The word Populism is probably the buzzword at the World Economic Forum this year. The headlines this week were heavily dominated by the concerns of the rise of populism around the globe. “Brazil’s Bolsonaro is the Face of Populism at the Davos Forum” “Merkel encourages multilateralism in the face of populism…” “Chrystia Freelans decries the rise of populism…” “Is Davos listening? Populist wind blows over…” “Business leaders concerned about the rise of US nationalism, populism…” This year, three Western Leaders are not present, and the reason behind it is tilted towards the issue of populism.
This is actually a “ Strong Message ” for the financial markets. The United States is not in attendance due to the shutdown related to the funding of the Wall. President Trump is taking a hard line on immigration and trade.
The United Kingdom is trapped with Brexit. Theresa May abstained from the forum as Brexit uncertainties linger. The UK leaving the European Union is the notable example of the rise of populism based on the desire to regain control over immigration and national sovereignty.
France is being rattled by the “yellow vests” protests which initially begun because of the fuel tax hikes and mean well. However, as it lingers through more than two months, there are concerns that it has given rise to populist strategies in French Is Populism a headwind for Economic Growth and the Markets? The IMF recently flagged how policies need to be adjusted to face the slowing global growth amid rising risks and has called for multilateral cooperation to tackle protectionism and trade tensions.
The message echoed the fears of the rise in populism in the markets. The concept of populist parties and economic growth can be complexed as the effects need to be assessed on the short-term and long-term basis. Populist political parties sometimes come with a fiscal spending policy that stimulates the economy in the short-term, similar to the outperformance of the US economy.
The Trump administration has boosted growth, business and consumer confidence and reduced unemployment through various policies such as tax cuts. However, populist parties often come with protectionism measures and anti-immigration policy which is a hindrance for long-term economic growth. Domestic economies are not able to reap the benefits that normally come with globalization which means that trade restrictions and labour immobility can create a stagflationary environment.
The US is the example of how the US economy bolstered during the first two years of Trump’s presidency mostly driven by fiscal spending, but the growth is expecting to slow down due to the gridlock in Washington. Similarly, the spread in populist parties has prompted market angst in the European markets. European shares have been underperforming compared to the global markets.
The % change for a year shows that the fall in major European equities – Euro Stoxx 50, FTSE100, the Dax and the CAC 40 is deeper compared to the US or Australian equity benchmark. Source: Bloomberg The shared currency is also under pressure. A look at the graph below shows that since the beginning of the year, major currencies are in the green against the US dollar compared to the Euro.
A combination of weak data, domestic political challenges and a rise in populism are weighing heavily on the Eurozone outlook. Populism and Emerging Countries The list of headwinds that the Emerging markets have to deal with over the past year is long: US Rising rates and the Fed Trade tensions The rout in oil markets Populist parties Without any doubt, we saw EM crashing last year on the three main points listed above. Populism is another significant point to monitor.
Emerging economies are the ones who benefitted the most from globalization. Trade barriers can have a big impact, and EMs rely heavily on exports to developed countries. Populism is among the most significant risks to the financial markets which are increasing the risk of triggering a crisis.
By
GO Markets
Artikel ini ditulis oleh analis dan kontributor GO Markets berdasarkan analisis independen atau pengalaman pribadi mereka. Pandangan, opini, atau gaya trading yang diungkapkan sepenuhnya merupakan milik penulis, dan tidak mewakili atau dibagikan oleh GO Markets. Setiap saran yang diberikan bersifat “umum” dan tidak mempertimbangkan tujuan, situasi keuangan, atau kebutuhan pribadi Anda. Sebelum mengambil tindakan berdasarkan saran tersebut, pertimbangkan apakah saran tersebut sesuai dengan tujuan, situasi keuangan, dan kebutuhan Anda. Jika saran tersebut berkaitan dengan perolehan produk keuangan tertentu, Anda harus memperoleh Pernyataan Pengungkapan (Disclosure Statement/DS) dan dokumen hukum lainnya yang tersedia di situs web kami sebelum membuat keputusan apa pun.
Asia starts the week with a fresh geopolitical shock that is already being framed in oil terms, not just security terms. The first-order move may be a repricing of risk premia and volatility across energy and macro, while markets wait to see whether this becomes a durable physical disruption or a fast-fading headline premium.
At a glance
What happened: US officials said the US carried out “Operation Absolute Resolve”, including strikes around Caracas, and that Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were taken into US custody and flown to the United States (subject to ongoing verification against the cited reporting).
