Venezuela commands the world's largest proven oil reserves at 303 billion (bn) barrels (bbl). Yet political turmoil, global sanctions, and recent US intervention show that being the biggest isn’t always best.

‍

What does this mean for oil markets?

The concentration of reserves among Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) members (60% of the global total) gives the group ongoing influence on supply policy and market sentiment, even as US shale provides a production counterweight. 

Venezuela's potential return as a major exporter post-US intervention could eventually ease supply constraints, though most analysts view significant production increases as years away.

Sanctions could create a situation where discounted crude seeks buyers willing to navigate compliance risks. Refiners with heavy crude processing capability may benefit from price differentials if Venezuelan barrels increase.

While reserves appear abundant, economically recoverable volumes depend on sustained high prices. If renewable adoption accelerates and demand peaks sooner than projected, stranded assets become a material risk for reserve-heavy producers.

‍

Top 10 countries by proven oil reserves

1. Venezuela – 303 billion barrels 

• Controls 18% of global reserves, primarily extra-heavy crude in the Orinoco Belt requiring specialised refining.
• Heavy crude typically trades $15-$20 below Brent benchmarks due to high sulphur content and complex processing requirements.
• Output crashed by 60% from 2.5 million bpd in 2014 to less than 1 million barrels per day (BPD) last year.
• Approximately 80% of exports flow to China as loan repayments, with export revenues dwarfed by reserve potential.

‍

2. Saudi Arabia – 267 billion barrels 

• The majority of its light, sweet crude oil requires minimal refining and commands premium prices, contributing to world-leading exports of $191.1 bn in 2024.
• Maintains 2-3 million bpd of spare production capacity, providing a stabilising buffer during supply disruptions.
• Oil comprises roughly 50% of the country’s GDP and 70% of its export earnings.
• Production decisions significantly impact international oil prices due to market dominance.

3. Iran – 209 billion barrels 

• Heavy Western sanctions severely limit the country’s ability to monetise and access international markets.
• Production estimates vary significantly (2.5-3.8 million bpd) due to sanctions, limited transparency, and restricted international reporting.
• Significant crude volumes flow to China through discount arrangements and sanctions-evading mechanisms.
• Sanctions relief could rapidly boost production toward 4-5 million bpd, though domestic consumption (12th globally) reduces export potential.

‍

4. Canada – 163 billion barrels 

• Approximately 97% of reserves are oil sands (bitumen) requiring steam-assisted extraction and significant upfront capital investment.
• Political stability and regulatory frameworks position Canada as a secure source compared to volatile producers, with direct pipeline access to US refineries.
• Supplied over 60% of US crude oil imports in 2024, making Canada America's top source by far.

5. Iraq – 145 billion barrels 

• Decades of war and sanctions have prevented optimal field development and infrastructure modernisation.
• Improved security conditions since 2017 have enabled production recovery, but pipeline attacks and ageing facilities continue to constrain output.
• Oil revenue comprises over 90% of government income, creating extreme fiscal vulnerability.
• Exports flow primarily to China, India, and Asian buyers seeking a reliable Middle Eastern supply, with most production from super-giant southern fields near Basra.

6. United Arab Emirates – 113 billion barrels 

• Produces primarily medium-to-light sweet crude commanding premium prices, ranking fourth globally in export value at $87.6 bn.
• Has successfully diversified its economy through tourism, finance, and trade, reducing oil's GDP share compared to Gulf peers.
• Strategic location near the Strait of Hormuz and openness to international oil companies help facilitate efficient global distribution.

‍

7. Kuwait – 101.5 billion barrels 

• Reserves are concentrated in ageing super-giant fields like Burgan, which require enhanced recovery techniques.
• Favourable geology enables extraction costs around $8-$10 per barrel, with proven reserves providing 80+ years of supply at current production rates.
• Oil comprises 60% of GDP and over 95% of export revenue.

‍

8. Russia – 80 billion barrels 

• The world's third-largest producer despite ranking eighth in reserves.
• Post-2022, Western sanctions redirected crude flows from Europe to Asia, with China and India now absorbing the majority at discounted prices.
• Despite export restrictions and G7 price cap at $60/barrel, it posted the second-highest global export value at $169.7 bn in 2024.
• Russian Urals crude typically trades $15-30 below Brent due to quality, sanctions, and logistics, with November 2024 revenues declining to $11 bn.

