市場新聞與洞察
透過專家洞察、新聞與技術分析,助你領先市場,制定交易決策。

Expected earnings date: Wednesday, 28 January 2026 (US, after market close) / early Thursday, 29 January 2026 (AEDT)
Key areas in focus
Intelligent Cloud (Azure)
Azure remains Microsoft’s primary earnings swing factor. Markets are watching to see whether any growth reflects demand strength or capacity constraints, and how AI-related workloads are impacting margins.
Productivity and Business Processes
Microsoft 365, Office, and LinkedIn are sources of recurring revenue for Microsoft. Growth, pricing discipline, and client churn remain the key variables that markets will be watching.
Personal Computing
Windows, devices, and gaming are more cyclical. Stabilisation of PC demand and gaming engagement remain secondary sources of revenue but are still noteworthy.
Artificial intelligence
Approaches around the monetisation of Microsoft’s AI play are still developing. Trends in enrolment and infrastructure cost are expected to be key factors.
What happened last quarter
Microsoft reported results ahead of consensus, supported by steady cloud demand and resilient enterprise software revenues.
Azure and other cloud services' growth remained a central focus, alongside commentary on AI-related investment and capacity.
Last earnings key highlights:
- Revenue: US$77.7 billion
- Earnings per share (EPS): US$3.72 (GAAP) and US$4.13 (non-GAAP adjusted)
- Intelligent Cloud revenue: US$30.9 billion
- Azure and other cloud services: up 40% year on year
- Operating income: US$38.0 billion
How the market reacted last time
Microsoft shares fell in after-hours trading following the release, despite the beating of headline numbers, as investors focused on AI investment intensity, capacity constraints and related implications for future margins.
What’s expected this quarter
Bloomberg consensus points to continued revenue growth led by cloud services, alongside broadly stable margins despite elevated capex.
Bloomberg consensus reference points (January 2026):
- Revenue: about US$68 to US$69 billion
- EPS: about US$3.10 to US$3.20 (adjusted)
- Azure growth: mid-to-high 20% year on year (YoY) (constant currency)
- Operating margin: expected to remain broadly stable
- Capex: expected to remain elevated, reflecting AI and cloud build-out
*All above points observed as of 16 January 2026.
Expectations
Sentiment appears cautious. Microsoft can remain sensitive to any cloud, margin, or guidance disappointment, particularly where investors interpret investment intensity as open-ended.
Price action traded within an established range of US$472 and US$490 recently, but has moved below this in the last week.
Listed options were pricing an indicative move of around ±2% based on near-dated options expiring after 28 January and an at-the-money options-implied ‘expected move’ estimate.
Implied volatility was about 33.5% annualised into the event as observed on Barchart at 11:00 AEDT on 16th January 2026.
These are market-implied estimates and may change; actual post-earnings moves can be larger or smaller.
What this means for Australian traders
Microsoft’s earnings may influence near-term sentiment across US technology indices, particularly the Nasdaq, with potential spillover into global equity risk appetite and, in turn, the ASX.
As a major technology stock, and with Tesla (TSLA) also scheduled to report after the US close on the same day, volatility in Nasdaq-linked products may increase while futures markets remain open.
Important risk note
Immediately after the US close and into the early Asia session, Nasdaq 100 (NDX) futures and related CFD pricing can reflect thinner liquidity, wider spreads, and sharper repricing around new information.
Such an environment can increase gap risk and execution uncertainty relative to regular-hours conditions.

The Forex market is the largest in the world with around $5 trillion average daily trade volume. It dwarfs the daily trade volume of the New York (NYSE), Tokyo (TSE), and London Stock Exchange (LSE) which stands at around $22, $18 and $8 billion respectively. In this article, we will take a look at the top 5 most traded currencies in the world.
US dollar The United States Dollar (USD, US$) is the official currency of the United States and also eight other countries, including East Timor, Ecuador, El Salvador, Palau, Micronesia, Panama, Marshall Islands, and Zimbabwe. The US dollar is the most traded currency in the world, accounting for a daily average volume of around $2.2 trillion, making up a large proportion of the total average daily volume. There are a few reasons why the dollar is the most traded currency in the world – the US has the largest economy in the world at around $19 trillion.
