The US Dollar Index (DXY) is a popular tool used by forex traders to assess the value of the US dollar relative to a basket of other major currencies. The DXY is calculated using the weighted average of six major currencies: the euro, yen, pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc. To use the DXY to trade forex, you can follow these steps: 1.
Monitor the DXY: Keep an eye on the movements of the DXY to get a sense of the overall strength or weakness of the US dollar. You can use technical analysis tools, such as moving averages or trend lines, to identify the direction of the trend. 2. Analyse currency pairs Look for forex pairs that are inversely correlated to the DXY.
This means that when the DXY goes up, the currency pair goes down, and vice versa. For example, the EUR/USD pair is negatively correlated to the DXY, which means that as the DXY goes up, the EUR/USD pair goes down. Plan your trades Once you have identified a currency pair that is inversely correlated to the DXY, you can plan your trades accordingly.
For example, if the DXY is showing signs of weakness, you may want to consider going long on a negatively correlated currency pair, such as the EUR/USD. Manage your risk As with any trading strategy, it's important to manage your risk when using the DXY to trade forex. Make sure to use stop-loss orders to limit your losses in case the market moves against you.
Currency pairs may be influenced by other factors besides the DXY, which may not be a perfect indicator of the US dollar's value. To make informed trading decisions, it is important to combine the DXY with other technical and fundamental analysis tools.
By
Mark Nguyen
Account Manager
The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs. These documents are available here.
Big global events like the Olympics can pull attention away from markets, shift participation, and thin out volume in pockets.
When that happens, liquidity can appear lighter, spreads can be less consistent, and short-term price action can become noisier, even if broader index-level volatility does not change materially.
So instead of asking “Do the Olympics create volatility?”, a more practical lens is to ask “What volatility events could show up during the Games?”
Quick facts
Evidence is generally weak that the Olympics themselves are a consistent, direct driver of market volatility.
Volatility spikes that occur during Olympic windows have often coincided with bigger forces already in motion, including macro stress, policy surprises, and geopolitics.
The more repeatable Olympics-linked impact tends to be around execution conditions, not a new fundamental market regime.
Olympic “volatility bingo”, how it works
Think of it as a checklist of common volatility triggers that can land while the world is watching.
Some “volatility bingo” squares are timeless, like central banks and geopolitics. Others are more modern, such as cyber disruption risk, climate activism, and social flashpoints surrounding host-city logistics.
When policy expectations shift, markets can move regardless of the calendar.
London 2012 is a reminder that the story was not sport. It was the Eurozone. In late July 2012, ECB President Mario Draghi delivered his “whatever it takes” remarks in London, at a time when sovereign stress was a dominant volatility theme.
Macro stress already underway
Beijing 2008 took place in a year defined by the global financial crisis, with volatility tied to credit stress and repricing risk appetite, not to the event itself. The Games ran from 8 August 2008 to 24 August 2008.
S&P500 dropped almost 50% over 6 months in 2008 | TradingView
Geopolitics and security
Regional conflict timing
During Beijing 2008, the Russia-Georgia conflict escalated in early August 2008, overlapping with the Olympic period. The market lesson is that geopolitical repricing does not pause for major broadcasts.
“After the closing ceremony” risk
Beijing 2022 ended on 20 February 2022. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began on 24 February 2022, only days later.
This is a classic “bingo square” because it reinforces the same principle. A geopolitical escalation can land near a global event window without necessarily being caused by it.
Security incident headline shock
The Olympics have also been directly impacted by security events, even if those events are not “market drivers” on their own.
Two historic examples that shaped the broader security backdrop around major events are:
The Munich massacre during the 1972 Summer Games.
The 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing in Centennial Olympic Park.
Security measures for Paris 2024 included AI-powered cameras | Adobe Stock
Modern host-city climate
Environmental and anti-Olympics protests
Host city activism is not new, but the themes have become more climate and infrastructure-focused.
Paris 2024 saw organised protests and “counter-opening” events. Reporting around Paris also referenced environmental protest attempts by climate groups.
The current 2026 Winter Olympics opened amid anti-Olympics protests in Milan, with reporting that included alleged railway sabotage and demonstrations focused in part on the environmental impacts of Olympic infrastructure.
These types of headlines can matter for markets indirectly, through risk sentiment, transport disruption, policy response, and broader “instability” framing.
Cyber disruption risk
The cyber “bingo square” has become more prominent in modern Games.