What markets may focus on now: Headline-driven risk premia and volatility, especially in products and heavy-crude-sensitive spreads, rather than a clean “missing barrels” shock.
What is not happening yet: Early pricing has so far looked more like a headline risk premium than a confirmed physical supply shock, though this can change quickly, with analysts pointing to ample global supply as a possible cap on sustained upside.
Next 24 to 72 hours: Market participants are likely to focus on the shape of the oil “quarantine”, the UN track, and whether this stays “one and done” or becomes open-ended.
Australia and Asia hook: AUD as a risk barometer, Asia refinery margins in diesel and heavy, and shipping and insurance where the price can show up in friction before it shows up in benchmarks.
What happened, facts fast
Before anyone had time to workshop the talking points, there were strikes, there was a raid, and there was a custody transfer. US officials say the operation culminated in Maduro and his wife being flown to the United States, where court proceedings are expected.
Then came the line that turned a foreign policy story into a markets story. President Trump publicly suggested the US would “run” Venezuela for now, explicitly tying the mission to oil.
Almost immediately after that came a message-discipline correction. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US would not govern Venezuela day to day, but would press for changes through an oil “quarantine” or blockade.
That tension, between maximalist presidential rhetoric and a more bureaucratically describable “quarantine”, is where the uncertainty lives. Uncertainty is what gets priced first.
Source: Adobe images
Why this is price relevant now
What’s new versus known for positioning
What’s new, and price relevant, is that the scale and outcome are not incremental. A major military operation, a claimed removal of Venezuela’s leadership from the country, and a US-led custody transfer are not the sort of things markets can safely treat as noise.
Second, the oil framing is explicit. Even if you assume the language gets sanded down later, the stated lever is petroleum. Flows, enforcement, and pressure via exports.
Third, the embargo is not just a talking point anymore. Reporting says PDVSA has begun asking some joint ventures to cut output because exports have been halted and storage is tightening, with heavy-crude and diluent constraints featuring prominently.
What’s still unknown, and where volatility comes from
Key unknowns include how strict enforcement is on water, what exemptions look like in practice, how stable the on-the-ground situation is, and which countries recognise what comes next. Those are not philosophical questions. Those are the inputs for whether this is a temporary risk premium or a durable regime shift.
Political and legal reaction, why this drives tail risk
The fastest way to understand the tail here is to watch who calls this illegal, and who calls it effective, then ask what those camps can actually do.
Internationally, reaction has been fast, with emphasis on international law and the UN Charter from key partners, and UN processes in view. In the US, lawmakers and commentators have begun debating the legal basis, including questions of authority and war powers. That matters for markets because it helps define whether this is a finite operation with an aftershock, or the opening chapter of a rolling policy regime that keeps generating headlines.
Market mechanism, the core “so what”
Here’s the key thing about oil shocks. Sometimes the headline is the shock. Sometimes the plumbing is the shock.
Venezuela’s heavy-crude system: Orinoco production, key pipelines, and export/refining bottlenecks.
Volumes and cushion
Venezuela is not the world’s swing producer. Its production is meaningful at the margin, but not enough by itself to imply “the world runs out of oil tomorrow”. The risk is not just volume. It is duration, disruption, and friction.
The market’s mental brake is spare capacity and the broader supply backdrop. Reporting over the weekend pointed to ample global supply as a likely cap on sustained gains, even as prices respond to risk.
Quality and transmission
Venezuela’s barrels are disproportionately extra heavy, and extra heavy crude is not just “oil”. It is oil that often needs diluent or condensate to move and process. That is exactly the kind of constraint that shows up as grade-specific tightness and product effects.
Reporting has highlighted diluent constraints and storage pressure as exports stall. Translation: even if Brent stays relatively civil, watch cracks, diesel and distillates, and any signals that “heavy substitution” is getting expensive.
Heavy-light spread as a stress gauge: rising differentials can signal costly substitution and tighter heavy supply.
Products transmission, volatility first, pump later
If crude is the headline, products are the receipt, because products tell you what refiners can actually do with the crude they can actually get. The short-run pattern is usually: futures reprice risk fast, implied volatility pops; physical flows adapt more slowly; retail follows with a lag, and often with less drama than the first weekend of commentary promised.
For Australia and Asia desks, the bigger point is transmission. Energy moves can influence inflation expectations, which can feed into rates pricing and the dollar, and in turn affect Asia FX and broader risk, though the links are not mechanical and can vary by regime.
