucial because many ML models fail when they are over-optimized for past data but don’t perform well in real-time markets.
The goal is to find patterns that repeat across different time periods and market conditions. One of the challenges of this of course is to determine what constitutes a reasonable amount of past data and how this differs depending on the timeframe under investigation. Programming and Evaluating Results – Testing in Live Markets Once an ML model has been trained and optimized, the final step is deploying it in real-time trading.
This process involves simulated (demo) trading, forward-testing, and continuous performance monitoring. At this stage, traders must ensure: The model performs well in real-time data streams, not just historical backtesting. It adapts to changing market conditions rather than being reliant on past patterns.
Risk management is incorporated so that even if predictions fail, drawdowns remain controlled. AND is consistently monitored to quickly identify and potential intervene on changing performance. For example, a hedge fund may develop an ML model to trade Bitcoin breakout patterns.
In backtests, the model had a 72% win rate. However, once deployed in live markets, it struggles due to sudden changes in Bitcoin’s liquidity conditions and large institutional order flows. To fix this, the fund integrates real-time order book analysis, allowing the model to detect large buy/sell orders from major players.
After this adjustment, the model stabilizes and achieves consistent profitability in live trading. Many traders assume that once an ML model is built, it will work indefinitely. Just to reinforce the need for consistent monitoring, remember markets are constantly evolving.
The most successful machine learning models are those that are continuously monitored, retrained, and optimised based on the impact of new data on previously developed systems. What Machine Learning may mean for market price action for all traders. The growing influence of machine learning in trading is reshaping how markets behave.
Whether choosing to be an active participant or simply a discretionary trader it is essential to give some thinking about how market prices, and the movement of such could be impacted through a proliferation of ML driven strategies and automated models. Here are FOUR key ways ML may already be altering price action dynamics: Smoother Trends with Fewer Pullbacks Historically, market trends have often experienced frequent retracements, with price pulling back before resuming its primary direction. However, as ML-powered trading models become more dominant, trends are becoming smoother and more sustained.
This is because ML-driven trend-following strategies can identify high-probability trend continuations and execute trades that reinforce directional movement. For example, large hedge funds using ML-driven strategies may enter scaling positions, gradually increasing exposure instead of making single large trades. This reduces erratic price movements and contributes to more gradual, extended trends.
Faster Breakouts & Fewer False Signals One of the biggest frustrations for traders is entering a breakout trade, only for price to quickly reverse—a phenomenon known as a false breakout or "fakeout." Machine learning is improving breakout trading strategies by identifying breakout strength indicators, such as volume surges, volatility expansions, and order flow imbalances. For instance, ML models analysing Bitcoin price action may detect that breakouts with a 30% increase in trading volume have a significantly higher chance of success compared to breakouts without volume confirmation. As a result, traders using ML-based breakout models filter out weak breakouts and focus only on those with strong supporting evidence.
Increased Stop-Loss Hunting & Engineered Liquidity Grabs As ML-powered algorithms become more sophisticated, they are increasingly able to predict where retail traders and traditional algorithmic strategies place stop-loss orders. This has led to a rise in engineered liquidity grabs, where price briefly spikes below key support levels (or above resistance levels) to trigger stop-loss orders before reversing in the intended direction. For example, an ML-driven institutional trading desk might analyse order book data and recognize that a high concentration of stop-loss orders sits just below a key support level.
The algorithm may execute a series of aggressive sell orders to trigger those stops, temporarily pushing the price lower. Once the stop losses are triggered, the algorithm quickly reverses its position and buys back at a lower price, capitalising on the forced liquidation of retail traders. More Algorithmic Whipsaws in Low-Liquidity Zones As ML-powered trading strategies become more widespread, low-liquidity markets are experiencing an increase in whipsaws and rapid price reversals.
This is because ML algorithms are constantly competing with one another, leading to aggressive, short-term volatility spikes when multiple models react to the same data simultaneously. For example, in markets with thin liquidity—such as exotic forex pairs or small-cap stocks—ML-driven strategies might detect an inefficiency and rush to exploit it. However, because multiple trading models recognize the same opportunity at the same time, prices can experience violent, rapid movements as algorithms aggressively adjust their positions.
This has made it increasingly challenging for manual traders to navigate low-liquidity environments without getting stopped out by unexpected reversals. Final Thoughts: Machine Learning as a Continuous Process There are two key takeaways I want you to get from this article. Firstly, machine learning is here to stay and is only likely to proliferate further impacting on strategy developed but at the CORE of trading – will impact on the traditional way we see asset prices move.
Even if not an active part of ML in how you decide to trade you need to keep abreast of what is happening in this world and the potential changes to traditional technical analysis techniques that may necessitate a review of how YOU trade now. Secondly, machine learning in trading is not a “set-it-and-forget-it” system. Rather, it is a continuous learning process where models must be refined, adapted, and improved based on real-time data and evolving market conditions.
Those who do embrace this are likely to fall very short of its potential. There are NO SHORT CUTS in the process described nor in the need for continuous and thorough performance measurement and evaluation. Traders and institutions that effectively integrate ML into their strategies gain a significant edge by leveraging data-driven decision-making, automation, and adaptive learning.
While ML does not guarantee success, it reduces human bias, improves accuracy, and enhances trading efficiency, making it one of the most powerful tools for modern market participants.


