Noticias del mercado & perspectivas
Anticípate a los mercados con perspectivas de expertos, noticias y análisis técnico para guiar tus decisiones de trading.

Desde infraestructura de IA hasta cuidado de mascotas, semiconductores y exploración de oro, aquí están los cinco principales candidatos con más probabilidades de figurar en el ASX en 2026.
¿Qué es una oferta pública inicial (OPI)?
1. Firmus Technologies
Firmus Technologies está construyendo una infraestructura de centro de datos impulsada por IA en Tasmania, y puede ser una de las empresas tecnológicas más estratégicamente posicionadas en Australia en este momento.
Firmus es un socio de Nvidia Cloud y se ha unido al mercado Lepton del fabricante de GPU. La compañía ha diseñado su plataforma AI Factory modular y líquida en todas partes para evolucionar con las últimas arquitecturas de Nvidia, incluida la red Ethernet Nvidia Spectrum-X.
Un aumento de 330 millones de dólares australianos en septiembre de 2025 cerró en una valuación posterior al dinero de mil 850 millones de dólares australianos para la compañía. Para noviembre de 2025, después de un aumento adicional de 500 millones de dólares australianos, esa valoración se había triplicado a aproximadamente A$6 mil millones.
Una posterior inversión de 100 millones de dólares australianos de Maas Group a principios de 2026 confirmó la valoración de noviembre. Se informa que Firmus está contemplando una OPI de ASX dentro de los próximos 12 meses y, dada la valuación privada de A$6 mil millones, se espera que cualquier aumento público esté muy por encima A mil millones de dólares.
Con la creciente demanda de Australia de capacidad informática soberana de IA y el clima frío y la ventaja de energía renovable de Tasmania para las operaciones de centros de datos a gran escala, Firmus se erige como uno de los candidatos a OPI de ASX a mayor escala en 2026.
No obstante, aunque el interés del mercado en Firmus parece estar creciendo, el momento lo es todo cuando se trata de OPI. Esté atento a la confirmación del momento exacto de la OPI, el sentimiento de los centros de datos de IA y si Nvidia señala una profundización de su participación como inversor ancla estratégico después de la cotización.
2. Rokt
Rokt, fundada en Sídney, se ha convertido silenciosamente en una de las empresas tecnológicas privadas más valiosas de Australia. La plataforma de comercio electrónico adtech dirigida a ayudar a las marcas a monetizar el “momento de transacción” ahora se valora en ~7,9 mil millones de dólares.
Una hoja de términos preparada por MA Financial proyectó una salida precio de las acciones de 72 US$ en escenarios de caso base, cuando las acciones se liberan del escrow en noviembre de 2027.
Se espera que Rokt tenga una lista potencialmente dual en Estados Unidos y en el ASX en 2026, posiblemente tan pronto como el primer semestre del año. IG La estructura más discutida es una cotización primaria del Nasdaq con una estructura ASX CDI (CHESS Depositary Interest) para inversores australianos, en lugar de una doble cotización completa.
Los ingresos de Rokt para el año que termina en agosto de 2025 se proyectan en US$743 millones (un alza de 48% interanual), con un EBITDA pronosticado en US$100 millones y un margen de utilidad bruta de aproximadamente 43%. Actualmente se proyecta cruzar el hito de ingresos anuales de mil millones de dólares para agosto de 2026.
Se informa que Amazon, Live Nation y Uber son clientes de Rokt, y la compañía se ha expandido rápidamente en América del Norte y Europa.
Si Rokt opta por una cotización primaria en Nasdaq con una estructura ASX CDI, o una cotización dual completa, podría afectar significativamente la liquidez y el acceso de los inversores locales.
3. Cruz verde
Greencross, el negocio detrás de Petbarn, City Farmers y Greencross Vets, se prepara para volver a listar en el ASX luego de ser privado por la firma estadounidense de capital privado TPG en 2019.
TPG posee actualmente 55% de Greencross, mientras que AustralianSuper y Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) mantienen el 45% restante.
La compañía reportó ingresos por 2.000 millones de dólares australianos para el ejercicio 2025, un modesto aumento desde los mil 950 millones de dólares australianos de 2024. TPG pagó 675 millones de dólares australianos en valor patrimonial por el negocio en 2019; vendió una participación del 45% en 2022 con una valuación de más de 3.5 mil millones de dólares australianos. La OPI propuesta implica una valoración de más de 4 mil millones de dólares australianos.
