Market news & insights

We've held off making comments about the events of what happened last weekend. Everyone has seen it, everyone knows the horrible scenario that it was but it is probably also meant that we have missed really key economic and fundamental trading reasons U.S. markets are now in a very broad bull market scenario. Inflation It was only 10 weeks ago an unexpected surge in inflation meant the dominant question in markets was if the Fed would cut rates this year at all.

Some five weeks later it increased to one rate but is a distant memory of the three forecasted in January this year. That is now all changed downside surprises to the second quarter inflation and the continued rise in the unemployment rate have not only met cuts are likely but for the first time in 10 weeks the market is now forecasting 100% likelihood of a September rate cut. Seen here: Source: CME FedWatch In fact, as this chart shows there's even expectations that it may not just be a 25 basis point cut it could possibly be more.

Remember the current federal funds rate is 525 to 550 basis points. As we've said before in this trading US series, once the US Federal Reserve starts its right cutting cycle, it is unlikely to stop until it reaches the neutral rate. Expectations are building from investment houses that there could be a possible rate cut in 2024 that being September and December.

This is at least the consensus some are even suggesting that November could be included as well seeing the January forecast coming to fruition. Will understand this more tonight when governor Waller presents and adds a function but it's likely that he will back chair Powell's comments on Monday that ‘rights will need to be lower by the year end’. We think this is what is being missed over this week in relation to the bull market in equities and the change in FX and bond markets.

You only have to look at the Russell 2000 to understand this change. The industry is now up over 12.5 per cent in the last month alone and 7.5 percent of that has come in the last seven days. Compare that to the NASDAQ for example which actually sat still over the same period.

This is due to the rotation trade based on right cut expectations not the Trump trade. Remember small cap firms are much more reliant on capital borrowings and thus much more susceptible to interest rate movements. The index has been much unloved over the last trading period as small caps have been left in the dust due to their risk and exposure to rate.

But with the prospect of right cuts plural, the attraction to risk the attraction to rotate out of fully valued trades makes sense. Here is the performance of the Russell 2000 S&P 500 and the NASDAQ over the past seven days Source: Refinitiv - White: Russel 2000 Yellow: NASDAQ Blue: S&P 500 What will be very interesting to see is something like NVIDIA becoming a funding source as it is begun to show evidence of being. We see in NVIDIA, Meta and Microsoft falling into this funding category over the coming weeks, as traders move into higher risk.

What we think might catch them out is earnings. Earnings This brings us to the second part of what is driving U.S. markets. Earning season so far and yes, it's a small sample size, has been astounding.

All have been at the upper end or above the Street View. You only have to look at JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and most of the other major banks to see this. The bellwether Caterpillar, a forgotten darling, showed just how well it is doing in this ‘soft landing’ economy and surged over 5 percent on its results.

Again explains the rotation out of the magnificent 7 and into other sectors something we foreshadowed in part one. How it is also a warning sign, the probability that NVIDIA and the others beat expectations is high. The question we need to ask is will it be high enough?

As if the markets rotating out now could it become reporting day traders have to catch up to better than expected numbers and miss out on a possible next leg? It is something to ponder yourselves as you look to position for what is clearly going to be a strong US earning season. This brings us to Apple.

News this week that it achieved $8 billion in sales in India is something that can't be ignored. India is a market that Apple has severely underperformed in over the last several decades as its main competitor in Samsung took hold with cheaper more compelling phones. However, all that has changed since COVID, the interruptions it experienced taking supply chains out of China have seen it diversify into the world's second largest populous country.

There is only upside for Apple in this space. Secondly data this week showed how well it is now integrating AI into the Apple ecosystems. The links between its watch, phone, eyewear, laptop and iOS systems are strengthening by the day.

It is clear that over the next five years AI will make the ecosystem more intuitive and more attuned to everyday use. Thus making apple products that much more attractive and that much more needed by its mature and evolving marketplaces. This explains why Morgan Stanley this week suggested that in the coming two years Apple could become a $5 trillion company.

Apple is up over 20 per cent in the last month, and it could be the one that confirms the bull market in the US he's going to be sustained. These two points alone explain why the Trump trade is not the trade driving markets. Yes there is an influence and yes it is something we will talk about over the coming months leading into the US presidential election.

