学习中心
学习中心

市场资讯及洞察

每日财经快讯
特朗普和美联储的极限拉扯,美债为何受连累?

2025年,美国金融市场的核心问题,是一场关于“降息”的极限拉扯。一边是特朗普高举“猛药救市”的大旗,要求美联储火速降息;另一边是美联储主席鲍威尔坚持“缓慢放水”,强调“为时过早”。这场博弈的战场,不仅是美国经济政策的角力场,更牵动着全球资本市场的神经——尤其是美债,这个被视为“全球资产定价之锚”的避风港,为何成了风暴中心?

传统理论中,美股与美债呈“跷跷板”关系。股市跌,资金涌入债市避险,压低长期收益率。但2025年的市场却呈现反常现象——美股暴跌时,10年期美债收益率不降反升。例如,2024年11月特朗普胜选后,10年期美债收益率一度飙升至4.8%,随后虽回落至4.44%,但仍远高于2023年的3.6%。当前为什么这种关系失灵了呢,主要可能有下面三种原因:一是套利交易捆绑。大量投资者通过“买入美股+做多国债期货”或“买入美债+做空国债期货”的组合对冲风险,导致股债联动性增强。二是信用根基动摇。特朗普的关税政策(如对中国商品加征高额关税)推高进口成本,加剧通胀黏性(美国CPI长期维持在2.5%-3%),削弱了美债的“无风险”属性。三是赤字与供应的双重压力。美国国债发行量激增,2025年预计新增债务7.75万亿美元,市场对美债的消化能力面临考验。除此之外,本次美债暴跌也来源于特朗普与美联储的分歧。自2024年特朗普重返白宫以来,他多次公开施压美联储,要求通过降息降低企业融资成本、刺激经济。2024年9月美联储曾单次降息50个基点,将利率从5.25%-5.5%的高位下调,但此后降息步伐明显放缓,当前联邦基金利率仍维持在4.25%-4.5%区间。特朗普的逻辑是通过快速降息压低国债付息成本,缓解联邦政府债务压力(2024年美国财政赤字已接近2万亿美元),同时刺激股市繁荣,吸引全球资本回流,壮大美国制造业。鲍威尔的担忧则是过快降息可能引发资本外逃,导致美股、美债、美元“三杀”。尤其是美债市场,要知道过去二十年来,日本和中国一直是美国债务的最大外国持有者,一旦外资抛售潮启动,长期收益率可能飙升,甚至触发“债券义警”(Bond Vigilantes)的反噬。4月8日有消息传出,中日两国正在大量出售美债,美债利率持续攀升,截至4月9日30年期收益率已上行20基点,10年期收益率逼近4.5%。

若快速降息,资本外流加速,美债抛售潮或导致收益率飙升(如10年期突破5%),美股、美债价格螺旋下跌。若维持高利率:联邦政府每年需支付超1万亿美元利息,财政赤字进一步恶化。特朗普的策略看似矛盾——一边要求降息,一边发动关税——实则暗藏逻辑。对内施压美联储,通过关税战引发衰退预期,倒逼美联储降息。对外转移矛盾,提高关税保护本土产业,同时制造外部危机,迫使资本回流美国。然而,这一策略风险极高。据彼得·希夫(Peter Schiff)警告,若美股持续下跌,美债收益率失控,可能引发比2008年更严重的金融危机。2025年的美国金融市场,正站在十字路口。特朗普与美联储的博弈,不仅关乎利率数字的变动,更是一场关于信用、资本与权力的豪赌。若美债这个“基石”动摇,引发的连锁反应或将重塑全球经济格局。正如鲍威尔所言:“我们必须在控制通胀与维持增长之间找到平衡。”而这场平衡术的代价,或许将由全世界共同承担。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Christine Li | GO Markets 墨尔本中文部