TPG apunta a una oferta pública inicial de al menos 700 millones de dólares estadounidenses. La OPI marcará el regreso de Greencross a la ASX después de una ausencia de ocho años. El tamaño relativamente pequeño del aumento de TPG sugiere que la empresa está basando en un sólido desempeño del mercado de posventa antes de salir por completo.
El anuncio de la línea de tiempo de salida de TPG sigue siendo un reloj para saber si una OPI 2026 está en juego. Y si la empresa persigue una OPI tradicional o una venta comercial, que sigue siendo un camino alternativo.
4. Morse Micro
Morse Micro es una compañía de semiconductores con sede en Sydney que desarrolla chips Wi-Fi HaLow diseñados para aplicaciones IoT en agricultura, logística, ciudades inteligentes y monitoreo industrial.
Morse Micro celebró una ronda Serie C en septiembre de 2025, recaudando 88 millones de dólares, seguida en noviembre de 2025 por un aumento previo a la OPI de 32 millones de dólares, llevando la financiación total a más 300 millones de dólares.
Está dirigido a una lista ASX en los próximos 12 a 18 meses. El Serie C fue dirigido por el gigante japonés de chips MegaChips y la Corporación del Fondo Nacional de Reconstrucción.
Se pronostica que las conexiones globales de dispositivos IoT superarán los 30 mil millones para 2030, y Morse Micro sería una rara compañía de semiconductores pure-play que cotiza en ASX, lo que podría atraer un interés significativo de los administradores de fondos centrados en la tecnología.

La tracción de ingresos de Morse Micro con socios de hardware de primer nivel antes de la cotización es un reloj, y si la compañía busca una cotización concurrente en Estados Unidos dada la profundidad del apetito de los inversores estadounidenses en semiconductores.
5. Recursos de bisontes
Bison Resources es un explorador de oro y metales preciosos recientemente incorporado centrado en Estados Unidos que actualmente se encuentra en medio de su OPI ASX.
La oferta se cierra el 20 de marzo de 2026, con una cotización ASX dirigida a mediados de abril de 2026. En una capitalización de mercado indicativa de 13,25 millones de dólares en suscripción completa, Bison es el nombre más especulativo de esta lista por un margen significativo.
La compañía tiene cuatro proyectos de exploración en el noreste de Nevada, dentro de Carlin Trend (uno de los cinturones productores de oro más prolíficos del mundo), responsable de aproximadamente el 75% de la producción de oro de Estados Unidos.
La OPI busca recaudar A$4.5 a A$5.5 millones (22.5 a 27.5 millones de acciones a A$0.20 por acción). El equipo cuenta con experiencia previa en Sun Silver (ASX: SS1) y Black Bear Minerals, lo que le otorga una trayectoria en los listados mineros ASX junior fuera de Nevada.
OPI globales: ¿Cuáles son las OPI más grandes que se están produciendo a nivel mundial en 2026?
Conclusión
El calendario de OPI 2026 de Australia abarca todo el espectro de riesgo. Un juego de infraestructura de IA respaldado por NVIDIA, una plataforma de comercio electrónico multimillonaria y un explorador de oro junior con su OPI ya en marcha.
Cada candidato refleja una etapa diferente de madurez y un perfil de inversionista diferente. Juntos, sugieren que el ASX podría ver una inyección significativa de nuevos listados en todos los sectores que han estado ausentes en gran medida del mercado local en los últimos años.


The relative ease of online trading today has not only increased the opportunity of access but flexibility to trade different time frames that can better “fit” around other things going on in life. Trading short timeframes is a popular choice for many online trading strategies. Indeed, the shorter time-frame charts e.g. 15 minutes or less, are often peddled by so called trading gurus as the optimum way to trade index/commodity CFDs and Forex online.
However, in reality many short timeframe traders fail to achieve desired outcomes with many suggesting that those trading longer timeframes may do better. Obviously, whatever trading time-frame you choose is the right one for you (often dictated by lifestyle) but it does raise the question as to whether it is the timeframe itself or are there issues associated with short term trading that are the challenge. In this article we suggest three of the apparently common potential challenges (or “pitfalls” as we have chosen to call them) to facilitate awareness, if indeed trading shorter term charts is your online trading choice. 1 - Choice of time to trade Commonly, many shorter time-frame traders plan to ring-fence screen time, for example an hour per day, to execute their trading actions.