But we want to be clear that what really is happening with the Trump trade is behavioural bias and it is blocking out the clear rational evidence that is driving things and thus don't be distracted by what you see. Concentrate on the concrete evidence that's in front of us.

Over the coming 48 hours and then over the coming 2 weeks, Fed speak and US data is going to be some of the best trading opportunities in 2024. It’s been a pretty low-vol year despite several events that would under normal circumstances be triggers for much larger fluxes in FX and bonds. But to date: that has not been the case.

Let's look at the first part of what will be a clear mover of the USD, bonds and US equities. Fed speak First off let’s review day one of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell two-day semi-annual testimony to the Senate and the resultant reactions. To paraphrase the core, take outs from the testimony - Powell continued to spew out the lines around “inflation has significantly declined from its four-decade peak reached two years ago”.

Yet despite this improvement, “central bank officials require more progress before considering an interest rate reduction, while closely monitoring the job market.” Furthermore he also dropped this broken record line “We do not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target range for the federal funds rate until we have gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%,” Powell noted in his prepared testimony to Congress. During the hearing, he refrained from predicting a rate cut this year or specifying its timing, unlike previous comments. “The most recent inflation readings, however, have shown some modest further progress, and more good data would strengthen our confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%,” he added. All this is known knowns but what did create interest for us traders was this line that lit bond and FX markets up like a Christmas tree “Elevated inflation is not the only risk we face.

Reducing policy restraint too late or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment.” The reaction to this was clear, have a look at the impact this line had on the USD DXY – 1 minute chart AUD/USD at a 7-month high. It is chasing the 28 December high now of $0.687. From a trading perspective, the US CPI data on Thursday coupled with the employment data in Australia on July 18 and Australia’s CPI data on July 31 that could confirm if the pair do reach this point – on current forecasts – it’s probable.

The catch (seeming we will see over the coming day) is US inflation that has only just stabilised with last month’s data showing there wasn’t a price increase for the first time since November. It explains why it’s hard to argue that ‘we are not at a sustainable level’. It also explains why the dot plots for example are only one rate cut this year, down from the three forecasted in March.

But the dot plots do highlight that once cuts begin – there is likely to be a steady slide in the Federal funds rate. Thus, the start will signal the possibility of 6 rate cuts by the end of that said cycle. If we look at the Fed preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index.

It showed no monthly rise in consumer prices for the first time since November as well, with an annual rate of 2.6%, slightly down from 2.7% in May. But as New York Fed President John Williams highlighted just last week “Inflation is currently around 2.5%, indicating significant progress, but we still have work to reach our 2% target consistently,” said. This brings us to Thursday’s CPI data.

Core CPI data is expected to land at 3.4% unchanged from the May read, headline CPI is expected to fall to 3.1% from 3.3% and would be near the June 2023 low of 3%. Watch this space to anything below these two estimates and the USD will be off to the races. The other interesting part of Fed speak has been the pivot to employment and the risks of a ballooning unemployment rate.

Take for example Powell’s Senate testimony that the labour market has normalised but still faces risks. He compared the current job market to its pre-pandemic state, that being “strong, but not overheated.” This was backed up by showing that although the unemployment rate has risen to its highest level in over two years, employers continue to hire robustly. Couple this with the fact the gap between job openings and unemployed job seekers has significantly narrowed over the past year – a typical sign of a strong jobs market.

Senate Chair Sherrod Brown of Ohio however countered this with “I’m concerned that if the Fed waits too long to lower rates, the Fed could undo the progress we’ve made in creating good-paying jobs,” Which brings us back once more to the statement the markets got most excited about – how long should it wait? Powell acknowledged the Fed’s challenge of balancing the risks of rekindling inflation by cutting rates too soon against the potential weakening of the labour market by waiting too long. The Fed’s dual mandate is to stabilise prices and maximize employment, noting a recent shift towards a balanced focus on both goals.

Is this a signal that September is live? Trading in the rates market now put the September meeting at an even chance of the first cut. Consumer behaviour suggest that the Fed might have lower borrowing costs.