France’s national cybersecurity agency ANSSI reported 548 cybersecurity events affecting Olympics-related entities that were reported to ANSSI between 8 May 2024 and 8 September 2024.
Even when events are contained, cyber incidents can still add noise to headlines and confidence.
Logistics and “can the event run” controversy
Sometimes the volatility link is not the Games, but the controversy around delivery.
Paris 2024 had high-profile scrutiny around the Seine and event readiness, alongside significant public spending to clean the river and ongoing debate about water quality risks.
Health and disruption narratives
Public health concerns
Rio 2016 is a reminder that health risk narratives can become part of the Olympic backdrop, even when the market impact is indirect.
Zika concerns were widely discussed ahead of the Games, including debate about global transmission risk and travel-related spread.
The “postponement era” memory
Tokyo 2020 was postponed to 2021 due to COVID-19, which underlined that global shock events can dominate everything else, including major sporting calendars.
Tokyo 2020 “COVID” Olympics | Adobe Stock
Practical takeaways for traders
The most repeatable Olympics-era shift is often not “more volatility”, but different execution conditions.
During major global events, some traders choose to watch spreads and depth for signs of thinning liquidity, trade less when conditions look choppy, and stay aware that geopolitical, cyber, and protest headlines can hit at any time.
In global markets of enormous scale, sport is usually not the catalyst. The bingo squares are.
The Olympic and Winter Olympic Games capture global attention for weeks, drawing millions of viewers and dominating headlines. For traders, this attention often feels like a catalyst, yet the real market drivers remain the same: macroeconomics, policy, and global risk sentiment, not the sporting calendar.
So why do some traders say results feel weaker during major sporting events?
Often it comes down to a failure to adapt to conditions that can shift at the margin, particularly liquidity and participation.
1. Expecting “event volatility”
A major global event can create an assumption that markets should move more. Some traders position for breakouts or increase risk in anticipation of bigger swings, even when conditions don’t support it.
Key drivers
In some markets and sessions, reduced participation can weaken trend follow-through
Sentiment can inflate expectations beyond what price action delivers
Example: A trader expects a breakout during the Olympic opening ceremony period, but low regional participation limits price movement, leading to false starts.
2. Forcing trades in quiet sessions
When price action is slower and ranges compress, some traders feel pressure to stay active and take lower-quality entries.
Key drivers
Narrow intraday ranges can increase false signals
Lower conviction can favour consolidation over trend, raising false-break risk
“Staying engaged” can reduce selectivity
Takeaway: Use quieter sessions to refine setups or review data rather than forcing marginal trades.
3. Ignoring thinner liquidity
Participation can ease slightly during major global events, and the impact is often more pronounced on shorter timeframes. Daily charts may look normal, while intraday price action becomes choppier with more wicks.
Key drivers
In lower-depth conditions, price can jump more easily, and wick size can increase
In some instruments and sessions, thinner liquidity can coincide with wider spreads and more variable execution (varies by market, venue and broker conditions)
Timeframe sensitivity to thinner conditions
The above table is illustrative only (varies by market): Daily charts may look normal. Five-minute charts can feel more erratic.
Low volume big wicks example
Source: MT5
4. Using normal size in abnormal conditions
Even if overall volatility looks stable, execution risk can rise when liquidity thins, especially for short-term or scalping-style approaches.
Key drivers
Slippage can increase, and stops may “overshoot”
Thin conditions can trigger stops more easily in noise
Wider spreads can shift entry/exit outcomes versus normal conditions
Adjustment: Maintaining fixed sizing may distort effective risk. Some traders review transaction costs, including spreads, and execution conditions when setting risk parameters such as stops/limits, particularly in thinner sessions.
5. Trading breakouts with low follow-through
Trend-following tactics can falter when participation declines. Momentum may dissipate quickly, and false breaks become more common.
Key drivers
Reduced flow can limit sustained directional moves
Some low-liquidity regimes may favour mean reversion over momentum
Example: A classic range breakout appears valid intraday but fades rapidly as follow-through volume fails to materialize.
Failed breakout example
Source: MT5
6. Overlooking timing and distraction risk
There is no reliable evidence that the Olympic calendar predictably drives geopolitical events. But when tensions are already elevated, major global events can sometimes coincide with attention being spread elsewhere, somewhat similar to holidays, elections or major summits.
Traders should identify when conditions are slower or thinner and adjust accordingly, aligning tactics with reduced follow-through risk and calibrating position sizes to execution reality. Most importantly, avoid forcing trades when edge is limited during these periods.
