Market News & Insights
Market News & Insights
US Jobs Report
Klavs Valters
14/4/2021
•
0 min read
Share this post
Copy URL

The Buraeu of Labor Statistics have released the latest jobs report for April. Let’s take a look at the latest numbers. The total non-farm payroll employment increased by 263,000 the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, beating the forecast of 190,000. Biggest job gains were in professional and business services, construction, health care, and social assistance. Professional and business services added 76,000 Construction added 33,000 Employment in health grew by 27,000 Social assistance added 26,000 The unemployment rate fell to its lowest level since December 1969 to 3.6% beating the forecast of 3.8%.

The number of unemployed persons decreased by 387,000 to 5.8 million. The average hourly earnings remained unchanged at 3.2%, below the forecast of 3.3%. USDCAD – Hourly USDJPY – Hourly The next US jobs report is on 7th June.

This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions. Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.

Sources: Go Markets MT4, Google, Datawrapper,

By
Klavs Valters
Account Manager, GO Markets London.

The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs.

Related Articles

Commodity
Geopolitical events
Strategies
霍尔木兹危机解释：停火、过境费和新的石油溢价

4月8日宣布的停火以及围绕45天休战的平行讨论并未解决霍尔木兹海峡的混乱问题。目前，他们已经限制了最坏的情况，但油轮运输量仍处于正常水平的一小部分，伊朗对过境费的需求预示着结构性转变，而不是暂时的转变。

最初的地区冲突已成为全球能源冲击，市场面临的问题不再是霍尔木兹是否受到干扰，而是这种混乱对石油的最低定价产生了多大的永久性影响。

关键要点

  • 每天约有2000万桶（桶）的石油和石油产品通常通过伊朗和阿曼之间的霍尔木兹海峡，相当于全球石油消费量的约五分之一，约占全球海运石油贸易的30％。
  • 这是流量冲击，不是库存问题。石油市场依赖于持续的吞吐量，而不是静态存储。
  • 如果中断持续超过几周，布伦特原油可能会从短期飙升转向更广泛的价格冲击，存在滞胀风险。
  • 穿越海峡的油轮运输量从每天约135艘下降到中断高峰期的不到15艘船只，减少了约85％，超过150艘船只停泊、改道或延误。
  • 4月8日宣布了为期两周的停火，为期45天的休战谈判正在进行之中。伊朗已分别表示要求对使用该海峡的船只收取过境费，如果正式确定，这将是能源成本的永久地缘政治最低标准。
  • 市场已经开始从增长和技术敞口转向能源和国防企业，这反映了人们的观点，即石油价格上涨正在成为结构性成本，而不是暂时的风险溢价。

Institutional Grade Performance

Master the Markets with MetaTrader 5

Trade hundreds of instruments with superior speed and advanced technical analysis. Harness full EA functionality to execute your strategy.

Need to access your terminal? Log in to Client Portal

世界上最关键的石油阻塞点

霍尔木兹海峡每天处理大约2000万桶石油和石油产品，相当于全球石油消费量的20％和全球海运石油贸易的30％左右。由于全球石油需求接近1.04亿桶/日，且剩余产能有限，在最近的升级之前，市场已经处于紧密平衡状态。

该海峡也是液化天然气的重要走廊。2024年，平均每天约有2.9亿立方米的液化天然气通过该路线，约占全球液化天然气贸易的20％，亚洲市场是主要目的地。

国际能源署（IEA）将霍尔木兹描述为世界上最重要的石油运输阻塞点，并指出，即使是部分中断也可能引发价格的大幅波动。布伦特原油已跌破每桶100美元，这既反映了物质紧张，也反映了地缘政治风险溢价的上升。

Infographic map of the Strait of Hormuz showing its role as a global energy chokepoint, with 20.3 million barrels of oil and petroleum products and 290 million cubic metres of LNG transported through the strait each day on average in 2024.
来源： 美国能源信息管理局，2025 年 6 月 17 日，使用 2024 年的每日平均值

由于流量减慢，油轮处于空转状态

现在，航运和保险数据实时显示压力。据报道，超过85艘大型原油运输船滞留在波斯湾，而由于运营商重新评估安全和保险，有150多艘船舶停泊、改道或延误。据估计，这将使1.2亿至1.5亿桶原油在海上闲置。

这些量仅代表霍尔木兹正常吞吐量的六到七天，或略高于一天的全球石油消费。

最新的航运和保险数据现在证实，有150多艘船只停泊、改道或延误，高于最初报告的85艘船只。闲置原油的1.3天全球消费保障仍然是约束性制约因素：这是流量冲击，不是储存问题，停火尚未转化为产量的实质性恢复。

🌋 Trump, volatility and Hormuz.

As tariff shocks collide with a ten year extreme in oil positioning, the margin for error is zero. See the technical markers and safe haven pivots defining the current risk environment.

Access the deep dive

建立在流量而不是存储基础上的市场

石油市场在持续波动中运作。炼油厂、石化厂和全球供应链经过调整，可以沿着可预测的海道稳定交付。当流经占全球石油消耗量约五分之一和全球海运石油贸易约30％的阻塞点时，该系统可以在几天之内从平衡变为赤字。

剩余产能主要集中在欧佩克内，估计仅为每天300万至500万桶。这远低于霍尔木兹水流受到严重干扰时面临的风险交易量。

GO Markets — Idle Tankers: Days of Cover

Oil market analysis

How long do idle tankers last?

135M idle barrels — days of cover against each demand benchmark

GO Markets 20th Anniversary

vs. Strait of Hormuz daily flow  (20M bbl/day)

6.75 days of Hormuz throughput covered
6.75 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

vs. Global oil consumption  (104M bbl/day)

1.3 days of world demand covered
1.3 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

vs. US Strategic Petroleum Reserve release  (1M bbl/day)

135 days of full SPR release pace covered
135 days — but SPR exists to replace this role
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

135M

idle barrels on tankers (midpoint of 120–150M range)

~33%

of daily Hormuz flow that is idle storage, not transit

<31 hrs

is all idle storage against global daily consumption

Sources: IEA, EIA, industry estimates. Idle crude midpoint of 120–150M bbl range used.

Indicative market trajectories based on disruption severity

Scenarios for the weeks ahead

1–2 WEEKS

Ceasefire catch-up

Markets face catch-up repricing. Brent could consolidate in the US$105–US$115 range as risk premia unwind. Brent may trade lower (US$95–US$110) if strategic stocks bridge the temporary shortfall.

2–4 WEEKS

Infrastructure blitz

Shifts to structural supply shock. Brent moving toward US$150–US$200 cannot be ruled out. This is the stagflation trigger where energy costs constrain central bank flexibility.

STRUCTURAL

Geopolitical floor

Iran's transit fee demand creates a permanent input cost. The pre-crisis price structure (US$60–US$70) may not return, embedded in insurance and freight rates.

Critical Threshold US$120 remains the level at which energy inflation becomes a direct Federal Reserve policy problem.

通货膨胀风险和宏观溢出效应

石油冲击的通货膨胀影响通常以波浪形式出现。随着汽油、柴油和电力成本的上涨，燃料和能源价格的上涨可能会迅速提振总体通货膨胀。

随着时间的推移，更高的能源成本可能会流向货运、食品、制造业和服务业。如果混乱持续下去，通货膨胀率上升和增长放缓相结合，可能会增加滞胀环境的风险，使中央银行面临艰难的权衡。

🛢️ Brent hits $100.

Exxon and SLB are leading the rotation out of tech. Get the price targets and technical support levels for the top 5 energy majors.