US retailers have reported weaker-than-expected sales, and consumer demand has been tepid this summer compared to last year. So that is what the Fed is seeing – now we need to see the actuals backing this view – thus Part 2 of trading the US will be a deep dive into the CPI data and if there is enough evidence we are ‘sustainably returning to target’.

The basics: We are in the final weeks of the 2024 US presidential election. But what exactly are US citizens voting for and when will it actually take place? A US election always takes place on the first Tuesday of November – that means that for this year Tuesday, 5 November 2024, is when the election will be held, with the swearing of the next president of the United States of America taking place in the first week of January 2025 and will serve a 4-year term with the next election due in November 2028 for a swearing in in January 2029.

The electoral mechanics of a US election The President is not the candidate that gains the highest number of votes - known as the popular vote, just ask Hilary Cliton or Al Gore about this fact. The President is the candidate who wins the most ‘Electoral Colleges’. Each of the 50 US states and territories has a certain amount of electoral college votes allocated to it.

These votes are partly based on population densities and partly based on historical norms. The total number of electoral colleges across the country is 538 and thus the winner needs to gain 270 or more electoral college votes to win the Oval Office. Here is ‘Electoral College Map’ – each one of the numbers in each State is how many electoral college votes that State is allocated.

This is where it gets interesting, all but two states have a winner takes all rule. So even if the voting in Pennsylvania for example was 49.9% to 50.1% - the higher candidate would take all 19 votes for that State. There are two States that have a ‘split’ these being Maine and Nebraska.

As you can see in the map, these States have a split colour, in these two States some of the Electoral College votes can go to the lower voted candidate. However if there is a majority win all seats will go to the winner. These two have influenced elections in the past, however they are not expected to be in play this election.

The map currently shows five different scenarios. Those States that are solid towards one party or the other. Such as California (Democrats), and Texas (Republican).

Those States that are leaning towards one part of the other such as Colorado (Democrats) and Florida (Republican). Then there are those States that are the “Keys” to each election, the States that flip known as Swing States or battleground States. These have changed slightly over the years.

For example, the State of Ohio used to be known as the keystone State as every election up until 2012 which every party candidate Ohio voted for, won the oval office. It has now changed and is a lock for the Republican party. On the flipside States like Arizona and Nevada used to be locks for the Republican party; now they are swing States.

In 2024 there are 7 Swing States we see as the Keys to the election with one being the Keystone. They are: Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and the Keystone State of Pennsylvania. As things stand – Harris has solid and leaning State votes of 240, Trump has solid and leaning State votes of 225.

The seven Swing states have 93 so a combination of these will be needed for the candidate to cross the magical 270 mark. The Candidates Running as the Republican Party nominee is former president Donald Trump. He smashed his rivals in the primaries with a whopping majority and has been the presumptive nominee really since losing the 2020 election.

His vice-presidential running mate is Ohio senator JD Vance and is one of the youngest VP candidates in decades. Running as the Democrat nominee is current Vice-President Kamala Harris. Her road to the nominee has been unconventional as she joined the race after President Joe Biden dropped out and with no other Democrats standing against her no primaries were conducted.

Her vice-presidential running mate is Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, one of the oldest VP choices in decades although not as old as Trump himself. The Capitol The Oval Office is not the only thing up for grab on November 5, and although all of the attention will be on who wins the presidency. Congress which consists of both the House of Representatives and Senate will be up for grabs.

In the House of Representatives, all 435 seats are up for election. Currently the House is controlled by the Republicans, so a Trump Presidency with a Republican House would mean laws and spending directions would be easier to pass if the House status quo remained. But history shows that the house tends to swing every two years and having won the house in the Midterms the Republicans would be nervous of history repeating.

In the Senate 34 seats are being contested. There are 100 seats in the Senate rotating every 6 years. The Democrats currently control the Senate 51 seat to 49 and it's likely to also be hotly contested come November 5 and like the House anything is possible.

Trading the Day We think 2024 is likely to be similar to 2020 where the true result wasn’t known for several days. As the polls show 2024 is going to be one of the closest elections since WWII all votes will need to be counted before the winner is declared. We will be closely watching the seven Swing States for any signs one candidate is doing better than the other as this may provide a clearer picture of just how everything could play out.