The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) is one of the world's top 20 exchanges, hosting over 2,000 listed companies worth approximately $2 trillion.
Quick Facts:
The ASX operates as Australia's primary stock exchange, combining market trading, clearinghouse operations, and trade and payment settlement.
It represents roughly 80% of the Australian equity market value through its flagship ASX 200 index.
2,000+ companies and 300+ ETFs are listed on the exchange, spanning from mining giants to tech innovators.
How does the ASX work?
The ASX combines three critical functions in one system.
As a market operator, it provides the electronic platform where buyers and sellers meet. Trading occurs through a sophisticated computer system that matches orders in milliseconds, replacing the traditional floor-based trading that once defined stock exchanges globally.
The exchange also acts as a clearinghouse, ensuring trades settle correctly. When you buy shares, the ASX guarantees the transaction completes, managing the transfer of securities and funds between parties.
Finally, it serves as a payments facilitator, processing the money flows that accompany each trade. This integrated approach reduces settlement risk and keeps the market running smoothly.
What are ASX trading hours?
The ASX operates from 10:00am to 4:00pm Sydney time (AEST/AEDT) on business days, with a pre-open phase from 7:00am.
Stocks open alphabetically in staggered intervals starting at 10:00am, followed by continuous trading until the closing auction at 4:00pm.
The exchange observes Australian public holidays and adjusts for daylight saving time between October and April, which can affect coordination with international markets.
ASX trading hours by time zone:
Phase
Sydney (AEST)
Tokyo (JST)
London (BST)
New York (EDT)
Pre-Open
7:00am - 10:00am
6:00am - 9:00am
10:00pm - 1:00am
5:00pm - 8:00pm*
Normal Trading
10:00am - 4:00pm
9:00am - 3:00pm
1:00am - 7:00am
8:00pm - 2:00am*
Closing Auction
4:00pm - 4:10pm
3:00pm - 3:10pm
7:00am - 7:10am
2:00am - 2:10am
*Previous day. Note: Times shown assume daylight saving time in effect (AEST/BST/EDT). Japan does not observe daylight saving. Time differences vary when regions switch between standard and daylight saving at different dates.
Top ASX Indices
S&P/ASX 200
This is the exchange's flagship index. It tracks the 200 largest companies by market capitalisation and represents approximately 80% of Australia's equity market.
It serves as the primary benchmark for most investors and fund managers and is rebalanced quarterly to ensure it reflects the current market leaders.
The ASX also breaks down into 11 sector-specific indices, allowing investors to track performance in areas like financials, materials, healthcare, and technology.
These indices can help identify which parts of the Australian economy are strengthening or weakening.
ASX sector breakdown as of 31 December 2025. Source: S&P Global
Financials dominates as the largest sector, driven by Commonwealth Bank, NAB, Westpac, and ANZ. These banking giants provide lending, wealth management, and insurance services across Australia.
Materials ranks second, led by mining powerhouses BHP and Rio Tinto. This sector extracts and processes resources, including iron ore, coal, copper, and gold.
Consumer Discretionary includes retailers, media companies, and hospitality groups that benefit when household spending rises.
Industrials encompasses construction firms, airlines, and professional services businesses.
Healthcare features companies like CSL, a global biotech leader, and Cochlear, which produces hearing implants.
Real Estate features property developers and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) that own and manage commercial and residential assets.
Communication Services includes telecommunications providers like Telstra alongside media and entertainment companies.
Energy tracks oil and gas producers (many renewable energy companies typically fall under utilities).
Consumer Staples covers essential goods providers like supermarkets and food producers.
Information Technology includes software developers and IT services firms.
Utilities covers electricity, gas, and water suppliers, including renewable energy.
ASX sector breakdown:
ASX Symbol
Sector
Top Stocks
% of ASX 200
XFJ
Financials
CBA, NAB, ANZ
33.4%
XMJ
Materials
Orica, Amcor, BHP
23.2%
XDJ
Consumer Discretionary
Harvey Norman, Crown
7.4%
XNJ
Industrials
Qantas, Transurban
7.4%
XHJ
Health Care
ResMed, CSL and Cochlear
7.1%
XRE
Real Estate
Mirvac, LendLease, Westfield
6.7%
XTJXIJ
Communication Services
Telstra, Airtasker
3.7%
XEJ
Energy
Santos, Woodside
3.6%
XSJ
Consumer Staples
Woolworths, Westfarmers
3.4%
XIJ
Information Technology
Dicker Data, Xero
2.5%
XUJ
Utilities
AGL, APA Group
1.4%
Data accurate as of 31 December 2025. Source: SP Global
Top ASX companies
Three companies consistently lead the S&P/ASX 200 by market capitalisation.