Some market participants also monitor refined-product benchmarks, including gasoline contracts such as reformulated gasoline blendstock, as part of that chain rather than as a stand-alone signal.
Historical context, the two patterns that matter
Two patterns matter more than any single episode.
Pattern A: scare premium. Big headline, limited lasting outage. A spike, then a fade as the market decides the plumbing still works.
Pattern B: structural. Real barrels are lost or restrictions lock in; the forward curve reprices; the premium migrates from front-month drama to whole-curve reality.
One commonly observed pattern is that when it is only premium, volatility tends to spike more than price. When it is structural, levels and time spreads move more durably.
The three possible market reactions
Contained, rhetorical: quarantine exists but porous; diplomacy churns; no second-wave actions. Premium bleeds out; volatility mean-reverts.
Escalation, prolonged control risk: “not governing” language loses credibility; repeated operations; allies fracture further. Longer-duration premium; broader risk-off impulse across FX and rates.
Australia and Asia angle
For Sydney, Singapore, and Hong Kong screens, this is less about Venezuelan retail politics and more about how a Western Hemisphere intervention bleeds into Asia pricing.
AUD is the quick and dirty risk proxy. Asia refiners care about the kind of oil and the friction cost. Heavy crude plus diluent dependency makes substitution non-trivial. If enforcement looks aggressive, the “price” can show up in freight, insurance, and spreads before it shows up in headline Brent.
Catalyst calendar, key developments markets may monitor
US policy detail: quarantine rules, enforcement posture, exemptions.
UN and allies: statements that signal whether this becomes a long legitimacy fight.
The United States entered a government shutdown on October 1, 2025, after Congress failed to agree on full-year appropriations or a short-term funding bill. Although shutdowns have occurred before, the timing, speed, scale, and motives behind this one make it unique. This is the first shutdown since the last Trump term in 2018–19, which lasted 35 days, the longest in history.For traders, understanding both the mechanics and the ripple effects is essential to anticipating how markets may respond, particularly if the shutdown draws out to multiple weeks as currently anticipated.
What Is a Government Shutdown?
A government shutdown occurs when Congress fails to pass appropriation bills or a temporary extension to fund government operations for the new fiscal year beginning October 1.Without the legal authority to spend, federal agencies must suspend “non-essential” operations, while “essential” services such as national security, air traffic control, and public safety continue, often with employees working unpaid until funding is restored.Since the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019, federal employees are guaranteed back pay to cover lost wages once the shutdown ends, although there has been some narrative from the current administration that some may not be returning to work at all.
Why Did the Government Shutdown Happen?
The 2025 impasse stems from partisan disputes over spending levels, health-insurance subsidies, and proposed rescissions of foreign aid and other programs. The reported result is that around 900,000 federal workers are furloughed, and another 700,000 are currently working without pay.Unlike many past standoffs, there was no stopgap agreement to keep the government open while negotiations continued, making this shutdown more disruptive and unusually early.
Why an Early Shutdown?
Historically, most shutdowns don’t occur immediately on October 1. Lawmakers typically kick the can down the road with a “Continuing Resolution (CR)”. This is a stopgap measure that can extend existing funding for weeks or months to allow time for an agreement later in the quarter.The speed of the breakdown in 2025, with no CR in place, is unusual compared to past shutdowns. It suggests it was not simply budgetary drift, but a potentially deliberate refusal to extend funding.
Alternative Theories Behind the Early Shutdown
While the main narrative coming from the U.S. administrators points to budget deadlock, several other theories are being discussed across the media:
Executive Leverage – The White House may be using the shutdown as a tool to increase bargaining power and force structural policy changes. Health care is central to the debate, funding for which was impacted significantly by the “one big, beautiful bill” recently passed through Congress.
Hardline Congressional Factions – Small but influential groups within Congress, particularly on the right, may be driving the shutdown to demand deeper cuts.
Political Messaging – The blame game is rife, despite the reality that Republican control of the presidency, House, and Senate, as well as both sides, is indulging in the usual political barbs aimed at the other side. As for the voter impact, Recent polls show that voters are placing more blame on Republicans than Democrats at this point, though significant numbers of Americans suggest both parties are responsible
Debt Ceiling Positioning – Creating a fiscal crisis early could shape the terms of future negotiations on borrowing limits.
Electoral Calculus – With midterms ahead, both sides may be positioning to frame the narrative for voters.
Systemic Dysfunction – A structural view is that shutdowns have become a recurring feature of hyper-partisan U.S. politics, rather than exceptions.