But with postal votes and early voting slips in places like Michigan and Pennsylvania being counted last on the day they are likely to drag out the timeframes. We will also be watching key updates such as exit polls. The likes of Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia have previously hit the newswire around 11am AEDT.

In 2016 these States moved in Trump’s favour and famously saw the betting agencies wiping their markets for several minutes before returning with Trump a favourite over Clinton having been outside odds all campaign. At around 2pm AEDT Midwest Central States will start to declare keep these times in your diaries. Watch for movements in DXY.

The dollar basket in the 2016 election was volatile as a Trump presidency was seen as an ‘unknown’ however very quickly after the event it was bid up as his policies and market friendly mantra lead to strong inflows. As he is a “known known” in 2024 this may not be as big a mover as 2016. However, it’s likely the USD will shift higher any perceived good ‘Trump news’.

Be aware of false dawns. All elections have false dawns with pre-emptive calls, biased interpretations, early ballot boxes showing big swings to one candidate due to small vote numbers. The list is long.

These are trader traps, remember the election will not be over inside the Australian business day as West Coast States only close as we finish the day. Take your time to do your research with reputable news outlets tuned in to players like Bloomberg, Politico, CNBC, 538.com and Silver Bullet. International media stations like the BBC and our own ABC are likely to be impartial and news only focused.

Over the coming weeks leading into the November 5 election, we will be here to give you as much information as we can as to what is moving markets from the US election 2024 with this as our dedicated landing page. (link or whatever you guys want). So welcome to trading the US Presidential Election with GO Markets.

Over the past 3 months Nvidia has moved through ranges that some stocks don’t do in years, in some cases decades. Having lost over 35 per cent in the June to August sell off, it quickly bounced over 40 per cent in the preceding 20 days once it hit its August low as we build positions ahead of its results. These results delivered Nvidia style numbers with three figure growth on the sales, net profit and earnings lines but this did not appease the market, seeing it fall 22 per cent in a little over 8 days.

Which brings us to now – a new 16 per cent drive as Nivida reports it’s struggling to meet demands and that the AI revolution is translating faster than even it expected. This got us thinking – Where are we right “Now” in the AU players? Thus, it’s time to dive into the drivers for the Nvidia and Co.

AI players. Supersonic As mentioned, Nvidia’s results have been astonishing – and it still has time to do a US$50 billion buyback. It collected the award for becoming the world’s largest company in the shortest timeframe in the post-WWII era, think about that for one second – that’s faster than Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Google, Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, TV players of the 60s and 70s.

So the question is how does it keep its speed and trajectory? Well that comes from what some are calling the ‘supersonic’ scalers. These are the players like Google, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft that are the users and providers of the AI revolution.

These are the players that have spent hundreds billions thus far on the third digital revolution. Let us once again put that into perspective, the amount of spending is (inflation adjusted) the same as what was spent during the 1960’s on mainframe computing and the 1990’s distribution of fibre-optics. So we have now seen that level of spending in AI the next step is ‘usage’ and that is the inflection point we find ourselves at.

Currently AI is mainly used to train foundational models and chatbots – which is fine but not long-term financially stable. It needs to move into things like productions – that is producing models for corporate clients that forecast, streamline and increase productivity. This is the ‘Grail’ This immediately raises the bigger question for now – can this Grail be achieved?

The Voices To answer that – let us present some arguments from some of AI’s largest “Voices” On the AI potential and the possibility of a profound and rapid technological revolution, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has claimed that AI represents the "biggest, best, and most important of all technology revolutions," and predicts that AI will become increasingly integrated into all aspects of life. This reflects a belief in AI's far-reaching influence over time. The never subtle McKinsey and Co. has projected that generative AI could eventually contribute up to $8 trillion to the global economy annually.

This figure underscores the massive economic potential of AI. The huge caveat: McKinsey's predictions are never real-world tested and inevitably fall flat in the market. This kind of money is what makes AI so attractive to players in Venture Capital.

For the VC watchers out there the one that is catching everyone’s attention is VC accelerator Y Combinator which is fully embracing the technology. Just to put Y Combinator into context, according to Jared Heyman’s Rebel Fund, if anyone had invested in every Y Combinator deal since 2005 (which would have been impossible just to let you know), the average annual return would have been 176%, even after accounting for dilution. Furthermore to the VC story - AI has accounted for over 40 per cent of new unicorns (startups valued at $1 billion or more) in the first half of 2024, and 60 per cent of the increase in VC-backed valuations.