9. United States – 74.4 billion barrels 

• The shale revolution through horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has made the US the world's No.1 oil producer despite holding only the 9th-largest reserves.
• The Permian Basin accounts for nearly 50% of production, with shale/tight oil representing 65% of total output.
• Achieved net petroleum exporter status in 2020 for the first time since 1949, with crude exports growing from near-zero in 2015 to over 4 million bpd in 2024.
• The US government maintains a strategic reserve of 375+ million barrels.

10. Libya – 48.4 billion barrels 

• Holds Africa's largest proven oil reserves at 48.4 bn barrels, producing light sweet crude commanding premium prices.
• Rival bordering governments compete for oil revenue control, causing production to fluctuate based on political conditions.
• Oil facilities face blockades, militia attacks, and political leverage tactics, preventing consistent returns.
• Favourable geology enables extraction costs around $10-15 per barrel, with geographic proximity making Libya a natural supplier to European refineries.

‍

You can trade Oil and other Commodity CFDs, including metals, energies, and agricultural products, on GO Markets.

Start trading Commodity CFDs

As the final trading days of December approach, investors are assessing whether seasonal factors may again influence year-end price action.

‍

• The Santa Claus rally has delivered gains in 70 of the past 97 years, but history is no guarantee.
• Technology, retail, and consumer discretionary sectors have historically led with 1.9-2.1 per cent average gains during the Christmas period.
• Recent market rallies, AI weariness, and a hawkish Fed put doubts around the Santa Rally.

‍

The seven-day Santa rally window runs from 24 December through 5 January 2026.

This period has historically outperformed average market conditions, driven by holiday optimism, thin trading volumes, year-end bonus spending, tax-loss completions, and institutional portfolio rebalancing.

5 assets in focus this Christmas

1. Technology stocks

Technology stocks have historically been standout performers during the Santa rally period, averaging gains of 2.1 per cent across the seven-day window, although results vary significantly year to year.

The Nasdaq Composite typically posts stronger returns than broader indices, with an 82 per cent historical win rate for December-January performance.

However, tech stocks do currently face a challenging setup. The Nasdaq gained 19 per cent year-to-date (YTD) but has come under pressure in recent months, with AI-related stocks experiencing sentiment dips.

Key drivers:

• E-commerce momentum: Black Friday 2025 spending hit a record US$11.8 billion, with sustained demand through December as last-minute purchases drive revenue for Amazon and digital payment processors.
• Holiday infrastructure: Cloud computing, semiconductors, and digital payments capture the backend of holiday spending surges, benefiting from both retail transactions and year-end enterprise spending.‍
• Concentration risk: Five companies (Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon) account for 30 per cent of major index returns. Down periods for these companies, as seen during recent AI-sentiment-driven volatility, could bring down the sector as a whole.

‍

Source: Statista

‍

2. Gold

Gold enters one of its strongest seasonal periods from mid-December through February, having posted gains every year since 2015 during this window. 

The gold price is maintaining strength throughout December despite the dollar's resilience, positioning well as the Christmas jewellery season peaks.

Key drivers:

• Seasonal jewellery demand: Approximately two-thirds of annual gold production flows into jewellery fabrication. Christmas, Lunar New Year (February 2026), and the Indian wedding season create regular buying patterns as merchants stock up in December.
• Dollar weakness patterns: December has historically been the dollar's weakest month, with negative bias from 22 December onwards. Gold's inverse correlation to the dollar could provide upside momentum during this period.
• Real yields environment: With the Fed cutting rates to 3.5-3.75 per cent while inflation remains around 3 per cent, real yields stay relatively low, potentially supporting higher gold valuations.‍
• Central bank accumulation: Continued central bank purchases and year-end institutional portfolio rebalancing could provide additional support.

‍

‍

3. EUR/USD

December has historically been the most bullish month for EUR/USD, with the world's most-traded currency pair posting an average return of +1.2 per cent over the past 50 years. 

The US dollar regularly shows clear weakness during the Santa rally period, particularly from 22 December onwards. However, the Fed's hawkish rate cut has provided some dollar support this year.

Key drivers:

• Holiday liquidity dynamics: Lower institutional trading volumes during the holiday period reduce dollar support as retail traders and smaller participants dominate. Thin markets can amplify moves in either direction.
• Year-end rebalancing: European and Asian investors often repatriate funds or rebalance portfolios at year-end, creating demand for non-dollar currencies that typically support EUR and AUD against USD.‍
• Dollar strength from hawkish Fed: The Fed's December rate cut came with guidance of fewer cuts in 2026. This has kept the dollar elevated despite lower rates, possibly limiting the ability of EUR/USD seasonal patterns to influence the market.