Euro The Euro (EUR, €) is the official currency of the European Union, and it’s the second most traded currency in the world at $800 million average daily volume. The Euro is the official currency of 19 out of the 28 EU member states. It was first introduced back on the 1st January 1999.
Euro has one of the highest combined values of banknotes and coins in circulation in the world at €1.2 trillion. Japanese Yen The Japanese yen (JPY, ¥) is the third most traded currency in the world, making up a daily average volume of around $550 billion. Japan has the third largest economy in the world, just behind the United States and China at $4,8 trillion.
The Bank of Japan issues the Japanese yen (BoJ), and it is also unofficially used in the African nation of Zimbabwe. Pound Sterling The pounds sterling (GBP, £) is the official currency of the United Kingdom, Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, the British Antarctic Territory, and the Tristan da Cunha. The pound is fourth on the list of the most traded currencies in the world with a daily average volume of around $325 million.
Sterling is worlds oldest currency still in use. Australian Dollar The Australian dollar (AUD, A$) is the official currency of the Commonwealth of Australia and is also an unofficial currency of Cambodia, Gambia, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, and Zimbabwe. It is the fifth most traded currency in the world with a daily average volume of around $174 million.
The Aussie dollar, as it is usually referred to by foreign exchange trades is issued by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions.
Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.

The MACD (or the ‘Moving Average Convergence/Divergence oscillator’ to give its full name) is one of the popular extra pieces of information we often see added to charts. The purpose of this article is to clarify what it may be telling you about market sentiment and offer a description as to how traders commonly apply this in their decision making. This is a slightly lengthier article; brief explanation may not be clear, and we want you to really get to grips with this so you can make the right decisions for you.
Taking a step back. The purpose of technical indicators is to provide the trader with information to assist in entry, or exit, decision making. We have discussed the choice of adding indicators previously and suggested the following: a.
You should not add an indicator unless you understand what it is telling you about market sentiment. b. You should only use any indicator if it provides additional information to that which you have already. To do so may create a more colourful and impressive looking chart but little else. c.
You should always articulate how you are going to use an indicator for entry and/or exit in your trading plan in a specific unambiguous statement to facilitate consistency and measurement. d. There is no point on adding extra indicators if you are not sufficiently disciplined to use the existing plan you have. There is a different priority here you may need to work on if this resonates with you!
In this article we are hoping to add some value in addressing “a” through to “c”. What could the MACD be telling you? The MACD was developed in the 1970’s with the aim of offering information about changes in trend and momentum of a price move.
Additionally, there is a signal line that could assist in pressing the entry/exit button. Despite the somewhat complicated and jargon -filled full version of its title (hence the abbreviation), which unfortunately may put off some inexperienced traders from finding out more before they jump in and blindly use it, when you pick it apart, it is not perhaps as complicated as it may first seem. The indictor is based as the name suggests on using the commonly used and more easily understood moving averages and the principle that if you plot two of these on a chart of different periods e.g. 10 and 20, a cross of these may indicate a change in trend.
Before we move on to looking at the MACD on the MetaTrader platform, it is worth noting that those traders with experience of other software will notice a difference in how the MACD is shown. We will be discussing the MT4/5 version of this indicator as that is the platform that most of you will be using. Before we look at the indicator itself let’s look at a simple chart with two moving averages plotted and explain some of the terms to help explain some of the terminology once we move to the indicator itself.
Here we see a GBPUSD 15-minute chart. There are two exponential moving averages (EMA) namely a 12 and 26 (the reason for this will become obvious in a moment. We see a moving average cross marked; in this case the 26 EMA has moved above the shorter 12 EMA often perceived as indicating a change in trend to the downside.
We also see highlighted in yellow, firstly an example where the moving averages are moving further apart (termed divergence), this is often seen as a signal of increasing momentum as a trend develops. Subsequently, we see highlighted the space between the moving averages narrows (termed convergence). This is often seen as a signal of decreasing momentum and often ultimately results in reversal.