So far in 2024, U.S. unicorn valuations have grown by $162 billion, largely driven by AI’s rapid expansion, according to Pitchbook data. So the Voices certainly believe it can be achieved. But is this a good thing?

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly AI is advancing at such a rapid pace that existing performance benchmarks, such as reading comprehension, image classification and advanced maths, are becoming outdated, necessitating the creation of new standards. This reflects the fast-moving nature of AI progress. For example, look at the success of AlphaFold, an AI-driven algorithm that accurately predicts protein structures.

Some see this as one of the most important achievements in AI’s short history and underscores AI’s transformative impact on science, particularly in fields like biology and healthcare. This is the Good. Then there is the 165-page paper titled "Situational Awareness" by Aschenbrenner which has predicted that by 2030, AI will achieve superintelligence and create a $1 trillion industry.

Also, a positive, but will consume 20 per cent of the U.S. power supply. These incredible predictions emphasise the enormous scale of AI and the impact it will have on industry, infrastructure and people. The latest Google study found that generative AI could significantly improve workforce productivity.

The study suggests that roughly 80 per cent of jobs could see at least 10 per cent of tasks completed twice as fast due to AI, which has implications for industries such as call centres, coding, and professional writing. This highlights AI's capacity to streamline tasks and enhance efficiency across various fields. However it also raises the massive concern around job security, job satisfaction and the socio-economic divide as the majority of those affected by AI ‘productivity’ are in mid to low scales.

Then we come to Elon Musk’s new AI startup, xAI, which raised $6 billion at a valuation of $24 billion this year. The company is planning to build the world’s largest supercomputer in Tennessee to support AI training and inference. This all sounds economically and financially exciting but it has a darker side.

These are the kinds of AI ventures that have seen ‘deep-fake’ creations. For example Musk himself shared a deep-fake video of Vice President Kamala Harris. This is the ugly side of AI and reflects the broader cultural and ethical issues surrounding AI-generated content.

Furthermore – we should always be forecasting both the good and the bad for investment opportunities. These issues are already attracting regulations and compliance responses. How impactful will these be?

And will it halt the AI driven share price appreciation? It is a very real and present issue. Where does this leave us?

The share price future of Nvidia and Co is clearly dependent on the longer-term achievement of the AI revolution. As shown, the supersonic players in technology and venture capital are betting big on AI, with predictions that it will reshape the global economy, industries, and even basic societal structures. However, there is still uncertainty about the exact timeline for these changes and how accurately the market is pricing in AI's potential.

The AI ecosystem is moving at breakneck speed, with new developments outpacing benchmarks and productivity gains reshaping jobs, but whether all these projections that range from trillion-dollar economies to superintelligence materialises remains to be seen. Thus – for now – Nvidia and Co’s recent roller-coaster trading looks set to continue.

We will do a deep dive into how to trade the upcoming US Federal Reserve meeting on Wednesday but for now we need to address the Fed and others from an Australian traders perspective as it is one of 3 plays we need to be mindful of. 1. Hard or Soft – Can we stick the landing? All central banks across the developed world are doing summersaults, with a one and half twist to land their respective economies with a soft landing.

And this is increasingly seeing them align towards coordinated easing – barring the RBA more on that later. The debate between soft and hard landings in the global economy is accelerating. For example, traders have begun to notice that there is a switch in trade from the previously held trade of bad economic data that was often seen as good for risk assets, as it increased the likelihood of monetary easing.

To the now, poor data is also being traded as negative for risk, reflecting growing fears that economic weakness could be deeper and more prolonged than anticipated. We have highlighted this point through the US employment data and the slowing numbers in GDP. Equity markets clearly believe they will stick the landing with record all -time high trading in the DOW, S&P and most other major bourses including the ASX 200.

But they have yet to fully account for the potential downside risks of a hard landing scenario. In fact, equities have a bigger divergence that could spell trouble if central banks get it wrong as it is really only a small group of high-performing sectors or stocks that are driving gains, while many others lag. This narrow leadership, combined with elevated valuations, raises concerns about the market's vulnerability should the hard landing scenario materialise.