Get the stock list

不容易抵消，系统几乎没有松弛

当前局势之所以特别严重，是因为全球体系缺乏松弛。

当处理近2,000万桶/日（约占全球石油消耗量的五分之一）的阻塞点受到损害时，将近1.03亿至1.04亿桶的全球供需几乎没有备用缓冲。估计每天300万至500万桶的剩余产能，主要在欧佩克内部，只能覆盖风险产量的一小部分。

替代路线，包括绕过霍尔木兹的管道和改道运输，只能部分抵消流量的损失，而且通常成本更高，交货时间更长。

底线

在霍尔木兹海峡的过境恢复并被视为可靠安全之前，全球石油流动可能继续受损，风险溢价上升。对于投资者、政策制定者和企业决策者来说，核心问题是石油能否每天不间断地转移到需要去的地方。

Market Opportunity

Don't just watch the squeeze. Trade the framework.

As positioning gaps hit decade extremes, access advanced charting tools and real time execution on the six key markets defining this cycle.

Tight Spreads
Expert Analysis
Global Market Access

Trading CFDs and FX involves significant risk to your invested capital. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved before trading.

GO Markets
•
April 8, 2026
Shares
CFDs
Geopolitical events
Oil, Metals, Soft Commodities
Commodity
你的投资组合准备好了吗？随着TACO应对石油冲击的担忧，有6个市场值得关注

关于文明 “今晚死亡” 的标题本来是为了压倒一切而设计的，但更有说服力的信号可能是其背后的平静，因为市场开始将这种急剧升级然后突然缓和局势的周期视为一种模式，这并不奇怪。

在宏观圈子里，这种模式有一个直言不讳的标签：TACO，或 “特朗普总是退出”。该短语已加载，但逻辑很简单。最大压力威胁来袭，风险资产摇摆不定，一旦经济成本开始增加，就会出现暂停、延迟或更疲软的结果。

这并不意味着风险很小。这可能只是意味着投资者已经习惯了在最坏情况完全出现之前言论激烈、市场吸收冲击、克制表现出来的剧本。

Developing situation | Strait of Hormuz | Section 122 Tariffs
Published April 2026
Brent Crude Above US$100
VIX 31
In focus 6 markets
Oil Positioning Decade-low longs
The Framework & Mechanism Is the market the red line?
+

This is where the TACO idea starts to matter. Traders are not just watching the rhetoric. They are watching when it starts to hit markets, inflation and the wider economy.

Oil is at the centre of that risk. If disruption around the Strait of Hormuz starts to threaten global energy flows, the story quickly becomes macro. Higher oil can lift inflation expectations, pressure central banks and tighten financial conditions.

That is why a pause can look less like diplomacy and more like pressure relief. The real red line may be the point where the economic damage becomes too obvious to ignore.

Short Squeezed

Positioning adds another layer. Oil still looks under-owned, with futures positioning near decade-long bearish extremes. If a fresh shock lands, short-covering could drive prices higher much faster than fundamentals alone would suggest.

That is the short-squeeze risk. In the Commitment of Traders (COT) report, recent data suggests oil long exposure is relatively low by historical standards.

Humanitarian Reality

Whatever may be promised in political messaging, any sustained conflict in Iran would carry a heavy cost in displacement, infrastructure damage and wider regional stress. A relief rally in markets does not change that.

Global Isolation

Even if pauses are used to steady domestic market sentiment, allies and multilateral institutions may view bluff-and-retreat tactics as a credibility problem that creates longer-term diplomatic friction.

Positioning gap indicator

Divergence analysis between positioning and risk environment

APRIL 2026

Bars show GO Markets’ internal estimate of the divergence between current futures positioning and levels seen in comparable historical shock environments.

Brent crude Extreme
Gold (XAU/USD) Very high
Nasdaq 100 High
USD/CNH High
US 10 yr yield Medium
USD/CAD Medium
Extreme decade scale positioning extreme
High significant divergence
Medium moderate divergence
Methodology note

The Positioning Gap Indicator is based on GO Markets’ internal analysis and is intended as a high-level, illustrative framework only. It uses a combination of market positioning data, historical comparisons and discretionary assumptions about how similar energy and trade shocks have affected markets in the past. The ‘Extreme’, ‘Very High’, ‘High’ and ‘Medium’ labels are relative internal classifications, not objective market standards, and should not be relied on as predictions, forecasts or a guarantee of future outcomes.

The Six Markets

The six markets that matter most

Each of these six markets is exposed to the current situation through a different mechanism. Understanding the mechanism, not just the price, matters. It helps explain whether a move is a headline reaction or the start of something broader. Tap any card to expand the full analysis.

01
BRENT
Brent crude oil
ENERGY DIRECT CHANNEL SQUEEZE RISK: EXTREME
+
The Clear Transmission Channel

Brent is the international benchmark for crude and the most direct transmission mechanism in this geopolitical thesis. Any disruption to physical flows, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, forces an immediate tightening of global energy supply.

The Positioning Backdrop

Futures positioning currently sits at a ten year bearish extreme. Leveraged funds have cut long exposure heavily. In the event of a physical supply shock, this imbalance creates the potential for a violent short covering squeeze.

● Bull Case

Hormuz disruption extends beyond four weeks. Extended disruption could lift Brent sharply if supply flows are impaired for longer.

● Bear Case

Diplomatic intervention reopens the strait quickly. Strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) releases and increased spare capacity cap any price rally.

Strategic Marker

US$120: the point at which energy inflation becomes a direct Federal Reserve policy problem, rather than just a market narrative.

02
XAU/USD
Gold
SAFE HAVEN UNDER-OWNED SQUEEZE RISK: VERY HIGH
+
The Counter-Intuitive Setup

Despite a clear geopolitical risk profile, leveraged funds have been reducing bullish gold exposure. This leaves the market under-owned at the exact moment the fundamental case for safe haven assets is strengthening.

The Inflation Variable

The critical factor for Gold is whether energy-driven inflation limits the Fed's room to maneuver. If policy flexibility weakens, Gold could catch up quickly as a hedge against stagflation.

● Bull Case

Real yields fall as energy inflation outpaces rate hikes. Under-owned positioning amplifies the catch up move as institutional funds rebuild exposure.

● Bear Case

Geopolitical tensions ease rapidly. The Fed remains credibly focused on inflation, keeping real yields positive and supporting the USD over Gold.

Strategic Marker

One level to monitor is prior resistance, alongside any change in COT positioning.

03
US100/NAS100
Nasdaq 100
TECHNOLOGY DUAL PRESSURE RATE AND SUPPLY RISK
+
Why it is a complicated position

The Nasdaq faces immediate pressure from two fronts: Stickier energy-driven inflation forces rates higher for longer, compressing multiples, while trade tensions unsettle the supply chains beneath major tech names.

Why the 10 year yield matters here

When the 10 year Treasury yield holds above 4.5%, the future value of technology earnings must be discounted at a higher rate. AI linked earnings momentum must overpower this valuation headwind.

● Bull Case

Earnings season delivers proof of AI investment generating real revenue. Index components successfully insulate supply chains, and AI capex momentum overrides the macro headwind.

● Bear Case

Energy inflation keeps yields above 4.5%. Multiple compression in high valuation names triggers a broader index decline amid disappointments in AI monetization.

Strategic Marker

S&P 500 at 6,498: a widely watched Fibonacci cluster. A sustained move below this threshold highlights a historically challenging framework for growth equities.

04
USD/CNH
US dollar/offshore Chinese yuan
FX BEIJING READ POLICY PROXY
+
What it tells you

USD/CNH is the cleanest real time read on how Beijing is responding to tariff pressure. A sharp rise suggests China is allowing currency weakness to absorb the costs of trade friction.

Why it matters beyond China

A move in USD/CNH doesn't stay contained. It spills into Asian equities, commodity demand, and broader risk appetite. Deliberate depreciation signals a shift in the global trade environment.