‍

‍

4. Retail stocks

Consumer discretionary and retail stocks historically outperform during the holiday period, with the sector averaging 1.9-2.1 per cent gains during the Santa rally window. Holiday shopping accounts for 30-40 per cent of annual retail revenue for many companies, making this period crucial for full-year performance.

Key drivers:

• Record holiday traffic: A record 202.9 million consumers shopped during the Thanksgiving-Cyber Monday weekend, up from 197 million in 2024. November spending surged 3.8 per cent year-over-year, with total holiday spending projected to exceed US$1 trillion for the first time.
• High-income shoppers trend: Value-oriented retailers (TJX, Five Below) and those with strong omnichannel presence are capturing a disproportionate share of value over retailers targeting low-middle income earners.
• Post-Fed tailwind: The December rate cut provides marginal relief through lower borrowing costs, potentially extending holiday spending into late December as credit becomes more accessible.

‍

‍

5. Bitcoin

Bitcoin's December performance has been highly inconsistent, with a median return of -3.2 per cent, contrasting with traditional Santa rally patterns. Currently, Bitcoin is trading around US$87,500, down approximately 30 per cent from its October all-time high of US$126,210. 

However, there are signals that the historically volatile asset could see a Santa-led bounce this year.

Key drivers:

• Institutional infrastructure in place: More than US$120 billion is now held in spot Bitcoin ETFs, which provides a framework that could support capital flows if risk sentiment improves, although inflows are not assured.
• Pro-crypto policy expectations: Discussion around potential developments such as a US strategic Bitcoin reserve and the CLARITY Act could influence sentiment going into 2026, although outcomes remain uncertain.‍
• Four-year cycle inflection point: The recent sell-off came roughly 18 months after the most recent Bitcoin halving, a point linked to turning points in some past cycles, with the four-year narrative potentially influencing market behaviour.

‍

‍

Risks to watch

• The December Fed meeting delivered a 25 basis point cut, but the hawkish tone has set expectations for fewer rate cuts in 2026.
• The Nasdaq's 19 per cent YTD gain has pushed valuations to elevated levels as AI-stock sentiment begins to dip. 
• Five companies account for 30 per cent of index returns, placing portfolio concentration at concerning levels.
• Reduced holiday liquidity amplifies both moves and risks. Thin trading volumes can create exaggerated reactions to headlines, particularly around geopolitical events or economic data.

‍

Is Santa coming to town?

The Santa Claus rally remains one of the better-known seasonal patterns in financial markets, but a historical hit rate of around 72 per cent also implies meaningful years where it does not play out.

A more balanced way to view the Santa rally window is as one input among many. 

Seasonal observations can be considered alongside technical levels, fundamental drivers, and risk management — particularly given how quickly sentiment can change in thin holiday conditions.

And, if you can, take time away from the screens and enjoy the break.

Bitcoin has now outlasted the peak of all its previous four-year cycles.

For over a decade, every Bitcoin cycle has followed the same sequence: consolidation, breakout, mania, crash. Rinse and repeat.

Timeline-wise, we should be at the post-mania inflection point, waiting for the seemingly inevitable crash.

Yet unlike previous runs, this cycle never saw its “mania phase.” Instead, Bitcoin has spent the past year grinding sideways, touching new all-time highs without a euphoric blow-off top that defined previous cycles.

The fact that this euphoria period never materialised brings into question whether this cycle still has room to run, or has the market simply matured past the point of mania-driven peaks?

The Historical Four-Year Pattern

The traditional Bitcoin cycle was simple. Every four years, a halving event would reduce the block reward (amount of new Bitcoin being created) by half, creating a supply shock that triggered major bull markets.

The 2013 cycle, the 2017 cycle, and the 2021 cycle all followed this script. Each halving was followed by a 3-to 9-month growth period, then a full-on mania period, before topping out 12 to 18 months after the event.

Following the most recent halving in April 2024, Bitcoin experienced five months of sideways consolidation, then hinted at making its anticipated breakout into mania after the US election… but quickly returned to sideways consolidation for the next year.

We have seen new ATHs and the price has made some notable gains during the period, but the overall momentum has been much weaker.

This failure to repeat the frenzies of the past three cycles has brought into question how much influence the Bitcoin halving truly has on the market anymore.