Xavier Zhang
April 11, 2025
每日财经快讯
油价失守60美元大关:特朗普关税政策引发市场剧震

2025年4月初,原油市场遭遇自2021年以来最剧烈的下跌。受特朗普新一轮高强度关税政策影响,西德克萨斯中质原油(WTI)期货价格截止到4月7日盘中就已经跌破60大关,到8号盘中最低已经触及57美元,引发市场剧烈反应。特朗普于4月2日宣布对所有进口商品征收10%的基础关税,而中国作为与美国贸易逆差最大的国家,市场预期特朗普可能于4月9日正式宣布对中国商品加征高达50%的惩罚性关税,而特朗普则称此举旨在保护本土制造业和就业。特朗普这次“大动干戈”的关税政策极大程度上造成了整个世界范围内的市场剧烈波动,不管是货币,股票还是大宗商品。市场认为,这场“关税再升级”或将点燃新一轮全球贸易紧张局势,加剧全球经济放缓预期,甚至大幅拉高了美国经济衰退的可能性。高盛在报告中指出,若关税全面落地,全球GDP增速可能被拉低0.3至0.5个百分点,从而削弱能源需求预期。60美元:不仅是技术位,更是地缘风险红线

此次WTI油价跌破60美元关口,意义远不是短期技术调整那么简单。首先,从经济层面来看,60美元是美国页岩油行业的重要盈亏平衡点。根据德勤(Deloitte)2024年年报,多数中型页岩油生产商在油价低于62美元时将面临现金流紧张甚至停产风险。也就是说,持续低于这一水平可能造成美国产量收缩,进而反向推升未来油价波动风险。其次,更重要的是,60美元是国际政治博弈中的“价格地标”。自2022年12月起,七国集团(G7)联合欧盟与澳大利亚对俄罗斯实施“原油价格上限”制裁机制,明确规定不允许海运俄罗斯原油交易价高于60美元,违者不得使用欧盟成员国的金融或保险服务。因此,当全球基准原油价格跌破这一水平时,某种程度上也削弱了这一机制的执行力,为俄罗斯等产油国规避制裁提供空间,同时也削弱了西方在能源金融系统中的战略主导力。连锁反应显现:美股与信心动摇原油大跌不仅止步于商品市场。4月8日,美国三大股指同步下挫,道琼斯指数下跌1.4%,标普500指数跌幅达到1.2%。其中能源板块领跌,埃克森美孚和雪佛龙分别下跌4.8%和4.3%。而科技股则出现部分对冲性买盘。甚至这段时间以来还出现了罕见的美元和美股同步走弱这一现象,类似美元与美股同时走弱的现象极为罕见,上一次类似场景被广泛讨论还是在2000年互联网泡沫破裂时期,这也说明美元的避险属性在这次“关税事件”中也受到了冲击和挑战。这背后的逻辑在于,油价,美元和美股短期回落的同步出现,反映出市场对美国政策不确定性、全球增长动能与能源结构调整的整体担忧。

展望:短期不稳,长期警觉针对这次油价的波动,高盛认为,在典型的美国经济衰退和 OPEC 基准情景下,他们估计布伦特原油价格到 2025 年 12 月将跌至每桶 58 美元,到 2026 年 12 月将跌至每桶 50 美元。在当前背景下,油价已经不只是通胀预期的晴雨表,更成为全球资本对政治风险与经济信心重新定价的重要窗口。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Yoyo Ma | GO Markets 墨尔本中文部