So, back to our MACD, in simple terms, a MACD will give you the same information as above, though admittedly in a different form. Here is the same chart as above but with the MACD added. We have illustrated with the green arrows how the information on the top of the chart relates to the MACD at the bottom.
Now, just to swing back to a point made earlier. The reason we chose the 12 and 26 EMAs on the chart above to help understanding that these are the default settings on a traditional MACD (these are of course adjustable, though most traders wouldn’t choose to do this, nor should without testing). EMA cross and trend direction There is a ‘centreline’ at a zero point on the MACD you can see if there is a cross of the moving averages; the graph also crosses over this line.
If the histogram (the vertical bars) are above the line what this means is that the shorter term (12) EMA is above the longer term (26)EMA. This is indicative of an uptrend. If the vertical bars are below the line, then the longer EMA is on top (see chart above).
Momentum (convergence versus divergence) As referenced earlier in simple terms if the distance between the moving averages is increasing (divergence), this indicates increasing momentum in the trend (and so is thought to be a sign of potential continuation). If you look on the top chart, you will see how this increasing gap is illustrated on the MACD by increasing height of the bars. Conversely, when the moving averages begin to converge (get closer) then length of the bars decreases, this is suggestive of decreasing momentum in the trend which if continues may ultimately result in trend reversal (and a cross of the two EMAs).
On the Metatrader platform the length of the bars in the histogram is a numeric representation of this gap between the two EMAs (12 and 26). It is not unreasonable to question (and many do) that if all this information is on the top chart anyway and easily visible what justification is there to add the MACD box? The signal lines The answer lies in the only new piece of information, that is termed “signal line” as seen on the MACD example above.
The calculation of how this line is plotted is based on taking a simple moving average (SMA) of the difference between the two EMAs. It is seen as potentially important when there is a cross of this line above or below the histogram bar height. The purpose of this line is to potentially give additional information relating to the likelihood of that change in trend momentum and to create a readiness to take action.
To help explain the potential use of this “signal line” let’s use the diagram below which is a “snip” taken from part of the chart as it moves into uptrend. At the start of the uptrend, we see the histogram bar tops over the signal line. As the signal line is a SMA of the height of the bars you note it tracks upwards along with the increased momentum.
Ultimately, as momentum (divergence) begins to “top out”, the height of the bar moves below the signal line. Subsequently, we see a drop-in momentum as the EMAs converge and ultimately the trend ends. Hence, theoretically this could signal a potential reason to exit a trade.
Bringing it all together… Despite the additional “signal” line many questions the usefulness of adding this to decision making processes. However, it remains a popular indicator and as such our advice is, as always, not whether to use or not use it in your system, but rather emphasise the importance of testing your trading system. As with any indicator, general trader consensus is that NO indictor should be used in isolation.
Certainly, there is no information within the MACD that shows whether an asset is overbought or oversold, whether there is associated volume, and of course no accounting for the proximity of key price points (support and resistance), nor the potential impact of economic data. Logic would suggest that all of these are worth consideration alongside the MACD if you are choosing to integrate it within your system. There is some practical use of this that seem odd.
For example, if your “favoured” moving averages on a chart are let’s say 5 and 15 and yet you are using the default 12 and 26 EMAs as part of your MACD set up, this is worth exploring. The fact that much of the MACD information is easily seen on a standard chart is a compelling reason perhaps to test a system with and without MACD and simply look at results. Ultimately, and to finish, it is of course your choice as to which criteria you use.
Remember, whatever these are for you, the key lessons of specifically identifying how you are to use the criteria within your plan, the importance of forward testing (as well as back-testing) of any system change, and of course the discipline of following through are critical whether you use the MACD or don’t.


The electric vehicle industry has had a tough few weeks with the global chip and battery shortages affecting electric vehicle manufacturers around the world. Despite that, Tesla delivered 184,800 vehicles in Q1 of 2021, exceeding the number of vehicles produced (180,338). The deliveries consisted of 182,780 Model 3 and Model Y.