Commonwealth Bank (Mkt cap: A$259 bln)
Commonwealth Bank holds the top position on the ASX as Australia's biggest lender.
Founded in 1911 and fully privatised by 1996, CBA offers retail banking, business lending, wealth management, and insurance.
Its performance often signals the health of the domestic economy.
BHP Group (Mkt cap: A$241 bln)
BHP Group stands as the world's largest mining company.
Its diversified portfolio spans iron ore, copper, coal, and nickel operations globally.
It serves as a bellwether for Australian commodity markets.
CSL Limited (Mkt cap: A$182 bln)
CSL Limited leads the Australian healthcare sector as a global biotech firm.
Established in 1916, CSL develops treatments for rare diseases and manufactures influenza vaccines.
The company demonstrates Australian innovation competing on the world stage.
The ASX serves as a vital mechanism for capital formation in Australia. It tends to provide price signals that reflect market expectations.
When share prices rise, it suggests optimism about economic conditions. Falling markets may indicate concerns about future growth.
Australian companies raise funds through initial public offerings and follow-on share sales on the ASX, using proceeds to expand operations, fund research, or pay down debt.
Investors in these shares benefit from potential capital gains and dividend income. Many Australians build retirement savings through superannuation funds that invest heavily in ASX-listed companies.
Employment in financial services also depends partly on a healthy stock market. Brokers, analysts, fund managers, and supporting roles exist because of active capital markets.
Key takeaways
The ASX functions as a market operator, clearinghouse, and payments facilitator, providing the infrastructure that enables capital formation and supports retirement savings for millions of Australians.
Its flagship index, the S&P/ASX 200, tracks the 200 largest companies and captures about 80% of market capitalisation, while the All Ordinaries index covers the top 500.
Financials and Materials dominate the exchange, led by Commonwealth Bank, BHP, and CSL, reflecting Australia's strength in banking and resources.
Markets head into the week beginning 16 February with a heavy mix of economic data and ongoing earnings momentum, which will feed into the broader growth picture.
Flash PMIs (Friday): US, Eurozone, UK and Japan business surveys provide an early read on February growth momentum.
AI beyond tech: Commentary has increasingly focused on how AI could affect business models across industries, although sector moves can reflect multiple drivers.
Equity rotation: Recent tech performance has been mixed, and broader participation looks less consistent than a confirmed rotation.
Earnings: With most US mega caps reported, retail and consumer names are in focus this week, and the Australian reporting season remains busy.
Bitcoin (BTC): Pulled back after an attempted rebound and remains highly sensitive to shifts in sentiment.
Flash PMIs
Friday’s flash PMI readings across major economies could provide a timely read on business conditions and demand trends.
If services remain resilient while manufacturing stays soft, markets may interpret this as steady but uneven growth. If both weaken, growth concerns could return more quickly.
Earlier in the week, Japan GDP, UK labour data, UK CPI, Australian employment, and US trade data helped set the tone before Friday’s flash PMI releases from multiple countries.
Key dates
Flash PMIs (US, Eurozone and UK): Friday, 20 February
Monitor
Currency volatility around PMI releases.
Bond yield reactions to growth surprises or disappointment.
Sector and commodity performance shifts that may be tied to changing demand expectations.
AI disruption
Some market commentary has highlighted potential longer-term competitive implications of AI across a range of industries, although company and sector performance can still be driven by macro conditions, rates and earnings expectations.
Financials: Some discussion has focused on whether AI tools could alter parts of wealth management and advice delivery over time, though share-price moves can reflect multiple influences.
Logistics and freight: Some market discussion has centred on whether greater automation could affect costs and pricing dynamics over time, alongside other cyclical drivers.
Software: Reactions remain mixed, with some companies benefiting from AI integration while others face questions about differentiation and pricing power.
This shift means the AI theme could increasingly express itself through relative performance and dispersion, rather than a broad “risk-on” bid.
Monitor
Earnings guidance that references automation, AI investment, or AI-related competitive pressure.
Increased dispersion between sectors and within sectors.
Larger reactions to forward-looking commentary rather than headline beats or misses.
