Market News & Insights
Market News & Insights
比特幣主導地位達到 60%,山寨幣還能跟上嗎?
The Editorial Desk
10/11/2026
•
0 min read
Share this post
Copy URL
On this page
What traders are asking
Sign up

山寨幣季節真的即將來臨,還是 60% 的主導地位線誤導了市場?從不同數據供應商計算市值的方式,到自動化 ETF 資金外溢的神話,以下是加密貨幣主導地位圖表真正揭示的資訊。

The 60% question: why Bitcoin can leave altcoins behind | GO Markets

Bitcoin dominance can help explain the gap but it cannot tell traders what happens next.

When Bitcoin outperforms and smaller tokens struggle, a familiar assumption can creep in: once Bitcoin has its moment, altcoins must be next. The problem is the word ‘must’.

According to CoinMarketCap, which displayed a reading of around 60% when checked on 21 October 2026, Bitcoin dominance measures Bitcoin’s share of the cryptocurrency market’s total market capitalisation. That is a measure of market share, not a guarantee about the next price move.

For retail clients, the distinction matters as a chart that helps explain relative performance is not automatically a signal to buy Bitcoin or sell everything else.

1. The stablecoin catch behind the headline number

The assumption

"A 60% reading is straightforward: Bitcoin strictly accounts for 60% of the entire market value."

The reality

A 60% reading looks straightforward. Bitcoin accounts for 60% of the market value included in the calculation. But which market?

For instance, TradingView’s dominance calculation uses the total market capitalisation of its top 125 cryptocurrencies, while CoinMarketCap describes its measure against the total market capitalisation of all cryptocurrencies it tracks. The provider and methodology matter when comparing readings.

Historical comparisons need care, too. As noted by CoinMarketCap data, Bitcoin lost substantial market share during the 2017 and 2021 cycles, but that does not establish a timetable for another rotation. Nor were stablecoins absent in 2015; Tether launched its US-dollar token in October 2014, demonstrating that stablecoins were not absent in prior cycles. The relevant question is how the market’s composition has changed, not whether stablecoins existed.

Same Bitcoin, different calculation

Consider a hypothetical market where Bitcoin represents 60% of total value and stablecoins represent 10%. Remove stablecoins from that calculation and Bitcoin’s share of the remaining market becomes approximately 66.7%.

  • Denominator shifts: Bitcoin has not gained value in this hypothetical example. The denominator has changed. That calculation can help explain market composition, but it is an alternative measure, not a hidden ‘true’ dominance reading.
  • Stablecoin risk: Stablecoins also should not be treated as risk-free cash.
The Takeaway

The percentage becomes more useful once the calculation behind it is clear. It still cannot rule out an altcoin rally.

2. ETF money has no automatic onward ticket

The assumption

"Investors buy Bitcoin, take profits, then automatically move those funds into smaller cryptocurrencies."

The reality

The familiar rotation story sounds neat, but an exchange-traded fund (ETF) does not necessarily follow that script.

A Bitcoin-focused fund has its own investment objective. For example, BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF seeks to reflect Bitcoin’s price performance. It is not a discretionary fund choosing which altcoin might rally next. The distinction is between what the fund holds and what its investors decide to do.

Investors can sell a Bitcoin fund and allocate elsewhere. But that is a separate decision, not an automatic destination for Bitcoin ETF inflows.

Bitcoin-focused does not mean Bitcoin-only

The opposite claim also goes too far. Institutional access to crypto is not restricted to Bitcoin. For example, BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF provides exposure to ether, Ethereum’s native token.

That does not prove money will rotate into every smaller token. It does mean ‘institutions only buy Bitcoin’ is too broad a claim.

The Takeaway

The useful distinction is narrower: demand for one investment product does not establish demand for the whole crypto market. An ETF inflow is not an invitation addressed to every altcoin.

3. Bigger price swings do not make an easier trade

The assumption

"Because altcoins are more volatile, they make a better short when Bitcoin dominance rises or prices fall."

The reality

An altcoin can move in the same direction as Bitcoin and still produce a very different result.

Some tokens have displayed larger price swings than Bitcoin, and relationships change over time. CME Group’s research has examined differences in volatility and correlation between Bitcoin, ether and Solana rather than treating them as interchangeable exposures.

Correlation describes how returns move together. It does not mean they move by the same percentage. That matters when a narrative turns ‘more volatile’ into ‘a better short’. A token capable of falling sharply can also rebound sharply. Greater movement increases the potential size of both favourable and adverse outcomes.

The chart does not set the account’s risk

  • Position costs: For a short CFD position, a rising price creates a loss. Leverage can magnify that loss, while spreads and applicable financing charges add costs. Fast markets can also affect execution.
  • Universal rules: There is no reliable universal rule saying a particular Bitcoin decline must produce a fixed percentage fall across altcoins. The token, measurement period and market conditions matter.
The Takeaway

A high dominance reading does not supply those missing details. It cannot establish how much an individual token will move or whether a position will remain within its margin requirements. More volatility is not the same as more predictable returns.

4. Altcoin season does not start at a magic percentage

The assumption

"Once Bitcoin dominance drops below 50%, or reverses between 60% and 63%, a broad altcoin rally is guaranteed."

The reality

A falling dominance chart can attract attention. It does not ring a bell announcing that every altcoin is about to recover.

The term ‘altcoin season’ generally describes a period of broad altcoin outperformance. As an example, CoinMarketCap’s Altcoin Season Index measures how widely selected cryptocurrencies outperform Bitcoin, rather than relying on a universal Bitcoin dominance threshold. That is different from declaring that dominance below 50% confirms a rally, or that a reversal guarantees a change in leadership.

A falling ratio can tell different stories

Because dominance is a ratio, it can decline for different reasons. As indicated by the structural calculations behind trackers like CoinMarketCap, other cryptocurrencies might gain value faster than Bitcoin, Bitcoin might fall more sharply, or stablecoin market capitalisation might increase. Not all of these scenarios mean altcoin prices are rising.

The Takeaway

A sequence of lower highs may describe a chart pattern, but it does not establish that a particular token is recovering or that a leveraged position is appropriate. The question is not simply whether dominance has crossed a line. It is what changed underneath the ratio.

Bitcoin dominance checklist

1. Hedging limitations: A long Bitcoin position combined with a short altcoin position does not simply reproduce the dominance chart. Its result depends on the chosen instruments, position sizes, price changes and costs.
2. Two-way directional risk: Opposing directions do not make the combination risk-free. Bitcoin could fall while the selected altcoin rises, causing losses on both positions.
3. Execution mechanics: For retail CFD accounts, the practical issue remains the relationship between market exposure, available equity and trading costs. A convincing market narrative does not remove those risks.

The bottom line

Bitcoin dominance can help explain why a Bitcoin-led market does not lift every token equally. It cannot prove that altcoins are finished, predict the next rotation or identify a suitable trade.

The 60% figure is a starting point for understanding market share. It is not a verdict on your favourite coin.

Related Articles