Short-Term Impact of Government Shutdown
AreaImpactFederal workforceHundreds of thousands have been furloughed with reduced services across various agencies.Travel & aviationFAA expects to furlough 11,000 staff. Inspections and certifications may stall. Safety concerns may become more acute if prolonged shutdown.Economic outputThe White House estimates a $15 billion GDP loss per week of shutdown (source: internal document obtained by “Politico”.Consumer spendingFederal workers and contractors face delayed income, pressuring local economies. Economic data releaseKey data releases may be delayed, impacting the decision process at the Fed meeting later this month.Credit outlookScope Ratings and others warn that the shutdown is “negative for credit” and could weigh on U.S. borrowing costs.Projects & researchInfrastructure, grants, and scientific initiatives are delayed or paused.
Medium- to Long-Term Impact of Government Shutdown
1. Market Sentiment
Shutdowns show some degree of U.S. political dysfunction. They can weigh on confidence and subsequently equity market and risk asset sentiment. To date, markets are shrugging off a prolonged impact, but a continued shutdown into later next week could start to impact.Equity markets have remained strong, and there has been no evidence of the frequent seasonal pullback we often see around this time of year.Markets have proved resilient to date, but one wonders whether this could be a catalyst for some significant selling to come.
2. Borrowing Costs
Ratings downgrades could lift Treasury yields and increase debt-servicing costs. The Federal Reserve is already balancing sticky inflation and potential downward pressure on growth. This could make rate decisions more difficult.
3. The Impact on the USD
Rises in treasury yields would generally support the USD. However, rising concerns about fiscal stability created by a prolonged shutdown may put further downward pressure on the USD. Consequently, it is likely to result in buying into gold as a safe haven. With gold already testing record highs repeatedly over the last weeks, this could support further moves to the upside.
4. Credibility Erosion
Repeated shutdowns weaken the U.S.’s reputation as the world’s most reliable borrower. With some evidence that tariffs are already impacting trade and investment into the US, a prolonged shutdown could exacerbate this further.
What Traders Should Watch
For those who trade financial markets, shutdowns matter more for what they could signal both in the short and medium term. Here are some of the key asset classes to watch:
Equities: Likely to see volatility as political risk rises, and the potential for “money off the table” after significant gains year-to-date for equities.
U.S. Dollar: With the US dollar already relatively weak, further vulnerability if a shutdown feeds global doubts about U.S. fiscal stability.
Gold and other commodities: May continue to gain as hedges against political and credit risk. Oil is already threatening support levels; any prolonged shutdown may add to the bearish narrative, along with other economic slowdown concerns
Outside the US: With the US such a big player in global GDP, we may see revisions in forward-looking estimates, slingshot impacts on other global markets and even supply chain disruptions with impact on customs services (potentially inflationary).
Final Word
The 2025 shutdown is unusual because of its scale and because it started on Day 1 of the fiscal year, without even a temporary extension. That speed points to a deeper strategic and political contribution beyond the usual budget wrangling that we see periodically.For traders, the lesson is clear: shutdowns are not just what happens in Washington, but may impact confidence, borrowing costs, and market sentiment across a range of asset classes. In today’s world, where political credibility is a form of capital, shutdowns have the potential to erode the very foundation of the U.S.’s role in global finance and trade relationships.
The US has entered the Israel-Iran war. However, despite an initial 4 per cent surge on the open, oil has settled where it has been since the conflict began in early June — around US$72 to US$75 a barrel.Trump claims the attacks from the US on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend are a very short, very tactical, one-off. This is something his base can get behind — some really big conservative players do not want a long-contracted war that sucks the US into external disputes.Whether this will be the case or not is up for debate, but there is a precedent from Trump's first presidency that we can look to. Iran had attacked several American bases in 2019, as well as attacking Saudi Arabia's most important oil refinery with Iranian drones. There wasn't a huge amount of damage; it was more a symbolic movement and display of capabilities by Iran.Initially, Trump didn't react — it took pressure from Gulf allies like the UAE and Israel for him to respond, which saw him order the assassination of the head of the Iranian Defence Force, Qasem Soleimani. This led to an Iranian response of ‘lots of noise’ and ‘cage rattling’, but minimal real action events, just a few drone attacks. Trump is betting on the same reaction now.If Iran follows the same patterns from the previous engagement, the geopolitical side of this is already at its peak.As of now, Iran is not going after or destroying major Gulf energy capabilities. Nor have there been any disruptions to the shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. In fact, apart from a posturing vote to block the Strait, Iran has not made any indication that it is going to disrupt oil in any way that would lead to price surges.Additionally, despite the U.S. military equipment buildup in the region being its highest since the Iraq war, critical Iranian energy infrastructure is running largely unscathed.This all suggests that the geopolitics and the physical and futures oil markets remain disconnected. Oil will spike on news rumours, but the actual impacts in the physical realm to this point remain low. Of course, this could change in future. But, for now, the risk of seeing oil move to US$100 a barrel is still a minority case rather than the majority.