Equity rotation
The rebound in technology shares seen earlier last week has lost momentum. Rather than clear risk-off conditions, the market is showing mixed participation.
Financials, industrials and defensive sectors have attracted flows at times, but not consistently enough to confirm a durable rotation.
Participation remains uneven, and evidence of a more consistent pattern of money flow is still limited at this stage.
Monitor
Sustained relative strength in non-tech sectors.
Yield movements and their influence on growth-sensitive equities
Broader sector participation versus narrow tech leadership
NASDAQ 1-day chart | TradingView
Earnings focus
As the US earnings season moves towards its backend, attention turns toward retail names this week.
Retail results can provide signals about consumer strength, discretionary spending trends and margin resilience, particularly amid mixed perceptions about the state of the economy.
In Australia, reporting season continues, supporting stock-specific volatility across the ASX.
Monitor
Retail margin commentary and discounting trends
Consumer demand outlook statements and guidance tone
Large single-stock moves even when index direction is muted
Bitcoin sentiment-sensitive
Bitcoin has traded lower over recent sessions and remains highly volatile. A move back toward the 5 February low is possible, but prices can change quickly in either direction.
Some market participants view Bitcoin as one indicator of speculative sentiment, although any broader “risk appetite” read-through is uncertain and can be influenced by multiple drivers across crypto markets.
Big global events like the Olympics can pull attention away from markets, shift participation, and thin out volume in pockets.
When that happens, liquidity can appear lighter, spreads can be less consistent, and short-term price action can become noisier, even if broader index-level volatility does not change materially.
So instead of asking “Do the Olympics create volatility?”, a more practical lens is to ask “What volatility events could show up during the Games?”
Quick facts
Evidence is generally weak that the Olympics themselves are a consistent, direct driver of market volatility.
Volatility spikes that occur during Olympic windows have often coincided with bigger forces already in motion, including macro stress, policy surprises, and geopolitics.
The more repeatable Olympics-linked impact tends to be around execution conditions, not a new fundamental market regime.
Olympic “volatility bingo”, how it works
Think of it as a checklist of common volatility triggers that can land while the world is watching.
Some “volatility bingo” squares are timeless, like central banks and geopolitics. Others are more modern, such as cyber disruption risk, climate activism, and social flashpoints surrounding host-city logistics.
When policy expectations shift, markets can move regardless of the calendar.
London 2012 is a reminder that the story was not sport. It was the Eurozone. In late July 2012, ECB President Mario Draghi delivered his “whatever it takes” remarks in London, at a time when sovereign stress was a dominant volatility theme.
Macro stress already underway
Beijing 2008 took place in a year defined by the global financial crisis, with volatility tied to credit stress and repricing risk appetite, not to the event itself. The Games ran from 8 August 2008 to 24 August 2008.
S&P500 dropped almost 50% over 6 months in 2008 | TradingView
Geopolitics and security
Regional conflict timing
During Beijing 2008, the Russia-Georgia conflict escalated in early August 2008, overlapping with the Olympic period. The market lesson is that geopolitical repricing does not pause for major broadcasts.
“After the closing ceremony” risk
Beijing 2022 ended on 20 February 2022. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began on 24 February 2022, only days later.
This is a classic “bingo square” because it reinforces the same principle. A geopolitical escalation can land near a global event window without necessarily being caused by it.
Security incident headline shock
The Olympics have also been directly impacted by security events, even if those events are not “market drivers” on their own.
Two historic examples that shaped the broader security backdrop around major events are:
The Munich massacre during the 1972 Summer Games.
The 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing in Centennial Olympic Park.
Security measures for Paris 2024 included AI-powered cameras | Adobe Stock
Modern host-city climate
Environmental and anti-Olympics protests
Host city activism is not new, but the themes have become more climate and infrastructure-focused.
Paris 2024 saw organised protests and “counter-opening” events. Reporting around Paris also referenced environmental protest attempts by climate groups.
The current 2026 Winter Olympics opened amid anti-Olympics protests in Milan, with reporting that included alleged railway sabotage and demonstrations focused in part on the environmental impacts of Olympic infrastructure.
These types of headlines can matter for markets indirectly, through risk sentiment, transport disruption, policy response, and broader “instability” framing.
Cyber disruption risk
The cyber “bingo square” has become more prominent in modern Games.
France’s national cybersecurity agency ANSSI reported 548 cybersecurity events affecting Olympics-related entities that were reported to ANSSI between 8 May 2024 and 8 September 2024.