We know that there are times when markets are more likely to move (consistent with the release of economic data, and opening of the larger exchanges. Hence, if you are to ringfence time, logically this ideally should be consistent with such periods where changes are market sentiment are more acute. So, challenge one is ensuring that you choose the right times for your “ring-fencing” whenever you choose to switch on your PC and delve into the online trading world.
If we do not strive to make this happen, the lack of more obvious trading opportunities can often create an emotional response of desperation and urgency to find a trade that may work. Often resulting in trying to ‘force a trade’, or ‘talking yourself into a trade’ where perhaps no opportunity exists technically, these will rarely result in a positive outcome. 2 - The ‘thrill of the chase’ Trading short timeframes is often seen as being exciting. The idea of challenging the market “big boys” may appeal to some, but from a motivational point of view, it is questionable if this is the right mindset to come in with into the online trading arena.
Such excitement can be a highly charged emotional state, and although we have written before about the place for channelled and controlled emotions in trading, equally when things are not going well with a trade, decisions are likely to be made from this high emotional state, in this case becoming potentially destructive. Listen to your internal ‘language’ both when trades go for and against you, and make a judgement call as to whether this may be creeping up on you as a potential issue. After all, you are trading to make profit not to be “excited”, and logically ‘in the cold light of day’ know that a heightened emotional state is not the place to make consistently good trading decisions. 3 - “Sucked” into price movements Watching that profit/loss column go up and down can be almost hypnotic in nature, It is easy to get sucked in to watching price movements continuously.
With money being for many an emotive topic, seeing movements up and down again may evoke emotional decision making. This “sucked in by price” scenario can take over from following your trading system and CHART price action, which is the place from which decisions should be made. If this resonates the solution is simple.
Right click in the “toolbox” (or terminal on MT4) area and remove ‘profit’ from the columns that you can see. - So there is our top three for any of you endeavouring to improve outcomes from your online Forex trading, and online CFD trading, and what may be causative factors if shorter timeframes are failing to deliver the results that you had hope for. With such awareness, if any of these resonate with you, you have: The start point to begin to take actions to address any of these. Perhaps justification for looking at alternatives.


Invariably, the motivation to look at adding another technical indicator beyond that which you are already using, is a belief that your trading results, and the system that creates these, could be improved. As traders, we are bombarded with information relating to the use of technical indicators to guide decision making in our entry and exit decisions. Such information can be “persuasive” in making a change but as you are responsible for your trading decisions and subsequent results, it seems logical to start the process by asking the question “is it the right time for me to explore the use of another indicator?”.
The aim of this article is to highlight the FOUR critical questions you should ask of yourself first. 1. Am I REALLY trading my existing system NOW? As previously referenced, the major impetus for considering adding an indicator is to improve results when trading an existing system.
You can only make the judgement of any improvement if you both have a comprehensive system that specifies entry/exit/position sizing as a minimum AND are actually trading this. Potential trading actions The reality for most traders is that they fall down on one or both of these two CRUCIAL factors. Honesty with what you are doing now backed up with the evidence of journaling will give you the answer to this.
If these resonate with you, logically addressing these should be your priority. Without this, you are not able to make that judgement and hence adding another indicator is far less likely to impact positively on results. 2. Is adding another indicator the ONE major thing that is going to make the most difference to my trading results NOW or is there something else I should invest my energy on?
We have already specified two potential priorities in the previous point with reference to your trading plan and adherence to it. Also, we referenced the issue of evidence through journaling. As this is not only crucial for the above point, it is a vital part of your review process should you choose to investigate the use of a new indicator.
So again, could be viewed as a priority. Finally, addressing your knowledge relating to trading may be more important for you now. Not only are we referring to general trading learning but an in-depth understanding of what indicators including the ones you are using now, do and do not tell you about market sentiment.
This learning is again important in your judgement as to which NEW indicator could be useful. Therefore, again we would suggest this could be a priority over adding another indicator right now for you. Potential trading actions Prioritise your trading plan, discipline, journaling and learning, making sure these are at an appropriate level for you to invest time in exploring new indicators. 3.