Pasar valuta asing (FX) bulan Maret dapat dibentuk oleh beberapa rilis berdampak tinggi yang dikelompokkan sekitar paruh pertama bulan ini. PMI China, PDB Australia, PDB Jepang, dan pertemuan Federal Reserve Maret semuanya dapat mempengaruhi sentimen FX seiring berjalannya bulan.
Fakta singkat
Ekspektasi suku bunga AS tetap stabil, dengan CME FedWatch menyiratkan kemungkinan lebih besar dari 85% tidak ada perubahan suku bunga pada pertemuan FOMC Maret.
PMI China, CPI/PPI dan data perdagangan akan membantu membentuk nada risiko regional awal bulan.
PDB Australia, keputusan RBA, data angkatan kerja, dan IHK menciptakan jendela acara domestik terkonsentrasi untuk AUD.
PDB Jepang dan pertemuan kebijakan Bank of Japan (BoJ) dapat mempengaruhi repricing imbal hasil domestik dan volatilitas JPY.
IHK kawasan Euro, produksi industri dan Keputusan Kebijakan Moneter ECB tetap menjadi kunci stabilitas EUR.
Dolar Amerika Serikat (USD)
Peristiwa penting
Penggajian Nonpertanian: 00.30 pagi, 7 Maret (AEDT)
Indeks Harga Konsumen (IHK): 11:30 malam, 11 Maret (AEDT)
Penjualan Eceran: 11:30 malam, 17 Maret (AEDT)
Keputusan kebijakan Federal Reserve: 5:00 pagi, 19 Maret (AEDT)
Konferensi pers Federal Reserve: 5:30 pagi, 19 Maret (AEDT)
Apa yang harus ditonton
USD tetap terutama didorong oleh data inflasi dan tenaga kerja dan implikasinya terhadap harga Federal Reserve.
Harga CME FedWatch menunjukkan bahwa pasar menetapkan probabilitas lebih besar dari 85% untuk tidak ada perubahan suku bunga pada pertemuan FOMC Maret. Ini menunjukkan posisi saat ini berlabuh di sekitar jeda, meningkatkan sensitivitas terhadap kejutan inflasi apa pun yang dapat mengubah ekspektasi.
Dengan jeda yang sebagian besar dihargai, arah USD mungkin lebih bergantung pada lintasan inflasi dan ekspektasi kebijakan jangka panjang daripada keputusan itu sendiri. CPI yang lebih kuat atau data tenaga kerja yang tangguh dapat memperkuat dukungan hasil.
Grafik utama: Grafik mingguan indeks dolar AS (DXY)
IHK kawasan Euro (perkiraan kilat): 10:00 malam, 3 Maret (AEDT)
Produksi industri kawasan euro: 9:00 malam, 13 Maret (AEDT)
Keputusan Kebijakan Moneter ECB: 12:15 pagi, 20 Maret (AEDT)
Konferensi pers ECB: 12:45 pagi, 20 Maret (AEDT)
PMI flash zona euro: 20:00, 24 Maret (AEDT)
Apa yang harus ditonton
Arah EUR tetap terkait dengan persistensi inflasi dan apakah data pertumbuhan menstabilkan ekspektasi di sekitar kebijakan ECB.
Inflasi yang lengket atau peningkatan data aktivitas dapat membatasi pelonggaran ekspektasi dan mendukung EUR. Inflasi yang lebih lembut dan data produksi yang lebih lemah dapat memperbarui tekanan turun, terutama jika data AS tetap kuat.
Struktur harian EUR/USD menunjukkan konsolidasi menyusul perpanjangan naik awal tahun ini. Momentum jangka pendek telah berkurang, dengan harga bertahan di atas level support jangka panjang.
PDB Jepang (Q4 2025, perkiraan ke-2): 10:50 pagi, 10 Maret (AEDT)
Pertemuan kebijakan Bank of Japan: 18—19 Maret (AEDT)
Pernyataan BOJ tentang kebijakan moneter: 19 Maret (AEDT)
Apa yang harus ditonton
JPY tetap sensitif terhadap data pertumbuhan domestik dan keputusan kebijakan Bank of Japan. Ekspektasi imbal hasil dan sinyal normalisasi kebijakan terus mempengaruhi volatilitas USD/JPY dan lintas JPY.