● USD Bull / Yuan Bear

Beijing allows yuan weakness as a deliberate countermeasure. Capital outflows accelerate, and USD safe haven demand reinforces the move.

● Yuan Recovery

Trade negotiations begin and a face saving off ramp is found. PBOC intervention defends the yuan, and the dollar's safe haven premium fades.

Strategic Marker

7.30 on USD/CNH: a sustained move above this has historically been associated with broader risk off moves in Asian markets.

05
US10Y/TNOTE
US 10 year Treasury yield
RATES MACRO PLUMBING SHAPES EVERYTHING ELSE
+
Why it sits under everything

The 10 year yield shapes mortgage costs, corporate borrowing, and the valuation framework for risk assets globally. When it rises, borrowing becomes more expensive across the entire system.

The Independent Movement Risk

If oil forces the Fed to delay cuts, the 10 year yield could rise regardless of Fed communication. It can tighten financial conditions even before a formal policy shift occurs.

● Rates Fall Case

Oil shock proves transient. Fed maintains guidance and 10 year yields pull back toward 4.0%, relieving pressure on equities and providing support for bonds.

● Rates Rise Case

Sustained oil above US$100 pushes inflation higher. Fed pauses rate cut language and the 10 year yield breaks above 4.5%, compressing equity multiples.

Strategic Marker

4.5% on the 10 year yield: a sustained break above this while oil remains above US$100 is a historically challenging combination for equities.

06
USD/CAD
US dollar/offshore Canadian dollar
FX OIL-LINKED LEAD INDICATOR
+
The Double Exposure

USD/CAD is a lead indicator because Canada sits at the intersection of energy and trade. It benefits from higher oil revenue but is highly sensitive to US economic and trade conditions.

When the Forces Collide

When oil rises, the CAD often strengthens; when trade stress rises, it weakens. In the current environment, these forces are colliding rather than canceling each other out.

● CAD Strengthens

Oil sustained above US$100 boosts export revenue while trade tensions stay short of Canada specific tariffs. Bank of Canada holds rates steady.

● CAD Weakens

Safe haven USD demand outweighs the oil benefit. Bank of Canada cuts rates to offset trade headwinds.

Strategic Marker

1.42 on USD/CAD: a sustained move above this signals trade anxiety is dominating the oil benefit, often preceding broader risk off moves.

What could go wrong

Four reasons the market logic could fail

+

A coherent macro case is still only a case. Markets regularly ignore tidy narratives for longer than expected, or invalidate them quickly. Four failure paths stand out.

1

The situation de-escalates faster than the news cycle suggests

Geopolitical risk premia can build slowly and disappear quickly. Any credible sign of de-escalation, especially around shipping lanes or energy infrastructure, could reverse oil sharply and drain urgency from the rest of the thesis. This is precisely the scenario the TACO framework predicts.

2

Tariff posturing does not become tariff policy

The market may be reacting to opening positions rather than settled policy. If Washington and Beijing find a face-saving off-ramp, as they have in previous trade disputes, currency and equity moves that anticipated escalation could unwind just as fast as they built.

3

AI investment spending overrides the macro headwind

Technology capital expenditure has remained more resilient than expected for much of the past two years. If earnings season shows that AI infrastructure spending is still translating into real demand and returns, the growth narrative may reassert itself, particularly in the Nasdaq 100.

4

The squeeze never arrives: extended positioning holds for longer than expected

Stretched positioning does not automatically produce a violent reprice. Markets can stay under-owned for months if risk appetite remains weak and institutions are unwilling to rebuild exposure. The set-up can exist without the catalyst arriving in a way that forces the move.

Forward Calendar

What to watch and when

+

Three time horizons matter here. The first tests supply resilience. The second tests financial system health. The third tests whether any shift in market leadership is cyclical or structural.

Three horizon watchlist

Signals and catalysts across the next two months

Next Two Weeks

Chipmaker guidance and supply commentary

Major semiconductor earnings calls will offer an early read on whether supply bottlenecks are worsening and whether management teams are changing production assumptions. If supply commentary deteriorates, the inflation story gets another push and the case for higher for longer rates strengthens.

Next 30 Days

Bank earnings and loan demand

Major US banks will provide a useful check on whether capital spending related to AI infrastructure is still being financed. The most important signal may not be earnings per share. It may be commercial loan demand. If businesses are pulling back on borrowing, the growth cycle may be softening earlier than the market expects.

Next 60 Days

Enablers versus spenders

The more structural test is whether the market begins rewarding businesses that produce physical outputs: energy producers, hardware makers and defence contractors, while penalising software companies that still cannot prove a clear return on AI spending. A wider performance gap between those groups would suggest something deeper than a temporary rotation.

前进的道路

当前地缘政治紧张局势和极端历史定位的融合为全球市场创造了独特的 “盘旋弹簧” 环境。而 炸玉米饼 框架表明了急剧升级之后出现战略暂停的模式，未来60天对交易者的真正考验将是从头条驱动的波动向结构性市场轮动的过渡。

无论是通过温和的缓和局势还是剧烈的空头挤压来缩小仓位缺口，拥有明确的反应框架都可以帮助交易者驾驭噪音。

Market Opportunity

Don't just watch the squeeze. Trade the framework.

As positioning gaps hit decade extremes, access advanced charting tools and real time execution on the six key markets defining this cycle.

Tight Spreads
Expert Analysis
Global Market Access

Trading CFDs and FX involves significant risk to your invested capital. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved before trading.

GO Markets
•
April 8, 2026
Central Banks
Geopolitical events
Market insights
AI
2026年4月美联储观察：石油、通货膨胀和联邦公开市场委员会解释

这是四月开始时的情况。一场战争正在影响世界上最重要的石油阻塞点之一。布伦特原油交易价格高于100美元。而美联储（Fed）在2025年的大部分时间里都在设计软着陆，现在面临的通货膨胀威胁与其说是由工资、服务业或国内经济驱动的，不如说是由能源驱动的。它正在关注石油冲击。

联邦基金利率为3.50％至3.75％。下一次联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）会议将于4月28日和29日举行，市场面临的关键问题不是美联储是否会削减，而是美联储能否削减，或者能源冲击是否可能在2026年的大部分时间里关闭了这扇大门。

大量重要数据将于4月发布。3月份的消费者物价指数（CPI）、非农就业人数（NFP）和第一季度国内生产总值（GDP）的预估是最重要的三个。但联邦公开市场委员会4月29日的声明可能为今年余下的时间定下了基调。

Fed Funds Rate

3.50%–3.75%

Next FOMC

28–29 April 2026

Brent crude

Above US$100

Key data events

12 major releases

增长：业务活动和需求

想想今年的美国经济是什么样子：人工智能驱动的资本支出（capex）是增长叙事的重要组成部分，企业投资意向看上去很坚定，《一、大、美法案》已经在其中了。从表面上看，增长故事看起来很扎实。

然后，霍尔木兹海峡的局势改变了计算方式。不是因为美国是净能源进口国，事实并非如此，而且结构隔热很重要。但是，对美国能源生产商有利的东西仍然可以挤压其他地方的利润率并压制全球需求。4月30日的第一季度国内生产总值（GDP）预估现在可以从两个角度来解读：冲击前经济有多强劲，以及它可能对未来几个季度发出什么信号。

Key dates (AEST)

2
Apr
US international trade in goods and services (February)
Bureau of Economic Analysis  ·  10:30 pm AEDT
Medium
30
Apr
Q1 GDP — advance estimate
Bureau of Economic Analysis  ·  10:30 pm AEST
High

What markets look for

  • Resilience in Q1 GDP despite the elevated interest rate environment and early energy cost pressures
  • Trade balance movements linked to shifting global tariff frameworks
  • Business investment intentions following passage of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"
  • Early signs of capacity constraints emerging in technology-heavy sectors