Have I got absolute clarity about what another indicator should do to enhance my existing system? Previous points relating to journaling and learning should give you the ability to more ably identify what it is that a new indicator could add to your trading. The first decision in this process is to identify whether your focus is on improving entry or exit.
Once you have clarified this and If you have ticked other boxes so far, the other potential area for exploration is to look at the perimeters of the indicators/systems you are currently using as it may be that this could simply be the answer to create potentially better outcomes. For example, let’s assume you are using a price/10 EMA cross as an exit signal. You have found that one of the areas you wish to improve has not been taken out early on a regular basis by “market noise”.
It may be a simple case of testing a change e.g. to a price 20EMA cross that may make the difference you are seeking. Potential trading actions • Learn about the indicator you are using and make sure it is a fit for any gap you have identified in your existing system. • Don’t forget it may serve your purpose to look at a simple adjustment of perimeters of existing indicators you are using. This STILL needs testing before implementation. 4.
Have I got a formal process for testing an additional indicator in place that will produce the evidence to decide whether to include it within your trading plan? Ok so you have got this far, and so are ready to look at your new indicator. So briefly here are three process components you need to have in place. i.
Perform a back-test on previous trades to determine any change in dollar outcome across a critical mass of trades, Remember the purpose of any back-test is to justify the need for a forward or prospective test, NOT to change your system at this point. ii. Perform a prospective test (again deciding what critical mass of trades are enough on which to make a judgement) on a demo account using the indicator as you intend to do so in live trading. This may not only reinforce information from your back-test but adds the reality of new data coming into the market live and the tests the trades you may not have taken (if your previous entry indicators would have blocked action).
It is important that you keep ALL other trading plan perimeters the same to be able to confirm that it is your new indicator that is making any difference observed. iii. If your test produces a positive outcome, then articulate within your trading plan how you are going to use your new indicator. It is important that you ensure any statements are sufficiently specific (see an article on this HERE ) to guide action and measurement, and this should include under what market circumstances you would use it. iv.
Set a review date (e.g. 3 months) to determine how beneficial its continued use has been. Potential trading actions Ensure your process is not only clear but one you adhere to. You may use the above as a start point to developing you on process but remember to specify how many trades YOU think is a critical mass on which to make decisions.
We trust this has been useful and as always please feel free to ask questions of our team or email to [email protected] with your comments.


Position accumulation is to increase exposure to a currency pair, by adding a second (or more) position in the same trading direction. Although on the surface the opportunity to increase potential return is attractive, there are also risks that MUST be at the forefront of your thinking. These principles described in this article are appropriate for Share, Index and Commodity CFDs as well as obviously Forex positions.
Are you ready to accumulate? Before considering position accumulation to your trading behaviour, it is worth considering two important aspects: This is not a strategy for the beginner trader, but rather when other systems are already in place such as a written trading plan that includes statements that reference risk management approaches, particularly that of appropriate position sizing and clear exit approaches. Also, logically, as you are potentially increasing exposure with this approach, it is not only having a trading plan that is important, but also a record of follow through with that plan.
We know disciplined trading is a challenge for some, so if this is something you are battling with then master this first. Why a profitable position only? It is crucial that this is one of the rules of any system you choose to develop.
Accumulating into a losing position (akin to ‘dollar cost averaging)’ should be considered a very high-risk strategy. The essence of this approach is that at each accumulation point, as you increase exposure, you manage the additional risk by moving a stop on previous positions at each accumulation point. Your position accumulation system checklist As with any aspect of trading behaviour, a measurable set of statements that dictate your actions as part of your trading plan should be developed with reference to your position accumulation.
These statements should be specific, unambiguous and measurable to facilitate consistency in action and allow you to make judgements as to whether any refinements could be made subsequent to a review of a critical mass of such trades. These may include as a minimum: Under what market circumstances you would consider accumulating e,g. strong uptrend confirmed across multiple timeframes. What technical signals are you going to use to signal the time to accumulate (e.g. if into a long position, break of a key price point, subsequent to confirmation of continued uptrend after a retracement or the next technical resistance).