The rest (2,020) were made up by Model S. The latest figures mark a 109% improvement from Q1 in 2020 when the company delivered 88,400 vehicles. The latest figures also put the company on track to beat last year’s deliveries of 499,500, which was just shy of Elon Musk’s target of 500,000. ''Our net income and cash flow results will be announced along with the rest of our financial performance when we announce Q1 earnings.
Our delivery count should be viewed as slightly conservative, as we only count a car as delivered if it is transferred to the customer and all paperwork is correct. Final numbers could vary by up to 0.5% or more. Tesla vehicle deliveries represent only one measure of the company’s financial performance and should not be relied on as an indicator of quarterly financial results, which depend on a variety of factors, including the cost of sales, foreign exchange movements and mix of directly leased vehicles'' – statement read on the company’s website following the latest delivery numbers.
Tesla – Monthly Chart Source: TradingView With the Tesla reporting strong numbers for Q1, the price target was also increased by Wedbush analyst Dan Ives. Ives lifted his price target on the stock to $1,000 a share from $950, with a "bull case" level of $1,300. "In our opinion, the first quarter delivery numbers released on Friday was a paradigm changer and shows that the pent-up demand globally for Tesla's Model 3/Y is hitting its next stage of growth as part of a global green tidal wave underway," Ives said. "With a green tidal wave kicked off by Biden last week in the US, and global EV demand skyrocketing going after a $5 trillion (total addressable market) over the next decade, we believe these delivery numbers are a paradigm and sentiment shifter for the space going forward." You can trade Tesla (TSLA) and many other stocks from the ASX, NYSE, and the NASDAQ with GO Markets as a Share CFD. Click here for more information.
Trading Derivatives carries a high level of risk.


805,734,252 – that’s how many doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been given globally so far as of the 12 th April (from 185 locations), according to Our World in Data. Israel, Bahrain and Chile are leading the way with 54.7%, 24.7% and 24.6% of the population fully vaccinated. With more and more people getting the jab across the world, the chance of side effects becomes more likely.
We have already seen the AstraZeneca vaccine being suspended for use for in few countries. Today, it was announced that the US agencies are calling to pause the Johnson & Johnson vaccine rollout after reports of extremely rare blood clot cases. Following the FDA and CDC advice, all federal sites in the US have stopped using the vaccine until further investigation.
European Union and South Africa have also confirmed that they will temporally stop the rollout of the Johnson & Johnson jab. The share price of Johnson & Johnson was down by around 1.34% following the latest news on their vaccine, trading at $159.48 per share the close. The stock is up by 1.57% year-to-date.
Johnson & Johnson - YTD Chart Source: TradingView You can trade Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and many other stocks from the ASX, NYSE, and the NASDAQ with GO Markets as a Share CFD. Click here for more information. Trading Derivatives carries a high level of risk.

In a previous article we introduced the SIX steps to improving your trading discipline and offered some guidance on developing “awareness” with a downloadable ‘checklist’ for you to complete. Before we start, If you haven’t seen this article, it is perhaps prudent to go now and complete the checklist as this will inform you for this second step. Click Here The second step has two sub-steps that are critical. 1.
From those areas you have identified in the checklist as requiring work which are the most important to work on. 2. Once you have nailed down your priority area, explore the reason why this may be, to provide you with a focus on what it is you must work on. Prioritise your discipline areas One of the challenges we often face is that if there are several different areas to work on in our development (both in and out of trading), then this can seem very “big” and sometimes overwhelming.
For new or inexperienced traders this feeling of overwhelm may often be a barrier to take any action. So, it seems logical to focus on one issue at a time to make things seem more manageable and achievable. Additionally, and looking forward to later steps, one of the other benefits of this approach is that success in one area will often provide a confidence and the motivation to tackle other areas.