No Longer a Supply Shock

In previous cycles, the halving created a situation where prices had to rise to clear the same dollar amount of miner expenses (who were now earning half the Bitcoin).

Bitcoin miners would simply not sell until the price reached a certain level, creating a supply shock that would drive prices higher.

Miners still do this today; however, the market’s maturation and the institutional adoption of Bitcoin have dampened the impact.

Selling off Bitcoin is no longer a balancing act where miners hold influence over price. The market has deep liquidity that can handle significant flows in either direction.

Institutional ETFs routinely purchase more Bitcoin in a single day than miners produce in a month. 

The supply reduction that once drove dramatic price movements is now easily absorbed by a market with institutional buyers providing constant demand.

If the Halving Isn't Driving Cycles, What Is?

The overriding narrative is that the Bitcoin cycle is now tied to the global liquidity cycle.

If you plot the Global M2 Money Supply versus Bitcoin on a year-on-year basis, you can see that every Bitcoin top has correlated with the peaks of Global M2 liquidity growth.

This isn't unique to Bitcoin. The Gold price has closely mirrored the rate of Global M2 expansion for decades.

When central banks flood the system with liquidity, capital tends to move into stores of value or high-risk assets. When they drain liquidity, those same assets tend to retreat.

However, this is a correlation; these relationships may change and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance.

Is the Dollar Just Getting Weaker?

The U.S. Dollar Strength Index tells the other side of this liquidity story. Bitcoin versus the dollar year-on-year has been almost perfectly inversely correlated. 

Simply put, as fiat currencies lose purchasing power, “hard” assets like Bitcoin and Gold start to appreciate. Not because of improved fundamentals, but because the currencies they are paired against are simply worth less.

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Beyond the charts and patterns, there is also the psychological notion that the four-year cycle persists precisely because people believe it will.

People have been conditioned by three complete cycles to expect Bitcoin to peak somewhere between 400 and 600 days after a halving.

This collective belief shapes behaviour: traders take profits, investors take fewer risks, and retail enthusiasm wanes. The prophecy fulfils itself.

When everyone believes Bitcoin should peak 18 months after a halving, the combined selling pressure can create exactly that outcome — regardless of whether the underlying driver still exists.

The current market weakness, with Bitcoin dropping over 20% from its October record high, occurred almost precisely at this 18-month mark.

Is This Cycle Built Different?

Despite this on-cue sell-off, this cycle still has the potential to break away from the historical four-year pattern. 

Increased ETF adoption by institutional investors has brought in higher quality and consistent ownership of Bitcoin.

Unlike retail traders, who often panic-sell during corrections, institutional holders tend to maintain their positions through volatility.

For example, Michael Saylor’s high-profile MicroStrategy fund has continued to purchase Bitcoin through market weakness. Recently reporting a purchase of 8,178 BTC at an average price of $102,171.

Another hard indicator that diverges from previous cycle peaks is the amount of Bitcoin being held on centralised exchanges.

The current amount of BTC on CEXs is unusually low. This pattern is generally seen closer to cycle lows, rather than peaks.

Other factors supporting the break of the four-year mould are coming out of the Whitehouse. 

A comprehensive regulatory framework through the CLARITY Act represents structural changes and boundaries for regulatory bodies that didn't exist in previous cycles.

And the move to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will see all government-held forfeited Bitcoin (approximately $30 billion worth) transferred into a government reserve, signalling Bitcoin as a strategic asset like Gold and oil.

Bitcoin Has Finally Grown Up

The four-year cycle has been a useful heuristic, but heuristics break down when conditions change. Institutional buyers, regulatory clarity, and strategic reserves represent genuinely new conditions historical patterns don’t account for.

At the same time, dismissing the cycle entirely would be premature. The self-fulfilling aspect means it retains predictive power even if the original cause has weakened. 

Market participants act on the pattern they've learned, and their actions create the pattern they expect.

Perhaps the real insight is that the Bitcoin market cycles never had just one cause. They were always the result of multiple overlapping forces — programmed scarcity, liquidity conditions, sentiment, self-reinforcing expectations.

The cycle shifts character as some forces strengthen and others weaken. But whether the forces have shifted enough to break the four-year trend is yet to be determined. 

The fundamental indicators show this cycle may have some life, but the psychological power of the four-year pattern could push it to another, predictable end.

‍

‍You can trade BTC and other popular Crypto CFD pairs on GO Markets with $0 swaps until 31 December 2025.