Your trail-stop process e.g. at each accumulation point for all previously opened positions -all opened positions should be treated as one re. your revised exit points as a trade goes in our direction. Position sizing e.g. accumulate no more than the original position, meaning if you enter 5 mini-lots initially that is the maximum you can add on each accumulation. Remember as you are trailing the initial stop of all accumulated positions you are risk managing through this method.
Your maximum exposure i.e. your total standard lots/contracts you are prepared to enter, e.g. if you accumulate 1 index CFD contract on each occasion how many times are you prepared to do this. Remember, as different instruments are positioned differently in terms of exposure you will have to specify this for each. It would be a nonsense to enter 1 Share CFD contract but may be appropriate to enter 1 gold CFD contract.
Other exit points or reason to delay/refrain from accumulating further e.g. economic data due. Once your system is complete then it should be tested prospectively, and amended as appropriate, prior to implanting in the reality of your trading practice. We trust this review of position accumulating will help in your choice as to whether to integrate this into your trading and of course, some of the considerations that are worth exploring and articulating within your plan.


By Mike Smith Let’s face it, trading can be a lonely occupation sometimes. Along with the hope of picking up a “hot tip”, this seems to be a key reason why trading forums are so popular. Unfortunately many people leave such forums almost as quick as they join them, simply because many users are not particularly supportive and often seem to be fuelled by ego-driven posting.
So, understanding that there are benefits from connecting with other traders, another option we’ve seen in action is to take on a trading buddy. This might be someone you know who has shown an interest in your battle against the markets, and they need not be the same level of experience as yourself. Indeed, it may be that they are only just beginning.
But that shared experience can create a difference. We’ve possibly identified THREE significant positives, and how trading buddies can not only increase your level of enjoyment when trading, but also reduce that “alone” feeling, and even potentially impact positively on results. Consider: 1.
Increased Accountability The very fact you have someone close that you can share your experiences with gives a layer of accountability that you will never get when you are trading without someone else knowing what you are doing. It’s easy to stray from whatever your trading “straight and narrow” is when no one is there to know. Logically, if you are sharing your experience of trades, those that go with you and those that don’t, there is one more reason to trade more consistently with your plan.
Beyond direct trading, there’s also the follow through in learning and system development that can be positively impacted upon by having someone else around. Recognising the potential benefits of this layer of accountability is why many traders seek out a coach and invest thousands of dollars in such. 2. Shared learning and experiences The benefit is based on the idea that “Two heads are better than one”.
Whether it be a theoretical trading concept, understanding and testing a trading indicator that you are considering using, or simply having someone on hand to encourage and support you, or even celebrate when things go well, a trading buddy can positively impact all of these. 3. More efficient and effective trading system development One of the critical tasks you face as a trader is to develop the systems that support your trading decision making. A staggering number of traders have no or incomplete trading plans, and no other systems in place that many believe are necessary.
Additionally, there’s the obvious benefit of measuring the success or otherwise of such systems and having a critical mass of trades as evidence that system changes may be useful. Developing and testing systems together and getting evidence more quickly with two people working on getting that critical mass of trades are definite positives for having a trading buddy. Making your trading buddy happen a.
Get one There are more advantages to having someone local (although much can be done online) who you can physically meet. This can not only be more enjoyable but more productive. Ideally, someone you already know and whose opinions you generally trust would seem logical.
Experience is less important than the above as we can help (see below) in bringing someone up to speed. Watch also for LIVE events happening across Australia we are running this year. One of the key objectives of these is to facilitate networking with other trades.
Also, check out Inner Circle if you are not already a member. Perhaps put the word out you are interested in having a trading buddy and see if anyone is interested. b. Get them trained If your prospective buddy is someone who has simply expressed interest in trading but not yet taken the plunge, point them in the direction of “First Steps”, our free education course.
It is designed for new traders and enables fast track learning. Get them up and running with a demo platform and of course ultimately a live trading account. If this is of interest, then connect with us ASAP and visit the FREE education page on the website.
If they already trade, get them involved in “Next Steps” and “Inner Circle” as appropriate, and direct them to the page on the website. c. Set some ground rules Any relationship needs them! It doesn’t have to be a formal session, just a simple ‘how can we both make this work’ conversation.