How this data may move markets

Scenario Treasuries USD Equities
Stronger than expected growth ↑ Yields rise ↑ Firmer Mixed - depends on inflation read
Softer growth/GDP miss ↓ Yields fall ↓ Softer Risk off if stagflation narrative builds

劳工：工资和就业

根据你的阅读方式，二月份的就业报告要么是短暂的，要么是一个警告信号。非农就业人数（NFP）下降了92,000人，失业率小幅上升至4.4％，官方说天气起了作用。这可能是真的，但这也是发生的事情。作为维持高利率的主要论点，劳动力市场突然显得不那么令人信服了。

4月3日的3月就业报告现在确实具有重要意义。回归正的薪资增长可能会稳定紧张情绪，而连续第二次的软打印，尤其是在能源价格上涨的背景下，将开始给美联储带来非常不舒服的说法。它将同时考虑就业增长放缓和通货膨胀威胁。那不是一个舒适的地方。

Key dates (AEST)

3
Apr
March employment situation (NFP and unemployment rate)
Bureau of Labor Statistics  ·  10:30 pm AEDT
High
30
Apr
Q1 employment cost index
Bureau of Labor Statistics  ·  10:30 pm AEST
Medium

What markets look for

  • A return to positive payroll growth, or confirmation that February's softness was the start of a trend
  • Stabilisation or further movement in the unemployment rate from 4.4%
  • Average hourly earnings growth relative to core inflation — the wage-price dynamic the Fed watches closely
  • Weekly initial jobless claims as a real-time signal of whether layoff activity is rising

通货膨胀：消费者价格指数、PPI和个人消费支出

关于通货膨胀目前的走向，这是一个令人不安的真相。在任何石油冲击结束之前，美联储首选的核心个人消费支出（PCE）在1月份已经同比增长了3.1％。美联储并未完全解决其通货膨胀问题，相反，它已经放慢了通货膨胀的速度。那是另一回事。

现在，除了尚未完全解决的通货膨胀问题外，油价还大幅上涨。能源价格可以通过汽油、运输和物流成本相对较快地纳入消费者物价指数（CPI），这些成本最终会出现在几乎所有物品的价格中。4月10日的3月CPI数据可能是本月最重要的单一数据发布，它可能会告诉我们能源冲击是否已经出现在美联储关注的数字中。

Key dates (AEST)

10
Apr
Consumer price index (CPI) — March
Bureau of Labor Statistics  ·  10:30 pm AEST
High
14
Apr
Producer price index (PPI) — March
Bureau of Labor Statistics  ·  10:30 pm AEST
Medium
30
Apr
Personal income and outlays incl. PCE price index — March
Bureau of Economic Analysis  ·  10:30 pm AEST
High

What markets look for

  • Monthly CPI acceleration driven by energy and shelter components — the two stickiest inputs
  • PPI as a forward-looking signal: producer cost pressure tends to feed into consumer prices with a lag
  • PCE trends relative to the Fed's 2% target, particularly the core reading that strips out food and energy
  • Any sign that AI-related pricing power is feeding into corporate margins in ways that sustain elevated core readings

How this data may move markets

Scenario Treasuries USD Gold
Cooling core inflation ↓ Yields fall ↓ Softer ↑ Supportive
Sticky or rising inflation ↑ Yields rise ↑ Firmer ↓ Headwind

政策、贸易和收益

4月也是美国财报季的开始，本季度的业绩具有异常的分量。在回报即将到来的基础上，投资者一直在向人工智能基础设施注入资金。问题是何时。随着地缘政治波动推动人们从以增长为导向的技术转向能源和国防，摩根大通4月14日的财报将既考虑管理层对宏观环境的看法，也要考虑数字本身。

然后是4月28日和29日的联邦公开市场委员会会议。在4月初公布包括NFP、CPI和生产者物价指数（PPI）在内的数据之后，美联储将有足够的信息来更新其措辞。无论是表明降息可能持续到2026年，还是稍微半开着大门，都可能是本季度最重要的沟通。

地缘政治波动已经促使投资者重新评估以增长为主的定位。估计耗资6,500亿美元的人工智能基础设施建设在投资回报率方面也受到更严格的审查。如果财报季在这方面令人失望，如果联邦公开市场委员会表示将长期搁置，那么这种组合可能会考验进入5月的风险偏好。

Monitor this month (AEST)

  • ◆
    14 April - JPMorgan Chase Q1 earnings

    The first major bank to report. Management commentary on credit conditions, consumer spending, and the macro outlook will set the tone for financial sector earnings and broader market sentiment.

  • ◆
    15 April - Bank of America Q1 earnings

    A read on consumer credit conditions and household financial health, particularly relevant given rising energy costs and the 4.4% unemployment rate.

  • ◆
    28-29 April - FOMC meeting and policy statement

    The month's most consequential event. The statement and any updated forward guidance may effectively confirm whether rate cuts remain a possibility for 2026.

  • ◆
    Ongoing - Strait of Hormuz tanker traffic

    A live indicator of energy supply risk. Any escalation or resolution carries immediate implications for oil prices, inflation expectations, and the Fed's options.

  • ◆
    Ongoing - Sovereign AI export restrictions

    Developing policy around technology export curbs may affect capital expenditure plans for US technology firms, with knock-on implications for growth and employment in the sector.

The Bigger Picture

Geopolitical volatility has forced a rotation into energy and defence at the expense of growth oriented technology positions. The estimated US$650 billion AI infrastructure buildout is increasingly being scrutinised for returns on investment. If earnings season disappoints on that front, and if the FOMC signals a prolonged hold, the combination could test risk appetite heading into May.

‍

美国即将发布重大数据？保持专注。
开设一个账户 · 登录
GO Markets
•
March 30, 2026
See all News & Insights

Recent Articles

如果霍尔木兹海峡关闭会发生什么，为什么石油流动比库存更重要，每天有多少石油流经霍尔木兹，霍尔木兹中断后的布伦特原油展望，霍尔木兹如何影响全球通货膨胀，欧佩克能否弥补霍尔木兹供应的流失，什么是石油市场的流量冲击，库存能抵消石油供应中断多长时间
Commodity
Geopolitical events
Strategies
霍尔木兹危机解释：停火、过境费和新的石油溢价

4月8日宣布的停火以及围绕45天休战的平行讨论并未解决霍尔木兹海峡的混乱问题。目前，他们已经限制了最坏的情况，但油轮运输量仍处于正常水平的一小部分，伊朗对过境费的需求预示着结构性转变，而不是暂时的转变。

最初的地区冲突已成为全球能源冲击，市场面临的问题不再是霍尔木兹是否受到干扰，而是这种混乱对石油的最低定价产生了多大的永久性影响。

关键要点

  • 每天约有2000万桶（桶）的石油和石油产品通常通过伊朗和阿曼之间的霍尔木兹海峡，相当于全球石油消费量的约五分之一，约占全球海运石油贸易的30％。
  • 这是流量冲击，不是库存问题。石油市场依赖于持续的吞吐量，而不是静态存储。
  • 如果中断持续超过几周，布伦特原油可能会从短期飙升转向更广泛的价格冲击，存在滞胀风险。
  • 穿越海峡的油轮运输量从每天约135艘下降到中断高峰期的不到15艘船只，减少了约85％，超过150艘船只停泊、改道或延误。
  • 4月8日宣布了为期两周的停火，为期45天的休战谈判正在进行之中。伊朗已分别表示要求对使用该海峡的船只收取过境费，如果正式确定，这将是能源成本的永久地缘政治最低标准。
  • 市场已经开始从增长和技术敞口转向能源和国防企业，这反映了人们的观点，即石油价格上涨正在成为结构性成本，而不是暂时的风险溢价。

Institutional Grade Performance

Master the Markets with MetaTrader 5

Trade hundreds of instruments with superior speed and advanced technical analysis. Harness full EA functionality to execute your strategy.