In terms of what we should choose, with the list of areas you will have already identified, there will be some which may potentially have a more easily defined impact than others. An example of this may be that, if you have a trading plan and yet you are consistently failing in executing exits as you should, this would have a major impact on results. So, to the practical aspect once again, with your list, allocate a score between 1-5 re. potential impact you think addressing this area of ill-discipline may have on your results.
This should help you choose the “one”. Identifying the cause. Potential causes of ill-discipline, although sometimes dependent on the situation, can be many.
Here are some of the most common causes (you can get clues from what your internal voice is telling you). 1. A choice that trading is not of enough importance to invest the time/effort needed. (So, “I haven’t got the time”) We all allocate time to trading activities. Such time may be effectively invested in things that could make a difference or otherwise.
Additionally, although we are not suggesting that trading should take over your life, there is a need to ringfence some time (rather than watching reruns of “Law and Order’ to put some hard yards in at the front end to have the right things in place). So, you have two choices to make. a. Do I choose to ensure I have ringfenced the time to do the things I need to become a “committed” trader? b.
Do I choose to ensure that the time I do allocate to trading activities is invested in the right things, e.g. Recording my trades in a trading journal or unfocussed skipping between “interesting” news, or often useless trading forum chatter? 2. Don’t know what to do (or perhaps, “it’s too hard”) OK, so there may be a ‘knowledge gap’ in terms of the “how-to” make something happen.
For example, you may believe that there is merit in making your trading plan statements specific enough to facilitate consistency and measurement, but you are not quite sure where to start. Two key points here... Firstly, as with any part of your trading development planning, you need to refine the question you are asking, then seek out appropriate resources and of course finally to follow through on asking for what you need.
GO Markets has platform support and educational support to help you on your journey. Perhaps you are not asking as you feel you should already know the answer or maybe even that you think your question may be “stupid”. Remember there is no such thing as a stupid question, and surely it is far less wise not to ask if the support is there.
Secondly, sometimes when faced with multiple issues to resolve it may seem overwhelming or perhaps taking on new knowledge is something that does not come easy. Think about your journey so far. I am sure there are things which you didn’t know at one stage that now come easy.
Why shouldn’t additional learning be the same? Quite simply, you must step up to the plate and find the answers you need. 3. You have not been specific about what you should do and when you should do it Ambiguity in a trading plan or system is one of the potentially most damaging issues on an on-going basis.
We frequently extol the virtues of having enough specificity in all your trading plan statement to facilitate consistency in action and the ability to measure your trading actions accurately and meaningfully (so as to make adjustments if needed). To remain in a state of uncertainty in action as you have not got sufficient and specific individual guidelines to use in the “heat of the action”, clearly does not serve you well from a discipline perspective. Additionally, it may be that your trading plan is incomplete.
Perhaps it does not cover all market scenarios or may have enough detail regarding trade entry but lacks the same rigor relating to exits. The solution here is obvious. Work need to be put in to make your trading plan as robust and specific as it needs to be.
We have written a previous article on this, so if this resonates with you then perhaps this would help (Insert link). 4. Don’t believe something/you will make a significant difference e.g. your existing system, a new system, a new piece of learning. Clearly if you have little faith that a particular action, be it part of your trading plan or the need to implement a system such as journaling, is going to make a difference to your trading results, then you are far less likely to action.
Adult learning theory is full of references to the need for relevance before learning action is taken and of course much of this is based on having some evidence that something will make a difference. Here is the problem, without evidence of at least some tangible difference you are less likely to act and yet without action you are not going to create the evidence you be sufficiently motivated to do something. We are going to discuss gathering evidence in detail in other articles within this series but for now it is probably sufficient to say, that if the only way to create the evidence that something will work for you then surely it is worth even dipping your toe in the water to find out a little.
This may be enough to give you the will to subsequently try something out for longer. 5. In-built trading ‘heuristics’ (cognitive biases) or a belief that the market is “wrong”. Our final point of the common fives is some of the in-built “wiring” you may have.