Documenting what you’re doing and writing plans for action can always help get the most out of it for both of you. We see some great potential advantages for you and your buddy and, of course, will facilitate that relationship through education and support as much as we can. Your next step is to consider whether the advantages we have discussed would be right for you and of course if they are, take action.


Chart patterns (e.g. head and shoulders, triangles, double bottoms/tops), are commonly used to assist in trading decision making. If using these as part of your entry approach, their use should be viewed as a specific strategy, amongst others you may use, and so merit a dedicated section within your plan. This article outlines some of the key things to consider when writing and using such in your trading plan.
General rules with trading plans revisited The statements within your trading plan serve two primary functions, as discussed in detail in previous articles. It is important that such statements are specific enough to more effectively perform these functions, namely: a. Facilitate consistency in trading action e.g. in the entry and exit of trades, allowing the trader, and b.
Enable measurement e.g. within a journal, to make an evidence-based judgement on how well these statements are serving you through testing. With this level specificity, it is easier to ‘tweak’ components rather than throwing the “baby” of any strategy “out with the bathwater”. Often, many experienced traders discover the finer details can make a relatively big difference to trading results, rather than massive changes in approach.
Obviously, if there is a lack of consistency, originating from behaviours that move away from what you have planned, make it almost impossible to make any judgement on the success, or otherwise, of a strategy. Using chart patterns adheres to all the above. What about trading chart patterns?
Chart patterns are simply a representation of potential changes in market sentiment. Often combined with other indicators and can be used to indicate a potential entry into, or in some cases exit from, a specific position. Some patterns indicate a trend reversal (e.g. head and shoulder, double tops, triple bottoms etc), others a pause (congestion) before continuing in the direction of a previous trend e.g. flags, pennants, symmetrical triangles.
Patterns may occur on any timeframe but generally speaking are more robust (in terms of potential longevity of movement) on longer timeframes (although of course they cannot indicate with any accuracy how long that move may be). As with any entry approach, there is a chance that a trading idea based on an identified pattern will fail and so, as always, appropriate risk management should be put in place And within your trading plan? Chart patterns are not easily identifiable with most general indicator systems and are often best “sighted” so there is an element of subjectivity.
Logically this could suggest that this makes it even more vital to be robust in your description of how to use these in your trading. We have identified FIVE potential components to include within your written trading plan. These are: 1.
Your definition of the chart patterns you are going to use 2. When you are going to use them 3. Identification of when a pattern is completed 4.
Other factors you may use to potentially decrease the chance of a false breakout from any chart pattern you are going to use 5. Your initial stop placement method #1 Your definition of the chart patterns you are going to use Specify which of the chart patterns you are choosing to trade. Ideally, a description of what this pattern looks like on a chart will help lock this in.
For example, if we were to describe a double top it could read: • Reversal of upwards trend. • Creation of two upwards prongs. Around the same price level forming a ‘M-shape’. • Breakout below the ‘confirmation point’ (bottom of “prongs” confirms reversal. #2 When you are going to use them There are two perhaps obvious, and yet important, factors to include: a. On which timeframes you are going to use chart patterns b.
The proximity of impending economic data releases. For example, If trading a 30 minute chart you could specify “no relevant (define this e.g. specific to currency pair, sector of share CFD), significant (define this e.g. you may decide to actually state the data points) data due within the next 3 hours. #3 Identification of when a pattern is completed Experienced traders always wait until a pattern is complete before acting. However, the incidence of false breakouts (i.e. when a trading idea fails after a pattern is completed) is worth taking steps to attempt to limit.
Let’s use the break of a neckline on a ‘reverse head and shoulders’ as an example. Clearly, price moving upwards through the neckline is the desire. However, you need to articulate what are you using to determine this.
E.g. At any time within a candle period or on candle close price; and/or is there a specific distance such as using 0.5 ATR, or perhaps number of pips/points, above the neckline? #4 Other factors you may use to potentially decrease the chance of a false breakout from any chart pattern you are going to use The following may be considered: a. Which other indicators e.g. moving average, volume b.
Intra-candle price action e.g. close within the top third of the candle if considering a long trade. c. Agreement on other timeframes (although this may not be the pattern what constitute “agreement” e.g. price above 10EMA. d. Minimum distance to next “key price point” e.g. next resistance price level if going long. #5 Your initial stop placement method As the structure of each pattern is different then it is important to specific your initial stop placement methods for each.