This brings us to Thursday’s Federal Reserve meeting – it will cut the expectations for a 25-basis point cut at the upcoming September meeting sits at 42 percent the bigger 50-basis point cut sits at 62 per cent. This has led to increased debate around market positioning and sector rotation. The Fed’s recent communications have largely endorsed the beginning of an easing cycle at a slow pace.

But that hasn’t stopped traders putting in an upward repricing - the bull steepening of the yield curve, particularly led by short-term yields, as markets anticipate rate cuts. This steepening trend, which began in earnest in late June, is significant because it reflects a growing belief that the most acute phase of the economic slowdown, and the associated recession risk, may be over. Take the US 2-year and 10-year yield curve which has been inverted.

Traditionally, an inverted yield curve signals a looming recession, but the recent return to a more normal curve suggests that the period of waiting for a slowdown and/or recession may have passed, and markets are now pricing in the economic consequences of monetary easing. Historically, during periods of bull steepening, certain defensive sectors such as Healthcare, Utilities, Banks, and Staples have outperformed, as investors shift towards sectors that offer stability and reliability in times of economic uncertainty, but that hasn’t happened – suggesting a gap is forming. Looking closer to home - the typical sectoral performance associated with yield curve steepening has only partially played out.

Just have a look at the Tech sector, it has significantly outperformed this year, a divergence from its usual underperformance during such periods. This divergence is largely due to the impressive growth execution couple that with their larger capitalisations in this cycle has made them a substitute for the quality growth traditionally offered by Healthcare. Looking forward, should the yield curve move from bull steepening to bull flattening (where the long end of the curve leads the decline), leading sectors are expected to shift.

In a bull flattening trade, sectors such as Real Estate and Materials typically emerge as leaders, creating the potential for broader equity market gains. This scenario is currently the most plausible case for broadening equity returns and driving further upside in the market index. 2. Commodities: Mind the thud While financial markets are pricing in the possibility of a soft landing, commodity markets are facing a much more severe test of the hard landing so hard it might be considered a ‘thud’.

The cost curves for key Aussie commodities, such as Iron Ore and Metallurgical Coal, are being battered by soft global demand and oversupply dynamics particularly out of China. These cost curves are being tested as commodity prices struggle to find support amid concerns over an economic slowdown. This is certainly the scenario BHP and Rio are seeing and have factored this into their forward guidance numbers.

Then we look at global commodities - oil inventories have reached levels typically associated with recessions, further signalling the market's concern over weakening demand and OPEC’s recent communiques suggesting it will halt its planned increases in output. We also have a scenario not seen in the modern era, a China story that isn’t working. China’s economic policies are under intense scrutiny, and the country’s growth trajectory will significantly impact global demand for key commodities in the coming year.

The negative price signals in the commodities space stand in sharp contrast to the more optimistic outlook being priced into equity markets. While equities suggest a soft landing is still the base case, commodities are flashing red with alarm as price weakness implying deeper demand concerns and thus issues around growth. This divergence raises the risk of a sharper reversal in positioning, particularly in resource-linked equities.

The caveat to this is the ongoing capital constraints on supply, combined with the potential easing of demand concerns as monetary policy softens, could set the stage for a recovery in certain commodity markets. If this was to play out, broad exposure to large-cap Energy stocks, particularly in Oil and Uranium, as well as to large-cap diversified Materials and Gold could be beneficial, as these sectors are well-positioned to benefit from any eventual recovery in global demand. 3. RBA’s Easing Path – When not If The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) continues to chart its own path.

It’s cautious approach that prioritises inflation risks has been the core principle of RBA Governor Michele Bullock. And despite mounting expectations for a faster easing cycle, the RBA has so far resisted pressure to cut rates aggressively stating that controlling inflation is far more important than short term growth concerns. Investors are divided on how quickly the RBA will move to ease policy.

While the central bank has maintained a patient stance, market expectations are pricing in a full rate cut by February. The consensus view is that the RBA will ultimately follow the lead of other central banks and cut rates sooner than currently forecast, with some expecting the easing cycle to begin well before the RBA’s projected May 2025 timeline. But whenever it starts – all are of the same view, once they start it will signal a solid period of cuts.