Even when events are contained, cyber incidents can still add noise to headlines and confidence.
Logistics and “can the event run” controversy
Sometimes the volatility link is not the Games, but the controversy around delivery.
Paris 2024 had high-profile scrutiny around the Seine and event readiness, alongside significant public spending to clean the river and ongoing debate about water quality risks.
Health and disruption narratives
Public health concerns
Rio 2016 is a reminder that health risk narratives can become part of the Olympic backdrop, even when the market impact is indirect.
Zika concerns were widely discussed ahead of the Games, including debate about global transmission risk and travel-related spread.
The “postponement era” memory
Tokyo 2020 was postponed to 2021 due to COVID-19, which underlined that global shock events can dominate everything else, including major sporting calendars.
Tokyo 2020 “COVID” Olympics | Adobe Stock
Practical takeaways for traders
The most repeatable Olympics-era shift is often not “more volatility”, but different execution conditions.
During major global events, some traders choose to watch spreads and depth for signs of thinning liquidity, trade less when conditions look choppy, and stay aware that geopolitical, cyber, and protest headlines can hit at any time.
In global markets of enormous scale, sport is usually not the catalyst. The bingo squares are.
The Olympic and Winter Olympic Games capture global attention for weeks, drawing millions of viewers and dominating headlines. For traders, this attention often feels like a catalyst, yet the real market drivers remain the same: macroeconomics, policy, and global risk sentiment, not the sporting calendar.
So why do some traders say results feel weaker during major sporting events?
Often it comes down to a failure to adapt to conditions that can shift at the margin, particularly liquidity and participation.
1. Expecting “event volatility”
A major global event can create an assumption that markets should move more. Some traders position for breakouts or increase risk in anticipation of bigger swings, even when conditions don’t support it.
Key drivers
In some markets and sessions, reduced participation can weaken trend follow-through
Sentiment can inflate expectations beyond what price action delivers
Example: A trader expects a breakout during the Olympic opening ceremony period, but low regional participation limits price movement, leading to false starts.
2. Forcing trades in quiet sessions
When price action is slower and ranges compress, some traders feel pressure to stay active and take lower-quality entries.
Key drivers
Narrow intraday ranges can increase false signals
Lower conviction can favour consolidation over trend, raising false-break risk
“Staying engaged” can reduce selectivity
Takeaway: Use quieter sessions to refine setups or review data rather than forcing marginal trades.
3. Ignoring thinner liquidity
Participation can ease slightly during major global events, and the impact is often more pronounced on shorter timeframes. Daily charts may look normal, while intraday price action becomes choppier with more wicks.
Key drivers
In lower-depth conditions, price can jump more easily, and wick size can increase
In some instruments and sessions, thinner liquidity can coincide with wider spreads and more variable execution (varies by market, venue and broker conditions)
Timeframe sensitivity to thinner conditions
The above table is illustrative only (varies by market): Daily charts may look normal. Five-minute charts can feel more erratic.
Low volume big wicks example
Source: MT5
4. Using normal size in abnormal conditions
Even if overall volatility looks stable, execution risk can rise when liquidity thins, especially for short-term or scalping-style approaches.
Key drivers
Slippage can increase, and stops may “overshoot”
Thin conditions can trigger stops more easily in noise
Wider spreads can shift entry/exit outcomes versus normal conditions
Adjustment: Maintaining fixed sizing may distort effective risk. Some traders review transaction costs, including spreads, and execution conditions when setting risk parameters such as stops/limits, particularly in thinner sessions.
5. Trading breakouts with low follow-through
Trend-following tactics can falter when participation declines. Momentum may dissipate quickly, and false breaks become more common.
Key drivers
Reduced flow can limit sustained directional moves
Some low-liquidity regimes may favour mean reversion over momentum
Example: A classic range breakout appears valid intraday but fades rapidly as follow-through volume fails to materialize.
Failed breakout example
Source: MT5
6. Overlooking timing and distraction risk
There is no reliable evidence that the Olympic calendar predictably drives geopolitical events. But when tensions are already elevated, major global events can sometimes coincide with attention being spread elsewhere, somewhat similar to holidays, elections or major summits.
Traders should identify when conditions are slower or thinner and adjust accordingly, aligning tactics with reduced follow-through risk and calibrating position sizes to execution reality. Most importantly, avoid forcing trades when edge is limited during these periods.