So, to use the previous example, if trading the “idea” of a breakthrough a neckline, a pre-planned exit logically could be move back through that neckline may indicate a trade failure and necessitate a risk management exit (and so of course be a determining factor in your position sizing into that trade). As with defining what constitutes a breakout, logically again, you need to specify whether you are using an anytime touch of a price for exit or a candle period close price, and/or is there a specific distance (an how you are going to articulate this) below the neckline. So now to action… Depending on where you are now with you plan there are two potential actions. 1.
If you are already using chart patterns use the above checklist to determine whether you have these components included, fill any gaps and that ensure they are specific enough 2. If you have not got part of your trading plan them this may help you get started in making it happen Remember of course, the above is indicative suggestions only, it is YOU that must make the choice about what to include/not include and the specific parameters you are going to test and ultimately use.


In previous articles we have discussed in detail the merits of a trading journal in offering evidence for both: a. How well you are following a trading plan? b. How well your trading system is serving you? (assuming you are already following a trading plan) We have also outlined the importance of “closing the circle” and making sure you review journal data and action plan to make any amendments that would be of benefit.
If you are in the position that you have “jumped in” and made a trading a journal a reality in your trading, next level journaling aims to increase the quality of information, where you can optimise those things you are doing well and work on those things that need improvement. This, in essence, is all to do with asking the right questions of the information you have, so you can continue to make evidence-based judgements as to what type of trading suits you best. The reality is that no two traders are the same (even if using a similar system).
Your challenge is to find YOUR best approach that works for YOU. And subsequently, mirror this on an ongoing basis. Here are THREE potentially “game-changing” questions you could ask of your journal data which may give clues about “best fit” behaviour for you as an individual. #1 Which trading direction works for me?
There is no doubt that some traders have results that seem to be better going “long” and others trading “short”. The other possible outcome, of course, is that it doesn’t matter, and you perform equally as well irrespective of direction. Measuring the results of long versus short trades will give you this answer.
Let’s assume there is a noticeable difference. After obtaining this evidence your choices are twofold. The root cause of this may either be: a.
You have a simple aptitude for trading in a specific direction and so can mirror this with all future trading. b. It may be that your system works well for going in one direction and needs adjustment with the other. In this case, provided you are not comfortable sticking to (a) above then of course you have the evidence to refine that part of your system that appears to require adjustment. #2 Which timeframe works for me?
Similarly, we can look at whether specific timeframes work better for you as an individual trader. Questions about optimum timeframes are some of the most frequent that we receive on both ‘Inner Circle’ and the ‘First Steps courses. We have written about this topic before, the conclusion being that it is your individual circumstances that are most likely to dictate which timeframe works best for you.
Again, the power of a journal is that you can easily come to an answer, and so mirror that going forward (of course, this is dependent on you recording this as part of your journal process). #3 Which trading vehicle suits my trading style? Many of you reading this may be trading multiple vehicles e.g. Forex, Index CFDs, Share CFDs, commodities, options.
There are obvious differences not only in how these various instruments are priced but also influencing factors on how they move. Using a similar approach to the above, you can easily identify which vehicles are working for you. As with exploring trading direction the reason for this could be your characteristics as a trade or the robustness of your system in trading different vehicles.
So, the choices are the same - you can allocate a larger proportion (or even all) of your capital into trading the vehicle that produces better results or of course review and tweak the system for those vehicles with less desirable results. OK, so these are your three starting questions, that may help you find a trading style that is best fit for you. However, before we finish, it is worth offering a couple of additional pieces of guidance when doing an exercise such as this. a.
You need a critical mass of trades to make the data meaningful. (there is little evidence that can be gained from a couple of trades in any category). There is no definitive number to what this may be but logically perhaps 15-20 will suffice in the first instance. b. Compare like with like.
To make things meaningful you need to reduce the number of actors that may skew your results. As a start point it would make sense to: i. remove any trades where you clearly didn’t follow your plan, ii. Unless analysing #3 above it would seem logical to compare within one trading vehicle e.g. just your forex trades.
Finally, we would love to hear your feedback on journaling and how it has/has not worked for you (or even problems) you have had getting started. Drop a line a [email protected] with any feedback you would like to share.