The consensus is that come December 2025 – the cash rate will be 3 percent not the current 4.35 per cent we have. The RBA’s decision-making will come down to the economic landing all are facing. Should a hard landing materialise, the RBA may be forced to cut rates faster to support the domestic economy.

However, if a soft landing prevails, there is every incentive for the RBA to remain behind its global peers in cutting rates. This approach (which is the current one taken by the RBA) would help support the AUD. It would also help in reducing the inflationary pressures from imported goods, while also allowing the labour market to cool and consumption to weaken, preventing a rapid reacceleration of inflation once policy is eased.

For equity markets, the RBA’s cautious easing profile suggests a prolonged period of below-trend growth. This would delay the cyclical uplift in earnings that is needed to justify current market valuations. As a result, it can explain why the ASX keeps hitting resistance at around 8100 points, there is no catalyst to push it higher.

While the easing cycle will eventually provide a tailwind for equity valuations, the current environment of slow growth and cautious monetary policy implies that significant market gains are unlikely until later in the cycle.

In this article, we take an in-depth look at the concept of strength of signal and its potential role in improving trading outcomes. Traders are constantly seeking ways to enhance their results consistently, and the idea of evaluating the strength of a trading signal may provide a pathway toward greater reliability and performance when applied to trading systems across multiple timeframes and instruments. By delving into this concept, we will explore not only what strength of signal means but also the key factors involved in its practical application in decision-making and trade execution.

Why Could Strength of Signal Be Important for Traders? Definition: Strength of signal refers to the degree of confidence and reliability a particular trading signal provides regarding anticipated market movements. It measures the quality and trustworthiness of a trading setup, aiming to increase the likelihood of success by filtering out weaker signals and focusing on higher-probability opportunities.

The idea of strength of signal is most commonly applied to trade entries, where traders seek to increase their chances of entering the market at an optimal point. This can lead to better overall performance by avoiding premature or low-confidence entries that could result in losing trades. However, strength of signal also holds significance in trade exits.

For instance, a strong signal at the entry point may weaken over time, indicating a lack of continuation in the trend. This change in signal strength could provide the trader with an early warning to exit the trade before a reversal occurs. At its most basic application, strength of signal may help traders decide whether to enter a trade.

However, its implications are far-reaching, influencing other critical aspects of trading such as: Position sizing: When the signal is stronger, a trader may feel more confident about increasing their position size. A weak signal, on the other hand, may prompt the trader to either reduce their position size or avoid entering the trade entirely. Accumulating positions: If a trader has already entered a trade and the strength of the signal improves, they might decide to add to the existing position.

This practice, known as scaling in, can maximize gains during favourable market conditions. Exit decisions: Weakening signal strength can serve as a warning sign to exit a position. If a trade was initially based on a strong signal but the factors driving that signal begin to diminish, it could indicate a shift in market sentiment, prompting the trader to take profits or cut losses.

Components of Strength of Signal The strength of a signal can be broken down into three broad categories: price action, trading volume, and the confluence of technical indicators. Each of these components contributes in its own way to the overall reliability of the trading signal. a. Price Action Price action is the cornerstone of technical analysis and is considered the most important component when assessing the strength of a signal.

This is because price action reflects real-time market sentiment and behaviour. Candle structure: The open, high, low, and close (OHLC) of a candlestick offers vital clues about the current battle between buyers and sellers. For example, long wicks might indicate rejection of certain price levels, while a series of bullish or bearish candles can point to the start of a trend.

Patterns and formations: Multiple candlesticks forming patterns (e.g., head and shoulders, triangles, or flags) can provide insight into potential reversals or continuations. Recognizing these patterns can significantly contribute to assessing signal strength. Timeframe comparison: Price action can vary significantly across different timeframes.

A signal that appears strong on a lower timeframe, such as a 5-minute chart, might weaken when compared to the price action on a daily or weekly chart. Evaluating the signal across multiple timeframes helps traders confirm its validity. Key levels: Price action near key levels, such as support and resistance or pivot levels, play a crucial role in signal strength.