Need to access your terminal? Log in to Client Portal

世界上最关键的石油阻塞点

霍尔木兹海峡每天处理大约2000万桶石油和石油产品，相当于全球石油消费量的20％和全球海运石油贸易的30％左右。由于全球石油需求接近1.04亿桶/日，且剩余产能有限，在最近的升级之前，市场已经处于紧密平衡状态。

该海峡也是液化天然气的重要走廊。2024年，平均每天约有2.9亿立方米的液化天然气通过该路线，约占全球液化天然气贸易的20％，亚洲市场是主要目的地。

国际能源署（IEA）将霍尔木兹描述为世界上最重要的石油运输阻塞点，并指出，即使是部分中断也可能引发价格的大幅波动。布伦特原油已跌破每桶100美元，这既反映了物质紧张，也反映了地缘政治风险溢价的上升。

Infographic map of the Strait of Hormuz showing its role as a global energy chokepoint, with 20.3 million barrels of oil and petroleum products and 290 million cubic metres of LNG transported through the strait each day on average in 2024.
来源： 美国能源信息管理局，2025 年 6 月 17 日，使用 2024 年的每日平均值

由于流量减慢，油轮处于空转状态

现在，航运和保险数据实时显示压力。据报道，超过85艘大型原油运输船滞留在波斯湾，而由于运营商重新评估安全和保险，有150多艘船舶停泊、改道或延误。据估计，这将使1.2亿至1.5亿桶原油在海上闲置。

这些量仅代表霍尔木兹正常吞吐量的六到七天，或略高于一天的全球石油消费。

最新的航运和保险数据现在证实，有150多艘船只停泊、改道或延误，高于最初报告的85艘船只。闲置原油的1.3天全球消费保障仍然是约束性制约因素：这是流量冲击，不是储存问题，停火尚未转化为产量的实质性恢复。

🌋 Trump, volatility and Hormuz.

As tariff shocks collide with a ten year extreme in oil positioning, the margin for error is zero. See the technical markers and safe haven pivots defining the current risk environment.

Access the deep dive

建立在流量而不是存储基础上的市场

石油市场在持续波动中运作。炼油厂、石化厂和全球供应链经过调整，可以沿着可预测的海道稳定交付。当流经占全球石油消耗量约五分之一和全球海运石油贸易约30％的阻塞点时，该系统可以在几天之内从平衡变为赤字。

剩余产能主要集中在欧佩克内，估计仅为每天300万至500万桶。这远低于霍尔木兹水流受到严重干扰时面临的风险交易量。

GO Markets — Idle Tankers: Days of Cover

Oil market analysis

How long do idle tankers last?

135M idle barrels — days of cover against each demand benchmark

GO Markets 20th Anniversary

vs. Strait of Hormuz daily flow  (20M bbl/day)

6.75 days of Hormuz throughput covered
6.75 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

vs. Global oil consumption  (104M bbl/day)

1.3 days of world demand covered
1.3 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

vs. US Strategic Petroleum Reserve release  (1M bbl/day)

135 days of full SPR release pace covered
135 days — but SPR exists to replace this role
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 days

135M

idle barrels on tankers (midpoint of 120–150M range)

~33%

of daily Hormuz flow that is idle storage, not transit

<31 hrs

is all idle storage against global daily consumption

Sources: IEA, EIA, industry estimates. Idle crude midpoint of 120–150M bbl range used.

Indicative market trajectories based on disruption severity

Scenarios for the weeks ahead

1–2 WEEKS

Ceasefire catch-up

Markets face catch-up repricing. Brent could consolidate in the US$105–US$115 range as risk premia unwind. Brent may trade lower (US$95–US$110) if strategic stocks bridge the temporary shortfall.

2–4 WEEKS

Infrastructure blitz

Shifts to structural supply shock. Brent moving toward US$150–US$200 cannot be ruled out. This is the stagflation trigger where energy costs constrain central bank flexibility.

STRUCTURAL

Geopolitical floor

Iran's transit fee demand creates a permanent input cost. The pre-crisis price structure (US$60–US$70) may not return, embedded in insurance and freight rates.

Critical Threshold US$120 remains the level at which energy inflation becomes a direct Federal Reserve policy problem.

通货膨胀风险和宏观溢出效应

石油冲击的通货膨胀影响通常以波浪形式出现。随着汽油、柴油和电力成本的上涨，燃料和能源价格的上涨可能会迅速提振总体通货膨胀。

随着时间的推移，更高的能源成本可能会流向货运、食品、制造业和服务业。如果混乱持续下去，通货膨胀率上升和增长放缓相结合，可能会增加滞胀环境的风险，使中央银行面临艰难的权衡。

🛢️ Brent hits $100.

Exxon and SLB are leading the rotation out of tech. Get the price targets and technical support levels for the top 5 energy majors.

Get the stock list

不容易抵消，系统几乎没有松弛

当前局势之所以特别严重，是因为全球体系缺乏松弛。

当处理近2,000万桶/日（约占全球石油消耗量的五分之一）的阻塞点受到损害时，将近1.03亿至1.04亿桶的全球供需几乎没有备用缓冲。估计每天300万至500万桶的剩余产能，主要在欧佩克内部，只能覆盖风险产量的一小部分。

替代路线，包括绕过霍尔木兹的管道和改道运输，只能部分抵消流量的损失，而且通常成本更高，交货时间更长。

底线

在霍尔木兹海峡的过境恢复并被视为可靠安全之前，全球石油流动可能继续受损，风险溢价上升。对于投资者、政策制定者和企业决策者来说，核心问题是石油能否每天不间断地转移到需要去的地方。

Market Opportunity

Don't just watch the squeeze. Trade the framework.

As positioning gaps hit decade extremes, access advanced charting tools and real time execution on the six key markets defining this cycle.

Tight Spreads
Expert Analysis
Global Market Access

Trading CFDs and FX involves significant risk to your invested capital. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved before trading.

GO Markets
•
April 8, 2026
TACO交易，现在值得关注的市场，布伦特原油前景，黄金头寸，纳斯达克100指数风险，美元兑人民币展望，美国10年期国债收益率，美元/加元信号，地缘政治市场风险
Shares
CFDs
Geopolitical events
Oil, Metals, Soft Commodities
Commodity
你的投资组合准备好了吗？随着TACO应对石油冲击的担忧，有6个市场值得关注

关于文明 “今晚死亡” 的标题本来是为了压倒一切而设计的，但更有说服力的信号可能是其背后的平静，因为市场开始将这种急剧升级然后突然缓和局势的周期视为一种模式，这并不奇怪。

在宏观圈子里，这种模式有一个直言不讳的标签：TACO，或 “特朗普总是退出”。该短语已加载，但逻辑很简单。最大压力威胁来袭，风险资产摇摆不定，一旦经济成本开始增加，就会出现暂停、延迟或更疲软的结果。

这并不意味着风险很小。这可能只是意味着投资者已经习惯了在最坏情况完全出现之前言论激烈、市场吸收冲击、克制表现出来的剧本。

Developing situation | Strait of Hormuz | Section 122 Tariffs
Published April 2026
Brent Crude Above US$100
VIX 31
In focus 6 markets
Oil Positioning Decade-low longs
The Framework & Mechanism Is the market the red line?
+

This is where the TACO idea starts to matter. Traders are not just watching the rhetoric. They are watching when it starts to hit markets, inflation and the wider economy.