People who come to trading have an inbuilt set of belief and value systems that develop through their lives through instruction from others and experience. These inbuilt systems are termed cognitive biases, and in many instances in the ‘heat of the action’ take over from your written and planned ‘trading system’, even if you strongly believe that your system is good, influence on your behaviour in the market. Results that you may produce from your trading can reinforce these inbuilt biases making them more acute, and so have more and more influence on what you may do when in the market, until finally they end up destroying the capital and so confidence of the investor.
There are many such biases documented in an area of study termed behavioural finance. Six of these seem to be commonly described namely: • Loss aversion bias, • Recency bias, • Outcome bias, • Sunk cost effect, • Minimalisation, & • Disposition bias. We will explore these in detail in future articles, but these may be a contributory root cause particularly of execution discipline with direct trading action.
So, with our five root causes covered, onto your missions for this second step (key question…Are you going to push through an exercise the discipline to follow through?): Consider the potential causes (listen to your internal voice) and begin to identify what cause(s) may be relevant for you. Make notes on anything you identify to get more detail “inked” on paper. Watch out for the next article in this series where we will explore starting to gather enough evidence to change potentially ill-disciplined behaviour into actions which may serve you well.

With very rare exceptions every trader must battle with trading discipline at stages in their trading career. Commonly when we explore trading discipline, there is an obvious focus on what we will term “execution discipline”, that is engaging and following through with elements of your trading plan e.g. adhering to a pre-planned exit strategy. However, becoming a better trader is more than simply doing what you say you will do with direct trading actions.
It also involves developing a structured plan for learning trading (fostering improved knowledge and confidence), creating those systems that support the development of that plan you intend to execute, discipline in learning and system development. Quite simply, discipline in learning gives you the tools to develop and creates effective systems (and measure them) without these, and a subsequent belief and confidence that they could work for you when trading, it becomes significantly more difficult to be disciplined in the execution of direct trading actions. So, in reality all these areas are interrelated in terms of potential trading outcomes.
With many traders knowing where to start and what to do to address the challenges of mastering trading discipline is a barrier to moving forward. In a recent ‘Inner Circle’ session (find out more about joining this group here ), we aimed to assist those in this position and outlined a six-step process to facilitate this. These steps are: 1.
Develop awareness and OWN your behaviour. 2. Explore potential cause(s) and prioritise areas for “work”. 3. Create the motivation to consider change through evidence. 4.
Action plan and follow-through 5. Lock in the new change 6. Measure and move on to next issue.
This first article in this series focuses on the first of these steps, with subsequent articles addressing the other steps. Developing awareness of where you are now not only assists in providing a benchmark as to where you are now but allows prioritisation of areas to address that will tighten your trading behaviour. Additionally, of course, through doing an exercise to develop this awareness, this facilitates some “ownership” of where you are now, i.e. being responsible for what you are doing well, and more importantly what areas need improvement.
This is invaluable as it moves away from the all to common blaming of the markets, or your system for your results. After all, two things are clear and indisputable: a. You have control and responsibility for all trading actions and hence are completely responsible for the results you get from trading.
This includes creation and evaluation of the trading system you are using. Logically, although this fact seems to escape many, you can’t even reasonably begin to “blame” a system for your results until you are following it religiously. As soon as you stray it becomes a “you” issue, rather than a system issue. b.
You are in control of what happens from now. Previous results, and the behaviours that led to these, serve only to give you “feedback” as to what you need to do next, the good news being of course that you CAN, with the ownership of discipline issues, make the changes you need to. So, with the theoretical justification covered now onto the practical.
To assist in your development of this ‘awareness’, crucial to the subsequent five steps, we have a “15-point discipline checklist” for you to download and complete to give you this opportunity to benchmark and consequently begin to prioritise and work upon. Although we previously referenced the interrelated nature of the three critical discipline areas - discipline in learning, discipline in systems, and discipline in execution, we have used these three areas as a framework to make identification of those areas that you need to work on, a little easier. So, your mission is clear for this first step: a.
Download the attached checklist below b. Complete it and then identify the three areas you think could make the most difference to your trading c. Watch out for the next article in this series where will give you additional information to move onto step 2.
Discipline checklist amended 3