热门话题
上周美股强势上涨,扭转了美国金融数据的压制。CPI和PPI均高于预期,但鲍威尔国会山表态最终以服软特朗普收尾,美联储考虑降息以配合关税政策组建经济强化组合拳。本周没有重大金融数据影响市场,财报方面也没有股指高权重企业冲击。澳大利亚本周二有望迎来加息以来首次降息,不过预期澳联储也仅仅降息25个基点,而新西兰则有望降息50个基点。周四美股三大股指震荡不大,纳指强势上冲,AI应用成为关键因素。近期AI应用持续火爆,AI医疗股节节高升,进一步兑现今年AI基础转向AI应用的预期。核电板块则分化明显,电力供应的缺口持续存在,CEG和VST保持缓慢稳步上行,继续适合长期持有,核技术股普遍回调,铀矿股因国际铀价破位下跌而持续走低。量子计算概念周五表现也不尽人意。无人机和机器人概念周五均跌多涨少。今天美股休市,且看衍生品市场表现。

今日A股港股大幅上涨,因Deepseek引发的产业效率提升预计使得外资涌入亚洲市场,AI ASIA进一步发酵,China50和HK50持续大涨。美元指数持续回落至107下方,金价周五也大幅走低回到2880平台,恐慌变动不大,油价继续继续看空,美油周五扩大跌幅,但依然保持在70美元以上,随着特朗普和俄罗斯当局谈判深入,俄罗斯有望进一步释放超亿桶原油,美油价格很快将回到70以下。外汇方面澳元周五走强,澳美回到0.635,美日随着美元回落而走低,中期有望回到150下方。美元人民币也回到了7.25平台。免责声明:GO Markets 分析师或外部发言人提供的信息基于其独立分析或个人经验。所表达的观点或交易风格仅代表其个人;并不代表 GO Markets 的观点或立场。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Xavier Zhang | GO Markets 高级分析师


热门话题
中国动画电影《哪吒之魔童闹海》也就是《哪吒2》自上映以来,取得了令人瞩目的成绩。截至北京时间2025年2月13日19时10分,影片全球票房突破100亿元人民币,超越《超级马里奥兄弟大电影》,进入全球影史票房榜前17名,成为首部进入全球票房榜前20的亚洲电影。 这一现象级的成功,不仅在文化领域引起广泛关注,也对相关行业、经济文化转型以及金融市场产生了深远影响。光线传媒作为《哪吒2》的主要出品方,在电影上映后迎来股价大幅上涨。2月5日,光线传媒股价强势涨停,涨幅达到20.04%,创下2023年8月以来的新高,收盘价为11.44元/股,创2023年8月以来新高。截至2月10日收盘,光线传媒收盘价为16.75元/股,单日涨幅为19.99%。此外,华策影视、中国电影等相关影视股也出现不同程度的上涨,这些现象都反映出了市场对国产动画行业的投资信心明显回暖。

近年来,中国动画电影市场快速成长,从《哪吒之魔童降世》到《熊出没》系列,再到《长安三万里》,票房数据屡创新高。这表明,国产动画不仅在国内市场赢得认可,还逐步具备了国际竞争力。这次《哪吒2》的成功,不仅推动了动画制作公司,也带动了特效制作、衍生品开发和院线放映等相关行业的发展。除了中国本土市场,《哪吒2》在北美、欧洲和东南亚市场同样表现强劲,成为近年来中国电影在海外市场表现最亮眼的作品之一。不同于传统的中国功夫题材动画,《哪吒2》结合了中国传统神话与现代叙事风格,受到了国际观众的青睐。而随着中国动画的全球化发展,未来也有可能联动迪士尼,索尼等西方影视动画公司合作,拓展海外市场,为相关影视股提供新的增长点。除了电影票房,《哪吒2》的成功也带动了衍生品经济的发展。数据显示,目前电影IP衍生品市场规模已经突破1500亿元,其中动漫、影视相关周边产品占比超过50%。在这一趋势下,电影公司与衍生品公司将迎来新的市场机会。光线传媒已启动哪吒系列衍生品开发,涵盖潮玩、手办、服饰、文创产品等多个领域,而华强方特也在主题公园业务中融入更多国产动画IP,这些企业有望从衍生品市场获得长期收入。

2024年以来,A股传媒板块整体表现相对疲软,但从2025年春节开始间,影视行业龙头股光线传媒、华策影视、中国电影等股价大幅上涨,市场情绪明显改善。而《哪吒2》的火爆上映,进一步加强了投资者对国产动画影视行业的信心。而由于《哪吒2》的现象级成功,资本市场对国产动画的关注度提高。未来,可能会有更多影视公司获得融资,进一步提升动画电影的制作水平,使行业进入良性循环。尽管目前市场对影视股的热情高涨,但我们作为投资者需要知道的是,影视行业具有一定的周期性,票房爆款的出现虽然能短期推动股价,但长期来看,市场仍需关注以下几个因素:内容生产的稳定性:国产动画的崛起并非一蹴而就,未来仍需持续推出高质量作品,才能维持市场热度。行业政策环境:电影市场受政策监管影响较大,国产电影在国际市场的拓展仍然需要政策支持。市场竞争加剧:国际动画巨头如迪士尼、梦工厂、皮克斯等依然是市场主导者,国产动画要想进一步抢占市场,需要不断创新。

不得不说,这次《哪吒2》的成功确实给中国影视业打了一针强心剂,我们投资者当然可以在这种现象级的市场波动中抓住投资机会,但是盲目跟风是不可取的,遇到这种突然的机会往往会冲昏我们的头脑,但是我们还是要考虑清楚自己的投资风格是不是适合这种短期的“风口式投资”,我们有没有承担这种“跟风”所带来的风险,选择适合自己的才是最重要的。
免责声明:
GO Markets 分析师或外部发言人提供的信息基于其独立分析或个人经验。所表达的观点或交易风格仅代表其个人;并不代表 GO Markets 的观点或立场。
联系方式:
墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903
作者:
Yoyo Ma | GO Markets 墨尔本中文部