Oil is at the centre of that risk. If disruption around the Strait of Hormuz starts to threaten global energy flows, the story quickly becomes macro. Higher oil can lift inflation expectations, pressure central banks and tighten financial conditions.

That is why a pause can look less like diplomacy and more like pressure relief. The real red line may be the point where the economic damage becomes too obvious to ignore.

Short Squeezed

Positioning adds another layer. Oil still looks under-owned, with futures positioning near decade-long bearish extremes. If a fresh shock lands, short-covering could drive prices higher much faster than fundamentals alone would suggest.

That is the short-squeeze risk. In the Commitment of Traders (COT) report, recent data suggests oil long exposure is relatively low by historical standards.

Humanitarian Reality

Whatever may be promised in political messaging, any sustained conflict in Iran would carry a heavy cost in displacement, infrastructure damage and wider regional stress. A relief rally in markets does not change that.

Global Isolation

Even if pauses are used to steady domestic market sentiment, allies and multilateral institutions may view bluff-and-retreat tactics as a credibility problem that creates longer-term diplomatic friction.

Positioning gap indicator

Divergence analysis between positioning and risk environment

APRIL 2026

Bars show GO Markets’ internal estimate of the divergence between current futures positioning and levels seen in comparable historical shock environments.

Brent crude Extreme
Gold (XAU/USD) Very high
Nasdaq 100 High
USD/CNH High
US 10 yr yield Medium
USD/CAD Medium
Extreme decade scale positioning extreme
High significant divergence
Medium moderate divergence
Methodology note

The Positioning Gap Indicator is based on GO Markets’ internal analysis and is intended as a high-level, illustrative framework only. It uses a combination of market positioning data, historical comparisons and discretionary assumptions about how similar energy and trade shocks have affected markets in the past. The ‘Extreme’, ‘Very High’, ‘High’ and ‘Medium’ labels are relative internal classifications, not objective market standards, and should not be relied on as predictions, forecasts or a guarantee of future outcomes.

The Six Markets

The six markets that matter most

Each of these six markets is exposed to the current situation through a different mechanism. Understanding the mechanism, not just the price, matters. It helps explain whether a move is a headline reaction or the start of something broader. Tap any card to expand the full analysis.

01
BRENT
Brent crude oil
ENERGY DIRECT CHANNEL SQUEEZE RISK: EXTREME
+
The Clear Transmission Channel

Brent is the international benchmark for crude and the most direct transmission mechanism in this geopolitical thesis. Any disruption to physical flows, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, forces an immediate tightening of global energy supply.

The Positioning Backdrop

Futures positioning currently sits at a ten year bearish extreme. Leveraged funds have cut long exposure heavily. In the event of a physical supply shock, this imbalance creates the potential for a violent short covering squeeze.

● Bull Case

Hormuz disruption extends beyond four weeks. Extended disruption could lift Brent sharply if supply flows are impaired for longer.

● Bear Case

Diplomatic intervention reopens the strait quickly. Strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) releases and increased spare capacity cap any price rally.

Strategic Marker

US$120: the point at which energy inflation becomes a direct Federal Reserve policy problem, rather than just a market narrative.

02
XAU/USD
Gold
SAFE HAVEN UNDER-OWNED SQUEEZE RISK: VERY HIGH
+
The Counter-Intuitive Setup

Despite a clear geopolitical risk profile, leveraged funds have been reducing bullish gold exposure. This leaves the market under-owned at the exact moment the fundamental case for safe haven assets is strengthening.

The Inflation Variable

The critical factor for Gold is whether energy-driven inflation limits the Fed's room to maneuver. If policy flexibility weakens, Gold could catch up quickly as a hedge against stagflation.

● Bull Case

Real yields fall as energy inflation outpaces rate hikes. Under-owned positioning amplifies the catch up move as institutional funds rebuild exposure.

● Bear Case

Geopolitical tensions ease rapidly. The Fed remains credibly focused on inflation, keeping real yields positive and supporting the USD over Gold.

Strategic Marker

One level to monitor is prior resistance, alongside any change in COT positioning.

03
US100/NAS100
Nasdaq 100
TECHNOLOGY DUAL PRESSURE RATE AND SUPPLY RISK
+
Why it is a complicated position

The Nasdaq faces immediate pressure from two fronts: Stickier energy-driven inflation forces rates higher for longer, compressing multiples, while trade tensions unsettle the supply chains beneath major tech names.

Why the 10 year yield matters here

When the 10 year Treasury yield holds above 4.5%, the future value of technology earnings must be discounted at a higher rate. AI linked earnings momentum must overpower this valuation headwind.

● Bull Case

Earnings season delivers proof of AI investment generating real revenue. Index components successfully insulate supply chains, and AI capex momentum overrides the macro headwind.

● Bear Case

Energy inflation keeps yields above 4.5%. Multiple compression in high valuation names triggers a broader index decline amid disappointments in AI monetization.

Strategic Marker

S&P 500 at 6,498: a widely watched Fibonacci cluster. A sustained move below this threshold highlights a historically challenging framework for growth equities.

04
USD/CNH
US dollar/offshore Chinese yuan
FX BEIJING READ POLICY PROXY
+
What it tells you

USD/CNH is the cleanest real time read on how Beijing is responding to tariff pressure. A sharp rise suggests China is allowing currency weakness to absorb the costs of trade friction.

Why it matters beyond China

A move in USD/CNH doesn't stay contained. It spills into Asian equities, commodity demand, and broader risk appetite. Deliberate depreciation signals a shift in the global trade environment.

● USD Bull / Yuan Bear

Beijing allows yuan weakness as a deliberate countermeasure. Capital outflows accelerate, and USD safe haven demand reinforces the move.

● Yuan Recovery

Trade negotiations begin and a face saving off ramp is found. PBOC intervention defends the yuan, and the dollar's safe haven premium fades.

Strategic Marker

7.30 on USD/CNH: a sustained move above this has historically been associated with broader risk off moves in Asian markets.

05
US10Y/TNOTE
US 10 year Treasury yield
RATES MACRO PLUMBING SHAPES EVERYTHING ELSE
+
Why it sits under everything

The 10 year yield shapes mortgage costs, corporate borrowing, and the valuation framework for risk assets globally. When it rises, borrowing becomes more expensive across the entire system.

The Independent Movement Risk

If oil forces the Fed to delay cuts, the 10 year yield could rise regardless of Fed communication. It can tighten financial conditions even before a formal policy shift occurs.

● Rates Fall Case

Oil shock proves transient. Fed maintains guidance and 10 year yields pull back toward 4.0%, relieving pressure on equities and providing support for bonds.

● Rates Rise Case

Sustained oil above US$100 pushes inflation higher. Fed pauses rate cut language and the 10 year yield breaks above 4.5%, compressing equity multiples.

Strategic Marker

4.5% on the 10 year yield: a sustained break above this while oil remains above US$100 is a historically challenging combination for equities.

06
USD/CAD
US dollar/offshore Canadian dollar
FX OIL-LINKED LEAD INDICATOR
+
The Double Exposure

USD/CAD is a lead indicator because Canada sits at the intersection of energy and trade. It benefits from higher oil revenue but is highly sensitive to US economic and trade conditions.

When the Forces Collide

When oil rises, the CAD often strengthens; when trade stress rises, it weakens. In the current environment, these forces are colliding rather than canceling each other out.

● CAD Strengthens

Oil sustained above US$100 boosts export revenue while trade tensions stay short of Canada specific tariffs. Bank of Canada holds rates steady.

● CAD Weakens

Safe haven USD demand outweighs the oil benefit. Bank of Canada cuts rates to offset trade headwinds.

Strategic Marker

1.42 on USD/CAD: a sustained move above this signals trade anxiety is dominating the oil benefit, often preceding broader risk off moves.