Yoyo Ma
April 9, 2025
每日财经快讯
政策底已现,信心底还远吗?——解读国家队入场背后的逻辑

4月8日,中国A股迎来了一次久违的强劲反弹。因中美贸易摩擦再度升级,以及全球市场的剧烈动荡,A股曾连续下挫,不仅权重板块集体下跌,投资者信心也接近冰点。但就在市场气氛最为低迷之际,有迹象表明——国家队再次出手了。据多家财经媒体报道,中国主权基金以及多家大型机构在关键节点入场,定向增持权重股,稳住了股指,带动市场情绪明显修复。国家队入市的操作并不新鲜,自2015年股灾之后,这几乎成了中国股市剧烈波动时的“惯性手段”。但这一次,我们或许可以从中看到更深层次的信号。一、稳市不只是“救市”,更是“修复信心”中国资本市场的一个长期命题,是如何实现“去散户化”与“提升长期投资比例”。而在这个转型过程中,每一次系统性风险都可能造成信心大幅流失,影响结构性改革进度。因此,“稳市”从来不仅是应急之举,更是一种信号释放。从监管层近期的一系列表态来看,“保持市场稳定运行”已成为政策优先级之一。除了国家队直接买入外,监管在IPO节奏、再融资审核、量化交易监管等多个方面均有所收紧,目的就是要在风险释放期营造一个“政策底”,以便为后续结构调整赢得时间和空间。

二、政策底已现,但市场底与信心底并非同步到来我们必须明确一个现实:国家队的出手能稳住指数,却不一定能提振风险偏好。当下A股的结构性问题仍然突出——中小盘估值泡沫未完全消化,科技成长板块受制于海外压制和内需不足,消费板块复苏乏力,房地产板块信心不足……这些问题短期内难以依靠政策干预彻底解决。更关键的是,投资者的信心并非完全取决于指数涨跌,而是取决于对未来预期的稳定性。经历了过去几年疫情冲击、监管风暴、国际脱钩压力的反复拉扯,市场对“好消息”的敏感度降低,对政策兑现的信任度也在重建期。因此,信心底远比市场底来得更滞后,也更难构建。三、中国的托市,是为“下一步结构改革”赢得时间本轮国家队入市,也可以理解为一种“政策缓冲”:当外部压力(如中美贸易摩擦、全球避险加剧)与内部调整(如经济结构转型、平台经济规范)叠加时,监管层希望通过干预,阻断金融市场可能的连锁风险。这种“软着陆式托底”不仅仅是为了稳定股民情绪,更是在为下一阶段的改革赢得时间。譬如:在资本市场层面,推进注册制深化、吸引更多长期资金入场;在经济结构上,鼓励高端制造、绿色能源等战略性新兴产业发展;在宏观政策层面,协调货币、财政和产业政策的节奏,避免出现政策真空或误判。

四、长期投资者该怎么看待国家队的“出手信号”?对于普通投资者来说,国家队的出手虽不能直接预测后市,但可作为重要的“情绪转折”参考。它往往意味着短期底部已现,系统性风险可控,但也提示我们要保持理性预期:此后市场可能进入一个缓慢筑底、震荡修复的阶段,而非V型反转。更重要的是,这或许是个重新审视资产配置结构、布局中长期方向的机会窗口。过去单纯依赖高波动、题材炒作的投机模式将难以为继,未来更看重基本面与估值匹配的优质企业,将成为“新A股时代”的价值核心。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Sylvia Qin | GO Markets 悉尼中文部

Sylvia Qin
April 9, 2025
每日财经快讯
美国关税政策暂停90天“假消息“助市场“假止跌”

昨晚的美股走势尽显政治操控经济特色,凌驾于股市之上的因素发挥了强大作用。市场暴跌低开,夜盘一蹶不振,到关税政策暂停90天“假消息“诱导股指几分钟超过5%反转,很多大盘股几分钟股价反弹超过10%,再到消息被快速澄清,股指又迅速回落,赤裸裸体现出目前市场已经没有自己的稳定性,管理层一句话就足以改变市场走向。然而昨晚尽管三大股指回收夜盘暴跌幅度显示出止跌的迹象,但系统性风险并未解除,9号关税政策落地也越发临近,欧盟等国的反制和谈判细节时刻可能给市场扭转性影响。板块方面足见市场被压制已久的爆发力,2020年三月暴力反弹依旧历历在目,昨晚假消息就算被澄清,核电板块的超跌股也依然收下了不错的涨幅,核技术股均大幅上涨,OKLO收涨超过10%,也算暂时加仓及时,AI领域的爆发股也是反弹中可以快速获利的选择,博通和PLTR均涨超5%,英伟达“亲儿子“依旧没有发挥新上市的威力,股价很快回到$50并可继续持有。量子计算概念也大幅反弹,昨晚表现也很不错。