The closer the market is to a critical level, the more likely a strong reaction will occur, either a bounce or a break, adding weight to the signal. b. Trading Volume Volume is another critical component of strength of signal, as it represents the number of shares, contracts, or lots being traded at a particular price. Volume provides insight into the level of market participation and the conviction behind price movements.

Volume confirmation: When volume increases in the direction of the price move, it signals strong market participation, adding confidence to the strength of the signal. A price movement without sufficient volume may be viewed with caution, as it could lack the momentum needed for continuation. Volume divergence: Divergence between price and volume can signal a weakening trend.

For instance, if prices are rising but volume is decreasing, it may indicate that the buying interest is waning, and the strength of the signal is diminishing. Volume spikes: Sudden spikes in volume can indicate institutional participation or a major market event. High-volume candles at key levels can often confirm the validity of a breakout or breakdown. c.

Other Indicator Confluence Technical indicators summarize historical price and volume data, and while they are lagging in nature, they are undoubtedly useful in adding an additional layer of confirmation to any signal evaluation. Commonly used indicators: Many traders rely on widely recognized indicators such as moving averages, RSI, MACD, or ATR. These indicators help identify trends, momentum, volatility, and potential reversals.

The alignment of multiple indicators—often referred to as confluence —can significantly strengthen a signal. Categories of indicators: Trend indicators: Tools such as moving averages and parabolic SAR can help traders identify the overall direction of the market. A trade that aligns with the prevailing trend is likely to have a stronger signal.

Momentum indicators: Indicators like RSI and MACD provide insight into the speed of the price movement. A weakening momentum might indicate that a trend is losing steam, reducing the signal’s strength. Volatility indicators: Tools like ATR measure the degree of price fluctuation.

Sudden changes in volatility can affect signal strength, as low volatility periods may precede explosive movements. Mean reversion indicators: Bollinger Bands and similar indicators help traders identify overbought or oversold conditions. Trades taken at the extremes of these indicators can have stronger signals if supported by price action and volume.

The Role of News and Events as an influence on strength of signal evaluation Event risk is a crucial, yet often underestimated, component of signal strength. No matter how strong a technical signal appears, the release of major economic data or geopolitical news can drastically alter market conditions, leading to unexpected price movements. It’s essential for traders to remain aware of scheduled news events, such as central bank meetings or earnings reports, which can cause sudden volatility.

A strong technical signal might be overridden by fundamental factors, so incorporating event risk into the overall assessment of signal strength is a necessary practice. The Case for Weighting and a Strength of Signal Score To make the assessment of signal strength more objective, traders can develop a weighted scoring system. By assigning a value to each component (price action, volume, indicators, etc.), they can generate a Strength of Signal (SOS) score.

This score provides a quantitative measure to guide trading decisions. Weighting components: Not all factors carry equal importance. For instance, price action may be assigned a higher weight than indicator confluence, as it reflects current sentiment.

A possible weighting system could look like this: Sentiment change: 40% Candle structure: 20% Higher timeframe confirmation: 10% Volume: 10% Proximity to key levels: 10% Momentum: 5% Volatility change: 5% Instrument and timeframe differentiation: Different instruments and timeframes may require tailored weighting. For example, the weighting system for a fast-moving 30-minute gold chart might differ significantly from that of a more stable 4-hour AUD/NZD chart. Using a Score to Drive Trading Decisions Once a strength of signal score is established, it can be applied to various aspects of trade management: Entry decisions: A minimum SOS score (e.g., 60) could be required for entering a trade.

This ensures that only high-quality setups are considered. Position sizing: A higher SOS score could justify increasing position size. For example, if the score is above 70, a trader might increase their position by 1.5x the normal size, while a score above 80 might warrant doubling the position.

Exit decisions: A decreasing SOS score (e.g., below 30) might signal the need to exit the trade, helping traders protect profits or minimize losses. Summary The concept of strength of signal offers a structured approach to assessing the quality of trading setups. By incorporating factors like price action, volume, and technical indicators into a weighted system, traders can make more informed decisions, potentially improving both their consistency and performance.

Experimenting with different scoring systems and analysing their impact on your trading strategy is worthwhile investigating further in the reality of your own trading. Over time, a well-developed score can provide valuable insights into when to enter, accumulate, or exit trades based on the changing dynamics of the market.