Pertemuan kebijakan BOJ dan komunikasi selanjutnya dapat mempengaruhi volatilitas jangka pendek dan ekspektasi suku bunga jangka panjang, dan dengan ekstensi sentimen JPY.
PDB yang lebih kuat atau sinyal kebijakan yang memperkuat normalisasi dapat mendukung JPY melalui penyesuaian imbal hasil domestik. Pesan yang lebih hati-hati dapat mempertahankan perbedaan hasil yang mendukung USD dan AUD.
Keputusan Kebijakan Moneter RBA: 14:30, 17 Maret (AEDT)
Survei Tenaga Kerja: 11:30 pagi, 19 Maret (AEDT)
Indeks Harga Konsumen (IHK): 11:30 pagi, 25 Maret (AEDT)
Apa yang harus ditonton
AUD menghadapi kalender domestik yang berpusat di sekitar pertemuan RBA 16-17 Maret. Pertumbuhan, tenaga kerja, dan inflasi melepaskan klaster dalam jendela tiga minggu, meningkatkan potensi volatilitas.
PDB yang lebih kuat atau inflasi yang terus-menerus dapat memperkuat kehati-hatian kebijakan dan mendukung AUD. Hasil tenaga kerja atau CPI yang lebih lembut dapat membebani ekspektasi suku bunga dan menekan AUD, terutama terhadap USD dan JPY.
Data China di awal bulan ini juga dapat mempengaruhi sentimen regional dan mata uang terkait komoditas seperti AUD.
Global penawaran umum perdana (IPO) pasar mengalami kebangkitan pada tahun 2025. Pendapatan meningkat 39% menjadi US$171,8 miliar di 1.293 listing, rebound tahunan paling tajam sejak booming pasca-pandemi.
Momentum itu sekarang berkembang hingga 2026 untuk apa yang beberapa analis keuangan berspekulasi bisa menjadi tahun IPO terbesar dalam sejarah.
Sejumlah perusahaan swasta mega-cap, termasuk SpaceX, OpenAI, dan Anthropic, sedang mengeksplorasi go public tahun ini, dengan penilaian gabungan yang bisa melebihi US $3 triliun.
Data pasar IPO 2025
Kandidat IPO teratas pada tahun 2026
1. SpaceX - penilaian US$1.5T
Pendapatan SpaceX dilaporkan mencapai US $15 miliar pada tahun 2025, dengan analis memproyeksikan peningkatan menjadi US $22-24 miliar pada tahun 2026. Perusahaan telah memiliki arus kas positif selama bertahun-tahun, sebagian besar didorong oleh jaringan broadband satelit Starlink.
Setelah akuisisi semua saham pada Februari 2026 dari perusahaan AI Elon Musk Xai, entitas gabungan juga mencakup Grok AI dan platform media sosial X (Twitter).
Analis keuangan terkemuka telah melaporkan SpaceX menargetkan daftar pertengahan 2026. Putaran pendanaan berikutnya diperkirakan akan mengumpulkan sekitar US $50 miliar, menempatkan kapitalisasi pasar awalnya sebesar US $1,5 triliun, yang akan menjadikannya penilaian IPO tertinggi kedua sepanjang masa.
Penilaian ini berarti SpaceX akan diperdagangkan pada 62-68 kali proyeksi penjualan 2026. Premi curam yang membutuhkan asumsi pertumbuhan besar-besaran seputar Starlink dan ambisi AI berbasis ruang angkasa jangka panjang.
2. OpenAI - penilaian US $850 miliar
OpenAI, perusahaan di balik ChatGPT, sekarang melaporkan lebih dari 800 juta pengguna aktif mingguan dari produk AI inovasinya.
Awalnya laboratorium penelitian nirlaba, telah direstrukturisasi menjadi entitas nirlaba yang mengembangkan model bahasa besar untuk aplikasi konsumen, perusahaan, dan pengembang.
OpenAI dilaporkan menargetkan IPO Q4 2026, menyelesaikan putaran pendanaan US$100 miliar lebih (terbesar yang pernah ada), yang akan menempatkan valuasinya sebesar US $850 miliar.
Namun, OpenAI masih perlu mengatasi beberapa rintangan jangka pendek untuk mencapai potensi yang terkait dengan penilaian setinggi itu.