早盘股指期货继续上行,各股盘后也在继续上冲,目前需要重点关注围绕关税政策的一系列消息,任何决定性变动都足以引发金融剧震,特朗普早间确认不会轻易改变目前的关税政策,本周的高危时间还没过去。美元指数晚间走势十分坚挺,黄金跳水跌破3000大关,尽显妖金本色。恐慌指数快速回落,昨天暴涨后空恐慌的朋友注意分仓操作,部分短波段思路反复应对市场剧震,部分高位持空中期稳定获益,当然是在保证金充裕的前提下。原油昨天也是一个非常好的进场时机,美油一度跌破对俄制裁价$60美元,早盘已经回到$61美元以上。比特币暴跌暴涨,早盘重回八万大关,今天日内可能选线延续涨势。外汇方面澳元也有所反弹,多空争夺0.6主要支撑位。澳日和美日均有一定程度反弹。美元人民币变动不大,依然保持着7.34位置之上。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Xavier Zhang | GO Markets 高级分析师

Xavier Zhang
April 8, 2025
Featured
Geopolitical events
Another Period For The History Books.

We have deliberately waited a few days before commenting on “Liberation Day” and the fallout that would come from President Trump’s new tariffs regime.It will go down as just another historical period of heightened volatility, uncertainty, risk, and a whole manner of market turmoil. This is why we wanted to put what is happening right now into some context. (If that is possible, considering how volatile the period is and how erratic and how quick the president's manner can change.)US markets have seen this kind of violent move only three times since the 1950s. The S&P’s over 10 per cent drop in the final two sessions of the week following President Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement has it in rare company – and not in a good way - October 1987 (Black Monday), November 2008 (Global Financial Crisis), March 2020 (COVID-19).So, why such a reaction?The market reaction reflects not the ‘shock’ but the scale and brevity of the tariffs. A 10% across-the-board tariff was broadly expected. There were some calculations as much as 15 to 20% judging by the net $1 trillion in and out of the federal government revenue. (This is the impact of DOGE and other government spending cuts coupled with the tariffs now in place that will offset the promised 0% personal income tax for those earning up to US$150,000)But what markets didn’t see coming was the country-specific layer. Take China as an example; the additional 34% reciprocal tariff on Chinese goods pushed the total to 54%. With other measures factored in, the effective burden could approach 65%.Then there were the tariffs that were tied to trade deficits, hitting Japan, South Korea and most emerging markets between the eyes (i.e. Vietnam).The EU saw a 20% rate, which was within expectations, while the UK, Australia, New Zealand and others landed at 10%. Canada and Mexico were spared, as was Russia, North Korea and Belarus, interestingly enough.Energy was excluded, which is unsurprising considering Trump’s goal of getting energy down, down and staying down. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors were also carved out, however, this is more down to the probability of more targeted action like that of steel and aluminium.Now, what is different about this market shock and risk off trading is that it would send funds flowing to the US dollar, ratcheting it higher. But not this time. The dollar weakened against the euro. Theories as to why range from Europe’s lighter tariff load to euro-based investors pulling money out of the US. The same could be said of the Swiss Franc.All this leads to an average effective tariff rate of around 22%. That number will likely climb once product-specific tariffs on areas like pharmaceuticals and lumber are formalised. Some of this may be negotiated down, but not soon, and the possibility of tit-for-tat retaliation like China has now entered into could actually see it going higher still as the President looks to outdo country responses.The broader uncertainty this introduces to the US outlook is now at its highest since early 2020 and has the markets pricing in 110 basis points of Fed rate cuts this year – a near 5 cut call shows just how unprecedented this is.In fact, in no time in living memory has a developed economy lifted trade barriers this aggressively or abruptly. What has been implemented is textbook economics 101 supply-side shock.Input costs go up, finished goods get pricier, and the ripple effects hit margins and employment. Expect to see this in the next six months.Expect core PCE inflation to finish the year at 3.5% —nearly a full percentage point higher than the consensus forecast from just a week ago.Real GDP growth is forecast to slow to 0.1% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. That path may be volatile as Q1 could look worse due to soft consumption and strong imports, with a mechanical bounce in Q2.What has been lost in the chaos of last Thursday and Friday’s trade was the March Non-farm payrolls jobs print came in at 228,000, which was above consensus, the caveat being it is less so after downward revisions to prior months.Hospitality hiring was strong, likely helped by a weather rebound that won’t repeat. Government payrolls are holding steady for now, but cuts are coming. Layoffs in defence and aerospace (DOGE) are already underway, and tariffs will act as a brake on new hiring. Expect softer reports ahead.Unemployment ticked up slightly to 4.15%, reflecting a modest rise in participation. That’s still within range, giving the Fed cover to hold off on immediate action. But if job losses build pressure on the Fed to act, it will increase quickly.The consensus now is for the first rate cut of this cycle to start in May, triggered by softer April payrolls and earlier signs of deterioration in jobless claims and business sentiment.Zooming out from just a US-centric point of view, the macro standpoint is just as bad if not worse. The scale of tariffs adds pressure on industrial production, trade volumes and cross-border investment.That’s feeding into commodity markets, where the outlook has turned more cautious.Brent is expected to fall into the low US$60s as trade frictions and oversupply build. LNG looks weaker too, with soft Asian demand and less urgency in Europe to restock. Iron ore is more exposed to China, and the reciprocal tariffs put a vulnerability into the price due to the broader global slowdown and higher prices to the US.Looking at China specifically, infrastructure remains a key policy lever that would offset the possible loss of demand in aluminium, copper, and steel. Monetary indicators are beginning to turn, suggesting the start of a new easing cycle. It also suggests that policy remains inward-facing, and a focus on domestic stability would mean a metals-heavy growth path. Thus suggesting Australia could be the ‘lucky country’ once more and could escape the full burden of the global upheaval.In short, the global reaction isn’t just about tariffs. It’s about what happens when policy shocks collide with already-fragile global demand, and central banks are forced to navigate inflation that’s driven by politics, not just price cycles.This is the question for traders and investors alike over the coming period.