What could go wrong

Four reasons the market logic could fail

+

A coherent macro case is still only a case. Markets regularly ignore tidy narratives for longer than expected, or invalidate them quickly. Four failure paths stand out.

1

The situation de-escalates faster than the news cycle suggests

Geopolitical risk premia can build slowly and disappear quickly. Any credible sign of de-escalation, especially around shipping lanes or energy infrastructure, could reverse oil sharply and drain urgency from the rest of the thesis. This is precisely the scenario the TACO framework predicts.

2

Tariff posturing does not become tariff policy

The market may be reacting to opening positions rather than settled policy. If Washington and Beijing find a face-saving off-ramp, as they have in previous trade disputes, currency and equity moves that anticipated escalation could unwind just as fast as they built.

3

AI investment spending overrides the macro headwind

Technology capital expenditure has remained more resilient than expected for much of the past two years. If earnings season shows that AI infrastructure spending is still translating into real demand and returns, the growth narrative may reassert itself, particularly in the Nasdaq 100.

4

The squeeze never arrives: extended positioning holds for longer than expected

Stretched positioning does not automatically produce a violent reprice. Markets can stay under-owned for months if risk appetite remains weak and institutions are unwilling to rebuild exposure. The set-up can exist without the catalyst arriving in a way that forces the move.

Forward Calendar

What to watch and when

+

Three time horizons matter here. The first tests supply resilience. The second tests financial system health. The third tests whether any shift in market leadership is cyclical or structural.

Three horizon watchlist

Signals and catalysts across the next two months

Next Two Weeks

Chipmaker guidance and supply commentary

Major semiconductor earnings calls will offer an early read on whether supply bottlenecks are worsening and whether management teams are changing production assumptions. If supply commentary deteriorates, the inflation story gets another push and the case for higher for longer rates strengthens.

Next 30 Days

Bank earnings and loan demand

Major US banks will provide a useful check on whether capital spending related to AI infrastructure is still being financed. The most important signal may not be earnings per share. It may be commercial loan demand. If businesses are pulling back on borrowing, the growth cycle may be softening earlier than the market expects.

Next 60 Days

Enablers versus spenders

The more structural test is whether the market begins rewarding businesses that produce physical outputs: energy producers, hardware makers and defence contractors, while penalising software companies that still cannot prove a clear return on AI spending. A wider performance gap between those groups would suggest something deeper than a temporary rotation.

前进的道路

当前地缘政治紧张局势和极端历史定位的融合为全球市场创造了独特的 “盘旋弹簧” 环境。而 炸玉米饼 框架表明了急剧升级之后出现战略暂停的模式，未来60天对交易者的真正考验将是从头条驱动的波动向结构性市场轮动的过渡。

无论是通过温和的缓和局势还是剧烈的空头挤压来缩小仓位缺口，拥有明确的反应框架都可以帮助交易者驾驭噪音。

Market Opportunity

Don't just watch the squeeze. Trade the framework.

As positioning gaps hit decade extremes, access advanced charting tools and real time execution on the six key markets defining this cycle.

Tight Spreads
Expert Analysis
Global Market Access

Trading CFDs and FX involves significant risk to your invested capital. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved before trading.

GO Markets
•
April 8, 2026
US Earnings
AI
Announcments
Shares
国防、颠覆和大金融：本财报季值得关注的 3 个名字

所以问题是：四月份的美国财报季即将到来，市场仍然感觉不正常。正如GO Markets所解释的那样 全球美国收益手册：交易者必备指南，本报告期是在市场关心的问题发生真正转变之后到来的。它不再只是不惜一切代价追求增长。这是关于表面之下的数字在说什么。

而在2026年，这些信号将在高摩擦背景下发生碰撞：

  1. 地缘政治冲突：中东持续的紧张局势
  2. 石油供应冲击：布伦特原油突破100美元
  3. 美联储：央行仍受粘性通货膨胀的困扰

耐久性支点

是的，人工智能仍然是市场的主要故事。它仍然是最受关注的华而不实的引擎。但在此之下，人们对那些看上去能够在条件变得更艰难时表现更好的公司采取了更为平静的举动。

当利率不确定且能源市场面临压力时，摩根大通和主要国防承包商等公司开始占据更大的份量。它们并不能取代人工智能的叙事。它们正在成为交易者解读风险偏好、收益耐久性的方式的一部分，最终，也是市场寻求更稳健的支撑方式的一部分。

! Important: Confirmed or estimated times, dates and figures should be checked against official investor relations calendars. Reporting schedules can change without notice.
$JPM | 2026 第 1 季財報發布期

摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase & Co.)

NYSE | 金融服務 | 2026年4月14日
已確認

全球發布倒數 (美股開盤前)

00:00:00:00
每股盈餘 (EPS) 預期
US$5.42
營收預期
US$47.88bn
澳洲 / 亞洲 4月14日 | 晚上 8:45
美國 / 拉美 4月14日 | 早上 6:45
Market Intelligence: $JPM

Analysis: JPM price drivers and scenarios
NII guidance
~US$103bn
Full year | US$95bn ex:markets
ROTCE target
17%
Return on tangible common equity
Analyst range
US$5.02:5.70
Low to high estimate spread
AVG
LOW US$5.02 AVG US$5.39 HIGH US$5.70

The analyst spread of US$0.68 signals genuine disagreement about how the rate environment is flowing through to margins. A result that beats consensus but lands below the high:end estimate may produce a muted reaction. A print above US$5.70 changes the conversation.

Key swing factors for the result

Net interest income (NII)
The cleanest macro lever. Reflects the gap between lending rates and deposit costs.
Guidance: US$103bn full year
ROTCE: Scale check
Determines if JPM is converting scale into efficiency. 17% is the benchmark.
Target: 17% ROTCE
Trading and investment banking
Strong Q1 growth was expected in fees and markets revenue. These lines can offset softness in lending and a stronger than expected performance here can shift the narrative away from rate sensitivity entirely.
Watch: IB fees vs prior quarter
Expense discipline
A bank can beat the EPS estimate and still sell off if expense growth is running too hot. Pairing the EPS result with the expense trajectory gives a more complete read on whether the beat is durable.
Watch: Expense outlook commentary
Trade Execution: $JPM

Earnings reaction framework: Q1 2026
Bull case
EPS above US$5.70 | NII on track | ROTCE at or above 17%
Result clears the top of the analyst range. NII guidance holds or is revised up. IB fees and markets revenue show strong Q1 growth. Expense commentary is constructive.
Momentum and repositioning likely
Base case
EPS US$5.39:5.70 | NII in line | ROTCE near target
Result beats consensus but stays within the expected range. NII tracks guidance. Conference call tone matters more than the number. First move may fade if guidance is unchanged.
Muted or mixed initial reaction
Bear case
EPS below US$5.39 | NII misses | Expense growth surprises
Result falls at or below the consensus midpoint. NII guidance is cut or qualified. Expense growth comes in above the market expectation. IB or markets revenue disappoints.
Repricing of earnings multiple likely

Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the print may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume suggests the bear case is gaining traction.

Sentiment Analysis · JPMorgan Chase

Interactive scenario analysis: $JPM
Select earnings outcome
Growth momentum

The AI offset: quality beat with NII and ROTCE confirmation

Stronger:than:expected demand for AI:related industrial lending effectively offsets the cooling mortgage market. Management maintains guidance as NII remains resilient in higher:for:longer conditions. IB fees and markets revenue add upside. ROTCE at or above 17% confirms the bank is converting scale into profit efficiently.
EPS Outcome
Above US$5.70
NII Signal
On track
ROTCE
At or above 17%
Likely Reaction
Momentum rally

从信贷到国防

如果摩根大通让市场尽早了解消费者、信贷质量和商业活动，那么辩方的名字就不一样了。这是重点开始从信贷周期转移到政府支持的需求的时刻。

在仍受地缘政治风险影响的市场中，这很重要。即使整体前景看起来不太确定，长期计划也可以帮助提高收入的可见性。这是该行业稳居观察名单上的原因之一。

$LMT | Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD

Lockheed Martin Corp.