Ini memproyeksikan kerugian US$14 miliar pada tahun 2026 dan tidak mengharapkan profitabilitas sebelum 2029. Perusahaan ini menghadapi persaingan intensif dari Google Gemini dan startup AI lainnya yang memotong pangsa pasarnya, dan Elon Musk telah mengajukan gugatan terhadap perusahaan yang meminta ganti rugi hingga US$134 miliar.
3. Antropik - penilaian US $350 miliar
Sementara OpenAI telah bersandar pada produk konsumen, Anthropic telah membangun bisnisnya di sekitar adopsi perusahaan. Sekitar 80% dari pendapatannya berasal dari pelanggan bisnis, dan delapan dari Fortune 10 sekarang adalah pengguna Claude.
Anthropic menutup putaran pendanaan senilai US$30 miliar pada Februari 2026 dengan penilaian US$350 miliar, lebih dari dua kali lipat valuasi US$183 miliar dari lima bulan sebelumnya.
Pendapatan tahunan Anthropic telah tumbuh sebesar 10x per tahun sejak 2024, jauh melampaui pertumbuhan OpenAI sebesar 3,4x per tahun. Jika tren ini berlanjut, pendapatan Anthropic bisa melewati OpenAI pada pertengahan 2026. Namun, sejak Juli 2025, tingkat pertumbuhan Anthropic telah melambat menjadi 7x per tahun.
Proyeksi pertumbuhan antropis jika tren pendapatan berlanjut | Epoch.ai
Anthropic telah melibatkan firma hukum Wilson Sonsini untuk memulai persiapan IPO, dan penunjukan mantan CFO Microsoft Chris Liddell baru-baru ini ke dewan menandakan dorongan tata kelola menjelang potensi listing akhir 2026.
Perusahaan ini belum menguntungkan, tetapi bauran pendapatan perusahaan yang besar dan lintasan pertumbuhan yang cepat menjadikannya salah satu kandidat IPO yang paling diawasi tahun ini.
4. Stripe - Penilaian US$140 miliar
Stripe memproses total volume pembayaran sebesar US$1,4 triliun pada tahun 2024, kira-kira 1,3% dari PDB global. Setengah dari Fortune 100 sekarang menggunakan Stripe, dan langkah terbaru ke stablecoin dan pembayaran “agentic commerce” AI-to-AI memperluas pasar yang dapat dialamatkan.
Stripe tetap menjadi salah satu IPO fintech yang paling dinanti secara global, tetapi perusahaan telah menunjukkan kurangnya urgensi untuk mendaftar di masa lalu. Salah satu pendiri John Collison mengatakan di Davos pada Januari 2026 bahwa Stripe “masih tidak terburu-buru.”
Alih-alih mengejar IPO, Stripe telah melakukan penawaran tender setiap enam bulan dengan penilaian yang meningkat, memberikan likuiditas karyawan tanpa menyerahkan kendali.
Tender yang sering ini secara efektif berfungsi sebagai alternatif pasar swasta untuk go public. Namun, IPO tradisional masih ada di kartu pada tahun 2026, dengan penawaran tender perusahaan Februari yang menilainya sebesar US $140 miliar atau lebih, dan profitabilitas sejak 2024 menghilangkan salah satu hambatan utama untuk pencatatan.
5. Databricks - penilaian US $134 miliar
Databricks menyelesaikan putaran pendanaan US$5 miliar pada Februari 2026 dengan penilaian US$134 miliar.
Pendapatan tahunan perusahaan melebihi US $5,4 miliar pada Januari 2026, tumbuh sebesar 65% tahun-ke-tahun, dengan produk AI menghasilkan US $1,4 miliar.
CEO Ali Ghodsi mengatakan perusahaan siap untuk go public “ketika waktunya tepat,” dengan sebagian besar analis mengharapkan listing H2 2026. Dengan nilai US $134 miliar, Databricks bernilai lebih dari dua kali saingannya yang diperdagangkan secara publik Snowflake (~ US $58 miliar).
Intinya
2026 berpotensi menjadi tahun IPO terbesar berdasarkan penilaian dalam sejarah. Dengan kandidat yang paling mungkin, SpaceX dan Databricks, mencocokkan penilaian total semua IPO 2025 dengan sendirinya.
Jika pemain AI utama seperti OpenAI dan Anthropic, serta fintech pembayaran terkemuka dunia Stripe, juga terdaftar sebelum akhir tahun, 2026 dapat melihat total nilai tambah lebih dari US $3 triliun ke pasar global melalui IPO saja.