Evan Lucas
April 7, 2025
每日财经快讯
空头狂欢节

美股持续暴跌,特朗普关税政策持续发酵,美国民众周末疯狂游行示威抗议,特朗普支持率跌至新低。早盘期货市场一开盘就再给出“重拳“,纳指期货开跌近5%,这几周已然演变成空头的“狂欢节“,恐慌指数的上涨仿佛核战开打,美油早盘一度跌破了多年未破的$60大关。世界金融秩序被彻底打破,在当前市场环境下,切不可贸然加码股市,有持仓被套的可以用VIX或者指数空单对冲,熬过市场回撤风暴。本周美国最新CPI数据即将公布,预测值较前值有明显回落,照理是能够助推美联储降息预期的,然而目前国际金融环境被特朗普破坏,恐慌的蔓延早已碾压了诸多实际数据的影响。周五各大板块全部暴跌,今天不出意外将继续暴跌。

美元黄金早盘双双扩大跌幅,全球资产快速萎缩,恐慌期货早盘暴涨,油价暴跌破多年低位。外汇方面澳元继续暴跌,风险货币的不稳定再度体现,澳美已经跌破0.6大平台,澳日仅剩87。美元对日元早盘也跌超了1.5%,目前日元是可以避险的主要币种。联系方式:墨尔本 03 8658 0603悉尼 02 9188 0418中国地区(中文) 400 120 8537中国地区(英文) +248 4 671 903作者:Xavier Zhang | GO Markets 高级分析师

Xavier Zhang
April 7, 2025