NYSE | Aerospace | Defense | 22 Apr 2026
Estimated

Global Release Countdown (BMO)

00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$6.50
Consensus Revenue
US$16.32bn
AU | ASIA 22 Apr | 9:20 pm
US | LATAM 22 Apr | 7:20 am
Market Intelligence: $LMT

Analysis: LMT price drivers and scenarios
Order backlog
US$194bn
Record high visibility
Book-to-bill
1.2x
Orders outstripping sales
Analyst range
US$6.90:7.10
Low to high estimate spread
AVG
LOW ~US$6.90 AVG ~US$6.94 HIGH US$7.10+

The consensus sits near the bottom of the analyst range. This positioning signals a potential beat-and-raise setup if backlog growth and F-35 delivery timelines confirm execution. A print near the high:end above US$7.10 could drive a multi:session continuation move.

Key swing factors for the result

Backlog visibility
Primary proof of demand. Book-to-bill above 1.2x validates full:year guidance and production ramp.
Backlog: US$194bn record
Free cash flow yield
Defence stocks rerate on cash conversion. Market wants confirmation of the US$6.5bn floor.
Guide: US$6.5bn to 6.8bn
Missile segment growth
PrSM and THAAD deliveries are in peak demand. Strong space margins can offset softness in aeronautics.
Watch: Fire control margins
Margin pressure
Pension charges and production inflation remain risks. A beat can be faded if operating margins contract.
Watch: Segment operating margin
Trade Execution: $LMT

Earnings reaction framework: Q1 2026
Bull case
EPS above US$6.70 | Backlog Visibility Confirmed | FCF Guide Holds
Result clears the upper half of the analyst range. Management reaffirms or raises the full:year FCF outlook. Strong Missiles and Fire Control (MFC) margins offset any aeronautics supply chain lag.
Momentum and repositioning likely
Base case
EPS US$6.30:6.70 | Backlog steady at ~US$194bn
Result aligns with the US$6.38 consensus. F:35 delivery pace remains on track but offers no major upside surprise. Market waits for specific segment guidance on the conference call.
Muted or mixed initial reaction
Bear case
EPS below US$6.30 | FCF Guide Qualified | Margin Contraction
Result falls to the bottom of the analyst spread. Management cites further software delays or program losses. FCF trajectory is narrowed toward the lower end of previous expectations.
Repricing of earnings multiple likely

Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the print may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume suggests the bear case is gaining traction.

Sentiment Analysis · Lockheed Martin

Interactive scenario analysis: $LMT
Select earnings outcome
Backlog confirmed

The defence premium: backlog and FCF confirmation drives continuation

EPS clears the top of the analyst range. Backlog holds at or above US$194bn and book:to:bill stays above 1.2, confirming that orders are replenishing faster than revenue is being recognised. FCF guidance holds within the US$6.5bn range.
EPS Outcome
Above US$7.00
Backlog Signal
Above US$194bn
FCF Guide
Holds / Improves
Likely Reaction
Continuation move

并非所有的辩护名称都一样

洛克希德·马丁公司和诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司可能坐在同一个防御桶里，但市场对它们的解读并不总是相同的。洛克希德与F-35和当前的空战需求关系最为密切。诺斯罗普与B-21 Raider和Sentinel等下一代计划的关系更为密切。

这就是本节与之形成对比的原因。其中一个通常是从当前国防需求的角度来解读的。另一个与更长周期的战略现代化紧密相关。

$NOC | Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD

Northrop Grumman Corp.

NYSE | Defense | Space Systems | 23 Apr 2026
Estimated

Global Release Countdown (BMO)

00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$6.12
Consensus Revenue
US$10.24bn
AU | ASIA 23 Apr | 10:30 pm
US | LATAM 23 Apr | 8:30 am
Market Intelligence: $NOC

Analysis: NOC price drivers and scenarios
Consensus EPS
~US$6.96
Quarterly analyst average
Order Backlog
US$95.7bn
Record revenue visibility
FY EPS Guide
US$27.40:27.90
Full year 2026 outlook
AVG
LOW ~US$6.90 AVG ~US$6.96 HIGH US$7.20+

The consensus sits near the bottom of the analyst range. This gives traders a quick visual for whether the print is merely in:line or actually strong enough to override the guidance discount that hit the stock after its last update. A result above US$7.20 changes the conversation entirely.

Key swing factors for the result

Book-to-bill ratio
Currently at 1.10, suggesting orders are still running ahead of revenue recognition. This is a critical signal for multi:year growth visibility in defense.
Watch: 1.10 target
Guidance reset risk
Management’s guidance came in below Street expectations previously. Traders will be highly sensitive to any further softening of the 2026 outlook.
Watch: Guidance commentary
Program concentration
B:21 Raider and Sentinel carry outsized execution sensitivity. Updates on production ramp and funding are the clearest sentiment drivers for the stock.
Watch: B:21 / Sentinel updates
Capacity investment
Lean into capex supports the industrial base long term but may pressure near:term margins. Check if investment is suppressing current earnings power.
Watch: Operating margins
Trade Execution: $NOC

Earnings reaction framework: Q1 2026
Bull case
EPS above US$6.30 | Backlog Expansion >US$96bn | FCF Guidance Raised
Result crushes the US$6.03 consensus. Management confirms B:21 Raider production is ahead of schedule with improving margins. Sentinel program restructuring costs remain below baseline expectations. International awards drive the book:to:bill ratio above 1.15.
Momentum and sector rotation likely
Base case
EPS US$6.00:6.20 | Backlog stable at ~US$95.7bn
Result aligns with consensus. FCF targets for 2026 are reaffirmed but not expanded. Market focus shifts to "organic sales growth" metrics and segment operating margins. Initial reaction likely depends on the specific pacing of B:21 milestone payments.
Muted or in:range reaction
Bear case
EPS below US$5.95 | Margin Compression | Guidance Narrowed
Result falls at the low end of the analyst spread. Management flags higher infrastructure costs for Sentinel or delays in restricted Space segment awards. Margin pressure in Aeronautics persists, and the 2026 revenue guide is narrowed toward the US$43.5bn floor.
Sharp repricing of execution risk

Reaction trigger to watch: The market response in the first 30 minutes after the print may indicate which scenario traders are leaning towards. A move above the prior session high on volume may support the bull case. A fade back into the range after an initial pop may point to the base case. A break below the prior session low on volume suggests the bear case is gaining traction.

Sentiment Analysis · Northrop Grumman

Interactive scenario analysis: $NOC
Select earnings outcome
Stealth momentum

The stealth premium: B-21 acceleration drives rerating

EPS clears US$6.15. Management confirms production capacity agreement for the B:21 Raider. Sentinel ICBM restructuring hits Milestone B on schedule. Record backlog visibility and higher FCF guidance toward US$3.5bn trigger broad repositioning.
EPS Outcome
Above US$6.15
B-21 Signal
Acceleration
FCF Guide
$3.5bn Range
Likely Reaction
Momentum rally

故事在哪里得到考验

简而言之，冲突和更高的利率可能会支撑这些防御性支撑。但是市场故事很少如此精彩。

估值紧张、利率预期变化或中东局势的突然缓和，都可能迅速改变市场情绪。在文章从信息转向解释之前，这是叙事需要放慢脚步并接受考验的地方。

Your next earnings setup starts here

Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.

Need help? Contact our support team

GO Markets
•
April 7, 2026
See all News & Insights