Pasar bergerak ke minggu depan dengan data inflasi di Australia dan Jepang, di samping meningkatnya ketegangan geopolitik yang terus mempengaruhi harga energi dan sentimen risiko yang lebih luas.
Indeks Harga Konsumen Australia (IHK): Data inflasi dapat mempengaruhi Bank Cadangan Australia (RBA)) jalur kebijakan, dengan dolar Australia (AUD) dan imbal hasil lokal sensitif terhadap kejutan apa pun.
Cluster data Jepang: CPI Tokyo (awal) ditambah produksi industri dan penjualan ritel memberikan denyut inflasi dan aktivitas yang dapat membentuk ekspektasi normalisasi Bank of Japan (BoJ).
Zona Euro & Jerman CPI: Pembacaan inflasi kilat akan menguji narasi disinflasi dan mempengaruhi ekspektasi waktu pemotongan suku bunga ECB.
Minyak dan geopolitik: Minyak mentah Brent telah membukukan penutupan tertinggi sejak 8 Agustus 2025 di tengah ketegangan Timur Tengah yang diperbarui, memperkuat risiko inflasi yang didorong oleh energi.
CPI Australia: Ekspektasi RBA berubah?
Rilis IHK Australia yang akan datang akan diawasi ketat untuk sinyal apakah inflasi stabil atau terbukti lebih persisten dari yang diharapkan.
Pencetakan yang lebih kuat dari perkiraan dapat dikaitkan dengan hasil yang lebih tinggi dan AUD yang lebih kuat seiring dengan penyesuaian ekspektasi suku bunga. Hasil yang lebih lembut dapat mendukung harapan untuk sikap kebijakan yang lebih stabil.
Tanggal utama
Tingkat Inflasi (MoM): 11:30 pagi Rabu, 25 Februari (AEDT)
Rilis akhir pekan Jepang menggabungkan CPI Tokyo (awal) dengan produksi industri dan penjualan ritel, menawarkan pembacaan yang lebih luas tentang tekanan harga dan permintaan domestik.
CPI Tokyo sering dipandang sebagai sinyal tepat waktu untuk dinamika inflasi nasional dan debat BoJ. Output industri dan pengeluaran ritel menambah konteks aktivitas.
Kejutan di seluruh cluster ini dapat mendorong pergerakan tajam dalam JPY, terutama jika hasilnya mengubah persepsi seputar kecepatan dan persistensi normalisasi BoJ.
Tanggal utama
CPI Tokyo: 10:30 pagi Jumat, 27 Februari (AEDT)
Produksi Industri: 10:50 pagi Jumat, 27 Februari (AEDT)
Penjualan Eceran: 10:50 pagi Jumat, 27 Februari (AEDT)
Memantau
Sensitivitas JPY terhadap kejutan inflasi
Imbal hasil obligasi bergerak sebagai respons terhadap data aktivitas
Reaksi ekuitas jika ekspektasi momentum pertumbuhan bergeser
Aliran energi dan safe-haven
Harga minyak telah naik ke penutupan tertinggi sejak 8 Agustus 2025 di tengah ketegangan Timur Tengah yang baru.
Laporan terbaru tentang aktivitas militer regional yang meningkat dan berita utama risiko pengiriman di dekat Selat Hormuz telah memperkuat keamanan energi sebagai fokus pasar. Selat Hormuz tetap menjadi titik penghalang yang diawasi secara luas untuk aliran energi global.
Harga minyak yang lebih tinggi dapat memberi makan ekspektasi inflasi dan mempengaruhi imbal hasil obligasi. Pada saat yang sama, ketidakpastian geopolitik dapat mendukung USD melalui permintaan safe-haven dan posisi suku bunga relatif.
Memantau
Tingkat harga minyak mentah Brent
Kekuatan USD versus mata uang utama
Pergerakan imbal hasil seiring penyesuaian premi risiko inflasi
Pembacaan inflasi kilat dari Jerman dan zona euro yang lebih luas (HICP) akan menguji apakah tren disinflasi kawasan itu tetap utuh.
Rilis Jerman dapat mempengaruhi ekspektasi menjelang angka agregat zona euro. Jika inflasi inti terbukti lengket, ekspektasi seputar waktu dan laju pelonggaran potensial Bank Sentral Eropa dapat berubah.
Tanggal utama
Jerman - Tingkat Inflasi: 00:00 Sabtu, 28 Februari (AEDT)